72 lines
34 KiB
JSON
72 lines
34 KiB
JSON
{
|
||
"task_intent": "From my stay at Homewood Suites Southpointe, what's the estimated driving time to reach PPG Paints Arena?",
|
||
"prompt": "# Instruction\n- You are an expert in cleaning process data descriptions. Given a task, you are provided with a set of annotation description\ndata for a certain visual LLM related to human user operation videos. Plus, You are provided with full trace of playwright action,\nwhic includes action and url before and after the action.\n- You need to analyze all the descriptive data and ultimately summarize a complete and reasonable user operation description that can accomplish the given task.\n- For each strategy, give a clear list of the low level action sequence.\n\n# Task\nFrom my stay at Homewood Suites Southpointe, what's the estimated driving time to reach PPG Paints Arena?\n\n# Annotation description\n### Step-by-Step Actions in the Video Segment\n\n#### 1. **Action:** I click on the search textbox labeled \"Search\" at the top left corner of the page.\n - **Page Changes:** The cursor is now active inside the search textbox, ready for input.\n - **Possible Purpose:** The likely intent is to enter a location or keyword to search for a specific place on the map.\n\n#### 2. **Action:** I type \"Where is this?\" into the search textbox.\n - **Page Changes:** As I type, the text appears in the search textbox. However, no immediate results or suggestions are displayed until further action is taken.\n - **Possible Purpose:** The purpose is to initiate a search query to find a location or information related to the entered text.\n\n#### 3. **Action:** I click on the \"Go\" button next to the search textbox.\n - **Page Changes:** After clicking \"Go,\" the page processes the search query. A new interface element appears, showing navigation options with \"From\" and \"To\" textboxes.\n - **Possible Purpose:** The intent is to execute the search and potentially find directions or details about the queried location.\n\n#### 4. **Action:** I click on the \"From\" textbox in the newly appeared navigation interface.\n - **Page Changes:** The \"From\" textbox becomes active, allowing for input. A dropdown or suggestion list might appear depending on the input.\n - **Possible Purpose:** The goal is to specify the starting point for a route or direction.\n\n#### 5. **Action:** I type \"Homewood Suites, Southpointe, Cecil Towns\" into the \"From\" textbox.\n - **Page Changes:** As I type, suggestions or autocomplete options may appear below the textbox, helping to select the exact location.\n - **Possible Purpose:** The intent is to accurately set the starting location for the navigation or route planning.\n\n#### 6. **Action:** I click on the \"To\" textbox in the navigation interface.\n - **Page Changes:** The \"To\" textbox becomes active, ready for input. Similar to the \"From\" textbox, it might show suggestions as I type.\n - **Possible Purpose:** The goal is to specify the destination point for the route or direction.\n\n#### 7. **Action:** I type \"PPG Paints Arena, 1001, Fifth Avenue, Soho\" into the \"To\" textbox.\n - **Page Changes:** As I type, suggestions or autocomplete options may appear, aiding in selecting the correct destination.\n - **Possible Purpose:** The intent is to accurately set the destination location for the navigation or route planning.\n\n#### 8. **Action:** I click the \"Go\" button located near the navigation textboxes.\n - **Page Changes:** The page processes the \"From\" and \"To\" locations and displays a route on the map. Directions are listed on the left side, detailing the steps to travel from the starting point to the destination.\n - **Possible Purpose:** The goal is to generate and view the route and directions between the specified starting and ending points.\n\n### Summary\nIn this video segment, I perform a series of actions to search for and generate directions between two specified locations using the OpenStreetMap website. Each step involves interacting with search and navigation elements to achieve the final result of viewing a mapped route and its corresponding directions.\n\n# Playwright action\n[\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"link_Find directions between two points\",\n \"idx\": 0,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"Find directions between two points\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://miniserver1875.asuscomm.com:3000/#map=7/42.896/-75.108\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://miniserver1875.asuscomm.com:3000/#map=7/42.896/-75.108\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"textbox_From\",\n \"idx\": 2,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.pressget_by_role(\\\"textbox\\\", name=\\\"From\\\")Enter\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://miniserver1875.asuscomm.com:3000/#map=7/42.896/-75.108\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://miniserver1875.asuscomm.com:3000/#map=7/42.896/-75.108\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"textbox_To\",\n \"idx\": 4,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.pressget_by_role(\\\"textbox\\\", name=\\\"To\\\")Enter\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://miniserver1875.asuscomm.com:3000/directions\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://miniserver1875.asuscomm.com:3000/directions\"\n }\n }\n]\n\n# Output format\n- 先总结整个任务的Objective，然后按照Strategy-SubStrategy-action三级层次来给出整个过程，\n- 接着给出整个操作流程后的观察和有趣的发现，最后严格按照json格式输出三级层次的过程描述。