2585 lines
466 KiB
JSON
2585 lines
466 KiB
JSON
{
|
||
"summary": {
|
||
"total_cases": 160,
|
||
"processed_cases": 160,
|
||
"correct_cases": 6,
|
||
"accuracy": 0.0375
|
||
},
|
||
"results": [
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 103,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 103,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to GitLab Repository kkroening/ffmpeg-python\",\n \"Search Issues with Labels\",\n \"View Issue Details\",\n \"Extract Issue Information\",\n \"Analyze Results\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US5\", \"US6\", \"US7\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, so I've been given a task to figure out how to display a list of issues in a GitLab repository that have specific labels. The repository is named kkroening/ffmpeg-python, and the labels related to questions are the target. \n\nFirst, I need to break down what needs to be done. The main goal is to list issues with labels that include \"questions\". So, I need to navigate to the repository, find the issues section, filter those issues by their labels.\n\nI remember from the universal strategies that US1 is about navigating to a page or section. So, I would start by navigating to the GitLab interface and then to the specific repository. That would be US1: \"Navigate To Page/Section\".\n\nOnce in the repository, I need to go to the issues page. That's probably under the \"Issues\" tab. So, that would be another step using US1 again, maybe \"Navigate To Issues Page\".\n\nAfter that, I need to filter the issues by their labels. GitLab allows filtering issues by labels, so I would look for a search bar or filter options. There's probably a search box where I can enter \"questions\" to filter the issues. That would fall under US2: \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\".\n\nOnce the issues are filtered, I might need to retrieve the specific information about each issue. This could involve viewing each issue's details, which is covered by US5: \"View/Inspect Item Details\". So, for each issue that meets the criteria, I would click on it to view its details.\n\nThen, I might need to extract the relevant information from each issue, such as the issue number and the labels. This would be US6: \"Extract/Retrieve Information\".\n\nFinally, I might need to analyze the results to ensure that all issues with the \"questions\" label are correctly displayed. That might involve using US7: \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\" to check the results.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be: navigate to the repository, navigate to the issues page, search/filter by labels, view details, extract information, and analyze the results. The corresponding universal strategy IDs would be US1, US2, US5, US6, and US7.\n\nI should make sure that each step logically follows the previous one and that all necessary actions are covered. Maybe I should also consider if there are any additional steps, like exporting the data or presenting it in a certain way, but since the task is just to display the list, those might not be necessary.\n\nI think that's a solid plan. I'll structure the response with the task ID, the strategies used, and the universal strategy IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 109,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": true,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 109,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Orders Report\",\n \"Configure Report Parameters for 2022\",\n \"Generate and Review Monthly Orders Report\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, I need to figure out how to approach this task. The user provided an example where a task involves navigating to a report, configuring parameters, and generating a report. Now, the new task is about presenting the monthly count of successful orders from Jan to December 2022 in MM:COUNT format.\n\nFirst, I'll break down the task into steps. The main goal is to generate a report that shows the monthly counts. So, the first step is to navigate to the correct report section. That would likely be the \"Orders Report\" on the shopping_admin site. So, I'll use US1 for that.\n\nNext, I need to filter the report to show data from 2022. The universal strategy that fits here is US2 for searching or filtering data. So, I'll add a step to filter by the year 2022.\n\nAfter filtering, the report should display the data in MM:COUNT format. Since MM:COUNT is a specific formatting requirement, I need to ensure that the report is configured to output the data in that format. That falls under US3 for configuring parameters or settings. So, I'll set the date format to MM:COUNT.\n\nFinally, once the report is set up correctly, I'll execute the process to generate it. That's US4, where I initiate the action to create the report.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies needed are navigating to the report (US1), configuring the settings to filter by year (US3), and generating the report (US4). I think this covers all the necessary steps to fulfill the task."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 115,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 115,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Dissatisfaction Reviews\",\n \"Filter Dissatisfaction Reviews by Chloe tank\",\n \"Extract Customer Names from Dissatisfaction Reviews\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to complete this task using the Universal Strategy Templates provided. The task given is to show the names of customers who have expressed dissatisfaction with Chloe tank. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I need to understand what the user is asking for. They want to see a list of customers who have given negative feedback specifically about Chloe tank. So, the main goal here is to retrieve information from the system that matches this criteria.\n\nLooking at the provided strategies, I should consider which ones fit into this process. The first step is likely to navigate to a section where customer dissatisfaction reviews are available. That would correspond to US1, which is \"Navigate To Page/Section.\" So, I would start by navigating to the Reviews or Dissatisfaction Reports section on the shopping_admin site.\n\nOnce on that page, the next step is to find the specific criteria related to Chloe tank. This might involve filtering options. I would use US2, \"Search/Filter/Sort Data,\" to filter the reviews by product name or product ID. I would set the filter to look for \"Chloe tank\" or the relevant product code.\n\nAfter filtering, the results should display the names of customers who have expressed dissatisfaction. However, the task is to show these names, so I might need to extract this information. That would fall under US6, \"Extract/Retrieve Information,\" where I retrieve the customer names from the displayed data.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategy would involve navigating to the reviews section, filtering by Chloe tank, and then extracting the customer names. Each of these steps corresponds to US1, US2, and US6, respectively. I should make sure that the strategies are in the correct order and that each step logically follows the previous one to achieve the desired outcome."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 117,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US1"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 117,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"View the transaction history\",\n \"Sort transactions by date\",\n \"View the first transaction details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US5\", \"US2\", \"US1\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, I need to figure out how to complete this task using the Universal Strategy Templates provided. The task given is: \"What is the date when I made my first purchase on this site?\" Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, the user is asking about their first purchase date. That means they probably want to view their transaction history, specifically the oldest one. So, I need to figure out what actions they would take on the web interface to find this information.\n\nStep one would be to navigate to the user's transaction history. From the examples given, I remember that US1 is \"Navigate To Page/Section.\" So, the first strategy would be to navigate to the transaction history page. That makes sense because that's where purchase records are kept.\n\nOnce on the transaction history page, the next step is likely to filter or sort the transactions. The user wants the first purchase, so they probably need to sort the list in ascending order of date. Looking at the universal strategies, US2 is \"Search/Filter/Sort Data.\" So, the second strategy would be to sort the data, selecting the oldest date.\n\nAfter sorting, the first entry should display the date of the first purchase. The user would then need to view that specific transaction's details to confirm the date. So, the third strategy would be to \"View/Inspect Item Details,\" which is US5. This ensures they can see exactly when their first purchase was made.\n\nLet me make sure I'm not missing any steps. They navigate to the history, sort it, and then view the details. That covers all the necessary actions. I don't think they need to configure any parameters unless they want to filter by a specific date range, but the task is just about the first purchase, so sorting should suffice.\n\nI should also reference the correct strategy IDs. So, US1 for navigating, US2 for filtering, and US5 for viewing details. That should cover the task completely."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 123,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US7",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 123,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Feedback/Review Section\",\n \"Filter Reviews by Product\",\n \"Analyze Review Reasons for Circe's Products\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate Within Data/Results\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US8\", \"US2\", \"US7\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to help the user with their task. They provided a JSON input and an example output. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, looking at the input, the task is to tell customers why they like Circe's products. The site in question is shopping_admin. The intent is to find out the reasons behind customer likings.\n\nThe user mentioned that I should use the Universal Strategy Templates provided. So, I'll go through each of these strategies to see which ones fit the task.\n\nLooking at the examples, the output needs to include the strategies used, their IDs, and how they apply to the specific task. The example used US1, US3, and US4, which were about navigating to a page, configuring settings, and executing an action.\n\nFor this task, the first step would be to navigate to the review or feedback section where customers leave their opinions. That fits US1, which is \"Navigate To Page/Section.\"\n\nNext, once on that page, the user would likely want to filter or sort the reviews by the product in question, Circe's products. So, using US2, \"Search/Filter/Sort Data,\" to find specific reviews about Circe.\n\nFinally, after retrieving the relevant reviews, the user would need to analyze or evaluate the data to extract reasons why customers like the products. This is where US7, \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data,\" comes in, as it involves interpreting the information presented.\n\nSo, putting it all together, the strategies would be navigating to the feedback section, filtering for Circe's products, and analyzing the reviews. The corresponding IDs are US1, US2, and US7.\n\nI should make sure the output is in JSON format, as per the user's requirements, and that it includes the task_id, strategies, universal strategies, and their IDs. Also, each strategy should be clearly explained in the context of the task.\n\nI think that's all. I'll structure the JSON accordingly, making sure each part aligns with the provided example and the task details."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 125,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US8"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 125,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Mouth Guard Section\",\n \"Search for Teeth Grinding Mouth Guard\",\n \"Extract Price Range Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, I need to figure out how to approach this task. The user has provided a JSON input with a task_id, sites, and intent. The task is to determine the price range of teeth grinding mouth guards in the One Stop Market on the shopping site.\n\nFirst, I'll break down the intent: \"What is the price range of teeth grinding mouth guard in the One Stop Market?\" So, the goal is to find the price information for a specific product in a particular market section.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies, I should find the best fit for each step. \n\n1. The first step is to navigate to the correct section. The product is a mouth guard, so I need to go to the mouth guard section. That would use US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\n\n2. Next, within that section, I need to find the price range. That likely involves filtering or searching based on the product type. So, I'll use US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data to look for the specific mouth guard.\n\n3. After finding the product, I need to retrieve the price information. That's where US6: Extract/Retrieve Information comes in, as it's about getting specific data from the page.\n\nI don't think I need to configure settings or execute an action beyond retrieving the price. So, the strategies are US1, US2, and US6, and their corresponding steps are navigate to mouth guard, search/filter for teeth grinding mouth guard, and extract price range."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 127,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 127,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Search Log Analysis\",\n \"Extract Brand Names from Search Terms\",\n \"Analyze Frequency of Brands\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US6\", \"US7\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to complete this task. The task is to determine which brands appear most frequently among the top search terms on the shopping_admin site. The user wants me to act as a GUI Agent and use the Universal Strategy Templates provided to plan and design the strategy.\n\nFirst, I need to break down the task into smaller steps. The main goal is to identify the most frequent brands in the top search terms. That means I'll need to look at the search queries and count the occurrences of each brand.\n\nLooking at the Universal Strategies, I see several relevant ones. US1 is about navigating to a specific page, so I'll need to go to the search logs or wherever the top search terms are displayed. US6 is for extracting information, which fits because I need to pull the brand names from the search data. US7 involves analyzing or evaluating data, which is perfect for counting frequencies.\n\nSo, the first step is to navigate to the page where the top search terms are shown. That would be using US1. Then, I need to extract the brand names from that page, which is US6. Finally, I have to analyze this extracted data to count how often each brand appears, which is US7.\n\nI should make sure each step is clear and follows logically. Navigating to the correct page, extracting the necessary information, and then analyzing it all fit together. I don't think I need any other strategies because the task doesn't involve modifying or deleting items, just retrieving and analyzing data.\n\nI should also consider if there are any other steps, but I don't think so. Extracting and analyzing are the main actions needed here. So, the strategies should be US1, US6, and US7 with their respective IDs.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategy should first navigate to the search logs, then extract the brand names, and finally analyze the frequency of each brand. That should give me the answer the user is looking for."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 131,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 131,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Orders Page\",\n \"View Recent Orders\",\n \"Extract Total Items from Recent Orders\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Navigate Within Data/Results\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US8\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, let's tackle this task. The user wants to know the total number of items sold in the most recent 7 orders. So, first, I need to figure out the steps to get that information from the web interface.\n\nI think the first step is to navigate to the Orders page because that's where order data is stored. Without going there, I can't access the order details. So, that would be using US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\n\nOnce on the Orders page, the next step is to look for a way to view the most recent orders. Usually, there's a section for recent orders or a filter option. So, I'll use US8: Navigate Within Data/Results to scroll or filter to the top recent orders.\n\nNow, I need to get the total number of items from these orders. That probably means clicking on each order to view its details and then adding up the items. So, after viewing the details, I should use US6: Extract/Retrieve Information to get the number of items from each order.\n\nAfter extracting the data, I'll need to sum them up to get the total. This would fall under US4: Execute Action/Process, where I perform the calculation or action to get the total number.\n\nWait, but do I need to configure any parameters first? Maybe I should check if there's a specific report or summary feature. But since the task is about recent orders, navigating directly to the recent section should suffice without needing US3: Configure Parameters/Settings. So, I'll skip that.\n\nSo, the steps are: navigate to Orders, navigate to recent orders, extract the number of items, and execute the sum action. The universal strategies used are US1, US8, and US4.\n\nI think that's all. Let me structure it."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 139,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 139,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Map\",\n \"Configure Driving Time Parameters\",\n \"Generate Driving Time Estimate\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to complete this task using the Universal Strategy Templates provided. The task is to estimate the driving time between Joe Biden's hometown and Bridgeport, CT. Let's break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I need to identify Joe Biden's hometown. I remember he's from Delaware, but I'm not 100% sure. Maybe I should double-check that. Once I know the location, the next step is to navigate to a mapping tool on the map site. Since the site is \"map,\" I assume it's a mapping interface like Google Maps or something similar.\n\nSo, the first strategy would be to navigate to the map section. That would correspond to US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\n\nAfter getting to the map, I need to locate Joe Biden's hometown. Once I have that marked, I should find Bridgeport, CT on the same map. Once both locations are on the map, I can use the mapping tool's feature to calculate the driving time. I think most mapping tools have a 'calculate driving time' or 'route planner' feature. That would be the second strategy: Configure Parameters/Settings, specifically US3, where I set the departure and arrival points.\n\nOnce the settings are configured, the next step is to execute the action, which is generating the driving time estimate. That would be US4: Execute Action/Process.\n\nWait, do I need to view any details? Probably not in this case since the intent is just to get the time, so maybe US5 isn't necessary here. Also, extracting information isn't needed since the result is a time value, not raw data. So, the relevant strategies are navigating to the map, configuring the settings, and executing the calculation.\n\nI should make sure that the strategies are in the correct order. First, get to the map, then set the parameters, then run the calculation. That makes sense. So the strategies array would be [\"Navigate to Map\", \"Configure Driving Time Parameters\", \"Generate Driving Time Estimate\"], and the universal strategies would be US1, US3, and US4.\n\nI think that's all. Let me structure this properly in JSON format as per the example."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 149,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 149,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to the Reports section and select 'Section Report'\",\n \"Filter the results to show only items purchased in February 2023\",\n \"View the color configuration details of the artificial plants\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate Within Data/Results\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US8\", \"US2\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so the user has given me a task to figure out the color configuration of artificial plants they bought in February 2023. Let me break this down step by step. \n\nFirst, I need to understand the intent here. The user is looking to check the color settings of their purchased items. They probably bought some artificial plants and now want to know the color configuration, maybe for a return or a replacement. \n\nLooking at the provided universal strategies, I should match each step with the appropriate strategy ID. The first step is to navigate to the specific section where their purchased items are stored. Since they bought these from the shopping site, I think the Reports section would have a section report for their items. So that would be US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\n\nNext, they need to filter the results to only show the items purchased in February 2023. This sounds like a filter function, so US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data makes sense here.\n\nAfter filtering, they need to view the color configuration details. That would involve viewing the specific item details, which is US5: View/Inspect Item Details. \n\nSo putting it all together, the strategy steps would be: navigate to the Reports section, filter for February 2023, and then view the item details. The corresponding strategy IDs are US1, US2, and US5.\n\nI should make sure each step is clear and uses the correct strategy ID. Also, I need to format the output as JSON, including the task_id, strategies, universal_strategies, and universal_strategy_ids. \n\nWait, let me double-check if the Reports section under Shopping Admin has a section report for purchased items. Yes, typically, each user has their own section report. So the steps should be correct.\n\nI think that's all. The output should match the example structure, using the JSON format as specified."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 15,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 15,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Reviews Report\",\n \"Search Reviews for 'best'\",\n \"Generate and View Reviews Report with 'best' Mentions\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, let me try to figure out how to approach this task. The user wants to know the number of reviews that mention the term \"best\" across all time. So, first, I need to break this down into steps.\n\nFirst, I need to navigate to the Reviews section. That sounds like using US1, which is about navigating to a page. So, step one is to go to the Reviews Report.\n\nOnce in the Reviews section, I need to look for where the reviews are listed. Probably, it's in a list view. So, I should use US8, which is about navigating within data results. That way, I can view all the reviews.\n\nNext, within the list of reviews, I need to search for mentions of the term \"best\". That falls under US2, which is searching or filtering data. So, I'll set the search criteria to include \"best\" in the review text.\n\nAfter filtering, I need to count how many reviews match this criterion. Counting isn't directly covered by any of the provided strategies, but it's a logical step after filtering. Maybe the user expects this as part of the process, so I'll include it as an implied step.\n\nFinally, I need to present this number. That would involve viewing the count, which is part of US5 (viewing item details), but since it's just a number, maybe US1 again for navigating to the summary view.\n\nWait, but the example output uses US1, US2, and US4. In the output, they have \"View the count of reviews mentioning 'best'\". So, that's using US5 (View/Inspect Item Details) because it's looking at the details of the count. But since the count is a single metric, maybe US1 applies again when navigating to the summary section.\n\nHmm, I'm a bit confused. Let me check the example again. In the example, after filtering, they generate and review the report, which uses US4 (execute action/process) and US5 (view details).\n\nSo, in my case, after filtering with US2, I need to execute the count, which is US4, and then view the result, which is US5. But the user's output example only includes the main steps, not every detail.\n\nAlternatively, maybe the counting is considered a part of viewing the result, so it's part of US5. Therefore, the strategies would be US1 (navigate to reviews), US2 (search for \"best\"), and US4 (generate and review the filtered list).\n\nWait, but the user's output example includes US1, US2, and US4. So, perhaps after filtering, the next step is to generate the report, which counts the mentions, and then view that report.\n\nSo, I think the steps are: navigate to reviews (US1), search for \"best\" (US2), and generate/report (US4). That makes sense because after filtering, generating the report would include counting, and then viewing the report would show the number.\n\nI think that's the logical flow. So, the strategies would be US1, US2, and US4."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 155,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 155,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to the Map\",\n \"Search for Animal Rescue League of Pittsburgh and Schenley Park\",\n \"Calculate Minimum Travel Time by Car\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, I need to figure out how to approach this task. The user provided an input JSON with a task_id of 155, sites including \"map\", and an intent asking for the minimum car travel time from one location to another. \n\nFirst, I recall the universal strategies provided. The task involves using a map, so navigation is key. I think the first step would be to navigate to a map interface. That probably corresponds to US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\n\nOnce on the map, the user needs to locate two specific places: the Animal Rescue League of Pittsburgh and Schenley Park. So, the next step would be to search for these locations on the map. That fits US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data, where the user can filter the markers to find these spots.\n\nAfter identifying the locations, the goal is to find the travel time. Maps typically have a feature to calculate driving time and distance. So, the next step would be to calculate the driving time between the two points. US4: Execute Action/Process makes sense here because the user needs to initiate the calculation.\n\nI should make sure each step logically follows the previous one. Navigating to the map, searching for the locations, and then executing the time calculation. I don't see any other steps needed, so the strategies should be US1, US2, and US4 with their corresponding IDs.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies array would be the three steps, and the universal_strategy_ids would be the respective IDs. The output should be in JSON format as specified."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 156,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US1"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 156,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"View Merge Requests Assigned to Me\",\n \"Search and Filter Merge Requests by Assignee\",\n \"View Merge Request Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US5\", \"US2\", \"US1\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to handle this task where the user wants to check out merge requests assigned to them on Gitlab. Let me break it down step by step.\n\nFirst, I should understand the goal: the user wants to see all the merge requests that are assigned to them. That means I need to navigate to the right section on Gitlab where this information is displayed.\n\nI remember that Gitlab has a section called \"Projects\" where you can view all your projects. Each project has a list of merge requests. So, the first step is to go to the Projects section. That would be a navigation action, so I think that's US1.\n\nOnce on the Projects page, I need to find the list of merge requests. I believe each project has its own tab, so I should filter the projects to only show the one that corresponds to the user's assigned merge requests. To do this, I might need to use a search function or filter options. That sounds like using US2 for Search/Filter/Sort Data.\n\nAfter filtering, I should look for the specific merge requests. Each request might have a status, like \"Open,\" \"Pending,\" or \"Approved.\" The user might be interested in seeing which ones are still pending or need their approval. To get this information, I'll need to view the details of each request. That's where US5, View/Inspect Item Details, comes into play. I'll click on a request to see more details.\n\nOnce I'm on the request's details page, the user can review it. Depending on the status, they might need to take action, like Approve or Comment. But the task is just to check them out, so maybe just viewing the details is sufficient. However, if they need to take an action, that would fall under US9, Update/Modify Item or US10, Delete Item, but since it's just checking, I think US5 is enough.\n\nPutting it all together, the steps are: navigate to Projects, search/filter to find the specific merge requests, and view their details. So the strategies used are US1, US2, and US5. The corresponding actions are navigation, searching, and viewing details.\n\nI should make sure the JSON output includes the task_id, the strategies in order, the universal strategies IDs, and the IDs of the strategies used. That way, the system knows which steps were applied to achieve the task."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 157,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 157,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Customers Report\",\n \"Configure Report Parameters to Show All Customers\",\n \"Generate and Display Customers Report\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, so I need to figure out how to complete this task. The task is to show all customers using the shopping_admin site. The user provided some universal strategy templates, so I should use those to break down the task into steps.\n\nFirst, I think about what it means to show all customers. That probably involves navigating to a section where customer data is displayed. Looking at the strategies, US1 is about navigating to a page or section, so that seems relevant.\n\nNext, once I'm on the right page, I might need to configure some parameters. Maybe there's a search box or filters that I can leave empty to show all customers without any limitations. That would be US3, configuring parameters or settings.\n\nAfter setting up the parameters, I need to execute the action to display the customers. That sounds like clicking a generate or submit button, which is US4, Execute Action/Process.\n\nI don't think I need to view or extract information in this case, so US5 and US6 might not be necessary. Also, there's no analysis or verification needed here, so US7 is out. Similarly, navigating through results or creating/modifying items isn't required, so US8, US9, and US10 can be skipped.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategy steps would be: navigate to the customers report, configure the parameters to show all, and execute the display. The corresponding universal strategy IDs would be US1, US3, and US4.\n\nI should make sure the JSON structure matches the example given, with task_id, strategies, universal_strategies, and universal_strategy_ids. I'll list each step clearly and reference the correct IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 162,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US9",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 162,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Search for Nintendo Switch Game Card Storage Options\",\n \"Filter Results by Best Storage Options\",\n \"Review Storage Options\",\n \"Create a List of Storage Options\",\n \"Add Storage Option to Order\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Create Item\",\n \"Update/Modify Item\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US2\", \"US2\", \"US5\", \"US9\", \"US10\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, I need to figure out how to help the user with their task. The task is to find the best storage option for 40 Nintendo Switch game cards. Let me break this down.\n\nFirst, the user mentions they have a lot of game cards and need to find a storage option. So, the goal is to locate storage solutions that can fit 40 cards. I should consider where to look for such information. Probably, the user would search online for storage options, so starting with a search or results page makes sense.\n\nNext, after searching, they'll need to view the results. That would involve navigating to a results page, which is a common web interface action. So, the first step is to navigate to the search results page. That would correspond to US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\n\nOnce on the results page, the user needs to sort or filter the options to find the best storage. Since they're looking for the best option, filtering by popularity or effectiveness would be useful. So, using a filter function, which is covered by US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data.\n\nAfter filtering, the user needs to review the options. Reviewing involves looking through the results, which might involve scrolling or viewing each option's details. US8: Navigate Within Data/Results could be used here for scrolling through pages if there are many options.\n\nOnce the user identifies the best option, they might want to create a new list or add the storage to their order. Creating a new list would use US9: Create Item, and adding to order would use US10: Update/Modify Item if it's an existing list.\n\nSo, putting it all together, the strategies would be: navigate to results, filter the options, review them, and then either create a new list or update an existing one. The universal strategies used would be US1, US2, US8, US9, and US10.\n\nI think that covers all the necessary steps to help the user find and manage their storage solution."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 167,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US7",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 167,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Search for Product Reviews\",\n \"Extract Sentences About Criticisms\",\n \"Analyze Sentences for Main Points\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US2\", \"US6\", \"US7\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I'm looking at this task where I need to figure out the main criticisms of a product and extract the relevant sentences. The goal is to design a strategy using the provided universal templates. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, the task is to analyze user feedback about a product's criticisms. The user wants the main points extracted. So, I need to plan how to achieve this.\n\nStep 1: I think the first thing to do is to navigate to the product review section. That would be the starting point where all the reviews and feedback are stored. So, I'll use the \"Navigate To Page/Section\" strategy, which is US1. That makes sense because I need to go to the right place to find the reviews.\n\nOnce I'm on the review page, the next step is to look through the comments. But I don't want just any comments—I specifically need the ones that mention criticisms. So, I'll need to use a search function. Maybe there's a search bar where users can filter reviews by sentiment or type. That would fall under the \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\" strategy, which is US2. I'll set the filter to look for negative or critical feedback.\n\nAfter filtering, I might have a list of reviews, but they might not all be in one place. They could be spread out across multiple pages. So, to make sure I cover all the relevant sentences, I'll need to navigate through each page. This would use the \"Navigate Within Data/Results\" strategy, US8. I'll use the pagination controls to go through each page until there are no more results.\n\nOnce I've gone through all the pages, I need to extract the relevant sentences. That means reading through each review and picking out the parts that talk about criticisms. This would involve using the \"Extract/Retrieve Information\" strategy, US6. I'll go through each sentence, identify the critical points, and collect them.\n\nFinally, after extracting all the relevant information, I need to present it in a clear and organized manner. Maybe I'll list out the main points or summarize them. This would be covered by the \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\" strategy, US7, where I evaluate each sentence for its relevance to criticisms.\n\nWait, but does the order of strategies make sense? Let me think. First, navigate to the page (US1), then search within the data (US2), navigate through results (US8), extract info (US6), and analyze (US7). That seems logical. Alternatively, maybe after extracting, I can analyze directly, but I think the current order flows better.\n\nIs there a way to combine steps? For example, after navigating, maybe I can directly search and extract in one step, but I think breaking it down into separate strategies makes it clearer. So, I'll stick with US1, US2, US8, US6, and US7.\n\nWait, but looking at the output example, they have three strategies and three universal IDs. In my case, I have five steps, so maybe I need to combine some. Let me see: navigating, searching, extracting, and analyzing. Perhaps I can combine steps 2 and 3 into one strategy. Maybe after searching, I navigate through the results and extract info in a single step. But I'm not sure if that's necessary. It might be clearer to have separate strategies for each action.\n\nAlternatively, maybe after extracting, I can directly analyze, so perhaps the order is:\n\n1. US1: Navigate to Reviews\n2. US2: Search for criticisms\n3. US8: Navigate through results\n4. US6: Extract sentences\n5. US7: Analyze extracted data\n\nBut that's five strategies. The example only has three, but perhaps I can combine some. For example, searching and navigating within results could be one step, and extracting and analyzing as another. But I'm not sure if that fits the templates. Maybe it's better to have each action as a separate strategy.\n\nSo, in summary, the strategy would involve:\n\n- Navigating to the review section (US1)\n- Searching for critical feedback (US2)\n- Navigating through the search results (US8)\n- Extracting the relevant sentences (US6)\n- Analyzing the extracted information (US7)\n\nI think that covers all the necessary steps. Now, I'll structure the output accordingly, making sure to reference each strategy and its ID."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 169,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 169,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Gitlab Repositories\",\n \"Filter Repositories by Contributions\",\n \"Extract Star Counts\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to complete this task using the Universal Strategy Templates provided. The task given is to find the full names of repositories on Gitlab where the user made contributions and those repositories have the most stars. \n\nFirst, I need to break this down into steps. The user wants to know two main things: the repository names and the number of stars they've received. So, I'll probably need to navigate to the repositories, filter them based on stars, and then extract the information.\n\nLooking at the Universal Strategies, I think the first step would be to navigate to Gitlab's repository section. That would be US1: Navigate To Page/Section. I'll go to the Gitlab interface and find the repository section.\n\nOnce there, the user wants repositories where they made contributions. So, I'll need to filter repositories based on contributions made by the user. I'm not sure if Gitlab has a specific filter for contributions, but if it does, that would fall under US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data. I can use a search or filter function to find repositories where the user has contributed.\n\nAfter filtering, the next step is to find out how many stars each repository has. So, I'll need to retrieve the star count. That would be US6: Extract/Retrieve Information, as I need to read the star count displayed on the repository page.\n\nNow, putting it all together, the strategies would be: navigate to Gitlab's repositories, filter by contributions, and extract the star counts. The corresponding Universal Strategy IDs would be US1, US2, and US6.\n\nWait, but do I need to sort the repositories by stars? The task says they got the most stars, so I might need to sort them. But the provided examples don't include a strategy for sorting, just filtering. Maybe I can combine US2 and US4. But US4 is for executing an action, like submitting a report, which doesn't fit here. Hmm.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps the filtering step (US2) can include sorting by stars. But since the provided strategies don't have a sorting strategy, I might have to proceed without it. So, I'll just extract the star count for each repository that meets the contribution criteria.\n\nSo, the steps would be: navigate to repositories, filter by contributions, and extract star counts. Therefore, the strategies would be US1, US2, and US6 with IDs 1, 2, and 6.\n\nI think that's the logical flow. I can't think of a more efficient way without a sorting strategy, so I'll stick with these three steps."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 173,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 173,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Search for issues containing the keyword \\\"better\\\"\",\n \"View the latest issue with the keyword \\\"better\\\" in its title\",\n \"Check if the latest issue is closed\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US2\", \"US5\", \"US7\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, let's tackle this task step by step. The user wants to open their latest updated issue on GitLab that includes the keyword \"better\" in the title and check if it's closed. \n\nFirst, I need to figure out the strategy to find this issue. Since it's on GitLab, the interface might have a search bar or a keyword filter. I think the best approach is to search for issues with the keyword \"better\" because that's a direct way to filter the search results.\n\nNext, after finding the relevant issues, the user needs to open the latest updated one. On GitLab, issues typically have a list view, and the latest ones are usually displayed at the top. So, the next step would be to click on the latest issue to view its details.\n\nOnce the issue is open, the user needs to check if it's closed. On GitLab, closed issues are marked with a crossed-out checkmark. So, the final step would be to navigate to the issue's details and look for that indicator.\n\nNow, mapping these steps to the universal strategies. The first step is to search for issues with a specific keyword, which aligns with US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data. The second step is to open the latest issue, which is US5: View/Inspect Item Details. The final step is to check if it's closed, which involves US7: Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data because it's about evaluating the status of the issue.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies should be US2, US5, and US7. The corresponding strategy IDs are \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\", \"View/Inspect Item Details\", and \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\", with IDs 2, 5, and 7 respectively.\n\nI should make sure each step clearly maps to the right strategy and that the explanation is concise. Also, the final JSON output should include all the required fields as per the instructions."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 182,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 182,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Open Best Issues Page\",\n \"View Issue Details\",\n \"Analyze Issue Status\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US5\", \"US7\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to complete this task using the Universal Strategy Templates provided. Let me start by understanding what the task is asking.\n\nThe task is to open a specific issue on Gitlab that has homepage content in its title and check if it's closed. Hmm, okay. So, first, I need to navigate to the issue that was just created. But how do I find it? The title mentions homepage content, so maybe it's the latest issue added to the homepage. \n\nAlright, so step one is to navigate to the correct page. Since the site is Gitlab, I know that the interface might have a specific layout. I think the latest issues are displayed on the homepage, so I should go to the homepage first. Once there, I can look for the latest issues section. Among those, I need to find the one whose title includes homepage content. Once I find that issue, I should open it to check its status.\n\nWait, but what if there are multiple issues on the homepage? I need to make sure I'm selecting the latest one or the one that specifically has homepage content in its title. Maybe I should use a search function or filter if available. Or perhaps the issue title is unique enough that it stands out.\n\nOnce I'm on the issue's page, the next step is to check if it's closed. On Gitlab, issues can be in various states, and I assume there's a way to see if it's marked as closed. Maybe there's a button or a checkbox indicating the status. If it's closed, then great; if not, I might need to take further action, but the task only asks to check if it's closed.\n\nNow, thinking about the Universal Strategies, let me map this out. The first step is navigating to the page where the latest issues are displayed. That would correspond to US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\n\nThe second step is viewing or focusing on a specific item (the issue) to examine its details. That's US5: View/Inspect Item Details.\n\nThe third step is checking the status of the issue, which might involve analyzing the data or verifying the information. US7: Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data seems appropriate here.\n\nWait, but do I need to extract any information? Maybe not in this case, since the task is just to check if it's closed. So perhaps US7 is enough for that analysis.\n\nAlternatively, if I need to see if the issue is closed, maybe I can use US4: Execute Action/Process if there's an action to mark it as closed, but the task only asks to check, not to change its status. So maybe US7 is sufficient for checking.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be:\n\n1. Navigate to Best Issues Page (US1)\n2. View the Issue Details (US5)\n3. Analyze the Issue Status (US7)\n\nBut wait, the output example includes US1, US3, and US4. In my case, I'm using US1, US5, and US7. Let me check if that's acceptable.\n\nYes, because US1 is about navigating to a page, US5 is about viewing an item's details, and US7 is about analyzing data. So that should cover the task.\n\nI think that's a solid plan. Now, I'll format the output as required, making sure the task ID, sites, and intent are correctly included, followed by the strategies, the universal strategies used, and their IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 184,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 184,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Inventory Management\",\n \"Search for Products with Zero Units\",\n \"View Product Details to Extract Names\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to approach this task. The user wants me to act as a GUI Agent who needs to plan and execute a task on a web interface. The task given is to \"Give me the name of the products that have 0 units left.\" \n\nFirst, I'll break down what needs to be done. The user is asking for the names of products with zero units in stock. So, I need to find a way to view this data. \n\nLooking at the Universal Strategies, the first step would likely be to navigate to a section where inventory or stock levels are displayed. That would correspond to US1: Navigate To Page/Section. So, I'll plan to go to the Inventory Management page.\n\nOnce on that page, the next step is to find the products with zero units. I assume there's a way to filter or search for such products. That would fall under US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data. So, I'll set up a filter to show products where the units in stock are zero.\n\nAfter finding the relevant products, I need to retrieve their names. This would involve viewing the product details, which is US5: View/Inspect Item Details. I'll click on each product to see their names.\n\nFinally, once all the names are retrieved, the user probably wants a list of them. So, I'll extract the names, which is US6: Extract/Retrieve Information. I'll compile the names into a list to provide the desired output.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be navigating to the inventory page, searching for zero-unit products, viewing their details to extract the names, and then executing the process to retrieve them. Each step corresponds to the respective Universal Strategies."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 190,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 190,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"View the details of my latest order\",\n \"Extract the total cost from the order summary\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US5\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to approach this task. The user has provided a task where they want to know the total cost of their latest complete order. They've given an example response that breaks down the task into specific steps using the Universal Strategies provided.\n\nFirst, I look at the task: the user wants the total cost of their latest complete order. That means they need to access their order, check its details, and get the total cost.\n\nLooking at the Universal Strategies, the first step is likely to view the order details. That would correspond to US5: View/Inspect Item Details. So I'll start by selecting that strategy.\n\nNext, after viewing the details, the user would need to find the total cost. That's probably a number displayed somewhere in the order summary. To retrieve that information, I can use US6: Extract/Retrieve Information. So I'll add that step.\n\nPutting it together, the task is broken down into two strategies: viewing the order details and extracting the total cost from those details. The corresponding Universal Strategy IDs are US5 and US6.\n\nI should make sure that the strategies flow logically. First, you view the order to inspect it, then you extract the necessary information from that view. There's no need for additional steps like configuring parameters or generating a report because the user is directly asking for the total cost, which is likely already available.\n\nI also need to ensure that the strategies are correctly referenced and that the JSON structure matches the example provided. Each strategy should be a string with the appropriate ID, and the overall structure should include the task_id, strategies array, universal_strategies array, and universal_strategy_ids array.\n\nSo, compiling all that, the final JSON should list the two strategies with their respective IDs and IDs, ensuring the task is completed correctly."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 196,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US7",
|
||
"US7",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 196,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to the Cancelled Orders Report\",\n \"Filter the report to show last 4 cancelled and completed orders\",\n \"Sort the report to separate cancelled and completed orders\",\n \"Configure Payment Difference analysis for the selected orders\",\n \"Generate and view the Payment Difference Summary report\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Sort Within Data/Results\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US8\", \"US3\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, I need to help the user by outlining a strategy for their task. The task is to compare the payment difference between the last 4 cancelled orders and completed orders. Let me break this down.\n\nFirst, the user needs to navigate to the correct report section where these orders are stored. So, I'll use US1 for navigating to the page.\n\nNext, they'll need to filter the report to show only the last 4 cancelled and completed orders. That means using a filter function, which falls under US2.\n\nAfter filtering, they should sort the results to separate cancelled and completed orders. Sorting is part of data management, so US8 would be appropriate here.\n\nThen, they have to configure the parameters to extract payment difference data. This sounds like setting up a report or analysis, which is covered by US3.\n\nOnce the data is extracted, they need to generate the report. That's US4.\n\nFinally, they should view the summary to compare the differences, so US5 applies here.\n\nI'll make sure each step is clear and uses the right strategies."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 202,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 202,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Cancelled Orders Report\",\n \"Configure Report Parameters for Most Recent Entries\",\n \"Generate and Review Cancelled Orders Report\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to handle this task where I need to get the date of the most recent cancelled order for the shopping_admin site. The user provided some instructions about using a GUI Agent and selecting the right universal strategies. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I need to understand the task. The intent is to find the date of the most recent cancelled order. So, the main goal is to retrieve specific information from the system's data.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies, I should think about which ones apply here. Let's go through them one by one.\n\nUS1: Navigate to Page/Section. That makes sense because I need to go to the section where cancelled orders are listed. So, I'll need to go to the cancelled orders report.\n\nUS3: Configure Parameters/Settings. I might need to set certain parameters to filter the results. For example, I might want to sort the list by date in descending order to get the most recent first.\n\nUS4: Execute Action/Process. Once I'm on the page, I might need to generate or display the report, which would involve clicking a \"Generate\" or \"View\" button.\n\nAnother strategy could be US8: Navigate Within Data/Results. If after viewing the most recent order, I need to navigate to the next page, but in this case, since it's just one order, maybe this isn't necessary. Alternatively, if there are multiple pages, navigating within the results might be needed, but I'm not sure if that's required here.\n\nI don't think I need to use US5 to view details because the main goal is to get the date, not the detailed information of the order. US6 is about extracting information, but once I'm on the page, I can directly get the date without extracting it again. US7 is for analysis, which isn't necessary here since we just need a date.\n\nSo, the main steps are: navigate to the cancelled orders report, configure the parameters to show the most recent ones, and then generate or view the report to get the date.\n\nLet me structure this. The strategy will involve navigating to the page (US1), configuring the settings to filter for the most recent orders (US3), and then generating or viewing the report (US4). \n\nI should make sure that each step is clear and follows logically. First, move to the correct section, then set the parameters, and finally execute the action to retrieve the information.\n\nI think that covers all the necessary steps. I don't see any other universal strategies that would be applicable here. So, the final plan should include these three steps with their respective IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 205,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US2"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 205,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to the Commits Report\",\n \"Filter Commits by Date (3/5/2023)\",\n \"Extract Commit Count\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to complete this task. So, the user has provided a JSON input with a task that needs to be broken down using the Universal Strategy Templates. Let me go through this step by step.\n\nFirst, the task is to determine how many commits Kilian made on 3/5/2023 using GitLab. The sites involved are [\"gitlab\"], and the intent is a specific query about commit counts.\n\nI need to plan this task by breaking it down into steps. So, the first thing is to navigate to the GitLab interface where the relevant reports are located. That would involve using the \"Navigate To Page/Section\" strategy, which is US1. This step is straightforward because I need to get to the place where I can find the commit data.\n\nNext, once on the appropriate page, I need to filter the commits to the specific date. GitLab has a date range selector, so I'll use the \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\" strategy, which is US2. This will allow me to narrow down the commits to March 5, 2023.\n\nAfter filtering, the next step is to retrieve the count of commits. This involves using the \"Extract/Retrieve Information\" strategy, US6, to pull the number from the displayed data. I might need to look for a section that shows commit statistics or a summary.\n\nPutting this together, the strategies needed are navigation, filtering, and extracting information. The corresponding IDs are US1, US2, and US6. I should ensure that each step logically follows the previous one, starting from the page, then filtering, and finally extracting the data.\n\nI also need to make sure that the output is in JSON format, as specified, and that it includes the strategies, their IDs, and the task details. No markdown or additional formatting should be used, just plain JSON.\n\nSo, the final output should list the task and the three strategies with their respective IDs and brief explanations. I think that covers all the requirements. I'll double-check each step to ensure it aligns with the Universal Strategies and that the task is completed efficiently."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 215,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US7",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US7",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 215,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Customer Reviews\",\n \"Search for Circe Ice Fleece\",\n \"Extract Customer Feedback\",\n \"Analyze Customer Insights\",\n \"Generate Customer Dislike Report\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\",\n \"Create Item\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US6\", \"US7\", \"US9\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to design a strategy for this task. The task is to find out what key aspects customers don't like about Circe ice fleece. The site to use is shopping_admin, which I think is the admin interface for the shopping site.\n\nFirst, I should break down the task. The main goal is to identify the key customer dislikes regarding the product. To do this, I probably need to look at customer reviews. So the first step would be to navigate to a section where these reviews are displayed.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies, US1 is about navigating to a page or section. That makes sense here. So I'll use US1 with the title \"View Customer Reviews.\"\n\nNext, after navigating to the reviews section, I need to find the specific product, Circe ice fleece. So I should search for it. US2 is about searching or filtering data, which fits perfectly. I'll use US2 with the search query \"Circe ice fleece.\"\n\nOnce I've located the product page, I need to extract the information about what customers don't like. That means reading the reviews and notes. US6 is about extracting information, so I'll apply US6 with the title \"Extract Customer Dislikes.\"\n\nAfter extracting all the relevant information, I need to analyze it to identify the key aspects. US7 is for analyzing or evaluating data, so that's the strategy I'll use. The title would be \"Analyze Customer Feedback.\"\n\nFinally, I'll need to create a report based on this analysis. US9 is for creating an item, so I'll use that. The title would be \"Generate Customer Dislike Report.\"\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be: navigate to reviews, search for the product, extract feedback, analyze it, and create the report. The corresponding universal strategy IDs are US1, US2, US6, US7, and US9.\n\nI should make sure each step is clear and follows logically. Maybe I should also consider if any steps can be combined or if there's a more efficient way, but based on the given strategies, this seems comprehensive."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 220,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 220,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to the Map\",\n \"Search for Hotels Near Gardner Steel Conference Center\",\n \"Filter Hotels by Walking Distance (up to 5 minutes)\",\n \"Display the Walking Map\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Generate and submit an action\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US6\", \"US5\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, I need to figure out how to handle this task for the GUI Agent. The task is to show the walking distance from nearby hotels to the Gardner Steel Conference Center, with the requirement that the hotels have a maximum walking time of 5 minutes. \n\nFirst, I'll break down the steps. The user wants to see a map, so I should navigate to a mapping tool or service on the map site. Then, I need to search for hotels near the conference center. After that, I have to filter the results to only include hotels within a 5-minute walking distance. Once the relevant hotels are selected, the interface should display a map showing these locations. Finally, the user should be able to view this map on the map site.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies, I see US1 is about navigating to a page or section, which fits for going to the map site. US3 is for configuring parameters, which would be setting the search area and distance. US4 is for executing actions, which would be generating the map. So the strategies should be US1, US3, and US4.\n\nI need to make sure each step aligns with these strategies. Navigating to the map site is US1. Configuring the search parameters is US3. Executing the action to generate the map is US4. \n\nI think that covers all the necessary steps without needing any additional strategies. This should fulfill the user's request effectively."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 221,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 221,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Map/Geolocation\",\n \"Search for USPS Postal Office\",\n \"Select Transportation Method\",\n \"Calculate Travel Time\",\n \"View Travel Time Results\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US2\", \"US4\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to handle this task where the user is asking about the time it takes from CMU Pittsburgh to the nearest USPS postal office using different transportation methods. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I need to understand what the user is asking for. They're at CMU Pittsburgh and want to know the duration it takes to the nearest USPS postal office. They also mentioned different transportation methods, so I guess they're interested in knowing how long it would take via various means, like driving, public transit, biking, etc.\n\nNow, looking at the provided strategies, I need to map this scenario to the available universal strategies. Let me go through each part.\n\n1. **Identify the Starting Point**: The user is at CMU Pittsburgh. So, the first step would be to navigate to the map interface that shows the location. That would correspond to \"US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\"\n\n2. **Search for USPS Postal Offices**: Once on the map, the user needs to find the nearest USPS postal office. This likely involves searching within the map application, which would fall under \"US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data.\"\n\n3. **Select Different Transportation Methods**: After identifying the USPS office, the user wants to know the time taken via different methods. This probably means setting the transportation mode in the map application, which is another \"US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data\" step because it's filtering the results based on transportation options.\n\n4. **Calculate Travel Time**: The map application should be able to calculate the travel time based on the selected transportation method. This might involve using a navigation feature, which would be \"US4: Execute Action/Process,\" specifically clicking a \"Calculate\" or \"Get Directions\" button.\n\n5. **View Results**: Finally, the user needs to view the results, which would involve \"US5: View/Inspect Item Details\" to see the detailed information about each transportation option and its estimated time.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would involve navigating to the map, searching and filtering for USPS offices, selecting transportation methods, executing the calculation, and viewing the results. Each of these steps maps directly to the universal strategies provided.\n\nI should also consider if there are any other steps, like perhaps exporting the data or making a printout, but based on the user's query, it seems they just want to know the time via different methods, so those extra steps might not be necessary.\n\nAnother thought: maybe the map application has a feature to set the starting point (CMU Pittsburgh) and then calculate multiple routes. If that's the case, navigating to the map and setting the location would be the first step, then searching for USPS offices, selecting transportation modes, calculating each route, and then viewing each result. That might streamline some steps, but I think breaking it down into five separate strategies is clearer for the user.\n\nI also need to make sure that I'm referencing the correct universal strategy IDs. Let me double-check each step:\n\n- Navigating to the map: US1\n- Searching and filtering USPS offices: US2\n- Selecting transportation methods: US2 again\n- Calculating time: US4\n- Viewing results: US5\n\nThat seems accurate. I don't think I need any additional strategies beyond these five.\n\nLastly, I should structure the output as specified, including the task ID, strategies in order, the IDs of the universal strategies used, and the reasons for each mapping. That way, the GUI Agent can clearly understand the plan and execute it step by step."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 225,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 225,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Customer Reviews for Brush\",\n \"Filter Reviews to Show Only Brushes\",\n \"Extract Customer Reviews for Brushes\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to help the user with their task. The task is to determine what customers say about brushes from Sephora. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, the user is asking about customer reviews for brush products on Sephora. So, I need to navigate to a section where these reviews are available. On the Sephora website, I know that reviews are typically found in customer review sections, often under product pages or in a dedicated reviews area.\n\nNext, once I'm on the correct page, I should look for any filters or search options. Since the intent is specifically about brushes, I'll need to filter the results to show only brush reviews. This might involve checking a filter dropdown or using search functionality to limit results to brushes.\n\nAfter filtering, I can then retrieve the information needed, which in this case is just the text of the reviews. I might need to extract specific details from the review snippets, like the date posted, the reviewer's name, and the summary of their experience with the brush.\n\nOnce I have all the relevant information, the next step is to analyze or evaluate the data. This could involve looking for common themes, positive or negative feedback, or any standout reviews that might be particularly helpful for the user.\n\nPutting this together, the strategies I would use are: navigating to the page where reviews are displayed, configuring the filters to focus on brushes, and then extracting the necessary information from those reviews. Each of these steps corresponds to specific universal strategies—US1 for navigating, US2 for filtering, and US6 for extracting information.\n\nI should make sure that each step is clearly defined and that the universal strategy IDs are correctly referenced. This way, the GUI Agent can follow the instructions precisely to complete the task effectively."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 227,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 227,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Product List\",\n \"Filter Products by Brand\",\n \"Extract Price Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to complete this task. The user has given me an example of how to structure the JSON output, and now they've provided a new task. I need to break down this task into the appropriate universal strategies.\n\nFirst, let me understand the task. The user wants to know the price range for products from EYZUTAK. So, I need to find that information on the shopping interface. \n\nLooking at the universal strategies, I should start by identifying which ones fit. The first step is likely to navigate to a specific section where these products are listed. That would correspond to US1: \"Navigate To Page/Section\".\n\nOnce on that page, I probably need to filter the products to show only those from EYZUTAK. That would involve using a filter function, which falls under US2: \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\".\n\nAfter filtering, the next step is to retrieve the price range. That means extracting the price information from the displayed products, which is US6: \"Extract/Retrieve Information\".\n\nSo, putting it all together, the strategies would be navigating to the products section, filtering by the brand, and extracting the price data. The corresponding universal strategy IDs would be US1, US2, and US6.\n\nI should make sure the JSON structure matches the example provided. The task_id is 227, the sites are [\"shopping\"], and the strategies are listed with their IDs. \n\nWait, the example output included \"intent\" in the JSON, but in the new task, the intent isn't provided. However, since the user provided an example that included \"intent\", maybe it's better to include it. But in the output example, it wasn't necessary. Hmm, perhaps the \"intent\" is part of the task data, but the output doesn't need it. I'll stick to the example's structure.\n\nSo, the final JSON should have task_id, strategies with their IDs, and the list of universal strategy IDs. No need for \"intent\" in the output as per the example.\n\nI think that's all. Let me structure it correctly."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 23,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 23,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Reviews Section\",\n \"Filter Reviews by Mentioning Fingerprint Resistant\",\n \"Extract Reviewer Names from Filtered Reviews\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, so the user has provided a task that needs to be broken down into strategy steps using the Universal Strategy Templates. Let me start by understanding the task itself.\n\nThe task is to list out reviewers, if they exist, who mention about good fingerprint resistant products. So, the goal is to identify reviewers who have good fingerprint resistance in their product mentions.\n\nFirst, I need to figure out what steps are necessary to accomplish this. The user is likely working within a web interface, perhaps a review or product management site. The task involves navigating to a section where reviews are displayed, filtering those that mention fingerprint resistance, and then extracting the reviewer names.\n\nLooking at the Universal Strategies, let me go through each ID to see which ones fit.\n\n1. **US1: Navigate To Page/Section** - This makes sense because the first step is to go to the Reviews section. Without navigating there, we can't perform any further actions. So, that's the first strategy.\n\n2. **US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data** - Once on the Reviews page, the next step is to filter the reviews. The user is interested in those mentioning fingerprint resistance. So, using a search or filter function here is essential. That's the second strategy.\n\n3. **US6: Extract/Retrieve Information** - After filtering, the next step is to retrieve the information we need, which is the list of reviewers. This involves extracting the names of the reviewers from the filtered results. That fits the third strategy.\n\nI should make sure that each step logically follows the previous one. Starting with navigation, then filtering, and finally extracting the data. It seems straightforward, but I need to ensure that all steps are covered without any overlaps or unnecessary steps.\n\nI also need to reference the correct Universal Strategy IDs to meet the user's requirement. So, US1 for navigation, US2 for filtering, and US6 for extracting information. That covers all the necessary actions.\n\nI don't think any other strategies are needed here. For example, there's no need to sort data unless the user specified it, which they didn't. So, sticking to the three steps should suffice.\n\nIn summary, the task involves navigating to the reviews, filtering for specific mentions, and extracting the reviewer names. Each of these steps corresponds to the Universal Strategies US1, US2, and US6, with their respective IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 235,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 235,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Recent Orders\",\n \"Filter Orders by 'Under Delivery'\",\n \"View Most Recent Under Delivery Order\",\n \"Extract Order Number from Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US5\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to create a strategy for this task: \"Get the order number of my most recent under delivery order\" on the \"shopping\" site. Hmm, let me break this down.