\n- 最后的输出json应该是包在```{json}```之间，最底层动作需要包含描述、对应的playwright动作指令顺序编号，以及具体指令内容。\n\n# Example\n### Complete User Operation Description to Display Labeled Issues in kkroening/ffmpeg-python\n\n**Objective:** Filter and display all issues labeled as \"question\" in the kkroening/ffmpeg-python repository.\n\n---\n\n#### **Strategy 1: Navigate to the Repository**\n**Low-Level Action Sequence:**\n1. **Search for the user \"kkroening\"**\n - Click the global search bar (placeholder: \"Search GitLab\").\n - Type \"kkroening\" and press `Enter`.\n2. **Select the user from results**\n - Click the \"Users\" tab in search results.\n - Click on \"Karl Kroening @kkroening\" in the user list.\n3. **Access the repository**\n - Navigate to the \"Personal projects\" section.\n - Click on the \"ffmpeg-python\" project.\n\n---\n\n#### **Strategy 2: Filter Issues by Label**\n**Low-Level Action Sequence:**\n1. **Open the Issues tab**\n - Scroll to the left sidebar menu.\n - Click the \"Issues\" tab (displaying the count, e.g., \"Issues 402\").\n2. **Apply label filtering**\n - Click the search/filter bar in the issues list.\n - Select the \"Label\" dropdown from the filter options.\n - Type or select \"question\" from the label dropdown.\n - Click the search/apply button to confirm the filter.\n\n---\n\n#### **Final Oberservation**\nThe issues list will refresh to show only issues with the \"question\" label. The URL will reflect the filter:\n`.../ffmpeg-python/-/issues/?label_name[]=question`.\n\n---\n\n### Key Observations from Playwright Trace\n- The final URL after filtering:\n `http://ec2-3-135-39-80.../ffmpeg-python/-/issues/?label_name%5B%5D=question`\n confirms the \"question\" label filter is applied.\n- Critical interactions include selecting the \"Label\" dropdown and explicitly choosing \"question\" to refine results.\n\n### Final output\n```json\n[{\n \"strategy\" : \"Navigate to the Repository\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Search for the user \\\"kkroening\\\"\",\n \"actions\" : [\n {\n \"description\": \"Click the global search bar (placeholder: \\\"Search GitLab\\\"). \",\n \"playwright_idx\" : 18,\n \"playwright_instruction\" : \"frame.pressget_by_placeholder(\\\"Search GitLab\\\")Enter\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Select the user from results\",\n \"actions\" : [\n ]\n }\n ]\n},\n{\n \"strategy\" : \"Filter Issues by Label\",\n \"substrategies\" : [\n ]\n}]\n```",
|
||
"response": "<think>\nOkay, let's tackle this problem. The user wants to find the estimated driving time from Homewood Suites Southpointe to PPG Paints Arena. The provided annotation and playwright actions need to be analyzed to create a structured summary.\n\nFirst, looking at the annotation steps. The user starts by clicking the search box, typing \"Where is this?\", then clicking Go. That brings up the navigation interface with From and To fields. They input the hotel as the From location and the arena as the To, then click Go again to get directions. The summary mentions using OpenStreetMap, so the process is about getting directions on that site.\n\nNow, the playwright actions. There are three actions here. The first is clicking a link named \"Find directions between two points\". Then pressing Enter in the From and To textboxes. The URLs before and after these actions remain the same, which suggests that the navigation is handled within the same page without URL changes, maybe a SPA.\n\nWait, the annotation steps include typing \"Where is this?\" but the playwright actions don't directly show that. Hmm. Maybe the \"Find directions\" link is clicked first, which brings up the From and To fields. Then the user fills those in. The playwright actions might be a bit abbreviated compared to the annotation steps. For example, the annotation's step 1-3 involve searching, but the playwright's first step is clicking the directions link. So perhaps the initial steps in the annotation are part of navigating to the directions feature.\n\nSo, the overall strategy would be:\n\n1. Access the directions feature on OpenStreetMap.\n2. Enter the starting location (Homewood Suites) in the From field.\n3. Enter the destination (PPG Paints Arena) in the To field.\n4. Execute the search to get the route and driving time.\n\nLooking at the playwright actions, the first action is clicking the \"Find directions\" link. Then pressing Enter in the From and To fields. But in the annotation, the user types the locations and clicks Go. The playwright actions might be a different way of steps, perhaps using Enter to submit each field. But the annotation shows typing and clicking Go. Need to reconcile these.\n\nWait, the annotation's step 3 is clicking Go after typing \"Where is this?\" which brings up the directions interface. Then steps 4-8 are filling in From and To and clicking Go again. The playwright actions start with clicking the \"Find directions\" link, which might be equivalent to step 3 in the annotation. So maybe the initial steps in the annotation (steps 1-3) are replaced by directly clicking the directions link in the playwright trace. That makes sense. The user might have initially tried a search but then found the directions link, which is a more direct way. So the correct sequence would be:\n\n- Click the \"Find directions between two points\" link (playwright action 0).\n- Enter the From location (Homewood Suites) and press Enter (playwright action 2).\n- Enter the To location (PPG Arena) and press Enter (playwright action 4).\n\nBut the annotation steps include typing into the search box first. However, the playwright actions suggest a more direct approach. The annotation might include some exploratory steps, but the playwright trace shows the actual steps taken. So the correct strategy should follow the playwright actions, but also incorporate the annotation's details of filling in the From and To fields.\n\nWait, the playwright actions have three steps: clicking the link, pressing Enter in From, pressing Enter in To. But the annotation has more steps, like typing into the From and To fields. So perhaps the playwright actions are simplified. For example, after clicking the directions link, the user types into the From field, presses Enter, then types into the To field and presses Enter. But in the playwright trace, the actions are frame.press on the textboxes with Enter. So maybe the actual steps are not captured in the playwright actions, but the key actions are. So the user's actions would be:\n\n1. Click the \"Find directions\" link.\n2. Focus on the From textbox, type the address, press Enter.\n3. Focus on the To textbox, type the address, press Enter.\n\nBut the annotation's steps 4-8 involve clicking the From, typing, clicking To, typing, then clicking Go. The playwright actions might be using Enter to submit each field instead of clicking Go. So there's a discrepancy here. The user might have used different methods, but the playwright trace shows pressing Enter in the textboxes. So the correct low-level actions need to combine both sources.\n\nBut the task is to summarize based on the annotation and playwright data. The annotation provides detailed steps, while playwright gives the actual code actions. So the final answer should merge both, but the playwright actions are the actual executed steps. However, the example given in the problem shows that the playwright actions are mapped to the steps. For example, in the example, each action has a playwright_idx and instruction.\n\nSo in this case, the steps from the annotation need to be aligned with the playwright actions. Let's see:\n\nThe playwright actions are:\n\n0. Click the \"Find directions between two points\" link. This would correspond to step 3 in the annotation (clicking Go after the search query \"Where is this?\"), but perhaps in reality, the user clicked the link directly instead of searching. So maybe the initial steps in the annotation are not the most efficient, and the playwright trace shows a more direct method. Therefore, the correct strategy would be to click the directions link, then fill in From and To.\n\nBut the annotation's steps 1-3 are about searching for \"Where is this?\" and clicking Go, which brings up the directions interface. However, the playwright's first action is clicking the directions link. So perhaps the \"Where is this?\" search is redundant, and the user could have directly clicked the directions link. Therefore, the correct steps would be:\n\n1. Access the directions interface by clicking the \"Find directions between two points\" link (playwright action 0).\n2. Enter the From location (Homewood Suites) into the From textbox, press Enter (playwright action 2).\n3. Enter the To location (PPG Paints Arena) into the To textbox, press Enter (playwright action 4).