\n\nFirst, I think I need to navigate to the right section where under delivery orders are listed. Probably, there's a section for orders that I can find by clicking a link or maybe it's on the homepage. So that would be using US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\n\nOnce I'm in the orders section, I need to find the under delivery orders. Maybe there's a filter or a specific list for under delivery. That might involve using US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data to narrow down the list. So I'll set the filter to \"Under Delivery\" or something like that.\n\nAfter filtering, I need to find the most recent order. Usually, the most recent items are at the top or bottom of the list. I'll have to scroll or use pagination if there are many results. So that might involve US8: Navigate Within Data/Results, using the pagination controls to go to the next page until I find the most recent one.\n\nOnce I find the order, I need to get its number. I can click on the order to view its details. That would be US5: View/Inspect Item Details. In the details, I should be able to see the order number there. Maybe it's in a specific field like \"Order ID\" or \"Transaction ID.\"\n\nWait, do I need to extract the information? Yes, I think so. So after viewing the details, I might need to use US6: Extract/Retrieve Information to pull out the order number from the details section.\n\nPutting it all together: navigate to the orders, filter for under delivery, navigate through results, view the order details, and extract the number. The universal strategies used would be US1, US2, US8, US5, and US6 with their respective IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 236,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 236,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to the Map\",\n \"View Carnegie Mellon Details\",\n \"Search for Pharmacies within 20mins\",\n \"View Pharmacy Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US5\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I have this task where I need to figure out the best strategies to achieve it using the provided universal strategies. The task is about finding the nearest pharmacy from Carnegie Mellon within a 20-minute walk. Let me break it down step by step.\n\nFirst, I need to navigate to the map section. The site in question is \"map,\" so I'll use the \"Navigate to Page/Section\" strategy, which is US1. That makes sense because I need to be on the map interface to start looking for the pharmacy.\n\nOnce I'm on the map, I need to locate Carnegie Mellon. Carnegie Mellon is a well-known institution, so it should have a prominent marker or label on the map. I'll use the \"View/Inspect Item Details\" strategy, US5, to zoom in on Carnegie Mellon's location. This way, I can see exactly where it is and then look for nearby pharmacies.\n\nAfter identifying Carnegie Mellon's position, the next step is to search for nearby pharmacies. The map interface likely has a feature to find nearby businesses. I'll use the \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\" strategy, US2, to filter the results by proximity. I'll set the maximum distance to 20 minutes, which I assume translates to 1.2 miles (since a 20-minute walk is roughly that distance). This will give me a list of pharmacies within the desired range.\n\nOnce the search is done, I need to view the details of these pharmacies to get more information. I'll use the \"View/Inspect Item Details\" strategy again, US5, to click on each pharmacy's marker. This will display their addresses, opening times, and other relevant details, helping me make an informed decision.\n\nFinally, after reviewing all the options, I need to either select the nearest pharmacy or note that none are within the specified distance. The \"Execute Action/Process\" strategy, US4, would be used here to confirm the selection or take further action if needed.\n\nPutting it all together, the steps involve navigating to the map, viewing details, searching by location, and then viewing each pharmacy's details. The corresponding universal strategies are US1, US5, US2, and US4. This sequence ensures I efficiently find the nearest pharmacy within the given time frame."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 240,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US10",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 240,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Competitive Swimwear Section\",\n \"Filter to Competitive Swimwear Category\",\n \"Extract Information about Most Expensive Product\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, let me try to figure out how to approach this task. So, the user has a task where they need to perform a market survey for one stop market, specifically showing the most expensive product from the competitive swimwear category. \n\nFirst, I need to break this down into steps. The main goal is to find the most expensive product in that category. So, I think the first step would be to navigate to the competitive swimwear section on the website. That makes sense because without seeing the products, I can't look through them. So, that would correspond to the \"Navigate To Page/Section\" strategy, which is US1.\n\nOnce I'm in the competitive swimwear section, the next step is to find the swimwear category. I'm assuming there's a way to browse or select categories within the swimwear section. So, I might need to use the search or filter function to select competitive swimwear. Looking at the universal strategies, US2 is about searching or filtering data, so that fits here.\n\nAfter selecting the category, the next step is to look for the most expensive product. I think the interface would have a way to sort products by price, maybe a sort option or a button that says \"Sort by Price.\" Once I select that, the most expensive product should appear. So, this would be part of configuring parameters or settings, which is US3.\n\nOnce the product is displayed, the next step is to view its details. I need to make sure that the strategy includes viewing the product details, so that the most expensive product's information is accessible. That would be US5, the \"View/Inspect Item Details\" strategy.\n\nFinally, after viewing the details, the task is to show that product, so I need to extract the information about the most expensive product. That would involve using the \"Extract/Retrieve Information\" strategy, which is US6.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be: navigate to the competitive swimwear section, search/filter to select that category, sort the products by price, view the details, and extract the information. The corresponding universal strategy IDs are US1, US2, US3, and US6.\n\nWait, but the output example only includes three strategies. Hmm, maybe I'm overcomplicating. Let me check the example again. In the example, they had three strategies, each with a universal strategy. So, perhaps I should only include the main strategies, not every single step. So, maybe the main steps are navigating to the section, selecting the category, and then extracting the information. That would be US1, US2, and US6. \n\nAlternatively, maybe the extraction is part of the process after viewing the details. So, perhaps the steps are: navigate to the section (US1), filter to the category (US2), and then extract the information (US6). That makes sense because the user just needs to know the most expensive product, so extracting that information is the final step.\n\nSo, the strategies would be \"Navigate to Competitive Swimwear Section\", \"Filter to Competitive Swimwear Category\", and \"Extract Information about Most Expensive Product\". The corresponding IDs would be US1, US2, and US6.\n\nI think that's a solid breakdown. It covers navigating to the right place, filtering to the category, and then extracting the required information. It's efficient and covers all necessary steps without unnecessary details."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 247,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 247,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Customer Satisfaction Report\",\n \"Filter Customers by Dissatisfaction Level\",\n \"View Details of Most Unhappy Customer\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, I need to figure out how to create a strategy for the given task using the provided universal strategies. The task is to show the email address of the most unhappy customer with Zoe products. Let me break it down step by step.\n\nFirst, I think the user wants to find out which customer is the most unhappy with Zoe products. So, I need to locate that customer. That probably involves navigating to a customer satisfaction report or section. Looking at the strategies, US1 is about navigating to a page, so that's a good start.\n\nOnce on the report, the user likely needs to filter the data to show the most unhappy customers. US2 is for searching or filtering data, so that fits here. They can set the filter to identify the most dissatisfied customers based on some metric, like a satisfaction score.\n\nAfter filtering, the next step would be to view the details of that specific customer to get their email address. US5 is about viewing item details, which would allow the user to see the customer's information, including their email.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be: navigate to the customer satisfaction report, configure the filter to show the most unhappy, and then view the details of the top customer. The corresponding universal strategy IDs would be US1, US2, and US5."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 250,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 250,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Map of Apple Stores\",\n \"Search for Apple Store near Pitt\",\n \"Extract Coordinates from Result\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate Within Data/Results\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US8\", \"US2\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to help the user with their task. The task is to find the coordinates of the Apple Store near Pitt in DD format using a web interface. The user provided some instructions about using a GUI Agent to plan tasks using universal strategies.\n\nFirst, I need to break down the task into smaller steps. The main goal is to get the coordinates, so I think the first step would be to navigate to a map of the Apple Store locations. That makes sense because maps are great for showing physical locations.\n\nOnce I'm on the map, I probably need to search for \"Apple Store near Pitt.\" So the next step would be to search on the map. That would involve using a search function, which falls under US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data.\n\nAfter searching, I should get a list of Apple Stores and their locations. The user wants the coordinates, so I need to extract that information. That would be US6: Extract/Retrieve Information, where I click on the store near Pitt and retrieve its coordinates.\n\nFinally, I need to present the coordinates in DD format, so I might need to do some formatting. But since the user's examples didn't include data extraction beyond the UI, maybe that's handled elsewhere. So the last step could be to format the data, which might not be a universal strategy but part of the process.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be: navigate to the map, search for the store, retrieve the coordinates, and format them. The corresponding universal strategy IDs would be US8 for navigating within the map, US2 for searching, and US6 for extracting data. I might also need to consider US1 for navigating to a specific page, but in this case, the initial step is about the map, so US8 covers that.\n\nI think that's the logical flow. So the strategies array would include navigating to the map, searching for the store, and extracting the coordinates. The universal strategy IDs would be US8, US2, and US6. I should make sure the JSON output follows the required structure, including task_id, strategies, universal_strategies, and universal_strategy_ids."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 254,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 254,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to the map view\",\n \"Search/Filter the map to find Western Pennsylvania Hospital\",\n \"View the phone number of Western Pennsylvania Hospital\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, let's break down the user's task. They need to find the phone number of Western Pennsylvania Hospital using a web interface. The input includes task_id 254, site \"map\", and intent to get the phone number.\n\nFirst, I think about the steps involved. They probably need to navigate to a map view on the site. So, the first strategy would be to go to the map section, which aligns with US1.\n\nNext, once on the map, they need to locate the specific hospital. They might have to search or filter the map to find it. This falls under US2 for searching data.\n\nAfter finding the hospital on the map, they need to retrieve the phone number. This would involve viewing the details, which is US5.\n\nI should make sure the strategies are in the right order and each step logically follows the previous one. Also, I need to reference the correct universal strategy IDs: US1, US2, and US5.\n\nPutting it all together, the output should list each strategy clearly, along with the corresponding IDs. I'll structure it as per the example provided, ensuring the JSON is correctly formatted."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 258,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 258,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"View All Public Projects\",\n \"Filter Projects to Public\",\n \"View Public Project Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US5\", \"US2\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "嗯，我现在需要解决一个关于在Web界面完成任务的问题。任务是“见所有公共项目”，任务ID是258，使用的 sites 是[\"gitlab\"]。首先，我得理解这个任务的具体要求是什么。用户想要看到所有公开的项目，这可能意味着他们想查看一个特定平台上的公开项目列表，比如GitHub或GitLab上的公开项目。\n\n接下来，我需要考虑如何通过Web界面来实现这个目标。通常，查看项目列表需要导航到一个特定的页面，然后可能需要筛选或查找公开项目。因此，我应该寻找合适的策略步骤。\n\n首先，我应该计划如何导航到正确的页面。这可能涉及到“导航到页面/部分”，也就是Universal Strategy ID US1。这一步通常是完成任何任务的第一步，确保用户能到达正确的起点。\n\n然后，我需要确保所见的项目都是公开的。这可能需要使用筛选功能，也就是“搜索/过滤/排序数据”，对应 Universal Strategy ID US2。通过这种方法，用户可以筛选出公开项目的列表。\n\n最后，用户可能需要查看或分析这些项目的详细信息。这可能涉及到“查看/查看细节”，也就是US5。这一步可以帮助用户深入了解每个项目的具体情况。\n\n我需要确保每个步骤都符合用户的需求，并且逻辑清晰。导航到页面，然后筛选公开项目，最后查看细节。这样的步骤应该能够满足用户的需求，让他们看到所有公共项目。\n\n另外，我需要确保每个策略都有对应的模板，并且引用正确的Universal Strategy ID。这样，整个策略设计会更规范，也更容易被理解。\n\n总结一下，我会按照这个思路来设计策略，确保每个步骤都符合用户的需求，并且引用正确的策略模板。"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 259,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 259,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Settings/Access Tokens\",\n \"Activate RSS Feed Token\",\n \"Generate and Submit RSS Feed Token\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to get the RSS feed token using Gitlab. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I remember that Gitlab has some settings where you can manage your access tokens. I think it's under the settings menu. So, I should start by going to the Gitlab interface and looking for where the settings are. That probably involves navigating to the settings section, which is usually a gear icon or something similar.\n\nOnce I'm in the settings, I need to find the access tokens. I recall that tokens are important for authentication, so they're probably stored there. I'll look for a section labeled \"Access tokens\" or something similar. Once I find that, I should see an option for the RSS feed token. If it's not listed there, maybe it's generated automatically, and I can create a new one if needed.\n\nAfter finding or creating the token, I need to make sure it's active. Sometimes, tokens have expiration dates, so I should check that the RSS feed token is still valid and not expired. If it's expired, I might need to generate a new one, which brings me back to the same step.\n\nOnce the token is confirmed as active and valid, I can use it to access the RSS feed. I might need to input the token into a specific field on the Gitlab interface when trying to retrieve the RSS feed. It's important to ensure that the token is correctly entered to avoid any authentication issues.\n\nI should also consider if there are any additional steps, like requesting the token from a manager or following specific procedures within Gitlab. Sometimes, tokens are requested through a particular workflow, so it's worth checking if there's an official method to obtain this token.\n\nTo summarize, the main steps are: navigate to the settings, locate and activate the RSS feed token, and then use the token to access the RSS feed. I need to make sure each step is followed correctly and that the token is valid before proceeding to use it.\n\nI think the Universal Strategies that apply here are US1 for navigating to the settings page, US3 for configuring parameters (in this case, activating the token), and US4 for executing the action of using the token to access the RSS feed. So, I'll structure the strategy using these templates to ensure the task is completed effectively."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 268,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 268,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Map to locate Vinalhaven, ME\",\n \"Search and Find Nearest National Park\",\n \"Calculate and Retrieve Bike Time\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate Within Data/Results\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US8\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, so I need to figure out how to complete this task using the Universal Strategy Templates provided. The task is to find out what the closest national park to Vinalhaven, ME is and how long it takes to bike there. The sites mentioned are Wikipedia and Map.\n\nFirst, I should break down the task into smaller steps. The user wants two pieces of information: the nearest national park and the bike time. So, I'll need to navigate to a source that provides both location and transportation details.\n\nLooking at the Universal Strategies, US1 is about navigating to a specific page. That makes sense because I need to go to a map site. US8 is for navigating within data results, which would help in finding the nearest park and the biking duration. US4 is executing an action, which would involve searching and generating the information.\n\nI think the first step is to navigate to the map site, probably Wikipedia's map section. Then, within the map results, I need to search for Vinalhaven, ME and find the nearest national park. Once located, I can use the biking time feature or calculate the distance and time based on available data. Finally, I'll execute the action to retrieve and display this information.\n\nI should make sure each step aligns with the provided strategies to ensure the task is completed efficiently."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 27,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 27,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Showerthoughts Section\",\n \"View Latest Post and Comments\",\n \"Generate Comment Count Summary\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US5\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, I need to figure out how to complete this task using the Universal Strategy Templates provided. The task is about Reddit, specifically looking at Showerthoughts forum comments. The user wants the count of comments that have more downvotes than upvotes, and it's for the person who made the latest post.\n\nFirst, I should break down the task into steps. The main goal is to count these specific comments. So, I probably need to navigate to the correct section on Reddit. That sounds like using US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\n\nNext, once on the forum, I need to look at the latest post and then check its comments. I think comments are usually below the post, so I might need to scroll down. But scrolling isn't one of the provided strategies, so I'll have to note that as a possible action but maybe not a strategy. Then, I need to review each comment to count those with more downvotes than upvotes.\n\nSo, the first strategy is to go to the Showerthoughts section. Then, find the latest post and its comments. After that, go through each comment to count those meeting the criteria. \n\nLooking at the examples, the output includes the strategies used and their IDs. In the example, US1, US3, and US4 were used. Here, navigating to the section is US1, configuring parameters (maybe not needed here), and executing the process (US4) would be applicable. \n\nI should make sure that the strategies fit the task. US1 is definitely needed to get to the right place. US4 is about executing an action, which in this case is reviewing the comments. But wait, is there a step where I set parameters? Maybe not, because the task doesn't specify any filters. So perhaps it's just US1 and US4.\n\nWait, but to count the comments, I need to inspect each one, which might fall under US5: View/Inspect Item Details. So maybe I should include that as well.\n\nPutting it all together, the steps would be:\n\n1. Navigate to the Showerthoughts section on reddit.com (US1).\n2. View the latest post and its comments (US5).\n3. Inspect each comment to count those with more downvotes than upvotes (US5 again? Or maybe US6 to extract information about votes).\n4. Generate a report or summary of the count (US4).\n\nHmm, but the example output had three strategies: navigate, configure, generate. In this case, configure might not be necessary, but if there's a need to set something, maybe US3. But since the task doesn't mention any parameters, maybe it's not needed.\n\nI think the best approach is to use US1 to navigate, US5 to view comments, and US4 to generate the count. Alternatively, if extracting information is needed, US6 might be used. \n\nWait, the task is to count, so perhaps US6 is extracting the information (the votes), and then US4 is generating the report. So the strategies would be US1, US5, and US6. But looking at the example, the strategies are US1, US3, and US4. Maybe the example used US3 for configuration, which isn't needed here.\n\nI'm a bit confused about which strategies to use. Maybe I should stick to what makes sense for counting the comments.\n\nSo, the final strategies would be:\n\n1. Navigate to Showerthoughts (US1).\n2. View the latest post and comments (US5).\n3. Extract the downvotes and upvotes, then count those with more downvotes (US6).\n4. Generate the count (US4).\n\nBut since the output requires a list, maybe it's better to combine steps. Maybe after viewing the comments (US5), extract the information (US6), then generate the count (US4). Alternatively, if the extraction is part of the viewing, then perhaps just US1 and US4.\n\nI think the most straightforward way is to use US1, US5, and US6. But I'm not sure if US6 is necessary. Perhaps just US1 to go to the section, then US4 to generate the count after viewing the comments. But I'm not certain about the exact steps.\n\nIn the example, they used US1, US3, and US4. Maybe in this case, since there's no configuration needed, US3 isn't used, and instead, US5 and US6 are used. But I'm not entirely sure how to structure it.\n\nI think I'll go with US1, US5, and US4 as the strategies, even though US6 might be involved in extracting the information. Maybe the example used US3 for a different task where configuration was needed."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 270,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 270,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Products List\",\n \"Filter Products by Price and Category\",\n \"Generate Product List\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to handle this task. The user has given me a JSON input with a task_id of 270, sites as [\"shopping\"], and an intent to show products under $30 in the \"men shoes\" category. I need to break this down into strategies using the provided universal strategies.\n\nFirst, I think about what the intent is. They want to see products that are priced under $30 specifically within the \"men shoes\" category. So, I need to navigate to the right section where these products are displayed.\n\nLooking at the strategies, US1 is about navigating to a page or section, which makes sense here. So I'll start with that. I'll plan to navigate to a products listing page, maybe under a men's shoes category.\n\nNext, once I'm on that page, I need to find the products under $30. That probably involves filtering. So, I should look for a filtering option, which would be US2: Search/Filter/Data. I'll set the price range to under $30.\n\nAfter filtering, I'll need to view the results. So, I should use US5: View/Inspect Details to open the detailed view of these products. But wait, maybe I need to retrieve the information first, so perhaps using US6: Extract/Retrieve Information to get the list of products under $30. Hmm, but the main action is to show the products, so maybe I can skip extracting and just view them directly.\n\nAlternatively, maybe I should extract the list first and then view them. I'm a bit confused here. Let me think. If I first extract the list, I can then view the details, but perhaps it's more efficient to navigate, filter, and then view directly. So maybe US1, US2, and then US5.\n\nWait, but looking at the example, they had US1, US3, US4. So perhaps in the example, they navigated, configured parameters, and then executed the process. In this case, the process is to generate or display the results. So maybe I don't need US4, but just US1, US2, and US5.\n\nBut let me check the universal strategies. US1 is navigate, US2 is search/filter, US5 is view/inspect. So the steps would be: navigate to the products page (US1), filter by price and category (US2), then view the results (US5). So the strategies would be US1, US2, US5, with IDs 1, 2, 5.\n\nWait, but in the example, they had US1, US3, US4. So maybe in their case, after navigating, they configured parameters and then executed. In this case, perhaps after filtering, the view is generated, so maybe US5 is the execute action. Hmm, but US5 is more about viewing details, not generating the report.\n\nAlternatively, maybe after filtering, the list is generated, so perhaps US4: Execute Action/Process. So the steps would be US1, US2, US4. That makes sense because you navigate, filter, then execute the action to generate the list.\n\nWait, but the example used US4 for generating the report. So in that case, the process is to generate the report after setting parameters. So in our case, after filtering, we need to generate the list of products. So perhaps US4 is the execute action step.\n\nSo, putting it all together: US1 for navigating to the products page, US2 for filtering by price and category, and US4 for generating the list. That seems logical because you first go to the page, then filter it, then generate the result.\n\nI think that makes sense. So the strategies would be US1, US2, US4 with IDs 1, 2, 4. That should cover navigating to the products page, filtering to under $30 and the men's shoes category, and then generating the list to display the results."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 276,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US2"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": true,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 276,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Search for Switch Accessories\",\n \"Search for Switch Accessories in Shopping Section\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US2\", \"US2\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to complete this task. The user has given me a JSON input with a task_id of 276, sites set to [\"shopping\"], and an intent to search for \"switch accessories\". I need to generate a strategy design using the universal strategies provided.\n\nFirst, I need to understand the intent. The user wants to search for \"switch accessories\" in the shopping section. So, the main action here is searching. Looking at the universal strategies, there's US2 which is about searching, filtering, or sorting data. That seems like a good fit.\n\nNext, I should think about the steps involved. The first step would be to navigate to the correct page where \"switch accessories\" are displayed. Since the site is \"shopping\", I assume there's a search bar or category section. So, I might need to use US1, which is navigating to a page or section. Maybe I should say something like \"Navigate to the Shopping Page\" and then \"Search for Switch Accessories\" as separate strategies.\n\nWait, but do I need both US1 and US2? Because navigating to the page would set the stage for searching. So, the sequence would be: first navigate to the shopping page, then perform the search. That makes sense.\n\nI should also consider if there are any other steps. Maybe after searching, I would need to retrieve the results, but since the intent is just to search, I don't need to go further than that. So, the strategies would be: navigate to the shopping page, search for \"switch accessories\".\n\nLooking back at the examples, they often combine navigation and searching. So, I'll follow that structure. I'll map the steps to the universal strategies, making sure to reference the correct IDs. US1 for navigating and US2 for searching.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies array would have two steps, and the universal_strategies would include both US1 and US2, with their respective IDs.\n\nI think that covers it. Let me make sure I'm not missing anything. The task is straightforward: search for specific items. So, just navigating and searching should suffice. No need for any parameters or configurations unless specified, which it isn't here."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 279,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 279,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Search for Sony Bluetooth Headphones\",\n \"Filter Results by Sony Brand\",\n \"View Product Details\",\n \"Extract Price Information\",\n \"Compile and Share the Report\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US2\", \"US5\", \"US6\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to complete this task. The user wants me to act as a GUI Agent and follow the Universal Strategy Templates provided. The task is to provide the complete names of Bluetooth headphones from Sony and share the price range for the available models.\n\nFirst, I need to break down the task into steps. The main goal is to search for Sony Bluetooth headphones, get their names, and find the price range. \n\nStep 1: Navigate to the product search page. That makes sense because I need to look for specific products. I think US1 is about navigating to a page, so that's a good fit.\n\nOnce on the search page, I need to filter the results to find Sony products. So, I'll go into the search filters and select Sony as the brand. This is US2 because it's about searching and filtering data.\n\nAfter filtering, I need to retrieve the complete names of the headphones. So, I'll click on each product to view their details. That's US5, which is about viewing or inspecting item details.\n\nNow, for the price range, I need to extract the price information from each product. That's US6, where I'll read and capture the price data from the product details.\n\nFinally, after gathering all the information, I need to compile it into a report or presentation. That's US4, which involves executing an action, in this case, compiling the information.\n\nSo, putting it all together, the strategies are: navigate to the product search, search and filter for Sony headphones, view product details, extract price information, and execute the report."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 283,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 283,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Xbox Products\",\n \"Filter Products by Release Date (2020-2021)\",\n \"View Most Recent Models\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to help the user with their task. The user provided a task where they want to look up the most recent models of Xbox controllers released between 2020-2021. I remember the instructions mentioned using Universal Strategies with IDs, so I should break this down into steps and match them to the right strategies.\n\nFirst, I think the user needs to go to the right section of the web interface. Xbox controllers are probably on a specific page, maybe a \"Products\" or \"Games\" section. So I'll use US1, which is \"Navigate To Page/Section.\"\n\nOnce on that page, the user wants to find models released in 2020-2021. That sounds like filtering. So I'll use US7, \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data,\" where they can filter by release date. Or wait, maybe US2 is better because it's specifically about searching or filtering data. Hmm, US2 is \"Search/Filter/Sort Data,\" which makes more sense for filtering by date range.\n\nAfter filtering, they might need to sort the results to see the most recent ones. That would fall under US8, \"Navigate Within Data/Results,\" using the sorting controls.\n\nFinally, they should review the results to confirm the models. So US7 again, \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data,\" might be appropriate here to ensure the correct models are displayed and to verify the data meets their criteria.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be navigating to the products section, configuring the filters, generating or viewing the results, and then analyzing or reviewing them. The corresponding IDs would be US1, US2, and US7. I need to make sure each step logically follows the previous one and covers all aspects of the user's intent."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 285,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US7",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 285,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Switch Case Accessories\",\n \"Filter Products by Minimum Storage Capacity of 15\",\n \"View Details of Least Expensive Switch Card Holder\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, let me try to figure out how to approach this task. So, the user has provided a task where I need to generate a strategy for a web interface. The task is to \"Show the least expensive switch card holder with a minimum storage capacity of 15 cards.\" on the \"shopping\" site.\n\nFirst, I'll break down the task. The goal is to find a specific product: the least expensive switch card holder that can hold at least 15 cards. So, I need to navigate to the right section of the website, filter the products accordingly, and then retrieve the information about the cheapest one.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies provided, I can start by identifying the steps needed. The first step is to navigate to the correct section where switch card holders are displayed. That would be \"Switch Case Accessories\" on the shopping site. So, that's US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\n\nOnce on that page, the next step is to filter the products. The user wants at least 15 cards, so I need to use the filter function. That falls under US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data.\n\nAfter filtering, the next step is to find the least expensive option. This would involve either viewing the prices and selecting the cheapest or using a sort function to order by price. That would be US6: Extract/Retrieve Information if I need to read the price, or perhaps US4: Execute Action/Process if I need to perform a manual selection.\n\nWait, maybe it's more accurate to say that after filtering, we need to retrieve the information about the cheapest product. So, extracting the price data would be US6. Alternatively, if we just need to view the product details, that's US5: View/Inspect Item Details.\n\nBut since the task is to show the product, I think the main steps are navigating, filtering, and then retrieving the product details. So the strategies would be US1, US2, and US5 or US6 depending on whether we need the price extracted or just the product view.\n\nWait, the output example includes US1, US3, US4. Let me check the example again. The example task was to generate a sales report, so they used US1 to navigate to the reports section, US3 to configure settings, and US4 to generate the report.\n\nIn our case, after navigating to the switch card holders, we need to filter by storage capacity and then retrieve the cheapest one. So, after filtering, we need to view the product details to identify the cheapest. So that would be US5.\n\nAlternatively, if we need to extract the price data, it would be US6. But the output example shows that after configuring settings, they execute the action, so perhaps in this case, after filtering, they execute the action to retrieve the product.\n\nWait, perhaps the steps are: navigate to the accessories section (US1), filter by storage capacity (US2), and then execute the action to retrieve the product details, which would be US4. Or if they need to extract the price, it's US6.\n\nBut the output example includes US4 for executing the action. So perhaps, after filtering, they execute the action to retrieve the product details, which would be US4.\n\nAlternatively, maybe US5 is needed to view the product details after filtering. So the strategies would be US1, US2, and US5.\n\nWait, but in the example, they used US4 to generate the report, which is an action. So in our case, after filtering, we need to retrieve the product, which might involve viewing its details or extracting information.\n\nI think the appropriate strategies are US1 (navigate to the accessories section), US2 (filter by storage capacity), and US5 (view the product details). So the universal_strategy_ids would be US1, US2, US5.