\n\nBut the annotation's steps 4-8 involve clicking the From textbox, typing, then To, then clicking Go. The playwright actions use Enter to submit each field. So the actual steps in the playwright are:\n\n- Click directions link (action 0)\n- Press Enter in From textbox (action 2)\n- Press Enter in To textbox (action 4)\n\nBut how does the data get entered? The annotation shows typing into the fields. So perhaps the playwright actions are after the typing. For example, after typing into the textbox, pressing Enter. So the steps would be:\n\nFor From field:\n\n- Click the From textbox (annotation step 4)\n- Type the address (step 5)\n- Press Enter (playwright action 2)\n\nSimilarly for To:\n\n- Click To textbox (step 6)\n- Type address (step7)\n- Press Enter (playwright action4)\n\nBut the playwright actions don't capture the typing, only the Enter presses. So the low-level actions would be:\n\n1. Click directions link (playwright action0)\n2. Click From textbox, type address, press Enter (playwright action2)\n3. Click To textbox, type address, press Enter (playwright action4)\n\nBut the playwright actions for action2 is frame.pressget_by_role(\"textbox\", name=\"From\") Enter. So pressing Enter in the From textbox. Similarly for To.\n\nSo the actual steps would be:\n\nStrategy 1: Access Directions Interface\n\n- Click the \"Find directions between two points\" link (playwright action0)\n\nStrategy 2: Set Starting Location\n\n- Click the From textbox and type \"Homewood Suites...\" (annotation steps4-5)\n- Press Enter to confirm (playwright action2)\n\nStrategy3: Set Destination\n\n- Click the To textbox and type \"PPG Paints Arena...\" (steps6-7)\n- Press Enter to confirm (playwright action4)\n\nThen, the directions are displayed.\n\nBut the playwright actions don't have the typing steps, only the Enter presses. So in the JSON output, each action should reference the playwright action's idx. For example, the action of pressing Enter in From is idx2, and To is idx4.\n\nBut the annotation steps include typing, which are not captured in the playwright actions. However, the user instruction says to include the playwright action's instruction and idx. So the low-level actions need to map to the playwright actions. But the typing steps are not in the playwright trace. So perhaps the playwright actions are incomplete, but according to the data given, we have to use the playwright actions provided.\n\nSo the steps would be:\n\nStrategy 1: Access Directions Feature\n\n- Click the \"Find directions between two points\" link (action0)\n\nStrategy2: Enter Starting Location\n\n- Press Enter in the From textbox (action2). But how does the text get entered? Maybe the user had already typed it, but according to the annotation, they typed after clicking the From textbox. But the playwright actions only show pressing Enter. This is a bit conflicting.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps the playwright actions are a trace of the actual code executed, which may not capture every keystroke but only certain actions like pressing Enter. So the actual steps would be:\n\n1. Click the directions link (action0)\n2. Focus on From textbox, type the address, then press Enter (action2)\n3. Focus on To textbox, type the address, then press Enter (action4)\n\nBut the playwright actions are not present. So in the JSON output, the actions would reference the playwright actions where available. For example, the Enter presses are actions2 and4. The typing steps are not captured in playwright, but are part of the annotation. So how to handle this?\n\nThe example given in the problem shows that each action in the JSON includes a playwright_idx and instruction. So for steps that are in the annotation but not in the playwright trace, perhaps they are omitted, or maybe the playwright actions are considered as the actual steps. But the user instruction says to \"summarize a complete and reasonable user operation description that can accomplish the given task\" based on both the annotation and playwright data.\n\nSo the correct approach is to combine both sources. The annotation provides the user's step-by-step actions, and the playwright trace provides the actual code-level actions. So the low-level actions should include both the user's described steps and the corresponding playwright actions.\n\nFor example, the step \"I click on the search textbox labeled 'Search'\" is part of the annotation, but the playwright trace starts with clicking the directions link. So perhaps the initial steps in the annotation are not part of the actual process captured in the playwright trace. Therefore, the correct steps are those in the playwright trace, supplemented by the annotation's details.\n\nWait, the playwright trace's first action is clicking the \"Find directions between two points\" link. The URL before and after is the same, which might indicate that the page is a single-page application, and the directions interface is loaded without a URL change. The annotation's steps 1-3 involve using the search box to type \"Where is this?\" and clicking Go, which then brings up the directions interface. But the playwright trace shows that the user clicked the directions link directly. So there are two possible paths: one via search and another via the directions link. However, the playwright trace indicates that the directions link was used. Therefore, the correct steps are based on the playwright actions, with the annotation providing additional context.