\n\nBut wait, the user's task is to show the least expensive product, so perhaps after filtering, they need to execute an action to retrieve the product, which would be US4.\n\nHmm, I'm a bit confused. Let me think again. The task is to show the product, so the main steps are:\n\n1. Navigate to the accessories section (US1).\n2. Filter by minimum storage capacity of 15 cards (US2).\n3. Retrieve the product details (US5).\n\nAlternatively, if they need to extract the price, it's US6. But since the task is to show the product, I think viewing the details is sufficient, so US5.\n\nBut wait, the output example shows that after configuring settings (US3), they execute the action (US4). So perhaps in our case, after filtering, they need to execute an action to retrieve the product, which would be US4.\n\nI'm a bit torn between US5 and US4. Let me check the universal strategies again. US5 is about viewing or inspecting item details, while US4 is about executing an action. So if the goal is to show the product, viewing its details (US5) makes sense. But if the goal is to retrieve the price, then US6.\n\nSince the task is to show the product, I think US5 is appropriate. So the strategies would be US1, US2, and US5.\n\nWait, but in the example, they used US4. Maybe because they needed to generate a report, which is an action. So in our case, after filtering, we need to retrieve the product, which could be an action.\n\nAlternatively, maybe the action is to submit the search, which would be US4.\n\nI think I'll go with US1, US2, and US5, as the main steps are navigate, filter, and view the product."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 287,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 287,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to the Map\",\n \"Generate and Review the Route\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to solve this task. The task is to determine how much time it takes to travel from Pittsburgh to Philadelphia by car using a map website. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I should figure out which strategy to use. The task is asking for a travel time, so I need to navigate to a map that shows the route and possibly calculates the driving time. Looking at the universal strategies, US1 is about navigating to a page or section, which fits because I need to go to a map.\n\nOnce on the map, I probably need to select the starting point, which is Pittsburgh. I'm not sure if the map will automatically detect my location, so maybe I have to click on \"Set My Location\" or something similar. That might be part of the navigation steps.\n\nNext, I need to choose the destination, Philadelphia. Again, the map should have this option, maybe by clicking on a marker or selecting it from a list. After setting the start and end points, the map should display the route and the estimated driving time.\n\nI'm wondering if the map also provides a detailed route, like the route planner. If so, I might need to use that feature to get a more detailed route, which would be another step. However, the main task is just to find the driving time, so maybe that's optional.\n\nI should check if there are any other steps, like entering a departure time or considering traffic conditions. But since the task is about the time it takes by car, I think just the driving time is sufficient. Unless the map provides additional options, which I might need to include.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would involve navigating to the map (US1), setting the location (maybe another US1 step), selecting the destination (US1 again), and then generating the route and time (US4, which is execute action). So, three strategies in total.\n\nWait, but navigating to the map is US1, then within that, setting the location might also be US1, but perhaps it's considered part of the same strategy. Alternatively, maybe it's a separate step, but I think it's part of navigating to the page. Then, once on the map, selecting the route and generating the time would be US4.\n\nI'm a bit confused about whether setting the location is a separate strategy or part of navigating to the page. Maybe it's part of US1. Then, after setting it, I execute the action to get the time, which is US4.\n\nSo, the strategies would be: navigate to the map (US1), generate and review the route (US4). But I might also need to select the route, which could be another step, but I'm not sure if that's necessary. The main goal is to find the time, so perhaps just navigating and generating is enough.\n\nAlternatively, maybe the map has a built-in feature for driving time, so after selecting the route, it automatically shows the time, which would be US4.\n\nI think I'll go with two strategies: navigating to the map (US1) and generating the route and time (US4). I'm not sure if setting the location is a separate step, but since it's part of navigating to the page, maybe it's included in US1.\n\nSo, the final strategies would be US1 and US4, with the steps being \"Navigate to the Map\" and \"Generate and Review the Route\".\n\nWait, but the output example shows three strategies, so maybe I need to include setting the location as a separate step. But I'm not sure if that's necessary. Alternatively, maybe it's considered part of navigating to the page.\n\nI think I'll stick with US1 and US4, as those are the two main steps needed to achieve the task. The detailed route might not be necessary unless specified, but since the task is just about time, I don't need to go into that."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 288,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 288,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to History Report\",\n \"Configure Report Parameters for Cancellation Data\",\n \"Generate and View Cancellation Report\",\n \"Extract Customer Name with Most Cancellations\",\n \"Analyze Customer Data to Find Top Customer\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Generate and Review Bestsellers Report\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\", \"US5\", \"US6\", \"US7\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to handle this task for a GUI Agent. The task is to tell the user the name of the customer with the most cancellations in history. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I need to understand what the intent is. The user wants the name of the customer who has the highest number of cancellations. So, the main goal is to find and display this information.\n\nLooking at the Universal Strategies, I think the first step is to navigate to the correct report or section where the cancellation data is stored. That would be \"Navigate To Page/Section\" (US1). So, the agent should go to the History section or the appropriate report area.\n\nOnce on that page, the next step is to configure the parameters or settings to focus on cancellations. The user specifically wants to find the customer with the most cancellations, so the system needs to be set to filter or sort the data accordingly. That would fall under \"Configure Parameters/Settings\" (US3).\n\nAfter setting up the parameters, the agent needs to execute the action to generate the report. That's \"Execute Action/Process\" (US4). So, the agent will click the \"Generate Report\" button to produce the list of customers with their cancellation history.\n\nNow, once the report is generated, the agent should extract the information needed, which is the name of the customer with the most cancellations. This would involve looking at the data in the report, which might be \"View/Inspect Item Details\" (US5) if the report is detailed enough. Then, from that data, the agent needs to retrieve the specific customer's name, which is \"Extract/Retrieve Information\" (US6).\n\nFinally, to provide the information to the user, the agent needs to present it in a clear and concise manner. This could involve summarizing the findings, so that's probably covered under \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\" (US7), where the agent evaluates the extracted data to find the top customer.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would involve navigating to the report, configuring the settings, generating the report, viewing the data, extracting the information, and analyzing it. Each of these steps corresponds to specific universal strategies."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 296,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 296,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to GitLab\",\n \"Search for Best GAN Implementation\",\n \"Clone the GAN Repository\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to clone the best GAN Python implementation using SSH, and I have to structure this as a strategy for a GUI application. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I think the user wants to clone a GAN implementation, so they'll need to go to a repository that has this code. The best approach is probably to navigate to a platform where such repositories are hosted, like GitLab. Since the site specified is \"gitlab,\" I can start by moving to the GitLab interface. That would be using the \"Navigate To Page/Section\" strategy, which is US1.\n\nOnce on GitLab, the user needs to search for the best GAN implementation. I should suggest using the search bar to look for keywords like \"best GAN Python implementation.\" This falls under the \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\" strategy, which is US2.\n\nAfter finding the repository, the next step is to clone it. Cloning a repository typically involves using the \"git clone\" command. So, I should instruct the user to navigate to the repository's section and use the appropriate method to clone it, maybe using a button or menu item for commands. That would be the \"Execute Action/Process\" strategy, US4.\n\nPutting it all together, the steps are: navigate to GitLab, search for the GAN implementation, and then clone it. Each of these steps corresponds to specific universal strategies, so I'll list them out with their IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 305,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 305,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Search for Philip's commits on GitLab\",\n \"Filter commits by January 2023\",\n \"Generate and retrieve commit count\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US2\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, I'm trying to figure out how to help the user with their task. They provided a JSON input and an example output, so I'll use that as a guide. \n\nThe input task has a task_id of 305, uses the gitlab site, and the intent is to find out how many commits Philip made in January 2023. \n\nFirst, I need to break down this task into smaller steps. The main goal is to count commits by Philip in a specific year and month. \n\nStep 1: I should navigate to the user's profile on GitLab. There's probably a section where users can view their own activity. Once there, I can filter the commits by Philip's name. That would involve using the search or filter function, which aligns with US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data.\n\nStep 2: After filtering, I'll need to select the date range. Since the task specifies January 2023, I'll use the date picker to set the period. US8: Navigate Within Data/Results might be useful here if there are multiple date ranges, but in this case, it's a single selection, so maybe US1: Navigate To Page/Section isn't directly needed, but it's part of moving through the interface.\n\nStep 3: Once the correct profile and date range are selected, I need to generate the count of commits. This would involve clicking a \"Count\" button or using a command, which falls under US4: Execute Action/Process.\n\nWait, but do I need to view the details first? Maybe after generating the count, I should retrieve the information, which would be US6: Extract/Retrieve Information. But the task only asks for the number, so perhaps that's optional.\n\nPutting it all together, the main steps are navigating to the profile, filtering by Philip, selecting the date range, and generating the count. The example output included US1, US2, and US4, so I think that's appropriate here.\n\nI should make sure to reference the correct universal strategies and their IDs. The example used US1 for navigating, US2 for filtering, and US4 for executing the action. That makes sense for this task.\n\nSo, the strategies would be: navigate to the profile section, search/filter for Philip, and execute the count. The universal strategy IDs would be US1, US2, and US4. \n\nI think that covers all the necessary steps without overcomplicating things. The user likely needs these three steps to complete the task efficiently."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 313,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 313,\n \"strategies\": [\"Navigate to Customer Service Contact Page\"],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\"Navigate To Page/Section\"],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to complete this task using the Universal Strategy Templates provided. The task given is: \"Which number to call for the customer service?\".\n\nFirst, I'll break down the task. The user wants to know the correct phone number to call for customer service. So, they're looking for specific information on their shopping website's customer service contact page.\n\nLooking at the Universal Strategies, I need to find the best fit. Let's go through each one:\n\n1. **US1: Navigate To Page/Section** - This seems relevant because the user needs to go to a specific page, which in this case is the customer service contact page. So, the first step would be to navigate to that page.\n\n2. **US3: Configure Parameters/Settings** - Hmm, this might not fit here. The user isn't setting any parameters or configurations, just looking for a number. So maybe this isn't necessary.\n\n3. **US4: Execute Action/Process** - I don't think this applies because the action is just viewing information, not executing anything like generating a report or submitting a form.\n\nWait, but the output example shows a combination of navigation, configuration, and execution. Maybe I should consider if there's another strategy involved.\n\nBut in this case, the main action is navigating to the correct page where the number is displayed. Once on that page, the user can view the information without needing to configure settings or execute an action beyond viewing.\n\nSo, the strategy should be just to navigate to the customer service contact page. That would be US1.\n\nI don't think US2 or US5 are needed here because the user isn't searching, filtering, or viewing details of an existing item. They just need the information presented on a page they navigate to.\n\nTherefore, the final strategy is to navigate to the customer service contact page using US1."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 321,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 321,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Refunds Report\",\n \"Search for Orders Cancelled in 2022\",\n \"Retrieve Refund Details Including Shipping Fees\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out the right universal strategies for this task. The user is asking how much refund they should expect from an order canceled in 2022, including shipping fees. Let me break this down.\n\nFirst, they need to navigate to the refund section. That sounds like using US1, which is about navigating to a specific page. So, step one is to go to the Refunds Report.\n\nNext, they should look for the specific order that was canceled in 2022. To do this, they might need to filter the orders by the year 2022. That falls under US2, searching or filtering data.\n\nAfter filtering, they need to calculate the refund amount, which includes shipping fees. That probably involves some calculation, but since the task is about navigating and filtering, maybe US6 isn't necessary here. Wait, US6 is about extracting information, which would come after viewing the data. So maybe the extraction comes after navigating and filtering.\n\nSo the steps are: navigate to Refunds Report (US1), search for the 2022 orders (US2), and then retrieve the refund information, including shipping fees (US6). That makes sense.\n\nI should make sure each step is clearly mapped to the right strategy. Navigation first, then filtering, then extracting the necessary data. That should cover the user's needs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 324,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US2"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 324,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Chairs List\",\n \"Sort Chairs by Price Ascending\",\n \"Generate Chairs Listings\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I've got this task to figure out how to help the user. The user wants me to act as a GUI Agent, which means I need to break down their instructions into a sequence of strategy steps and select the appropriate universal strategies from the given list.\n\nFirst, let me understand the task they provided. The input is a JSON object with task_id 324, sites [\"shopping\"], and an intent: \"Show me the 'chairs' listings by ascending price.\" My job is to design a strategy that achieves this.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies, I need to identify which ones fit. Let's go through them one by one.\n\nThe first step is to navigate to the correct page where chairs are listed. The relevant universal strategy here is US1: Navigate To Page/Section. So, I'll need to navigate to the \"chairs\" section. That makes sense because the user is specifically looking for chairs, so the page must be where chairs are displayed.\n\nNext, after finding the chairs, the user wants them sorted by ascending price. The appropriate strategy for this is US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data. This involves using a filter or sort function to arrange the chairs in ascending order based on price. I'll need to specify the sorting criteria, which is price ascending.\n\nFinally, after filtering and sorting, the user wants to view these listings. So, I need to execute an action to generate or display the report. That's where US4: Execute Action/Process comes in. Clicking a \"Generate\" or \"View\" button would trigger the display of the sorted chair listings.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategy steps are: navigate to the chairs page, sort them by price ascending, and then generate the view. The corresponding universal strategies are US1, US2, and US4 with their respective IDs.\n\nI should make sure that each step is clear and corresponds to the right universal strategy. Also, the output needs to be in JSON format, as per the instructions, with the task_id, strategies array, universal_strategies array, and universal_strategy_ids array.\n\nLet me double-check if there are any other strategies that might be relevant. US5 is about viewing item details, but in this case, the user just wants the listings, not detailed info. US6 is about extracting information, which isn't necessary here. US7 is analysis, which isn't needed since they just want a display.\n\nSo, I think the three steps I've identified cover the task comprehensively without any unnecessary steps. Each step corresponds to a clear universal strategy, and the JSON structure follows the required format."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 33,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US8"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 33,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"View Hilton Hotel near Pittsburgh Airport\",\n \"Retrieve the name of the Hilton hotel\",\n \"Calculate the shortest walking distance to a supermarket\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"Calculate/Analyze Distance\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US5\", \"US6\", \"US8\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, let's tackle this problem step by step. The user provided a task that involves two main actions: finding a Hilton hotel near Pittsburgh Airport and then determining the shortest walking distance to a supermarket from that hotel. \n\nFirst, I need to break down each part of the task. The first part requires navigating to a map interface to locate the hotel. That seems straightforward. I remember the universal strategy US1 is about navigating to a specific page or section, so that would fit here.\n\nNext, after finding the hotel, the user wants the name of the hotel. So, I think US5, which is about viewing item details, would be appropriate since it involves focusing on the hotel to get its name.\n\nThe second part of the task is more complex: finding the nearest supermarket from the hotel. This involves analyzing the map results, probably using a feature like a map service that can calculate distances. US8 comes into play here because it's about navigating within data or results, which in this case are the map directions or results.\n\nOnce the map shows the supermarket locations, I need to extract the distance data. That's where US6, extract/retrieve information, would be used to get the numerical distance.\n\nFinally, after obtaining the necessary information, the user wants a summary. So, US7, analyze/evaluate/verify data, would help in compiling the hotel name and distance into a coherent response.\n\nI should make sure each step is clear and uses the right strategy. I don't see any other strategies needed beyond these, so the final output should include all three strategies with their respective IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 333,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 333,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Spending Report\",\n \"Filter by November 2022\",\n \"Configure Discount Parameter for Orders Exceeding $200\",\n \"Generate Report\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, let's see. The user is asking about a task in the shopping interface. The task is to calculate the spending at One Stop Market on November 2022, considering a 20% discount for orders over $200 in cash.\n\nFirst, I need to break this down into steps. So, the main goal is to find the total spending with the discount applied. To do that, I think the first step is to navigate to the correct report section. That would be using US1, which is \"Navigate To Page/Section.\"\n\nOnce on the report page, the next step is to filter the data to only show November 2022. That falls under US2, \"Search/Filter/Sort Data.\" This will ensure we're only looking at the relevant period.\n\nAfter filtering, we need to apply the discount rule. That means creating a calculated field or using a parameter to set a 20% discount on orders over $200. This is where US9, \"Create Item\" comes in, but actually, it might be more about configuring settings. So perhaps US3, \"Configure Parameters/Settings,\" would be the right choice here to set up the discount condition.\n\nFinally, after setting up the parameters, we need to generate the report. That would be using US4, \"Execute Action/Process,\" to create and submit the report so the data can be analyzed.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies are navigating to the report, filtering by date, configuring the discount parameters, and generating the report. The universal strategy IDs are US1, US2, US3, and US4. Wait, but in the output example, they used a list of three strategies, so maybe I can combine some steps. Alternatively, perhaps US3 is enough for configuring the settings, and US4 for generating the report. So the final strategies would be US1, US2, US3, and US4, but in the output, I can list them as separate entries even if some are part of the same action.\n\nI think that's the correct approach. Each step is necessary to ensure the report is generated with the correct discount applied accurately."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 335,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US8"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 335,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Order History\",\n \"Search for Body Butter Order\",\n \"View Last Order Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, I need to figure out how to complete this task using the Universal Strategy Templates provided. The task given is to \"Tell me when I last ordered my body butter?\" using the shopping website. \n\nFirst, I should understand what the task is asking. The user wants to know the last time they ordered body butter. So, I need to find a way to access their order history, specifically focusing on body butter orders.\n\nLooking at the provided strategies, I see options that involve navigating to a report or section, viewing details, configuring parameters, executing actions, and so on. I think the first step would be to navigate to a section that shows order history. That would correspond to US1: \"Navigate To Page/Section.\"\n\nOnce on the order history page, the user needs to find their body butter order. So, I should include a step to search or filter for body butter. That would be US2: \"Search/Filter/Sort Data.\"\n\nAfter filtering, the user wants to know when the last order was. So, the next step would be to view the details of that specific order. That would be US5: \"View/Inspect Item Details.\"\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be navigate to the order history, search for body butter, and view the details. The corresponding IDs are US1, US2, and US5.\n\nI should make sure that each step logically follows the previous one and that all necessary actions are covered. Navigating to the order history allows the user to see their past orders, searching narrows it down to body butter, and viewing the details gives the exact timestamp of the last order.\n\nI don't think I'm missing any steps here. It's a straightforward process of navigating, searching, and viewing details. There's no need for extracting information beyond viewing the details, so US6 isn't necessary here. Also, no need to configure parameters beyond searching, so US3 isn't required. \n\nSo, the final strategy list should include navigating to the order history, searching for body butter, and viewing the last order's details. The universal strategy IDs would be US1, US2, and US5."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 341,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 341,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Issues Page\",\n \"Filter Issues by New Feature Requests\",\n \"View Issue Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I've been given this task where I need to figure out how to list all opened issues that are requesting new features on GitLab. I'm a bit new to using GitLab, but I know a few things about web interfaces. Let me start by breaking this down.\n\nFirst, I think I need to navigate to the right place where issues are managed. GitLab has a dashboard, right? So maybe I should go to the Issues section. I remember seeing something about a \"Issues\" tab on the dashboard. So that would be my first step: navigating to the Issues page.\n\nOnce I'm there, I need to find the opened issues. I think there's a filter or a way to sort issues by their status. I've heard GitLab uses labels for statuses. So perhaps I can look for a dropdown menu where I can select the status label. I believe the label for new features would be something like \"new feature request.\" So I need to select that label to filter the issues accordingly.\n\nAfter filtering, I should get a list of issues that are new feature requests. Now, the next step is to retrieve the details of each of these issues. Each issue probably has a section where you can view its details, which might involve clicking on the issue itself or there being a \"View\" button. So I'll need to go into each issue's details section to get more information.\n\nOnce I have all the details, the task is to list them. So I need to extract the information from each issue's details page. This might include the issue title, description, priority, and other relevant fields. I have to make sure I capture all the necessary information accurately.\n\nPutting this all together, I can outline the steps as follows: navigate to the Issues page, filter by new feature requests, then view each issue's details, and finally extract the information. Each of these steps corresponds to specific universal strategies. Navigating to the Issues page is US1, configuring the filter is US3, and retrieving information is US6. \n\nWait, but I'm not sure if US1 is the exact ID. Looking back, US1 is \"Navigate To Page/Section,\" which fits the first step. US3 is \"Configure Parameters/Settings,\" which would be selecting the status filter. US6 is \"Extract/Retrieve Information,\" which would handle getting the details of each issue. \n\nI think that's all the steps I need. I should make sure each step is clear and follows logically. Maybe I should also consider if there are any additional steps, like exporting the data or generating a report, but the task only asks to list the issues, so that might be enough.\n\nI should also check if there are any other filters or settings that might affect the outcome, like sorting by priority or other criteria. But since the intent is specifically for new feature requests, selecting the status label should suffice. \n\nAlright, I think I have a clear plan. Now I'll structure it into the required JSON format, making sure to reference the correct universal strategies and their IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 348,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 348,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Reviews Report\",\n \"Filter Reviews by May 2023\",\n \"Retrieve Number of Reviews\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, I need to figure out how to respond to this user's query. They provided a task with task_id 348, sites shopping_admin, and an intent to find out how many reviews the shop received in May 2023. \n\nFirst, I should break down the task. The user wants to count reviews in a specific month. So, the steps likely involve navigating to a reviews section, filtering by the desired month, and then retrieving the count.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies, the first step would be to navigate to the reviews page. That fits US1: Navigate To Page/Section. \n\nNext, they need to filter the reviews by May 2023. US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data would be appropriate here because it involves using filters to narrow down the results.\n\nFinally, after filtering, they need to get the count of reviews. US6: Extract/Retrieve Information seems right because it's about extracting numerical data from the displayed results.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies should be US1, US2, and US6. The steps would be: navigate to the reviews report, filter by May 2023, then extract the count."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 349,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 349,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Gitlab Interface\",\n \"View Repository Details\",\n \"Navigate to Access Controls\",\n \"Extract Access Information\",\n \"Analyze Access Data\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Navigate Within Data/Results\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US5\", \"US1\", \"US6\", \"US7\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, so I've got this task to figure out how to help someone get access to their Gitlab repository and see who else has their usernames. Let me think through this step by step.\n\nFirst, the goal is to identify users with access to a specific Gitlab repository. The user wants to know the usernames of those who have access. So, I need to plan out the steps to achieve this.\n\nStep one would be to navigate to the Gitlab interface. I remember that Gitlab has a web interface where you can manage projects and view access. So, I'll use the \"Navigate to Page/Section\" strategy, which is US1. That makes sense because the first thing is to get into the right place.\n\nOnce in the Gitlab interface, the next step is likely to go to the specific repository. So, I'll need to click on the project or repository in the sidebar. I'll use US5, \"View/Inspect Item Details,\" because it involves clicking on an item in a list to view its details.\n\nAfter viewing the repository details, the next logical step is to check who has access. Gitlab allows viewing access controls, so I'll need to go to the access controls section. That probably involves navigating to a specific page, so again, US1 applies here.\n\nNow, to see the list of users with access, I'll need to look for a group or a list that shows the users. I believe Gitlab displays this by listing users with access, so I can extract that information using US6, \"Extract/Retrieve Information,\" because I'm pulling data from the interface.\n\nFinally, once I have the usernames, I need to present them to the user. That would involve using US7, \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data,\" to process the extracted information and format it into a readable list.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be: navigate to the Gitlab interface, view the repository details, navigate to access controls, extract the access list, and analyze the data to get the usernames. Each of these steps corresponds to the universal strategies US1, US5, US1, US6, and US7 respectively.\n\nI should make sure the JSON output follows the required format, including the task_id, strategies, universal_strategies, and universal_strategy_ids. I think that covers all the necessary steps without missing anything."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 354,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 354,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Products Page\",\n \"Filter Products by Living Room Furniture Category\",\n \"Sort Products by Price Descending\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to list products from the \"living room furniture\" category in descending order of price on the shopping site. The user has provided a task, so I have to break this down into strategy steps using the Universal Strategy Templates provided.\n\nFirst, I think I need to go to the correct section where all products are listed. That probably involves navigating to a products page or category page. Looking at the templates, US1 is about navigating to a page or section, so that's a good start.\n\nOnce I'm on the products page, I need to filter them by the \"living room furniture\" category. That would likely involve using a filter or search function, which falls under US2 for searching or filtering data.\n\nAfter filtering, I probably need to sort the results by price in descending order. Sorting is usually a part of filtering or viewing data, so again, US2 might be applicable here, but maybe I can combine it with another strategy.\n\nWait, maybe after filtering, I can directly sort the results. So perhaps after filtering, I just execute the sort action. That might be covered in US4, which is about executing an action. Alternatively, if it's part of the filtering process, maybe it's still under US2.\n\nHmm, but I think the main steps are: navigate to the products section, filter by category, and then sort the results. So that would be US1, US2, and perhaps another US2 or maybe US4 for executing the sort.\n\nAlternatively, maybe the filtering and sorting can be done in one step under US2. Let me check the examples. In the input example, they used US2 for filtering issues by label, which is similar to filtering products by category.\n\nSo, in this case, navigating to the products page is US1. Then, using a filter to select the living room furniture category is US2. Finally, sorting the results by price in descending order might be another US2 or US4. But since the example uses US2 for filtering, maybe sorting is part of that process.\n\nI'm a bit unsure about whether sorting is a separate action or part of the filtering. If it's a separate action, then US4 would be appropriate. But I think in many systems, sorting is a part of the filtering or result view, so perhaps it's still under US2.\n\nBut to be safe, I'll break it down into three steps: navigate to products, filter by category, and sort by price. So that would be US1, US2, and US2 again, but maybe that's redundant. Alternatively, perhaps after filtering, the sort is a separate action, so US4.\n\nWait, let me think. Navigating is clear as US1. Filtering by category is US2. Then, sorting is a separate action, so US4. That makes sense because after filtering, you might choose to sort the results to display them in a specific order.\n\nSo, the strategies would be: navigate to products, filter by category, and sort by price. The universal strategies would be US1, US2, and US4, with IDs 1, 2, and 4.\n\nLet me make sure this covers everything. The task is to list products by descending price in a specific category. So, navigating to the products page, filtering by the category, and then sorting by price in descending order. That seems comprehensive.\n\nI think that's the correct approach. So the strategies are US1, US2, and US4, and the IDs are 1, 2, and 4."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 357,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 357,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Merges\",\n \"Filter Merges by State\",\n \"Review and Approve Merges\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I've been given a task to figure out how to handle a user request on a GitLab interface. The task is to \"Checkout merge requests requiring my review.\" Hmm, that sounds like the user needs to review certain merge requests and then probably either approve them or take some action on them.\n\nFirst, I need to break this down. The user is likely on the Gitlab interface, perhaps looking at their personal profile or dashboard. They need to access merge requests that require their review. So, the first step is probably to navigate to the right section where these merge requests are located.\n\nI remember that Gitlab has different views within the interface. There's the \"Merges\" view, which I think is where merge requests are listed. So, the first strategy would be to navigate to the Merges section. That sounds like US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\n\nOnce they're in the Merges section, they might need to filter these requests. The request mentions \"merge requests requiring my review,\" so the user probably wants to see only those that are in the review stage. Gitlab allows filtering by state, so the next step would be to filter the results by state, maybe selecting \"In Review\" or something similar. That would fall under US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data.\n\nAfter filtering, the user might want to review these requests. Depending on Gitlab's interface, they might need to click on each request or maybe there's a way to select multiple and then proceed. Once they've viewed the necessary information, the next step would be to either approve the merge request or take another action, like commenting or assigning it to someone else. Since the task just says \"Checkout merge requests requiring my review,\" I think the main action is to either approve them or handle them further, but the core actions are navigating there and filtering them.\n\nSo, in terms of strategies, the first is navigating to the Merges section, which is US1. Then filtering the results by their state, which is US2. Finally, executing the action to review or approve, which would be US4: Execute Action/Process.\n\nI need to make sure I'm not missing any steps. Maybe after reviewing, they need to approve, which would involve clicking a button or selecting an option. That would definitely be part of US4. So, putting it all together, the strategies would be navigate to Merges, filter by state, and then execute the review action."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 361,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 361,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Order Statuses\",\n \"View Order Details for Order 170\",\n \"View Order Details for Order 189\",\n \"Extract and Save Order Statuses\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"Create Item\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US5\", \"US6\", \"US9\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to handle this task. The user provided a JSON input with task_id 361, sites set to [\"shopping\"], and an intent asking for order statuses for order numbers 170 and 189. \n\nFirst, I should break down the intent. The user wants to see the statuses of two specific orders. That means I need to navigate to somewhere where I can view order details or statuses. \n\nLooking at the universal strategies, US1 is about navigating to a page or section. So I'll probably use that to go to the orders section. Then, I need to find the orders with the given numbers. US5 is for viewing item details, so I can use that to look at each order individually. \n\nAfter retrieving the order details, I should extract the statuses. US6 is for extracting information, so that fits. Finally, I need to present the information, perhaps saving it somewhere, so US9 (create item) might be involved. \n\nPutting it all together, the steps would be navigate to orders, view each order's details, extract the statuses, and save the results. The universal strategy IDs would be US1, US5, US6, and US9."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 367,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 367,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Search for Carnegie Mellon University\",\n \"Plot Walking Route to CVS\",\n \"Measure Distance\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US2\", \"US8\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, I need to figure out how to complete this task using the Universal Strategy Templates provided. The task is to measure the distance between Carnegie Mellon University and the closest CVS store by walking. The site involved is map, so I'm dealing with a mapping interface.\n\nFirst, I should break down the task into smaller steps. The main goal is to measure the distance, so I need to find the locations of both places, plot a route, and then get the distance.\n\n1. **Find Carnegie Mellon University on the map**: I'll need to locate the university on the map. Since the site is map, I can search for it. This might involve a search bar or a location picker tool.\n\n2. **Locate the closest CVS store**: After finding the university, I need to find the nearest CVS. The map interface probably has a way to search for stores or filter by type, so I'll use that to find the closest one.\n\n3. **Plot the walking route**: Once both points are on the map, I can draw a route between them. This is a navigation feature, so I'll use the map's navigation controls to create the path.\n\n4. **Measure the distance**: After plotting the route, the map should display the distance. I'll need to extract this information, maybe by reading the distance value provided by the map tool.\n\nNow, looking at the universal strategies, I can map each step to a strategy ID.\n\n1. **Search for Carnegie Mellon University** fits **US2** because it's about searching within the interface.\n\n2. **Find the closest CVS store** also uses **US2** since it's another search function within the map.\n\n3. **Plotting the route** would be **US8** as it involves navigating through multiple pages or sections of data (routes).\n\n4. **Measuring the distance** is **US6** because it's about extracting information (the distance value) from the current page.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies are search, search again, navigate, and extract. The IDs are US2, US2, US8, US6. But since the user wants unique IDs, I might need to adjust the approach for the second search. Maybe using a different function, but in this case, it's still search, so perhaps it's acceptable to repeat the ID or find another way.\n\nWait, maybe instead of repeating US2, there's a better fit. The second search is specifically for the closest store, which is still a search function, so US2 is appropriate. Alternatively, if there's a dedicated 'Find Nearest' option, that might be a different strategy, but since it's not specified, I'll stick with US2.\n\nSo the final strategies would be US2, US8, and US6. Wait, but there are three steps: search, plot, measure. So that's three strategies: US2, US8, US6. But in the example, they had three strategies with three IDs. So that should be fine.\n\nI think that's the plan. Now, I'll structure the output as required, listing each strategy and their corresponding IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 368,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 368,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to the Shopping All Items Page\",\n \"Filter Items by Discount\",\n \"Generate and Review the Discounted Items List\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to complete this task. The user has given me a JSON input with a task, and I have to generate a strategy using the provided universal strategies. Let me start by understanding the input.\n\nThe input is:\n```json\n[{\n \"task_id\": 368,\n \"sites\": [\"shopping\"],\n \"intent\": \"find discounted items.\"\n}]\n```\n\nSo, the task is to find discounted items on the shopping website. My goal is to break this down into specific steps using the provided universal strategies.\n\nFirst, I think I need to navigate to the right section where discounted items are displayed. That probably means going to a section that lists all items with discounts. So, strategy US1: \"Navigate To Page/Section\".\n\nOnce I'm on that page, I need to find a way to filter the items to show only those with discounts. The universal strategies mention US2: \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\", which fits perfectly here. I'll use the filtering options to find the discounted items.\n\nAfter filtering, I should probably make sure the results are correct. Maybe I need to sort them by price or apply a specific filter. So, another strategy would be to \"Sort/Filter Discounted Items\", which could still fall under US2, but perhaps it's better to include it as a separate step. Alternatively, maybe it's part of the same strategy. Hmm.\n\nWait, the example output included multiple steps under the same strategy. So, I can have multiple steps under US2 if needed. Let me check the example again. Yes, in the example, they had multiple steps under US2 and US4, so that's okay.\n\nSo, step 1: Navigate to the section with discounted items (US1). Step 2: Configure the filters to show discounted items (US2). Step 3: Generate the list (US4). That seems logical.\n\nAlternatively, maybe I should also consider if there are any parameters to configure, like date ranges or specific discounts. So, perhaps after navigating, I need to configure parameters to set the date range for the current month. That would be US3: \"Configure Parameters/Settings\".\n\nSo, updated steps: 1. Navigate to the section (US1). 2. Configure parameters for the current month (US3). 3. Filter for discounted items (US2). 4. Generate the report (US4). But wait, the order of steps matters. Configuring parameters might come before filtering.\n\nWait, the user's intent is to find discounted items, so maybe first, after navigating, I need to set the parameters (like date range or specific discounts), then filter. Or maybe the parameters are part of the filtering process. I'm not entirely sure. \n\nLooking at the universal strategies, US3 is about configuring settings, which could include setting parameters for the filter. So, perhaps after navigating (US1), I configure the settings (US3) to set the parameters needed for filtering, then apply the filter (US2). But US2 is about using search, filter, or sort, so maybe the configuring parameters is part of US2.\n\nI think the best approach is to break it down into: navigate, configure parameters (US3), then filter and generate. That would make four steps. But maybe combining some steps.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps the steps are: navigate (US1), filter using discount criteria (US2), then generate (US4). I think that's acceptable.\n\nWait, the user's example included multiple steps under the same strategy. So, I can have multiple steps under US2 if needed. Let me try structuring it as:\n\n1. Navigate to the section with all items (US1).\n2. Use filter to show discounted items (US2).\n3. Generate the list (US4).\n\nThat seems concise and covers all necessary steps. I don't think I need to include US3 unless there are specific parameters to configure beyond just filtering.\n\nSo, final strategies would be: US1, US2, US4.\n\nI think that's a logical breakdown. Now, I'll structure the output as required."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 369,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 369,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Carnegie Music Hall on Map\",\n \"View the description details of Carnegie Music Hall\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to complete this task using the Universal Strategy Templates provided. The task given is to \"Pull up the description page of Carnegie Music Hall on Map\". Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I should understand what the user is asking for. They want to view the description page of Carnegie Music Hall on the Map application. So, the goal is to navigate to this specific page.\n\nLooking at the Universal Strategies, the first one is US1: \"Navigate To Page/Section\". This seems to fit perfectly because the task involves moving to a specific page. The explanation for US1 mentions moving to a page, section, or area within the application, which aligns with what the user is trying to do.\n\nBut wait, is there anything else I might need to do beyond just navigating? The user specifically wants the description page. So, after navigating, I might need to open or focus on that specific page. That brings to mind US5: \"View/Inspect Item Details\". This strategy is about opening or focusing on a specific item to examine its details. So, after navigating to the Carnegie Music Hall page, I would then use US5 to view its description.\n\nLet me check the example provided. In the input example, the strategy was \"View the details of Order #12345\", which used US5. That's similar to what I just thought about for this task. So, yes, after navigating, viewing the details makes sense.\n\nI don't think I need any other strategies beyond these two. US1 for navigating and US5 for viewing the details. There's no need for searching, filtering, or configuring settings here, so US2, US3, or US5 aren't necessary.\n\nWait, but is there a possibility that after viewing the details, I might need to extract information? The example didn't include that, so maybe it's not required here. The task is just to pull up the page, not to do anything else with the information on it.\n\nSo, putting it all together, the strategy steps would be:\n\n1. Navigate to Carnegie Music Hall on Map using US1.\n2. View the description details using US5.\n\nThat should cover the task as per the given input. I don't see any other strategies needed here because the task is straightforward navigation and viewing details without any further actions required."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 37,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 37,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Use a mapping service to plan the route between the police station in Pittsburgh and the gates building at CMU\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate Within Data/Results\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US8\", \"US6\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to complete this task. The task is to check if the police station in Pittsburgh can be reached in one hour by car from the gates building at CMU. I'm a bit new to this, so I need to break it down step by step.\n\nFirst, I need to understand the goal. The intent is to verify the travel time between two locations: the police station in Pittsburgh and the gates building at CMU. CMU is Carnegie Mellon University, so I assume the gates building is a specific location there.\n\nI think the first thing I should do is find the addresses of both locations. Without knowing where exactly they are, it's hard to plan the route. So I'll look up the police station in Pittsburgh. Maybe it's at the Allegheny County Police Department building. Then, I'll find the gates building at CMU. I believe that's the Silicon Valley Gate or something similar.\n\nOnce I have both addresses, the next step is to figure out how to get from one to the other. I can use a mapping service like Google Maps for this. I'll input the two addresses and see what the suggested routes are. I'm interested in the driving time, so I'll make sure to select the car option and check the estimated time.\n\nIf the driving time is more than an hour, I might need to consider alternative routes or maybe there's a faster path that I'm not aware of. But since the user just wants to check if it's possible in one hour, I don't need to go into too much detail about why it might or might not be possible. Just confirming the feasibility is enough.\n\nPutting this all together, the steps would be: navigate to the map service, input the starting and ending points, and then review the driving time. I think this covers all the necessary actions without missing any important details.\n\nI should also make sure that I'm following the universal strategies provided. Navigating to the map service would use US1 (Navigate To Page/Section). Inputting the addresses and reviewing the time would involve US6 (Extract/Retrieve Information) and US4 (Execute Action/Process). Maybe US7 (Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data) could be used to confirm the time, but I think US4 is sufficient since I'm just generating the report.\n\nSo, in summary, I'll use the map service to plan the route, extract the driving time, and generate a report to confirm if it's within the one-hour mark."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 374,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US10",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 374,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Magento Admin Panel\",\n \"View Magento Blank Theme Details\",\n \"Generate Preview of Magento Blank Theme\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US5\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, I need to figure out how to help the user with their task. Let's see what they provided. The task is to preview the Magento Blank theme for their shop. \n\nFirst, I should break this down step by step. The user wants to preview the theme, so they probably need to access it within the Magento admin panel. \n\nI remember from the universal strategies that US1 is about navigating to a specific page or section. So, the first step would be to navigate to the Magento admin panel. That makes sense because that's where themes are managed.\n\nOnce they're in the admin panel, they need to find the theme. US5 is about viewing or inspecting item details, which in this case would be viewing the theme details. So, after navigating to the admin panel, they should locate the Magento Blank theme and use the \"View Details\" option to inspect it.\n\nAfter viewing the theme, the next logical step would be to generate a preview. US4 is about executing an action or process, so they would use the \"Generate\" button to create a preview of the theme. \n\nI should make sure to reference the correct universal strategies: US1 for navigating, US5 for viewing details, and US4 for generating the action. \n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be: navigate to the admin panel, view the theme details, and generate the preview. \n\nI think that covers all the necessary steps to fulfill the task. Now, I'll format the response as JSON with the strategies, their universal strategy IDs, and the list of strategies."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 376,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US1"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 376,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Customer Reviews for Amazon Echo Dot 3rd Generation\",\n \"Filter Reviews to Show Only Amazon Echo Dot 3rd Generation\",\n \"Extract and Summarize Customer Reviews Content\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US6\", \"US7\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, let me try to figure out how to approach this task. So, the user provided a task where they need to summarize customer reviews for the Amazon Echo Dot 3rd generation. The task includes a specific intent and some strategies to follow.\n\nFirst, I need to break down the task into manageable steps. The goal is to summarize reviews, so I should think about what steps are necessary to achieve that. Typically, this would involve accessing the review section, filtering the data, extracting the information, and then presenting it in a summary.\n\nLooking at the provided universal strategies, I should match each step with the appropriate ID. Let's see:\n\n1. Accessing the reviews for the specific product: That sounds like navigating to a page, which is US1.\n2. Filtering the reviews by the product: US8 is about navigating within results, which can help in filtering through pages.\n3. Extracting the text content: US6 is for extracting information from the current page.\n4. Summarizing the content: US7 is about analyzing and verifying data, which can include summarizing.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would involve navigating to the reviews, filtering to the Echo Dot, extracting the text, and summarizing the content. The corresponding IDs would be US1, US8, US6, and US7.\n\nI should make sure each step logically follows the previous one and covers all aspects of the task. Also, I need to ensure that the strategies are specific enough to guide the user without being too vague."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 381,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 381,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Carnegie Music Hall\",\n \"Search for Hotels Near Carnegie Music Hall\",\n \"View Hotel Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to complete this task. The task is to find a hotel around Carnegie Music Hall using the map site. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I think the user is on a map website, probably Google Maps or something similar. They want to find a hotel near Carnegie Music Hall. Carnegie Music Hall is a famous concert venue in Pittsburgh, so I'm guessing this is in Pittsburgh, PA.\n\nI remember the Universal Strategies mentioned. Let's see. The first one is \"US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\" That would be moving to the Carnegie Music Hall location on the map. Then, maybe \"US5: View/Inspect Item Details\" to zoom in on the hotel. But wait, how do you find hotels near a location?\n\nOh, right, there's probably a filter or a search function. So after navigating to Carnegie Music Hall, I should use a filter to show hotels nearby. That would be \"US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data.\" Once I have the list of hotels, I might need to sort them by proximity, which is another \"US2\" step. Then, to get more information about a specific hotel, I'd use \"US5\" again to view its details.\n\nWait, do I need to list each hotel? Probably not, since the task is just to find the hotel, not to list all options. So maybe after filtering, I can just select the hotel and maybe \"US4: Execute Action/Process\" to confirm the booking or whatever action is needed.\n\nHmm, maybe I should structure it as: navigate to Carnegie Music Hall, search for nearby hotels, view the hotel details, and then maybe save or confirm the hotel. Or perhaps just view the hotel details to check availability.\n\nI think the steps would be: navigate to Carnegie Music Hall (US1), search for nearby hotels (US2), view the selected hotel's details (US5). That should cover it. I don't think I need US9 or US10 for this task since it's not about creating or updating something, just finding.\n\nSo, the strategies would be US1, US2, and US5, and the corresponding actions would be navigate, search/filter, and view details. That should help the user find the hotel around Carnegie Music Hall."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 382,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 382,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Map View\",\n \"Search for US Citizenship and Immigration Services\",\n \"Measure Walking Distance to Social Security Administration\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate Within Data/Results\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US8\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to help this user with their task. Let me start by understanding what they're asking for. The user provided a JSON input with a task_id, sites, and intent. The intent is to find nearby USCSIS and Social Security Administration locations and the walking distance between them. \n\nFirst, I'll look at the sites specified, which is \"map\". That means the user needs to use a mapping service to navigate and find these locations. Now, I need to break down the task into steps and match them with the universal strategies provided.\n\nThe first step is to navigate to a map interface. That would fit the US1 strategy, which is about moving to a specific page or section. So, the first action is to go to the map view.\n\nNext, the user needs to find the USCSIS and Social Security offices. They want nearby locations, so they'll probably use a search function. That sounds like using search/filter/sort functionality, which is US2. So, they can filter the results to find the nearest offices.\n\nAfter identifying the locations, the user needs to determine the walking distance between them. To calculate distance, they might need a measure distance feature, which is part of executing an action, so that would be US4. They can generate a measure distance result to get the walking distance.\n\nI should make sure each step is mapped correctly and that the strategies make sense in sequence. Also, I need to ensure that the strategies are from the provided list and reference their IDs correctly. \n\nI think that covers all the necessary steps. Now, I'll structure the JSON output as required, including the strategies and their corresponding universal IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 383,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US2"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 383,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Hotel List\",\n \"Filter for Hyatt Hotels and Supermarkets\",\n \"Generate Directions to Supermarket\",\n \"Extract Supermarket Name\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Generate Action/Process\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US8\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out the best strategies to complete this task. Let me start by understanding what the user is asking for. They are arriving at Pittsburgh Airport and want to find nearby Hyatt hotels and nearby supermarkets within 15 minutes by car.\n\nFirst, I should break this down into steps. The user is at the airport, so they probably need to get to a hotel first. So step one would be to navigate to the hotel information. That sounds like \"Navigate to Bestsellers Report\" but in this case, it's more about hotel information. Hmm, maybe \"Navigate to Hotel List\" or something like that. Wait, the Universal Strategies include \"Navigate To Page/Section\" which is US1. So I can use US1 here.\n\nNext, after arriving at the hotel, they need to check if there's a Hyatt nearby. So I should look for a way to filter hotels by type. That would be \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\" which is US2. They can filter the list to show only Hyatt hotels.\n\nOnce they find a Hyatt, they need to look for nearby supermarkets within 15 minutes. So they should filter the hotels again, but this time by distance to a supermarket. That would again be using US2, but maybe as a separate step. Alternatively, if there's a specific section for nearby businesses, that might be US5, \"View/Inspect Item Details.\" But since it's about distance, maybe US2 is still appropriate.\n\nAfter identifying the nearby Hyatt, the next step is to get directions to the supermarket. That would involve \"Navigate Within Data/Results\" which is US8. They can scroll or use pagination to find the supermarket within 15 minutes.\n\nFinally, they need to retrieve the name of the supermarket. So \"Extract/Retrieve Information\" using US6 would be the way to go. They can click on the supermarket's listing to view its name.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be:\n1. Navigate to the hotel list.\n2. Search and filter for Hyatt hotels.\n3. Search and filter by distance to a supermarket.\n4. Generate directions to the nearby supermarket.\n5. Extract the supermarket's name.\n\nWait, but the output example includes three steps with three universal strategies. So maybe I need to consolidate some steps. Perhaps steps 2 and 3 can be combined under US2 as filtering by both hotel type and distance. Then, navigating to directions is US8, and extracting the name is US6. So the strategies would be US1, US2, US8, US6. But the output example only has three steps, so maybe it's acceptable to have four steps here.\n\nAlternatively, maybe the filtering steps can be done in one US2, then navigate in US8, and extract in US6. That would make three steps. Let me see.\n\nSo, to keep it concise, the main steps are:\n1. Navigate to hotel list (US1)\n2. Filter for Hyatt and nearby supermarkets (US2)\n3. Get directions to the supermarket (US8)\n4. Retrieve the supermarket name (US6)\n\nBut since the output example only includes three steps, perhaps the filtering can be done in one step. So combining steps 2 and 3 into one step using US2, then navigating and extracting as separate steps. That would make three steps total.\n\nSo, the final strategies would be:\n1. Navigate to hotel list (US1)\n2. Filter hotels for Hyatt and nearby supermarkets (US2)\n3. Generate directions to the nearest supermarket (US8)\n4. Retrieve the supermarket name (US6)\n\nBut to fit into the output example's structure, I might need to have three steps, so perhaps combining steps 3 and 4 as one step. Alternatively, maybe the filtering can be done in two separate US2 steps: first by hotel type, then by distance. But that would make four steps, which might be too many.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps the user just needs to know that after finding a Hyatt, they can look for nearby supermarkets, so the steps would be:\n\n1. Navigate to hotel list (US1)\n2. Filter for Hyatt hotels (US2)\n3. Filter for nearby supermarkets (US2)\n4. Generate directions (US8)\n5. Extract supermarket name (US6)\n\nBut that's five steps. The output example has three steps. So maybe the user doesn't need to extract the name, just view it. So perhaps it's:\n\n1. Navigate to hotel list (US1)\n2. Filter for Hyatt and nearby supermarkets (US2)\n3. Generate directions (US8)\n\nBut then, the user might need to know the name, so adding US6 as extract.\n\nI think the best approach is to have four steps: navigate to hotels, filter by type, filter by distance, get directions, and extract name. So four steps with four universal strategies.\n\nBut the output example only has three steps, so maybe the user doesn't need to extract the name. Or perhaps the hotel list already shows the name. Hmm.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps the user just needs to know the name, so after filtering, they can see the name on the hotel list. So maybe steps are:\n\n1. Navigate to hotel list (US1)\n2. Filter for Hyatt hotels (US2)\n3. Filter for nearby supermarkets (US2)\n4. View hotel name (US5)\n\nBut that's four steps again.\n\nI think I'll proceed with the four steps, using US1, US2, US8, US6."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 384,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 384,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Complaints List\",\n \"Filter Complaints by EYZUTAK Phone Cases\",\n \"Sort Complaints\",\n \"Extract Customer Names\",\n \"Generate and Review Customer List\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US8\", \"US6\", \"US4\", \"US7\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to list the customer names who complain about the quality of EYZUTAK phone cases using the given task. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I think I need to navigate to a section where customer complaints are recorded. I remember that US1 is about navigating to a specific page or section, so that's probably the first step. I'll use US1 with the site \"shopping\" and maybe the section where complaints are stored.\n\nNext, once on that page, I probably need to filter the complaints to only show those related to EYZUTAK phone cases. US2 is about searching or filtering data, so that makes sense. I'll set the search term to \"EYZUTAK phone cases\" or something similar to get the relevant results.\n\nAfter that, I might need to sort or reorganize the results to display the customer names in a list. US8 is for navigating within data results, which could include sorting by date, name, or some other criteria. Maybe I'll sort them alphabetically or by the most recent complaints to make the list more useful.\n\nOnce I have the list, I need to retrieve the customer names. US6 is for extracting information, so I'll extract the customer names from the displayed list. This will give me the names I need.\n\nFinally, I should probably review or export the list to present it clearly. US7 involves analyzing or evaluating data, so I might review the extracted names to ensure accuracy, and US4 to execute the process of generating the final report or list.\n\nWait, but in the example, they didn't include exporting, but in the output, they have \"Generate and Review Bestsellers Report\" which is a combination of US4 and US7. Maybe I can do something similar here. So after extracting the names, I generate the report and then review it.\n\nLet me check the universal strategies again. US1 for navigating, US2 for filtering, US8 for navigating within results, US6 for extracting, and US4 and US7 for generating and reviewing. That should cover all the steps needed.\n\nSo putting it all together, the strategies would be: navigate to the complaints section, filter for EYZUTAK phone cases, sort the results, extract the customer names, and then generate and review the list. The corresponding IDs would be US1, US2, US8, US6, US4, and US7.\n\nI think that's a solid plan. Now, I'll structure the output as per the requirements, making sure to include the strategies and their corresponding IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 386,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 386,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Ugreen Lightning 3.5mm Cable Product Page\",\n \"View the Product Details for Ugreen Lightning 3.5mm Cable\",\n \"Extract and Round the Rating to the Nearest Whole Number\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US5\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, I need to figure out how to respond to the user's query. They provided a task with an intent: \"What is the rating of Ugreen lightning to 3.5mm cable. Please round to the nearest whole number.\" My job is to break this down using the Universal Strategy Templates.\n\nFirst, I should identify the key steps. The user wants to find a specific product rating. So, they need to locate the product in the system. That sounds like navigating to a product page, which would use US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\n\nOnce on the product page, they need to find the rating information. That might involve viewing or inspecting the product details, so US5: View/Inspect Item Details makes sense.\n\nAfter retrieving the information, the user wants it rounded. That's a simple data extraction and calculation. So, US6: Extract/Retrieve Information would cover getting the rating, and then perhaps another step for rounding, but since that's a manual action, maybe just US6 is enough.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies are: navigating to the product page, viewing the details, and extracting the rating. The universal strategy IDs are US1, US5, and US6."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 387,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 387,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Reviews Section\",\n \"Configure Review Parameters for Phone Cases from EYZUTAK\",\n \"Extract Reviews with 4 or 5 Star Ratings\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, let me try to work through this problem step by step. So, the task given is to figure out who gave 4 or 5 stars for phone cases from EYZUTAK. The user has provided some strategies and examples, so I need to use those to come up with the right approach.\n\nFirst, I'll start by understanding the intent. The user wants to identify the reviewers who rated phone cases from EYZUTAK with 4 or 5 stars. That means I need to find a way to filter reviews based on both the product (phone cases) and the rating.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies provided, I see several that might be relevant. US1 is about navigating to a page or section, which probably means I need to go to the reviews section on the website. US5 is about viewing or inspecting item details, so maybe I need to look at individual reviews. US6 is for extracting information, which would help in filtering the ratings. US3 is about configuring parameters, which might be necessary to set the criteria for the search.\n\nSo, the first step would be to navigate to the review section, which is US1. Once there, I think I need to configure the parameters to filter for phone cases from EYZUTAK, which would be US3. After setting up the parameters, I can extract the information, specifically the ratings of 4 and 5 stars, which is US6.\n\nWait, but do I need to sort or analyze the data? Maybe US7 could be involved in analyzing the ratings, but looking at the example output, it doesn't include analysis. The example just includes navigation, configuration, and extraction. So perhaps US7 isn't necessary here since the task is just to retrieve the information, not to analyze it.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies should be: navigate to the reviews section, configure the parameters to filter by product and rating, and then extract the relevant information. The corresponding universal strategy IDs would be US1, US3, and US6.\n\nI think that covers the necessary steps. Now, I'll structure the output as per the requirements, making sure to include the strategies and their IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 392,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US9",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 392,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Merge Request for color usability in a11yproject.com\",\n \"Create Comment on Merge Request\",\n \"Analyze Merge Request for Feedback\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Create Item\",\n \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US9\", \"US7\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, I need to help the user with their task. They provided a JSON input and an example output. Let me break it down.\n\nFirst, the task is to post a specific comment on a GitLab merge request. The intent is to suggest an improvement related to color utility in an accessibility project. So, I need to figure out the steps to accomplish this.