\n\nTherefore, the strategy would be:\n\nStrategy 1: Access Directions Interface via Link\n\n- Click the \"Find directions between two points\" link (playwright action0)\n\nStrategy2: Enter From Location\n\n- Click the From textbox (annotation step4)\n- Type \"Homewood Suites...\" (step5)\n- Press Enter (playwright action2)\n\nStrategy3: Enter To Location\n\n- Click the To textbox (step6)\n- Type \"PPG Paints Arena...\" (step7)\n- Press Enter (playwright action4)\n\nThen, the route is displayed, showing the estimated time.\n\nBut how to map these steps to the playwright actions. The pressing Enter actions are in the playwright actions as idx2 and4. The clicking the textbox and typing are from the annotation but not present in the playwright trace. However, the user instruction says to include the playwright action's instruction and idx. So the steps that have corresponding playwright actions should include those, while the others (like typing) are part of the description but not linked to a playwright action.\n\nBut the example in the problem shows that each action in the playwright_idx and instruction. For example, in the example, the action \"Click the global search bar\" has playwright_idx 18 and instruction \"frame.press...\". So in this case, the actions that correspond to playwright actions should include their idx and instruction, while other actions (like typing) would not have playwright data. But the problem says to \"include the low level action sequence\" for each strategy, which includes the playwright action data.\n\nBut the annotation's steps 1-3 are not present in the playwright trace. So perhaps those steps are not part of the actual process. The playwright trace starts with clicking the directions link, which would be the correct first step. So the user's actual process was to click the directions link directly, not via the search bar. Therefore, the correct steps are:\n\n1. Click the \"Find directions between two points\" link (action0)\n2. Enter the From location (Homewood Suites) into the From textbox and press Enter (action2)\n3. Enter the To location (PPG Paints Arena) into the To textbox and press Enter (action4)\n\nBut how to break this into strategies and substrategies.\n\nStrategy 1: Access Directions Interface\n\n- Click the directions link (action0)\n\nStrategy2: Set Starting Location\n\n- Enter \"Homewood Suites...\" into From textbox and press Enter (action2)\n\nStrategy3: Set Destination\n\n- Enter \"PPG Paints Arena...\" into To textbox and press Enter (action4)\n\nBut the substrategies would be broken down into actions. Each action would have a description, playwright_idx, and instruction.\n\nFor example, under Strategy1:\n\nSubstrategy: Click the directions link.\n\nAction: Click the \"Find directions between two points\" link. Playwright_idx 0, instruction as per the action_repr.\n\nThen, Strategy2: Set From Location.\n\nSubstrategy: Enter From location.\n\nActions:\n\n1. Click the From textbox (from annotation step4)\n2. Type the address (step5)\n3. Press Enter (playwright action2)\n\nBut the playwright action2 is pressing Enter in the From textbox. So the action for pressing Enter would be mapped to playwright action2.\n\nSimilarly for Strategy3.\n\nBut the problem is that the typing steps are not in the playwright trace. So how to represent them. The user instruction says to \"summarize a complete and reasonable user operation description that can accomplish the given task\" using both annotation and playwright data. So even if the playwright trace doesn't capture typing, the annotation does, so those steps are necessary for completeness.\n\nTherefore, the JSON should include all steps from the annotation that are necessary, and map the playwright actions where applicable.\n\nSo the final JSON structure would have strategies and substrategies with actions that include both the annotation steps and the playwright actions.\n\nFor example:\n\nStrategy 1: Access Directions Interface\n\nSubstrategy: Open directions tool\n\nAction: Click the \"Find directions between two points\" link. Playwright action0.\n\nStrategy2: Enter Starting Location\n\nSubstrategy: Input From location\n\nActions:\n\n1. Click the From textbox (annotation step4)\n2. Type \"Homewood Suites...\" (step5)\n3. Press Enter (playwright action2)\n\nStrategy3: Enter Destination\n\nSubstrategy: Input To location\n\nActions:\n\n1. Click the To textbox (step6)\n2. Type \"PPG Paints Arena...\" (step7)\n3. Press Enter (playwright action4)\n\nBut the problem is that the typing steps don't have corresponding playwright actions. So in the JSON, those actions would not have playwright_idx or instruction. But the example, each action has those fields. So perhaps the steps that don't have playwright actions are omitted, but that would make the process incomplete.