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies, I should match each step with the appropriate ID. \n\n1. The first step is to navigate to the merge request. That would use US1, which is \"Navigate To Page/Section.\" So, I'll say \"Navigate to Merge Request for color usability in a11yproject.com.\"\n\n2. Next, I need to post a comment. This falls under US9, \"Create Item,\" because posting a comment is like creating a new item. So, the strategy would be \"Create Comment on Merge Request.\"\n\n3. Finally, I should review the merge request after posting. This uses US7, \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data,\" to check if the comment was placed correctly. So, the step is \"Analyze Merge Request for Feedback.\"\n\nI need to make sure each strategy is clearly mapped and the JSON structure is correct. I should also include the IDs for each strategy used. \n\nWait, the example output uses \"strategies\" as a list of actions and \"universal_strategies\" as another list with IDs. I should follow that format. \n\nLet me put it all together, ensuring each step is clear and the strategies are correctly referenced. I think that's all. Now, I'll format it into the JSON as required."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 4,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": true,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 4,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Bestsellers Report\",\n \"Configure Report Parameters for January 2023\",\n \"Generate and Review Bestsellers Report\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I have this task to figure out how to get the top 3 best-selling products in January 2023 on the shopping_admin site. Let me break it down step by step.\n\nFirst, I need to understand what the user is asking for. They want the top 3 best-selling products specifically for January 2023. That means I need to look at sales data filtered by both product and time period.\n\nI remember seeing that the task involved using a GUI Agent, so I should think about the typical steps a user would take on a web interface. Usually, to find sales reports, you'd navigate to a section dedicated to reports. So the first step is probably to go to the bestsellers report page. That would correspond to US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\n\nOnce on the report page, I need to filter the data by the specific time frame, which is January 2023. I think there's a filter or settings section where you can select the date range. This would be US3: Configure Parameters/Settings, where you set the parameters for the report.\n\nAfter configuring the settings, the next logical step is to generate the report. That involves clicking a submit or generate button, which falls under US4: Execute Action/Process.\n\nWait, do I need to view the details of each product once the report is generated? Maybe, but the user just asked for the top 3, so perhaps they can analyze the report directly without viewing individual product details. But to be thorough, maybe I should include viewing the top products as well, which would be US5: View/Inspect Item Details. However, the output example didn't include that, so perhaps it's unnecessary for this task.\n\nLet me check the example provided earlier. In the output, they had strategies like \"View the details of Order #12345,\" but in this case, the task doesn't require viewing individual orders, just the top 3 bestsellers.\n\nSo, I think the steps are:\n\n1. Navigate to the Bestsellers Report.\n2. Configure the report parameters to filter by January 2023.\n3. Generate the report.\n\nThat should cover all the necessary actions without needing to view individual product details.\n\nI should make sure each step is clear and corresponds to the right universal strategy. Using US1 for navigation, US3 for configuration, and US4 for generating the report seems appropriate.\n\nI don't think I need to include any extraction or analysis steps because the task is more about retrieving and viewing the data rather than processing or evaluating it. So, the strategies should be straightforward.\n\nAlright, I think I have a solid plan for this task. Now, I'll structure the JSON output as required, listing each strategy and referencing the corresponding universal strategies with their IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 404,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": true,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 404,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Reddit Books Subreddit\",\n \"Search for Newest Post in Books Subreddit\",\n \"Upvote the Newest Post\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I've got this task to handle. The user wants me to design a strategy for a web interface based on the given task. Let me break it down step by step.\n\nFirst, the task is to \"Upvote the newest post in books subreddit\" on Reddit. That means I need to navigate to the correct subreddit, find the newest post, and then upvote it.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies, I need to choose the right ones. The first thing is to navigate to the subreddit. From the examples, I see that US1 is for navigating to a page or section. So that's probably the first step.\n\nNext, after reaching the subreddit, I need to find the newest post. Since Reddit doesn't have a direct search function for posts, I might have to use the search function within the subreddit. So that would fall under US2, which is searching/filtering/sorting data.\n\nOnce I have the newest post displayed, the next step is to upvote it. That's a straightforward action, so US4, which is executing an action/process, seems appropriate.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategy steps would be: navigate to the subreddit, search for the newest post, and then upvote it. The universal strategies used here are US1, US2, and US4.\n\nI should make sure that each step is clear and follows logically. Navigating to the subreddit makes sense first, then searching for the newest post, and finally performing the upvote action. I don't think I'm missing any steps here. It seems pretty straightforward.\n\nI also need to format the output correctly. The example provided uses a JSON structure, so I'll follow that. The strategies array will contain the three steps, and the universal_strategies array will list the corresponding IDs. The universal_strategy_ids array will have US1, US2, and US4.\n\nI think that covers everything. I don't see any other strategies needed here. The key is to break down the task into manageable steps and match each with the appropriate universal strategy."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 419,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US10",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 419,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to GitLab Settings\",\n \"Configure Status Settings\",\n \"Save and Generate Report\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to complete this task using the Universal Strategy templates provided. The task given is to set the GitLab status as \"Enjoying life\" on the GitLab interface. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I should understand what each part of the task means. The task ID is 419, and the site involved is GitLab. The intent is to set a status, which probably means updating a profile or project status on GitLab.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies, I need to identify which ones apply here. Let's go through them one by one.\n\nThe first strategy is \"Navigate To Page/Section\" (US1). Since the user needs to set a status, they likely need to go to the profile or project settings on GitLab. So this makes sense as the first step.\n\nNext, \"Configure Parameters/Settings\" (US3) would involve entering the specific status value, \"Enjoying life.\" This probably means filling out a form or selecting the status from a dropdown menu. So this would be the second step.\n\nFinally, \"Execute Action/Process\" (US4) would be initiating the process that saves the status. This would involve clicking a \"Save\" or \"Update\" button after configuring the settings.\n\nWait, are there any other strategies that might apply? Maybe \"View/Inspect Item Details\" (US5) if the user needs to look at the current status before setting it, but since the task is to set it, it might not be necessary. Also, \"Extract/Retrieve Information\" (US6) doesn't seem relevant here since we're setting a status, not retrieving information.\n\nAnother thought: after setting the status, the user might need to \"Generate and submit the report\" if there's a report to generate based on the status change, but that's not specified in the task. So I think the three steps are sufficient.\n\nSo the strategies would be:\n1. Navigate to the profile or project settings on GitLab.\n2. Configure the settings to set the status.\n3. Execute the action to save the changes.\n\nThe universal strategy IDs would be US1, US3, and US4.\n\nI should make sure the JSON output matches the required structure, including the task_id, strategies as a list of strings, and the corresponding universal strategies and their IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 423,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 423,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Hollister Shirts Section\",\n \"Configure Sale Parameter\",\n \"Mark Hollister Shirts as On Sale\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to handle this task where I need to mark all Hollister shirts on sale using the provided strategies. Let me start by breaking down the problem step by step.\n\nFirst, the task is to mark all Hollister shirts on sale. That means I need to take Hollister shirts and set their sale status to \"Yes\". So, I'll probably need to navigate to the section where Hollister shirts are listed, find each one, and then mark them as on sale.\n\nI remember that the examples given include strategies like navigating to a page, configuring parameters, and executing actions. So, I should think about which strategies apply here.\n\n1. **Navigating to the correct section**: I'll need to go to the section where Hollister shirts are displayed. The universal strategy for this is US1: \"Navigate To Page/Section\". So, the first step is to use US1 with the target being the Hollister shirts section.\n\n2. **Marking each shirt as on sale**: Once I'm on the Hollister shirts page, I'll need to find each shirt and mark it. This likely involves some form of selection or toggle, which might be part of configuring parameters or executing an action. But since it's about marking each item individually, maybe it's more about using a parameter for the sale status. So, perhaps using US3: \"Configure Parameters/Settings\" to set the sale status to \"Yes\" for each shirt. However, I'm not entirely sure if US3 covers per-item configuration.\n\n3. **Executing the marking action**: After configuring the parameters, I might need to perform an action to mark each shirt. That sounds like US4: \"Execute Action/Process\". So, I'll execute the action to mark each item.\n\nWait, but marking each shirt individually might require multiple actions. So, after configuring the parameters, I need to loop through each shirt and apply the sale status. That might mean using US4 multiple times or perhaps another strategy that can handle multiple items.\n\nAlternatively, maybe there's a strategy that allows selecting multiple items and applying a parameter to them. But looking at the provided strategies, I don't see one that directly handles selecting multiple items. So, perhaps the best approach is to use US1 to navigate to the section, use US3 to configure the sale parameter, and then use US4 multiple times to execute the marking process for each shirt.\n\nBut that might not be efficient. Maybe there's a way to select all items and apply the sale status in one go. However, since the provided strategies don't include such a specific one, I'll stick to the existing ones.\n\nSo, the steps would be:\n- Use US1 to navigate to the Hollister shirts section.\n- Use US3 to configure the sale parameter to \"Yes\".\n- Use US4 to execute the process of marking each shirt.\n\nWait, but marking each shirt individually might require multiple executions of US4. That could be a bit repetitive. Maybe there's a way to automate this, but without a specific strategy for selecting multiple items, I'll proceed with the existing ones.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps I can use US6: \"Extract/Retrieve Information\" to get the list of Hollister shirts and then use US4 to mark each one. But that might complicate things unnecessarily.\n\nI think the most straightforward approach is to:\n1. Navigate to the Hollister shirts section using US1.\n2. Configure the sale parameter to \"Yes\" using US3.\n3. Execute the marking process for each shirt using US4 multiple times or in a loop.\n\nBut since the task is to \"mark all\" and not to \"mark each\", maybe there's a way to select all items and apply the sale status in one step. However, without a specific strategy for that, I'll proceed with the existing ones.\n\nSo, the strategies would be US1, US3, and US4."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 426,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US1"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US1"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 426,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to the Map\",\n \"Search for the Crash Site\",\n \"View the Crash Site Map\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate Within Data/Results\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US8\", \"US2\", \"US1\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to complete this task using the Universal Strategy Templates provided. The task is to find the page of the place in Pennsylvania where a plane crashed during the September 11th attacks on the map. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I think the user is working on a web interface, probably Wikipedia since one of the sites is \"wikipedia\" and another is \"map.\" The goal is to locate a specific map that shows where the plane crashed during the 9/11 attacks in Pennsylvania.\n\nStep 1: They probably need to navigate to the Wikipedia page about the September 11th attacks. That makes sense because that's where the information about the events would be. So, I'll use US1 here, which is about navigating to a specific page or section.\n\nOnce they're on the Wikipedia page, they'll need to find the section about the 9/11 attacks in Pennsylvania. That might involve scrolling or using a search function on the page. So, maybe another US1 to navigate within the page to the specific section.\n\nNow, within that section, they probably need to find a map showing the crash site. Wikipedia often has embedded maps or external links to maps. If the map is embedded, they might need to click on it, which would be US1 again. Alternatively, if they have to search for an external map, they might use US2 to search for the map on a results page.\n\nAfter finding the map, they need to view it, which is another US1 to navigate to the map's page or view it directly. If the map requires configuration, like selecting a date or location, they might use US3 to configure parameters. However, in this case, since it's a historical event, the configuration might not be necessary, so maybe US1 suffices.\n\nOnce they have the map open, they need to take an action, like interacting with it. If they need to export or download the map, that would be US4 to execute an action. Alternatively, if they just need to review it, US4 might still apply.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would involve navigating to Wikipedia, then to the specific section, then searching or viewing the map, and finally interacting with it. The universal strategy IDs would be US1 for navigating, US2 for searching, and US4 for executing actions.\n\nWait, but the user mentioned using the map site as well. So maybe after navigating to Wikipedia, they need to go to the map site. That's another US1. Then, within the map site, they might need to search for the crash site, which is another US2. Then view the map, another US1, and execute the action, US4.\n\nHmm, that seems a bit long. Alternatively, if the map is directly on Wikipedia, they might not need to go to a separate map site. So, maybe the strategies are: navigate to Wikipedia, navigate to the 9/11 section, search for the crash site within that page, view the map, and execute the action.\n\nSo the strategies would be US1, US1, US2, US1, US4. But the example output only had three strategies with three universal IDs. Since the task is to find the page on the map, maybe they need to navigate to Wikipedia, then to the 9/11 map, search for the crash site, and view it. That would be US1, US1, US2, US1.\n\nBut the output example had three strategies and three IDs, so perhaps it's simplified to the main steps without repeating US1 multiple times. So, maybe: navigate to Wikipedia (US1), navigate to the 9/11 map (US1), search for the crash site (US2), view the map (US1), and execute the action (US4). But that's five steps.\n\nAlternatively, considering the sites are Wikipedia and map, maybe they need to navigate to Wikipedia, then to the 9/11 page, then search for the crash site on the map, view it, and take action. So, that would be US1, US1, US2, US1, US4.\n\nBut the example output didn't have that many. So, perhaps the main steps are: navigate to the map, search for the crash site, view it, and take action. So, US1 (navigate to map), US2 (search), US1 (view), US4 (action). That makes four steps.\n\nWait, but the task is to find the page of the place on the map. So, maybe the main steps are: navigate to Wikipedia, find the 9/11 page, search for the crash site, view it, and take action. That would be US1, US1, US2, US1, US4.\n\nBut perhaps the user is only focusing on the map aspect, so they navigate to the map site, search for the crash site, view it, and take action. So, that would be US1, US2, US1, US4.\n\nI think that's the most concise way to break it down without unnecessary steps. So, the strategies would be: navigate to the map, search for the crash site, view the map, and execute the action. That covers all necessary steps and uses US1, US2, US1, US4. But since the output example used three strategies with three IDs, maybe it's simplified to the main actions: navigate to the map, search, view, and action.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps the user only needs to search on the map, so it's US2. But no, they need to navigate to the map first. So, the final answer would include navigating to the map, searching within it, viewing the result, and taking an action, using US1, US2, US1, US4. But the output example had three strategies, so maybe it's US1, US2, US4.\n\nWait, perhaps the user just needs to search on the map, so it's US2. But they also need to navigate to the map, which is another US1. Then, view the map, which is US1, and take action, US4. So, four steps.\n\nBut the output example had three strategies, so perhaps it's simplified to three main actions: navigate to the map (US1), search for the crash site (US2), and view the map (US1). Then, execute the action, which is US4. But the output example didn't include the action as a separate strategy, just the navigation and viewing.\n\nHmm, maybe the action is part of the strategy. So, the action of viewing the map is part of the strategy. So, perhaps the strategies are: navigate to the map (US1), search within it (US2), and view the result (US1). Then, the action is part of the last strategy, so the final step is to view and take action, which might be covered in US1.\n\nI think I need to structure it as: navigate to the map (US1), search for the crash site (US2), view the map (US1), and take action (US4). But since the output example didn't include the action as a separate strategy, maybe it's included in the last step. So, the final answer would have four strategies, but the output example had three, so perhaps it's better to include all necessary steps regardless of how many IDs are used.\n\nBut the output example used three strategies and three IDs, so maybe the answer should follow that structure. So, perhaps the main strategies are: navigate to the map, search within it, and view the result. That would be US1, US2, US1. The action is part of the viewing step, so it's included in US1. Then, the final output would have three strategies and three IDs.\n\nI think that's the best approach. So, the strategies are: navigate to the map (US1), search for the crash site (US2), view the map (US1). The action of taking the map is part of the viewing step. So, the final JSON would include these three strategies with their respective IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 43,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 43,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Search Analytics Report\",\n \"Search for Top Search Terms\",\n \"Sort and Retrieve Top 3 Search Terms\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to complete the task given by the user. The task is to list the top 3 search terms in the user's store. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I should understand the goal: I need to find out the top three search terms that users are using on the website. This likely involves some analysis of the search data on the platform.\n\nI remember that the user mentioned using a GUI Agent and Universal Strategy Templates. So I should refer to those to plan the steps.\n\nLooking at the templates, US1 is about navigating to a page, US2 is for searching or filtering data, and US4 is for executing an action. Also, US7 might be useful for analyzing data.\n\nSo, the first step would probably be to navigate to the search analytics page. That makes sense because that's where the data would be stored. So I'll use US1 here.\n\nOnce on that page, I need to find the search terms and filter them. That sounds like using a search function, so US2 would apply here. I'll filter for the most recent or popular terms.\n\nAfter retrieving the data, I need to sort it to find the top three. That would involve an action like sorting by frequency or relevance, so again, US4 would be the template for executing that action.\n\nI should make sure each step is clear and follows the templates accurately. Maybe I can also consider if there are more steps, but these three seem sufficient: navigate, search/filter, and execute the sort action."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 44,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 44,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Todos List\",\n \"View Todos\",\n \"Extract Information from Specific Todos\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US5\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I have this task to figure out how to help the user with their request. The user provided some JSON input and an example output, so I need to make sure I follow that structure. Let me start by understanding what the task is asking.\n\nThe task is to design a strategy for a web interface based on the given input. The input includes a task_id, sites, and intent. The output needs to be in JSON format, including strategies, universal strategies, and their IDs.\n\nLooking at the example, the output includes a list of strategies, the corresponding universal strategies, and their IDs. The example used strategies like US1, US3, and US4, which correspond to navigation, configuration, and execution.\n\nNow, the user's input is:\n{\"task_id\": 44, \"sites\": [\"gitlab\"], \"intent\": \"Check out my todos\"}\n\nSo, the task is to check out todos on the GitLab site. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I need to figure out what action corresponds to \"Check out my todos.\" On GitLab, todos are tasks or issues. Checking them out would likely mean viewing or reviewing them. So, the first step would be to navigate to the todos section.\n\nNext, once on the todos page, I might need to select or review each todo. Since the intent is to \"check out,\" it implies looking at the todos, so navigating to the todos list makes sense. That would align with US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\n\nAfter navigating, the next step would be to view the todos. So, I need to open the todos section, which again is US1. But since the user might need to perform an action on the todos, like viewing them, maybe that's covered in the same strategy.\n\nOnce on the todos page, the user would likely want to review each todo. Reviewing specific todos would involve selecting them, which might not be directly covered by the universal strategies provided. However, if the strategy is to retrieve information, that could be another step. Let me check the universal strategies.\n\nLooking at the list, US6 is about extracting information. So, after viewing, the user might need to extract details from specific todos. That would make US6 applicable here.\n\nBut wait, the task is just \"Check out my todos,\" which is more about viewing them rather than extracting information. Maybe US5, which is View/Inspect Item Details, would be more appropriate. However, viewing multiple items might not require a separate strategy for each.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps the user wants to create a report of the todos. That would involve configuring parameters (US3) and then generating the report (US4). But the task doesn't specify creating a report, just checking them out.\n\nAnother angle is that \"check out\" might mean editing or updating the todos. If that's the case, then US10: Update/Modify Item could be relevant, but the intent is more about viewing.\n\nI think the primary steps are:\n\n1. Navigate to the todos page on GitLab. That's US1.\n2. View the todos. That could be part of the same strategy as navigation or a separate one, but since viewing is a form of inspecting, maybe US5.\n\nSo, the strategies could be \"Navigate to Todos List\" and \"View Todos.\" The universal strategies would be US1 and US5, with IDs \"US1\" and \"US5\".\n\nWait, but looking at the example output, they had three strategies and three universal strategies. Maybe I need to include extracting information as well if that's part of checking them out. If the user needs to see details of specific todos, then extracting information would be necessary, making US6 another step.\n\nSo, the strategies would be:\n\n1. Navigate to Todos List (US1)\n2. View Todos (US5)\n3. Extract Information from Specific Todos (US6)\n\nAnd the universal strategy IDs would be US1, US5, US6.\n\nAlternatively, if the task is just to check them out without extracting, maybe only two strategies are needed. But since the example output included three, I'll assume that extracting is part of the task.\n\nAnother consideration is whether \"check out\" implies creating or updating, but without more context, I'll stick to viewing and extracting.\n\nSo, finalizing the strategies:\n\n- Navigate to Todos List (US1)\n- View Todos (US5)\n- Extract Information from Specific Todos (US6)\n\nAnd the corresponding IDs are US1, US5, US6.\n\nI think that's a reasonable breakdown. Now, I'll structure the JSON output accordingly."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 440,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 440,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to the Orders Management Section\",\n \"View the Makeup Removal Kit Details\",\n \"Reorder the Makeup Removal Kit\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Create Item\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US5\", \"US9\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to handle this task for the user. Let's see, the user ordered a makeup removal kit in summer 2022, but then canceled it. Now they want to reorder it. \n\nFirst, I should understand the steps involved in reordering an item. Usually, you need to go to the specific section where the item is managed, maybe under orders or returns. Then, they might need to select the item they want to reorder. After that, there's probably a process to update the order status to \"active\" or something similar to get it restocked.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies provided, I think US1 is for navigating to a page. So they'll start by going to the management section for the orders. Then, US5 would be for viewing the item details so they can see the specific makeup removal kit. Finally, US9 is about creating or updating an item, which in this case, would be reordering it.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategy would involve navigating to the orders management, viewing the specific item details, and then reordering it. The corresponding strategy IDs would be US1, US5, and US9. \n\nI should make sure each step is clear and follows the right order. First, navigate to the right place, then view the item to confirm, and finally reorder. This should help the user successfully get their canceled order updated."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 443,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US10",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 443,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Project Settings\",\n \"Configure Title Update\",\n \"Update Project Title\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, let's try to figure out how to handle this task. So, the user wants me to act as a GUI Agent that breaks down tasks into steps using the Universal Strategy Templates provided.\n\nFirst, looking at the task: update the project site's title to \"Not an interesting site\". The site is Gitlab, but I don't think the site name is editable on Gitlab. Wait, maybe the user is referring to a different Gitlab instance or perhaps a page within Gitlab that allows title changes. Assuming that it's possible, I'll proceed.\n\nNow, I need to decompose this task. The main action is to update the title. So, the first step would be to navigate to the project settings or the specific page where the title can be edited. That would fall under \"Navigate To Page/Section\", which is US1.\n\nNext, once on that page, I need to find the title field and change it. That would involve configuring the parameters or settings for the title update. So, that's US3, \"Configure Parameters/Settings\".\n\nFinally, after making the change, I need to execute the action, which would be submitting the form or saving the change. That's US4, \"Execute Action/Process\".\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies are navigating to the settings, configuring the title, and executing the update. The universal strategies used are US1, US3, and US4. \n\nI think that's all. Just to make sure, are there any other steps? Maybe checking if the change was successful, but that's more of an analysis step, which isn't part of the task here. So, the answer should be as concise as the example provided."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 448,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 448,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Profile Settings\",\n \"View Profile Homepage URL\",\n \"Save Updated Homepage URL\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US5\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I'm looking at this task where I need to set the homepage URL on a GitLab profile to a specific URL. Let me break this down step by step. \n\nFirst, I need to figure out where this task would fall on the web interface. Since it's about changing a URL on a profile, I'm thinking it involves navigating to a settings or profile section on GitLab. GitLab has a profile settings area where you can manage user information, including URLs. So, the first step would be to navigate to that section. That sounds like using US1, which is \"Navigate To Page/Section.\"\n\nOnce I'm in the profile settings, I need to find the option to set the homepage URL. On GitLab, I believe there's a field where you can input the base URL for your profile. I might need to click on \"Manage profile\" or something similar to get to this part. That would be part of US5, \"View/Inspect Item Details,\" because I'm inspecting the profile settings to find the URL field.\n\nAfter locating the URL field, I need to input the new URL, https://egg.tart.com. This action of entering the URL into a text field is a common task, but I'm not sure which universal strategy that falls under. Looking at the options, US6 is \"Extract/Retrieve Information,\" which is about getting information, but here I'm setting it, so maybe it's not directly covered. However, since the task involves interacting with a form element, perhaps it's part of US10, \"Update/Modify Item,\" because I'm modifying the profile's attributes.\n\nWait, but US10 is about updating an existing item, which in this case is the profile. So, after setting the URL, I need to save the changes. That would involve clicking a \"Save\" or \"Update\" button, which is part of US4, \"Execute Action/Process.\" So, the final step would be to execute that action, which is saving the settings. \n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be: navigate to the profile settings (US1), view the URL field (US5), and then execute the save action (US4). I might have missed a step in extracting the current URL, but since the task is about setting it, maybe that's not necessary. Alternatively, if I need to retrieve the current URL first to compare, that would involve US6, but the output example didn't include that. \n\nI think it's safe to proceed with the three steps: navigate, view the URL, and save the change. That covers the necessary actions without overcomplicating it."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 454,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 454,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Product Details\",\n \"Disable Ryker Tee Crew Neck\",\n \"Provide Documentation for Disabled Product\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, so I've got this task to disable a specific product called the Ryker Tee Crew Neck on the shopping_admin site. The user mentioned it's facing quality issues, so I need to make sure it's taken offline. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I need to navigate to the product page. That should be straightforward – just a matter of going to the correct URL. But wait, do I need to go through any specific steps to locate the product? Maybe search for it in the search bar or browse through the categories. Either way, the main action is to get to the product page.\n\nOnce I'm on the product page, the next step is to disable it. The user wants to remove it from the site, so I'll need to find the option to delete or disable the product. Is there a dedicated button for this, or do I have to go through a settings menu? I should check if there's a \"Delete\" or \"Disable\" option in the product's settings.\n\nNow, considering the quality issues, I might need to provide some rationale or documentation backing up the decision. Maybe I should have a section where I explain why the product is being disabled and any supporting data. That way, if there's any pushback or further issues, the information is readily available.\n\nPutting it all together, the first step is to navigate to the product page, which aligns with \"Navigate To Page/Section\" (US1). Then, I'll configure the settings to disable the product, which fits under \"Configure Parameters/Settings\" (US3). Finally, I'll execute the action to disable it, matching \"Execute Action/Process\" (US4). \n\nI should make sure each step is clear and actionable, so the user knows exactly what to do after following the instructions. Also, it's good to keep the reasons for disabling the product documented for clarity and reference."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 458,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 458,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Configure Product Price Settings\",\n \"Save Product Price Adjustment\",\n \"View Product Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US3\", \"US4\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, let's tackle this task. So, the goal is to reduce the price of a specific product by $5. I need to figure out the steps to achieve this using the provided universal strategies.\n\nFirst, I should identify which strategies are relevant. The user mentioned that the task involves changing a product's price, which is a configuration action. So, I think \"Configure Parameters/Settings\" would be the first step. Looking at the examples, US3 is about configuring settings, so that makes sense here.\n\nNext, after configuring the settings, I need to implement the change. That would involve clicking a \"Save\" or \"Update\" button, which falls under \"Execute Action/Process.\" In the example, US4 is about executing an action, so that's the second step.\n\nFinally, to ensure the change was made correctly, I should view the product's details to confirm the price reduction. This would use \"View/Inspect Item Details,\" which is US5. So, the third step is to view the product's details.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategy steps would be: configure the settings, execute the action to save, and view the product details. The universal strategy IDs would be US3, US4, and US5.\n\nI should also make sure the JSON output is correctly formatted, including all the necessary fields like task_id, strategies, universal_strategies, and universal_strategy_ids. Let me double-check the example provided to ensure consistency.\n\nYes, the example shows that the strategies are listed in the order they were applied, and the IDs are correctly referenced. So, I think I've covered all the necessary steps and matched them with the right strategies."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 46,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 46,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Issues Report\",\n \"Configure Issues Parameters for Most Recent\",\n \"View Issues Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to complete this task using the Universal Strategy Templates provided. The task given is to \"Check out the most recent open issues\" on the GitLab site. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I should understand what the user is asking for. They want to check the most recent open issues on GitLab. That means I need to navigate to the right section, find the open issues, and then view or analyze them.\n\nLooking at the Universal Strategies, I see several that might apply here. Let me go through them one by one.\n\nThe first strategy is \"Navigate To Page/Section\" (US1). This seems relevant because the user needs to go to the correct page to find open issues. So, I'll plan to use US1 here.\n\nNext, the second strategy is \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\" (US2). Since the user is looking for the most recent issues, I'll need to sort the list by the creation date. This would involve selecting a sorting option, which falls under US2.\n\nThe third strategy is \"View/Inspect Item Details\" (US5). After finding the open issues, the user might want to view each one in detail. So, clicking on each issue to see its specifics would use US5.\n\nPutting it all together, the steps would be: navigate to the Issues section, filter for the most recent ones, and then view each issue's details. This aligns with the strategies US1, US2, and US5, with their respective IDs: 1, 2, and 5.\n\nWait, let me double-check if there's a more efficient way. Maybe after navigating to the Issues section, there's a way to sort or filter directly without a separate search step, but I think it's safer to include both navigation and filtering as separate steps to ensure clarity.\n\nAlso, considering that GitLab might have a specific layout, I should ensure that the \"Issues\" section is correctly navigated to using US1. Then, within that section, there should be a way to sort issues by creation date, which would be part of the filtering process under US2.\n\nI think that covers all the necessary steps. So, the final strategy list should include navigating to the Issues report, configuring the sort parameters to show the most recent issues, and then viewing the details of each issue."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 464,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 464,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Antonia Racer Tank Product Page\",\n \"View/Inspect Product Description Details\",\n \"Extract Real User Positive Reviews\",\n \"Update Product Description with Comments\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US5\", \"US6\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to update the product description of Antonia Racer Tank to highlight real user positive reviews by quoting the comments. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I think I need to navigate to the product page where Antonia Racer Tank is listed. That makes sense because I can't update the description without being there. So I'll use the \"Navigate to Product Page\" strategy, which I think corresponds to US1 because it's about moving to a specific page.\n\nOnce I'm on the product page, I need to find the description section. That's probably where all the details about the product are. So the next step is to \"View/Inspect Item Details,\" which is US5. This will let me see the current description and any comments or reviews associated with the product.\n\nAfter viewing the details, the next step is to locate the real user positive reviews. I assume these are in a section somewhere, maybe under customer reviews or testimonials. So I'll use \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\" with the intent \"Real User Positive Reviews\" using US2. This will filter the reviews to show only the positive ones.\n\nNow, I need to highlight specific comments from these reviews. I'll have to extract the relevant parts of the comments. Using \"Extract/Retrieve Information\" with the intent to get the comments, which is US6. This will help me gather the exact quotes I need to include in the new description.\n\nWith the relevant comments in hand, I can now update the product description. This involves editing the text, which falls under \"Configure Parameters/Settings\" because I'm changing settings related to the description. So I'll use US3 to configure the settings for the description field.\n\nOnce the description is updated, I need to save the changes. This is an action, so it would fall under \"Execute Action/Process,\" which is US4. I'll click the \"Save\" button to apply the changes.\n\nPutting it all together, I have four main steps: navigate to the product page, view the details, extract the comments, and update the description. The universal strategies used are US1, US5, US2, US3, and US4. However, since the output requires only the top-level strategies, I'll need to group them appropriately.\n\nWait, let me double-check. The initial navigation is US1, viewing details is US5, extracting info is US6, and configuring settings is US3. The final action is US4. But the example output uses three strategies, so maybe some steps can be combined or simplified. Hmm.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps after extracting the comments, the next step is to update the description, which involves configuring the parameters (US3) and then executing the save (US4). So maybe the strategies are US1, US5, US2, US3, and US4, but the example shows three strategies, so perhaps the approach is to combine viewing and extracting into one step.\n\nI think the best approach is to outline each action clearly, even if some are part of the same process. So I'll list each step separately with the corresponding strategies."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 466,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 466,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Wish List\",\n \"Search for Product\",\n \"Add Product to Wish List\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Create Item\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US9\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I've got this task to figure out how to add 2 Hawaiian Bamboo Orchid Roots to a wish list using a GUI Agent. The user provided some universal strategies and examples, so I'll need to break down the task step by step using those.\n\nFirst, I need to understand what the task is asking. The user wants to add a specific product to their wish list. The product is \"2 Hawaiian Bamboo Orchid Roots #zc50\" from the site \"shopping\". So, the main actions would involve navigating to the wish list section, finding the product, and adding it.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies, I see US1 is about navigating to a page or section. So, I'll need to go to the wish list. That makes sense. Next, after being on the wish list, I need to find the specific product. To do that, I might have to search for the product using its name or the SKU number. That would fall under US2, which is about searching or filtering data.\n\nOnce the product is found, the next step is to add it to the wish list. That's a direct action, so US9, Create Item, would apply here because adding a new item to the wish list is creating a new entry.\n\nLet me make sure I'm not missing any steps. Navigate to wish list (US1), search for the product (US2), then create the item (US9). That covers all the necessary actions without any extra steps.\n\nI should also consider if there are any other strategies involved. Maybe after adding, the user might want to review the wish list, which would use US7, Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data, but the task doesn't specify that. So, sticking to the three steps should be sufficient.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be US1, US2, and US9. The corresponding actions are navigate to wish list, search for the product, and create the item.\n\nI think that's all. No need to overcomplicate it. Three clear steps using the provided strategies should handle the task effectively."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 471,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 471,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Orders Report\",\n \"Search for Order 307\",\n \"Update Order Status to Canceled\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Update/Modify Item\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US10\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, so I'm trying to figure out how to cancel order 307 on the shopping_admin site. The user provided an example of how to structure the response, so I should follow that format. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I need to understand the task. The intent is to cancel a specific order, so the main action is cancellation. Looking at the Universal Strategies, I remember that US9 is about creating an item, but here we're modifying an existing one. US10 is for updating or modifying an item, which fits because canceling an order would involve modifying its status.\n\nNext, I need to navigate to the correct place. Probably, the orders are in a specific report or section, so I think US1 would be \"Navigate To Page/Section\" to get to the orders page.\n\nOnce on the orders page, I need to locate order 307. This might involve searching or filtering, so US2, \"Search/Filter/Sort Data,\" would be applicable. I'll set the filter to find order 307.\n\nAfter finding the order, I need to modify its status to canceled. That sounds like US10, \"Update/Modify Item,\" which allows changing attributes of an existing item.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategy steps would be: navigate to the orders report, search for order 307, and then update its status. The corresponding universal strategies are US1, US2, and US10.\n\nI should make sure each step is clear and follows the example structure. The output needs to be in JSON, including the task_id, strategies, universal strategies, and their IDs. Let me double-check that I'm not missing any steps and that each action aligns with the provided strategies.\n\nYes, that seems right. I don't think there's a need to include additional strategies beyond what's necessary. The steps should be concise and directly address the task of canceling the order."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 476,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "To set up a new, empty repository named \"awesome_llm_reading\" on GitLab, follow these steps:\n\n1. **Navigate to the Repository Creation Page** \n - Move to the GitLab interface where you can create a new repository. \n - This aligns with the strategy of navigating to a page or section. \n - Universal Strategy ID: US1.\n\n2. **Configure Repository Details** \n - Enter the repository name as \"awesome_llm_reading\" in the designated field. \n - This involves configuring specific parameters for the repository. \n - Universal Strategy ID: US5.\n\n3. **Create the Repository** \n - Click on the appropriate button, such as \"Create\" or \"Make,\" to initiate the repository creation. \n - This corresponds to executing an action or process. \n - Universal Strategy ID: US4.\n\nBy following these steps, you will successfully create a new repository on GitLab with the specified name.\n\n```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 476,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Repository Creation Page\",\n \"Configure Repository Name\",\n \"Create Repository\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US5\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, I need to figure out how to set up a new, empty repository named \"awesome_llm_reading\" on GitLab based on the given task. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I know that GitLab has a repository creation interface. So, I should start by navigating to that interface. That seems like the first step, which would correspond to US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\n\nOnce I'm on the repository creation page, I need to enter the repository name. The user wants it to be \"awesome_llm_reading,\" so I'll have to locate the field where I can input the name and type that exact name. This falls under US5: View/Inspect Item Details, specifically configuring the repository details.\n\nAfter entering the name, the next step is to create the repository. On GitLab, I believe there's a \"Create\" or \"Make\" button for repositories. Clicking that would be an example of US4: Execute Action/Process, as I'm initiating the creation action.\n\nI don't think I need to filter or sort anything here, so maybe US2 isn't necessary. Also, I don't see any need to analyze or verify data beyond what's required for creating the repository, so US7 might not apply.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategy steps are: navigate to the repository creation page, configure the name, and execute the creation. The corresponding universal strategies are US1, US5, and US4."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 48,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 48,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Orders Report\",\n \"Configure Report Parameters for Past Three Days and Fulfilled Orders\",\n \"Generate Orders Report\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I have this task where I need to figure out how to complete it using the Universal Strategy Templates provided. The task is to find out how many fulfilled orders there are over the past three days and the total amount spent. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I need to understand the goal: the user wants to know the number of fulfilled orders and the total money spent in the last three days. That means I need to look at some data related to orders, specifically their fulfillment status and the amounts involved.\n\nLooking at the Universal Strategies, I see several that could be relevant. US1 is about navigating to a specific page, which makes sense because I'll probably need to go to an orders section. US3 is about configuring parameters, which might be necessary if there are filters I need to set. US4 is executing an action, which would involve generating a report.\n\nSo, the first step is to navigate to the Orders report. That would be US1, which is \"Navigate To Page/Section.\" I'll need to go to the correct section on the web interface where the orders are stored.\n\nNext, I need to ensure that the report includes only fulfilled orders. That means I might have to configure some filters. US3, \"Configure Parameters/Settings,\" would be the template here. I can set the filters to show only fulfilled orders and perhaps limit the date range to the past three days. This way, the report will only display the data the user is interested in.\n\nAfter setting up the filters, I need to generate the report. That would be US4, \"Execute Action/Process,\" where I click a \"Generate\" or \"Run\" button to create the report. Once the report is generated, I can then retrieve the information needed, which is the count of fulfilled orders and the total amount spent. This falls under US6, \"Extract/Retrieve Information,\" where I would look at the report's data to extract these numbers.\n\nSo, putting it all together, the strategies would be: navigate to the Orders report, configure the parameters to filter for fulfilled orders over the past three days, and then execute the action to generate the report. Each of these steps corresponds to specific Universal Strategies, ensuring that the task is completed systematically.\n\nI should also make sure that the order of these strategies makes sense. First, navigate to the correct place, then configure the filters to get the right data, and finally generate the report to extract the information. There's no need to view item details here since the user is looking for aggregated data, not individual order information.\n\nI might also consider if there are any other strategies involved, but based on the provided templates, these three steps should cover the task. It's important to follow the right sequence to ensure that the report is accurate and the data is correctly retrieved. I don't think I need to use any other strategies like US5 or US7 because the task isn't about viewing specific items or analyzing data in detail beyond the count and total.\n\nSo, finalizing the plan, the strategies are US1, US3, and US4. Each step is clearly defined and aligns with the Universal Strategy templates, making the process efficient and straightforward."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 485,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US10",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 485,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Gitlab Repository Settings\",\n \"Create Invite for Vinta\",\n \"Send and Check Invite\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Create Item\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US10\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, I need to help the user by designing a strategy for their task. Let me look at the input they provided. The task is to invite Vinta to their GitLab repository as a guest because he wants to check their dotfile configurations.\n\nFirst, I should break this down into steps. The main action here is inviting someone to the repository. So, the first step would be to navigate to the GitLab interface where the repository settings are located. That probably involves going to the repository settings, so I think US1 (Navigate To Page/Section) applies here.\n\nOnce in the settings, the next logical step is to find the invite section. I believe GitLab has a section where you can manage invitations, so I'll use US10 (Update/Modify Item) to represent the action of creating an invite. This involves filling out the invitee's details and selecting the repository.\n\nAfter creating the invite, the next step is to send the invitation. So, I'll use US4 (Execute Action/Process) to represent this action. Finally, I should check if the invitation was sent successfully, which means viewing the repository's invitation status. Using US5 (View/Inspect Item Details) would be appropriate here to check the invite status.\n\nPutting it all together, I'll list each step with the corresponding strategies and their IDs. The universal strategies used are US1, US10, and US4. The strategies themselves are \"Navigate to Gitlab Repository Settings,\" \"Create Invite for Vinta,\" and \"Send and Check Invite.\" \n\nI should make sure each step logically follows the previous one and covers all necessary actions without missing any. Also, I need to ensure that the Universal Strategy IDs are correctly referenced and that the JSON structure matches the required output format."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 488,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": true,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 488,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Home Page\",\n \"Update Page Title\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Update/Modify Item\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US10\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to change the page title of the Home Page on the shopping_admin site. The current title is \"Home Page\" and I need to change it to something more catchy: \"This is the home page!! Leave here!!\". \n\nFirst, I should think about what steps are involved in changing a page title on a website. Usually, you navigate to the page, find the area where the title is displayed, and either edit it directly or go through a content management system (CMS) if available. \n\nLooking at the universal strategies, I see US1 is about navigating to a page, which fits the first step. Then, I might need to edit the content, which could fall under US6, Extract/Retrieve Information, but wait, actually, editing is more about modifying existing content, so maybe that's a different strategy. \n\nWait, looking again, US9 is about creating an item, which doesn't fit. US10 is updating an item, which might be closer. US10 involves modifying attributes or content of an existing item, which in this case would be changing the page title. So that might be the right strategy here. \n\nSo the steps would be: first, navigate to the Home Page (US1), then find the page title, and then either edit it directly or use an update function (US10). \n\nWait, but US10 is more about modifying an existing item, so if the page is considered an item, then yes, US10 would be appropriate. \n\nSo the strategy would be: navigate to the Home Page, then update its title. \n\nI think that's the correct approach. So the strategy steps would be \"Navigate to Home Page\" and \"Update Page Title\". The universal strategies used would be US1 and US10."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 497,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US10",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 497,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"View the order details of Order #307\",\n \"Update the tracking number in the order details\",\n \"Save the updated order information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Update/Modify Item\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US5\", \"US10\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to update an order with a specific DHL tracking number. The task is to update order #307, so I need to think about the steps involved in doing that on a web interface.\n\nFirst, I'll break it down. I need to navigate to the order management section where I can edit or update an order. That sounds like \"Navigate To Page/Section,\" which is US1. Once there, I'll probably have to find the specific order I need to update. So, maybe \"View/Inspect Item Details,\" which is US5. That way, I can locate order #307.\n\nAfter finding the order, I need to input the new tracking number, 24353446464. That should fall under \"Configure Parameters/Settings\" or \"Update/Modify Item.\" Since it's an update, \"Update/Modify Item\" makes sense, which is US10. I'll have to locate where to enter the tracking number, maybe in a field related to delivery or shipping.\n\nOnce the tracking number is entered, I'll need to save the changes. That's probably under \"Execute Action/Process,\" which is US4. So the steps would be: navigate to the orders page, view the specific order, update the tracking number, and then save the changes.\n\nI should make sure each step is clear and follows the right universal strategy. So the strategies would be US1, US5, US10, and US4. I think that covers everything needed to update the order successfully."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 505,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US9",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 505,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Search for Aeno Capri Products\",\n \"Modify Aeno Capri Product Status\",\n \"Update Aeno Capri Product Status\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Update/Modify Item\",\n \"Update/Modify Item\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US2\", \"US9\", \"US9\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I've got this task to figure out how to make all Aeno Capri as out of stock on the shopping_admin site. Let me break this down step by step because I'm a bit new to this, but I think I can handle it by using the universal strategies provided.\n\nFirst, I need to understand what the task is asking. The user wants to set all Aeno Capri items to be out of stock. That probably means reducing their available quantity to zero or removing them from the inventory. So, I need to figure out how to do that on the shopping admin interface.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies, I should probably start by navigating to the right place. The intent mentions \"Aeno capri,\" so I need to find the product category for Aeno Capri. The first step is likely to go to the product management section where I can see all the products, including Aeno Capri. So, I think strategy US1, \"Navigate To Page/Section,\" applies here. I'll need to move to the Product Management or Inventory section.\n\nOnce I'm there, I need to find the Aeno Capri products. So, I'll have to search for them. That would be using the search functionality, which falls under strategy US2, \"Search/Filter/Sort Data.\" I can filter the list by product name to locate Aeno Capri.\n\nAfter identifying the products, I need to make them out of stock. That probably involves editing their details. So, I should look for a \"Edit\" or \"Modify\" option next to each product. This would be strategy US9, \"Create Item\" or \"Update/Modify Item.\" Since I'm changing their status, it's more about modifying an existing item.\n\nWait, but modifying each item individually might be time-consuming. Maybe there's a way to batch update them. I'm not sure if that exists, but if not, I'll have to go through each one. So, for each Aeno Capri product, I need to update their status to out of stock. This would involve clicking on each product and then selecting the option to set them as out of stock, which is likely under the same \"Update/Modify Item\" strategy.\n\nAlternatively, if there's a bulk action for setting products as out of stock, that could be more efficient. But based on the provided strategies, I think US9 is the best fit since it's about modifying existing items.\n\nPutting it all together, my steps would be:\n1. Navigate to the Product Management section to access Aeno Capri.\n2. Search for Aeno Capri products to locate them.\n3. For each Aeno Capri product, update its status to out of stock.\n\nEach of these steps corresponds to the universal strategies US1, US2, and US9. I'll need to make sure I'm using the correct IDs as per the example provided.\n\nI think I've covered all the necessary steps. I'm a bit unsure about whether there's a more efficient way to batch update, but without additional strategies, this seems like the way to go."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 506,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 506,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Meat Substitute Products\",\n \"Filter Products by Budget Range\",\n \"Sort Products by Rating\",\n \"Generate Purchase Order\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Sort/Reorder Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to complete this task using the Universal Strategy Templates provided. The task given is for a GUI Agent to handle a specific request on a web interface. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, looking at the task details: the task_id is 506, and it's for the \"shopping\" site. The intent is to \"Buy the highest rated product from the meat substitute category within a budget between 100 and 200.\" So, the goal is to find and purchase the best-rated meat substitute product priced between $100 and $200.\n\nI need to plan this task by breaking it down into steps. The user provided some Universal Strategies with IDs, so I should refer to those to structure the strategy.\n\nLet me think about the steps involved. The first thing would be to navigate to the correct section where meat substitute products are listed. That likely involves using the \"Navigate To Page/Section\" strategy, which is US1. So, I'll plan to go to the meat substitute category page.\n\nOnce on that page, I need to filter the results by budget between $100 and $200. That sounds like using the \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\" strategy, which is US2. So, I'll set the price range filter.\n\nAfter filtering, I should sort the products by rating to find the highest-rated ones. Sorting is typically handled by a strategy like \"Sort/Reorder Data,\" but I don't see that in the provided templates. Hmm, maybe I can use \"Configure Parameters/Settings\" (US3) to adjust the sorting criteria. Alternatively, if there's a dedicated sort function, that would be better, but since it's not listed, I'll have to use US3 to configure the settings for sorting by rating.\n\nOnce the products are sorted, the next step is to select the highest-rated product. But to do that, I need to view the details of the product. So, I'll use \"View/Inspect Item Details\" (US5) to open the product's details.\n\nAfter viewing the details, I need to make a purchase. That falls under \"Execute Action/Process\" (US4), so I'll initiate the purchase process, likely by clicking a \"Buy\" or \"Submit\" button.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be: navigate to the meat substitute section, configure the price filter, sort by rating, view the product details, and execute the purchase. The corresponding Universal Strategy IDs would be US1, US2, US3, and US4.\n\nWait, but the example output includes three strategies, not four. Let me check the example again. Oh, in the example, they had three strategies because one was combined. Maybe in this case, it's four separate steps, each with their own strategy ID.\n\nSo, in the output, the strategies array should have four entries, each with their respective IDs. That makes sense.\n\nI think that's a solid plan. Now, I'll structure the JSON output accordingly, ensuring that each step is clearly mapped to the correct strategy and ID."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 509,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US9",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 509,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Men's Shoe Category\",\n \"Filter Products by Reviews and Price\",\n \"Add Best Product to Cart\",\n \"Generate and Proceed to Checkout\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Create Item\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US9\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, let me try to figure out how to approach this task. The user wants me to act as a GUI Agent and generate a strategy plan based on the provided task. The task is to buy the best-rated product from the \"Men's shoe\" category that has at least 5 reviews and is the least expensive.\n\nFirst, I need to break down the task into smaller steps. The main steps would involve navigating to the correct section, filtering the products based on the criteria, and then purchasing the top product.\n\nSo, the first step is to navigate to the \"Men's shoe\" category. That sounds like using US1, which is \"Navigate To Page/Section.\" I'll need to go to that specific category on the website.\n\nNext, once I'm in the \"Men's shoe\" section, I need to filter the products. The criteria are at least 5 reviews and the least expensive price. So, I should use a filter function. Looking at the universal strategies, US2 is \"Search/Filter/Sort Data,\" which fits perfectly here. I'll apply this filter to narrow down the products.\n\nAfter filtering, I need to select the best-rated product that meets all the conditions. Once I've identified that product, the next step is to add it to the shopping cart. This would involve using a \"Add to Cart\" button, which falls under US9, \"Create Item.\" Finally, after adding it, I need to proceed to checkout, which is an action step. That would be US4, \"Execute Action/Process.\"\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be navigating to the category, filtering the products, adding to the cart, and executing the purchase. The corresponding universal strategy IDs are US1, US2, US9, and US4. \n\nI should make sure each step is clear and follows logically from the previous one. Also, I need to ensure that all the user's criteria are met in each step. For example, after filtering, I need to confirm that the product has at least 5 reviews and is the cheapest among the filtered list.\n\nI think that's a solid plan. Now, I'll structure it into the required JSON format, listing each strategy step and the corresponding universal strategies."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 514,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 514,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Wish List\",\n \"Retrieve Information About White Desk\",\n \"Add White Desk to Wish List\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"Create Item\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US6\", \"US9\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, I need to figure out how to help the user with their task. They provided a JSON input and an example output. The task is to add a white desk to their wish list on the shopping site. \n\nFirst, I should break down the task into steps. The user needs to go to the wish list, find the white desk, and add it. \n\nLooking at the universal strategies, I think the first step is to navigate to the wish list, which is US1. Then, they need to find the white desk, but that's more of a search function. Wait, the example included searching for bugs, but here it's about finding an item. Maybe US6, Extract/Retrieve Information, to get the white desk's details. \n\nOnce they have the details, they can add it to their wish list, which would be US9, Create Item. \n\nSo the strategies would be: navigate to wish list, extract the white desk info, and create the wish. The universal strategy IDs would be US1, US6, US9.\n\nI need to make sure the JSON structure is correct, with strategies and their IDs. The output should be in JSON format as per the example."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 516,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US9",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 516,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to the Wishlist Page\",\n \"Configure Wishes Settings\",\n \"Add Product to Wishlist\",\n \"Retrieve Wishlist to Confirm Addition\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Create Item\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US9\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, I'm trying to figure out how to solve this task. The user has provided a JSON input with a task, and I need to generate a strategy design using the Universal Strategy Templates provided. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, looking at the input task:\n- Task ID: 516\n- Sites: [\"shopping\"]\n- Intent: \"Add this product to my wishlist\"\n\nSo, the task is to add a product to a wishlist on the shopping interface. My goal is to plan the steps needed to accomplish this using the available strategies.\n\nI remember from the examples that tasks usually involve a sequence of strategies. Each strategy should be broken down into actionable steps based on the Universal Strategies provided.\n\nLet me list out the relevant strategies that could apply here:\n\n1. **US9 - Create Item**: This strategy is about adding a new entity, like a project or issue. In this case, adding a product to a wishlist would be similar to creating a new item. So, this seems like a good fit.\n\n2. **US3 - Configure Parameters/Settings**: Before adding the product, I might need to configure some settings or parameters. For example, selecting the wishlist category or ensuring the wishlist feature is enabled. This step might not be immediately necessary, but it's a precaution.\n\n3. **US1 - Navigate To Page/Section**: The first thing I need to do is locate the wishlist section on the shopping interface. I'll need to navigate there, which involves clicking on the correct menu or button. So, this is a foundational step.\n\n4. **US4 - Execute Action/Process**: Once I'm on the wishlist page, I need to find the product I want to add and then click the \"Add to Wishlist\" button. This is a direct action, so it fits here.\n\nWait, but in the output example, the strategies are ordered in the sequence they should be executed. So, I should list them in the order of navigation, configuration, execution, and then verification.\n\nLet me structure this:\n\n1. **US1 - Navigate to the wishlist page**: This is the starting point. Without being on the right page, I can't proceed.\n\n2. **US3 - Configure Parameters/Settings**: Maybe I need to select the product category or ensure the wishlist feature is active. Configuring settings ensures everything is set up correctly before adding.\n\n3. **US9 - Create Item (Add to Wishlist)**: Now that I'm on the correct page and settings are configured, I can proceed to add the product to my wishlist.\n\n4. **US6 - Extract/Retrieve Information**: After adding, perhaps I need to retrieve the wishlist to verify the addition. This might not be strictly necessary but could be a good step to confirm success.\n\nWait, but the output example only includes three strategies. Maybe I can combine some steps or adjust the order.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps the configuration step isn't strictly necessary if the wishlist is already active. In that case, maybe the configuration step isn't needed, and I can skip it.\n\nSo, adjusting the sequence:\n\n1. **US1 - Navigate to the wishlist page**\n2. **US9 - Create Item (Add to Wishlist)**\n\nBut then, how do I verify that the product was added? Maybe I need a way to retrieve the wishlist after adding, which would be US6.\n\nSo, the strategies would be:\n\n1. Navigate to the wishlist page (US1)\n2. Configure settings if necessary (US3)\n3. Add the product (US9)\n4. Retrieve the wishlist to confirm (US6)\n\nBut the output example only includes three strategies. Maybe the retrieval step isn't always necessary, but it's a good practice to verify.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps the configuration isn't needed, and I can proceed directly to adding the item.\n\nSo, considering all this, I think the appropriate strategies are:\n\n- US1: Navigate to the wishlist page\n- US3: Configure settings (if needed)\n- US9: Add the product to the wishlist\n\nBut to ensure the task is completed correctly, including a verification step (US6) makes sense.\n\nWait, but in the output example, the strategies are in the order they are executed. So, navigation first, then configuration, then execution.\n\nIn this case, perhaps the configuration is part of the execution process, so it can be combined with the add action.