\n\nAlternatively, the playwright actions may be considered as the key steps, and the typing steps are part of the description but not mapped to playwright actions. But the example shows that even actions without playwright data are included, but with empty playwright_idx. But in the example, some actions have playwright_idx and others don't. For example, in the example's substrategy \"Select the user from results\", the actions array is empty, which might mean that those steps are not captured in the playwright trace.\n\nBut according to the problem's example, the JSON includes actions that have playwright_idx and instruction where applicable. So for steps that are described in the annotation but not present in the playwright trace, they would be included in the JSON but without playwright data. However, the user instruction says to \"include the low level action sequence\" with playwright data. So perhaps only the steps that have corresponding playwright actions are included. But that would be incomplete.\n\nAlternatively, the steps from the annotation are used to build the strategy, and the playwright actions are mapped to the steps where possible. For example, the step of pressing Enter in the From textbox (playwright action2) corresponds to the annotation's step of clicking the Go button (step8). But in the annotation, after filling both From and To, the user clicks Go. But in the playwright trace, they press Enter in each textbox.\n\nThis discrepancy suggests that the user might have used different methods in the annotation versus the playwright trace. However, the task is to create a summary that accomplishes the task, using both sources.\n\nGiven that, the correct approach is to follow the annotation's steps but align them with the playwright actions where possible.\n\nBut the annotation's steps are:\n\n1. Click search box, type \"Where is this?\", click Go. This brings up the directions interface.\n\nBut the playwright's first action is clicking the directions link. So perhaps the initial steps in the annotation are not needed if the directions link is available. Therefore, the optimal path is to click the directions link directly, then fill in From and To.\n\nTherefore, the correct strategy is:\n\nObjective: Find the estimated driving time from Homewood Suites Southpointe to PPG Paints Arena using OpenStreetMap.\n\nStrategy 1: Access the Directions Tool\n\n- Click the \"Find directions between two points\" link (playwright action0)\n\nStrategy2: Set the From Location\n\n- Click the From textbox and type \"Homewood Suites...\" (annotation steps4-5)\n- Press Enter to confirm (playwright action2)\n\nStrategy3: Set the To Location\n\n- Click the To textbox and type \"PPG Paints Arena...\" (steps6-7)\n- Press Enter to confirm (playwright action4)\n\nStrategy4: View Driving Time\n\n- The route is displayed with the estimated time.\n\nBut the playwright actions only have three actions: 0,2,4. So the JSON would map those actions to the steps where they occur.\n\nSo the JSON structure would be:\n\n[\n {\n \"strategy\": \"Access the Directions Interface\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Open directions tool\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Click the 'Find directions between two points' link\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 0,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"Find directions between two points\\\")\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"strategy\": \"Set Starting Location\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Enter 'From' location\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Click the 'From' textbox and type 'Homewood Suites, Southpointe, Cecil Towns'\",\n \"playwright_idx\": null,\n \"playwright_instruction\": null\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Press Enter to confirm the 'From' location\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 2,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.pressget_by_role(\\\"textbox\\\", name=\\\"From\\\")Enter\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"strategy\": \"Set Destination Location\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Enter 'To' location\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Click the 'To' textbox and type 'PPG Paints Arena, 1001, Fifth Avenue, Soho'\",\n \"playwright_idx\": null,\n \"playwright_instruction\": null\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Press Enter to confirm the 'To' location\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 4,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.pressget_by_role(\\\"textbox\\\", name=\\\"To\\\")Enter\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n }\n]\n\nBut the problem is that the example in the user's instruction includes actions with playwright_idx and instruction. So steps that don't have playwright data would still be included but with null values. However, the user's example shows that some actions have empty arrays, but perhaps in this case, the typing steps are necessary for the process, even if not captured in playwright.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps the playwright actions are the key steps, and the other steps are part of the substrategy but not mapped to specific playwright actions. But the user's example includes actions without playwright data. For example, in the example's first substrategy, the action has playwright_idx 18, but others have none.\n\nSo the final answer should include all necessary steps from the annotation, and map the playwright actions where applicable.\n\nThus, the JSON output would include the steps from the annotation that are necessary, and the playwright actions are mapped to the corresponding steps (like pressing Enter).\n</think>\n\n```json\n[\n {\n \"strategy\": \"Access Directions Interface\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Open directions tool\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Click the 'Find directions between two points' link to initiate route planning.\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 0,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"Find directions between two points\\\")\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"strategy\": \"Set Starting Location\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Specify 'From' location\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Click the 'From' textbox to activate input.\",\n \"playwright_idx\": null,\n \"playwright_instruction\": null\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Type 'Homewood Suites, Southpointe, Cecil Towns' into the 'From' textbox.\",\n \"playwright_idx\": null,\n \"playwright_instruction\": null\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Press Enter to confirm the 'From' location input.\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 2,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.pressget_by_role(\\\"textbox\\\", name=\\\"From\\\")Enter\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"strategy\": \"Set Destination Location\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Specify 'To' location\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Click the 'To' textbox to activate input.\",\n \"playwright_idx\": null,\n \"playwright_instruction\": null\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Type 'PPG Paints Arena, 1001, Fifth Avenue, Soho' into the 'To' textbox.\",\n \"playwright_idx\": null,\n \"playwright_instruction\": null\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Press Enter to confirm the 'To' location input.\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 4,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.pressget_by_role(\\\"textbox\\\", name=\\\"To\\\")Enter\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n }\n]\n```",
|
||
"final_output": [
|
||
{
|
||
"strategy": "Access Directions Interface",
|
||
"substrategies": [
|
||
{
|
||
"substrategy": "Open directions tool",
|
||
"actions": [
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Click the 'Find directions between two points' link to initiate route planning.",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 0,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.clickget_by_role(\"link\", name=\"Find directions between two points\")"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"strategy": "Set Starting Location",
|
||
"substrategies": [
|
||
{
|
||
"substrategy": "Specify 'From' location",
|
||
"actions": [
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Click the 'From' textbox to activate input.",
|
||
"playwright_idx": null,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": null
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Type 'Homewood Suites, Southpointe, Cecil Towns' into the 'From' textbox.",
|
||
"playwright_idx": null,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": null
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Press Enter to confirm the 'From' location input.",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 2,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.pressget_by_role(\"textbox\", name=\"From\")Enter"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"strategy": "Set Destination Location",
|
||
"substrategies": [
|
||
{
|
||
"substrategy": "Specify 'To' location",
|
||
"actions": [
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Click the 'To' textbox to activate input.",
|
||
"playwright_idx": null,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": null
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Type 'PPG Paints Arena, 1001, Fifth Avenue, Soho' into the 'To' textbox.",
|
||
"playwright_idx": null,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": null
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Press Enter to confirm the 'To' location input.",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 4,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.pressget_by_role(\"textbox\", name=\"To\")Enter"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
} |