\n\nAlternatively, if the configuration is a separate step, it can be included before adding.\n\nI think the best approach is to include all necessary steps, ensuring that each strategy is applied in the correct order."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 521,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 521,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Subscribe to Newsletter\",\n \"Configure Newsletter Settings\",\n \"Generate Newsletter Subscription\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, so I need to figure out how to help the user with their task. The task is to subscribe to the newsletter of OneStopMarket on the shopping website. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I should understand the user's intent. They want to subscribe, which means they probably need to enter their email and submit a form. So, the main steps would involve navigating to the newsletter signup page, filling out the form, and submitting it.\n\nNow, looking at the Universal Strategy Templates provided, I need to match each step with the appropriate strategy ID. \n\n1. **Navigate to the Newsletter Signup Page**: This sounds like moving to a specific page, so that would be US1 (Navigate To Page/Section).\n\n2. **Enter Email and Submit**: Filling out a form and submitting it typically falls under configuring parameters or settings, which is US3 (Configure Parameters/Settings). This might involve setting the email field and then submitting the form.\n\n3. **Generate the Newsletter Subscription Confirmation**: Once submitted, the user should receive a confirmation. However, the task doesn't specify what to do after, just to subscribe. So maybe the last step is to complete the process, which would be US4 (Execute Action/Process).\n\nWait, but the output example provided by the user has three strategies, which includes viewing details, configuring settings, and executing an action. In my case, the first step is navigation, which is straightforward. The second is configuring the settings for the newsletter, and the third is executing the process of subscribing.\n\nI think that covers all the necessary steps. So the strategies would be US1, US3, and US4. The universal strategies array would list each ID, and the strategies array would have the corresponding actions.\n\nI should make sure the JSON structure matches the example given. The task_id is 521, sites are [\"shopping\"], and the strategies are [\"Subscribe to Newsletter\", \"Configure Newsletter Settings\", \"Generate Newsletter Subscription\"]. The universal strategies would be US1, US3, US4.\n\nI think that's all. I just need to present it in the required JSON format."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 524,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 524,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Search for Repositories\",\n \"Sort Repositories by Activity\",\n \"Star Repositories\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Sort\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I've got this task to handle on Gitlab. The user wants to star the top eight most staresmed repos in Gitlab. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I need to figure out how to access the repositories on Gitlab. I know that Gitlab has a search bar where you can look for repositories. So, I'll start by navigating to the Gitlab interface and going to the search page. That should be under the \"Search\" universal strategy.\n\nOnce I'm on the search page, I need to filter the results to show the top repositories. I remember that Gitlab has a \"Sort\" option where you can sort by activity, which in this case would be the number of stars. So, I'll select the \"Sort by: Activity\" option and make sure it's set to show the most active repositories first. That's probably under the \"Sort\" universal strategy.\n\nNow, I need to find the top eight repositories that have been starred. Once sorted, I can go through the list until I reach the eighth one. After identifying these repositories, I'll need to star each one individually. I think the way to star a repository is to click on the star button next to its name. So, for each of these eight repos, I'll click the star button. This action would fall under the \"Execute Action/Process\" universal strategy.\n\nLet me make sure I'm not missing any steps. First, navigate to the search page (US1), then sort by activity (US2), then star each repo (US4). That should cover all the necessary actions to complete the task.\n\nI should also consider if there are any additional steps, like viewing the starred repositories after starring them, but the task only mentions starring, not reviewing, so I think the steps are sufficient.\n\nAlright, putting it all together, the strategies involved are navigating to the search page, sorting, and then executing the starring action on each repository. That should get the job done."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 528,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "To draft a refund message via the contact us form for the phone screen protector purchased in March 2023, follow these steps:\n\n1. **Navigate to the Contact Us Form**: Use the navigation strategy to reach the contact section and the form.\n2. **Configure Parameters for Refund Details**: Set up the form to include the order ID, reason, and amount for the refund.\n3. **Generate and Submit Refund Request**: Fill out the form with the required information and submit it.\n\nThis approach uses three universal strategies: \"Navigate To Page/Section,\" \"Configure Parameters/Settings,\" and \"Execute Action/Process.\"\n\n```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 528,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Contact Us Form\",\n \"Configure Parameters for Refund Details\",\n \"Generate and Submit Refund Request\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I've got this task to figure out how to draft a refund message using the contact us form on the shopping website. The user bought a phone screen protector in March 2023, and it broke after three days. They need to provide the order ID, reason, and amount for the refund. The task is to draft this message via the contact us form.\n\nFirst, I need to break this down into steps. The goal is to create a message that the customer can fill out and send to get their refund processed. So, the main steps would be:\n\n1. Navigate to the contact us form. This seems straightforward—just go to the contact section and find the form.\n2. Fill in the necessary details: order ID, reason for the refund, and the amount. The user mentioned they have these details, so the system should prompt them for these fields.\n3. Submit the form and wait for the response. After submitting, there's an expectation that the contact center will review and process the refund.\n\nNow, looking at the universal strategies provided, I need to match each step with the appropriate strategy ID. \n\nThe first step, navigating to the contact us form, aligns with US1: \"Navigate To Page/Section.\" That's clear.\n\nThe second step involves filling out the form with specific information. This falls under US6: \"Extract/Retrieve Information\" because it's about inputting specific data into the form. However, since the task is to draft the message, it's more about structuring the message rather than extracting data. Wait, maybe it's more about configuring the message fields. Hmm, perhaps it's better to think of it as configuring the parameters for the message, which would be US3: \"Configure Parameters/Settings.\" \n\nWait, no, US3 is about setting up parameters for actions like generating reports. In this case, configuring the message fields is about setting up the form's data, so maybe US6 is still applicable because it's about extracting information to fill in the form.\n\nThe third step is submitting the form and expecting a response. US4: \"Execute Action/Process\" would be appropriate here because it's about initiating the submission action.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be:\n\n1. Use US1 to navigate to the contact us page.\n2. Use US6 to extract the necessary information (order ID, reason, amount) from the system to fill in the form.\n3. Use US4 to submit the form and process the request.\n\nWait, but the form is a template for the message, so maybe US5: \"View/Inspect Item Details\" is more appropriate for viewing the form's interface before filling it out. However, the user is supposed to draft the message themselves, so perhaps they don't need to view the form's details but rather just use the form as provided.\n\nAlternatively, since the form is an action element, maybe US5 isn't necessary. The task is to generate the message, so the form is where they input the details, which is covered by US6.\n\nSo, the strategies would be US1, US6, and US4.\n\nWait, but the user needs to draft the message, so it's more about creating the message content, which would involve US9: \"Create Item.\" But no, because the message is a form, not an item to be created. So perhaps US9 isn't applicable here.\n\nAlternatively, US5 is about viewing the form's interface, which the user would do before filling it out. So maybe US5 is needed as well.\n\nBut the task is to draft the message via the contact form, which is an action. So the steps are:\n\n- Navigate to the contact form (US1).\n- Fill in the form with the necessary details (US6).\n- Submit the form (US4).\n\nAlternatively, if the form is a template that the user needs to draft, perhaps the first step is to view the form (US5), then fill it in (US6), then submit (US4). But the user is drafting the message, so they would create the message content, which is more of a content creation step, but the form is the tool they're using.\n\nHmm, perhaps the correct approach is:\n\n1. Navigate to the contact us page (US1).\n2. Fill in the contact form with the necessary information (US6).\n3. Submit the form (US4).\n\nBut I'm a bit confused about whether viewing the form (US5) is necessary. Since the user is supposed to draft the message via the form, they might not need to view the form's interface unless they're configuring it. But in this case, the form is provided, so they just need to use it.\n\nAlternatively, maybe the form's structure is part of the task, so they need to view it to understand how to fill it out, which would be US5.\n\nBut the task is to draft the message, so perhaps the steps are:\n\n- Use US1 to navigate to the contact form.\n- Use US5 to view the form details.\n- Use US6 to extract the necessary information.\n- Use US4 to submit the form.\n\nBut I'm not sure if US5 is necessary. Maybe it's better to include US5 just in case.\n\nWait, looking back at the example provided, in the output, they used US1, US3, US4. So for the example of creating a project, they used US1 to navigate, US3 to configure settings, and US4 to execute.\n\nIn this case, navigating to the contact form is US1. Configuring the form with the necessary details is US3. Submitting the form is US4.\n\nYes, that makes sense. So the strategies would be US1, US3, US4.\n\nSo the final answer would be:\n\n{\n \"task_id\": 528,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Contact Us Form\",\n \"Configure Parameters for Refund Details\",\n \"Generate and Submit Refund Request\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 534,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 534,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Users to Follow\",\n \"Search/Filter Users on Gitlab\",\n \"Follow Selected Users\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to help the user with their task. They provided a JSON input with a task_id of 534, sites as [\"gitlab\"], and an intent to follow a list of users on Gitlab. The example response they gave earlier showed a JSON output with strategies, universal strategies, and their IDs. \n\nFirst, I need to understand what each part of the task means. The task is about following specific users on Gitlab. So, the goal is to navigate to Gitlab, find those users, and follow them. \n\nLooking at the universal strategies provided, I need to see which ones apply here. The first strategy, US1, is about navigating to a page or section. Since the task is about Gitlab, navigating to the profile or following section makes sense. \n\nNext, the second strategy, US2, is for searching or filtering. In this case, the user wants to follow specific individuals, so perhaps after navigating to the following section, there's a search or filter option to select those users. \n\nThen, the third strategy, US4, is about executing an action. Once the users are selected, the next step would be to actually follow them, which is an action. \n\nI should structure the output as per the example: an array of strategies in order, followed by the list of universal strategies used and their IDs. \n\nWait, do I need to include more steps? Maybe ensure that the user's list is correctly retrieved or displayed before following. But the example didn't do that, so perhaps it's assumed that the search/filter step already retrieves the correct users. \n\nSo, putting it all together, the strategies would be: navigate to the profile section, search/filter to find the users, then execute the follow action. The corresponding universal strategies are US1, US2, and US4. \n\nI think that's all. I'll structure the JSON accordingly."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 538,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US10",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 538,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Find or Select Order #299\",\n \"Configure Order Address Fields\",\n \"Save Modified Order Address\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate Within Data/Results\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US8\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "嗯，我现在要解决这个任务，任务是“Modify the address of order #299 to 456 Oak Avenue, Apartment 5B, New York, NY, 10001”。首先，我需要理解用户的需求，他们希望修改某个订单的地址信息。\n\n首先，我应该分解这个任务。用户需要找到订单299，然后编辑它的地址。这可能涉及到几个步骤：首先找到订单，然后进入编辑界面，输入新的地址信息，最后保存修改。\n\n接下来，我要考虑使用哪个万用策略。首先，我需要“Find or Select an Item”，这可能涉及到定位到特定的订单。然后，进入编辑模式，这可能需要“Configure Parameters/Settings”来设置新的地址信息。最后，保存修改，这可能属于“Execute Action/Process”。\n\n所以，策略应该是：1. 导航到订单299，这可能属于“Navigate To Page/Section”（US1）；2. 进入编辑模式，这属于“Configure Parameters/Settings”（US3）；3. 执行保存操作，这属于“Execute Action/Process”（US4）。\n\n这样组合起来，就能完成任务了。我需要确保每个步骤都正确应用相应的策略，并且信息准确无误地传递给系统。"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 548,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US10",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 548,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Frankie Sweatshirt Page\",\n \"Configure Color Options for Frankie Sweatshirt\",\n \"Generate and Submit Color Options Report\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, I need to figure out how to help the user with their task. The task is to add a new color, blue, to size S and M of the Frankie Sweatshirt. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I should understand the user's intent. They want to update the product listings by adding blue as a color option for specific sizes. So, the main actions will involve navigating to the product page, configuring the color options, and then submitting the changes.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies provided, I can start with US1: Navigate To Page/Section. That makes sense because the user needs to go to the Frankie Sweatshirt page. Once there, they'll need to configure the settings, which is US3: Configure Parameters/Settings. They're changing the color, so they'll adjust the color options there.\n\nAfter configuring, they'll need to execute an action, which would be US4: Execute Action/Process. That means generating or submitting the report with the new settings. So, the steps are: navigate to the product page, set up the color options, and then generate the report.\n\nI should structure the output to include each strategy step, the corresponding universal strategy IDs, and a brief explanation. Also, I need to make sure the JSON format is correct, with the task ID, strategies, universal strategies, and their IDs.\n\nWait, do I need to include all the steps? Let me double-check. The task is to add blue to sizes S and M. So, after configuring the settings, the action would be to submit the changes. Yes, that covers all necessary steps.\n\nI think that's it. Now, I'll format it according to the example provided, making sure each part is clear and concise."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 56,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 56,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Map Carnegie Museum of Art\",\n \"Search Carnegie Mellon University Library on Map\",\n \"Measure Walking Distance\",\n \"Calculate Walking Time\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Map\",\n \"Search\",\n \"Measure\",\n \"Calculate\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US8\", \"US6\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, let's break down this task step by step. The user wants to know how long it takes to walk from the Carnegie Museum of Art to a library located at Carnegie Mellon University. \n\nFirst, I need to figure out the location. The Carnegie Museum of Art is in Pittsburgh, PA, and Carnegie Mellon University is in Pittsburgh as well, but the library in question is at CMU's campus. So, both points are within Pittsburgh, but on opposite sides of the city. \n\nNext, I'll consider how to get from the museum to the library. Since both are in Pittsburgh, I can use map-related strategies. I'll start by navigating to the Carnegie Museum of Art's location on the map. That would involve using \"Map\" functionality to pinpoint the museum's address. \n\nOnce on the map, the user would need to locate the Carnegie Mellon University library. This step involves interacting with the map interface, perhaps by searching for the library's address or using a \"Search\" function within the map application. \n\nAfter identifying both locations on the map, the next step is to determine the walking distance. I can use the map's measurement tool to calculate the distance between the two points. This would require interacting with a \"Measure Distance\" or similar feature in the map interface. \n\nOnce the distance is known, the user would need to convert that into time. Walking speed can vary, but an average person walks about 3-4 miles per hour. So, dividing the distance by the average speed will give the time it takes. \n\nFinally, presenting this information clearly is essential. The user should see the result, which includes the distance and the estimated time. \n\nPutting this all together, the strategies involved are navigating to a specific location, searching for another location on the map, measuring distance, and calculating time. The corresponding universal strategies are US1 for navigating to a location, US8 for navigating within results (here, within the map interface), US6 for retrieving information (the distance), and US4 for executing the action of generating a report or result. \n\nI should structure the output to clearly show each step using the appropriate universal strategies and their IDs. This will help the GUI Agent execute the task efficiently."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 566,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US9",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US9",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 566,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to GitLab and Reddit interface\",\n \"Search for DIY subreddit posts\",\n \"Create repository named 'Do it myself'\",\n \"Add README file with links\",\n \"Publish repository and README\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate Within Data/Results\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Create Item\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US9\", \"US6\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, so I've got this task to figure out how to create a repository on GitLab and Reddit. The goal is to name the repository \"Do it myself\" and include a README file with links to the top 8 active DIY projects on the DIY subreddit. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I need to create a new repository. I remember that GitLab has a specific interface for this. I'll probably need to navigate to the GitLab interface and look for where to create a new repository. I think there's a section under projects or maybe under the \"+\" sign to create a new project. That should correspond to the \"Create Item\" strategy, which is US9.\n\nOnce the repository is created, I need to add a README file. I'm not entirely sure where exactly on GitLab to add a README, but I think there's a section for files within the repository where I can upload it. After adding the README, I'll need to fill in the content with the links to the DIY projects from Reddit. This part sounds like extracting information, so I should use the \"Extract/Retrieve Information\" strategy, which is US6.\n\nAfter setting up the repository and the README, I need to navigate to the Reddit subreddit where these DIY ideas are posted. I'll probably use the search function on Reddit to find the most active posts related to DIY. Then, I'll need to gather the links from these posts. Navigating through Reddit's interface might involve using the search controls, which falls under \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\" strategy, US2.\n\nOnce I have the links, I'll need to copy them into the README file on GitLab. This is straightforward, just copying and pasting. Then, I'll need to publish both the repository and the README. Publishing on GitLab likely involves a \"Submit\" or \"Publish\" button, which is covered by the \"Execute Action/Process\" strategy, US4.\n\nWait, let me make sure I'm not missing any steps. First, navigate to GitLab and Reddit (US1 for GitLab, US8 for Reddit). Then, create the repository (US9). Add the README (US6). Search Reddit (US2). Copy links (US6 again). Publish (US4). So the strategies would be US1, US2, US6, US9, US4.\n\nI think that's all. I should double-check if there's anything else, like maybe creating a branch or setting permissions, but the task doesn't mention that. So sticking to the main points should be fine."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 574,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US10",
|
||
"US10",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 574,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Profile/Information Update\",\n \"Extract Address Information Fields\",\n \"Save Updated Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US6\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so the user is asking me to help design a strategy for a task on a web interface. The task is to update personal information on OneStopShopping after moving. They provided the input in JSON format, which includes task_id, sites, and intent. \n\nFirst, I need to break down the intent. The user's address has four parts: street, city, state, and ZIP code. They want to update all of these on OneStopShopping. So, I should think about what steps are needed to update each part.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies, I see US1 is about navigating to a page, so that's the first step. They'll need to go to the profile or account section to find the update option. \n\nNext, each part of the address is different. The street address is one field, the city another, along with state and ZIP code. So, I'll need to use US6, Extract/Retrieve Information, for each field. That means extracting the current address details, updating each one, and then saving.\n\nWait, but do I need to navigate within results? Maybe not directly, but after updating, they might need to refresh or renavigate, but since the task is just to update, perhaps US6 is sufficient for each extraction and US4 for each save. \n\nSo, the steps would be: navigate to the profile section, extract each address field, update each with the new information, and save each change. That makes sense.\n\nNow, mapping this to the universal strategies: US1 for navigating, US6 for extracting each field, and US4 for each save. So, three strategies in total.\n\nI think that's a solid approach. I'll structure the response with the strategies, their explanations, and the corresponding universal strategy IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 577,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US9",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 577,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Extension Settings\",\n \"Add Users to Extension\",\n \"Verify Users are Added\",\n \"Generate and Review Extension Settings\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Create Item\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US9\", \"US5\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to add some users to a GitHub extension as maintainers. The task is to add two users: 'abisubramanya27' and 'lahwaacz'. I'm not super familiar with how GitHub extensions work, but I know a bit about the GitHub interface. \n\nFirst, I think I need to access the extension settings. I remember that extensions have a settings page where you can manage permissions and stuff. So, I should probably navigate to the extension's settings. That would be the first step, which I can label as \"Navigate to Extension Settings\".\n\nOnce I'm there, I believe there's an option to add users. Maybe it's under permissions or maybe under a settings section. I'm not sure, but I think it's under the settings where you manage who can edit or have access to the extension. That would be the second step, \"Add Users to Extension\".\n\nAfter adding the users, I need to confirm that they're added. So, maybe I should navigate back to the settings page to check if they're listed. That would be the third step, \"Verify Users are Added\".\n\nWait, is there a fourth step? Maybe generating or reviewing the changes? Or perhaps it's just adding them and that's it. I think after adding, I might need to review the changes to ensure they're correct. So, yes, adding a fourth step, \"Generate and Review Extension Settings\".\n\nI'm not sure if I missed any steps. Maybe there's a way to immediately test it, but I think the main steps are: navigating to the settings, adding the users, verifying, and then reviewing. \n\nI should make sure each step is clear. The first is about moving to the settings, the second about adding users, the third to confirm they're there, and the fourth to review the changes. \n\nI also need to reference the universal strategies. The first step is US1, navigating to a page. The second is US9, creating an item, but wait, adding users isn't exactly creating an item. Maybe US10, updating or modifying an item? Or US11, deleting an item? Hmm, not sure. \n\nWait, adding users isn't modifying an existing item but rather adding new ones. Maybe US9, create an item. Or perhaps it's under US10, update/modify, but I'm not certain. \n\nAlternatively, maybe it's under US11, delete, but that doesn't fit. I think the closest would be US9, create an item, but adding users is more like creating new entries. \n\nBut looking back, US9 is \"Create Item\", which could be analogous to adding users. So, I'll go with US9 for adding the users. \n\nSo, the strategies would be: navigate to settings (US1), add users (US9), verify (maybe US7?), and then review (US4). Or perhaps verify is US8, navigating through results. \n\nWait, verifying would be checking if the users are added, which might involve viewing their details. So, maybe US5, view details. Or US7, analyze data. \n\nI think the best approach is to have four steps: navigate to settings (US1), add users (US9), verify they're added (US5), and then generate and review (US4). \n\nI'm a bit confused about which universal strategy best fits each step, but I think this makes the most sense."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 58,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 58,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Map\",\n \"Search for Cafe(s) Near CMU Hunt Library\",\n \"View Cafe Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, I need to figure out how to complete this task using the Universal Strategy Templates provided. The task is to tell me the closest cafe(s) to CMU Hunt library. \n\nFirst, I should break down what needs to be done. I think the user wants to find cafes near a specific location. So, the process likely involves navigating to a map, searching for cafes, filtering by proximity, and then viewing the results.\n\nLooking at the Universal Strategies, I see US1 is about navigating to a page or section. So, I'll start with that to go to the map interface. Then, I need to search for cafes, which would fall under US2 for searching data. After finding the cafes, I might need to sort or filter them by proximity, which could be another search or US7 for analyzing data. But maybe US2 is sufficient for filtering. Finally, viewing the results would be US5 to inspect the details.\n\nPutting it together, the steps should be: navigate to the map, search for cafes, filter by proximity, and view the results. So the strategies would be US1, US2, and US5. That should cover all the necessary actions to fulfill the task."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 582,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 582,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Reddit Forum Creation\",\n \"Configure Forum Details and Sidebar\",\n \"Create and Review Forum\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to create a new forum on Reddit with specific details. Let me break this down step by step. \n\nFirst, I know that Reddit has a section where you can create new communities, called forums. So I'll need to navigate to that part of Reddit. I'm not entirely sure how Reddit's interface works, but I think there's a main page where you can search for existing communities or create a new one. I'll probably need to use the search function to find the right place to create a new forum.\n\nOnce I'm on the forum creation page, I need to enter the name of the forum, which is \"Cyberpunk.\" Then, I have to provide a description. The user specified \"Welcome to the future\" as the description, so I'll make sure to input that.\n\nNext, I need to set up the sidebar with the categories: ['Games', 'Books', 'Movies', 'Future']. I'm not sure how Reddit's interface allows you to customize the sidebar. Maybe there's a settings option or a menu where you can add categories. I'll look for a place where I can either add new categories or edit existing ones to include these four items.\n\nAfter setting up the name, description, and sidebar, I need to create the actual forum. I think this involves clicking a \"Create\" button or submitting a form with all the information I've entered. Once the forum is created, I might need to review it to make sure everything looks correct before it goes live.\n\nI'm a bit unsure about the exact steps for each of these actions, but I can try to follow the interface's guidance. If I get stuck, I might have to explore different menus or look for help resources on Reddit's site.\n\nSo, to summarize, the steps I think I need to take are:\n1. Navigate to the Reddit website.\n2. Find the place to create a new forum.\n3. Enter the forum name \"Cyberpunk.\"\n4. Add the description \"Welcome to the future.\"\n5. Set up the sidebar with the specified categories.\n6. Create the forum and review it before publishing.\n\nI should refer to the universal strategies provided to match each step. Let me see which strategies fit:\n- Navigating to a specific page or section (US1)\n- Configuring parameters or settings (US3)\n- Executing an action or process (US4)\n\nI think each of these steps corresponds to one of the universal strategies. So, my final answer should include these three strategies with their respective IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 593,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US9",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 593,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Milestones Page\",\n \"Create Milestone\",\n \"Configure Milestone Parameters\",\n \"Review Milestone\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Create Item\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US9\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to help the user by providing a task strategy for creating a milestone on Gitlab. The task is to merge all branches to main starting on March 15, 2044, ending on March 30, 2044. \n\nFirst, I should break down the task into steps. The first step is to navigate to the Gitlab interface. That would be using the \"Navigate To Page/Section\" strategy, which is US1. \n\nNext, I need to create a new milestone. Looking at the universal strategies, creating an item would fall under US9, which is \"Create Item.\" So, I'll select that.\n\nAfter creating the milestone, I need to set its start and end dates. That requires using the \"Configure Parameters/Settings\" strategy, which is US3. So, I'll add that step.\n\nFinally, I should review the milestone to ensure it's correct. That would involve using \"View/Inspect Item Details,\" which is US5. \n\nPutting it all together, the strategy steps are: navigate to the milestone section, create the milestone, configure its parameters, and review it. The corresponding universal strategies are US1, US3, and US5, with IDs US1, US9, and US5 respectively.\n\nI should make sure each step clearly aligns with the task and references the correct strategies. This way, the GUI agent can follow these steps to complete the task effectively."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 599,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 599,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Reddit Main Page\",\n \"Search/Filter for 'machine learning' Posts\",\n \"Subscribe to the Trending Post\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US9\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, I need to figure out how to complete the task given by the user. The task is to open the thread of a trending post on the forum \"machine learning\" and subscribe. The user provided some universal strategies and examples, so I should use those to plan the steps.\n\nFirst, let's break down the task. I need to navigate to a specific forum on Reddit, find a trending post related to machine learning, open that thread, and then subscribe to it. So, the steps should involve navigating to the correct section, searching for the post, viewing it, and then subscribing.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies, the first step would be \"Navigate To Page/Section.\" In this case, the site is reddit, specifically reddit's main page. So I'd use US1 to navigate to reddit's main feed.\n\nNext, after being on the main feed, I need to find a trending post about machine learning. On Reddit, posts are often filtered by trendiness, so I might use a search function or filters. The strategy here would be to search or filter for posts with the label \"machine learning.\" This corresponds to US2, which is about searching or filtering data.\n\nOnce the post is displayed, I need to open it. This would involve clicking on the post, which is a standard action, so US5, \"View/Inspect Item Details,\" applies here.\n\nAfter viewing the post, the next step is to subscribe to it. Subscribing on Reddit usually involves clicking a subscribe button or following the post. This action falls under US9, \"Create Item,\" but in this context, it's more about interaction rather than creating a new item. However, since US9 is the closest template, I'll use it here.\n\nSo, putting it all together, the steps would be: navigate to reddit's main page, search/filter for machine learning posts, view the post, and subscribe. The corresponding universal strategies are US1, US2, US5, and US9. Wait, but looking back at the output example, they used three strategies for three steps. Maybe I can combine the search and view into one step since they are sequential actions on the same screen.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps the search and view can be considered as one step because after searching, you directly view the post. So then the steps would be: navigate to reddit, search/filter for machine learning, view the post, and subscribe. But that's four steps with three strategies. Maybe I can combine the search and view into one strategy.\n\nLooking at the example, they had three steps with three strategies. So perhaps it's better to have three steps: navigate, search/view, and subscribe. So the universal strategies would be US1, US2, and US9. Wait, but US2 is for searching and filtering, which includes viewing, so maybe that's acceptable.\n\nAlternatively, I can have US1 for navigating, US2 for searching and viewing, and US9 for subscribing. That would make sense because after searching, you view the results, so US2 covers that part.\n\nSo the final strategies would be: US1, US2, and US9. That makes three strategies for the three steps: navigate, search/view, and subscribe.\n\nI think that's the correct approach. Now, I'll structure the output as per the instructions, including the strategies and their IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 605,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 605,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Reddit\",\n \"Search Reddit for Gaming Consoles\",\n \"Post a Question in the Gaming Consoles Subreddit\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US9\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, I need to help the user complete their task using the Universal Strategies. Let's break down their task first. They want to find a subreddit on Reddit focused on gaming consoles and post a question there. \n\nFirst, I'll consider the steps involved. They need to search Reddit, find the appropriate subreddit, then post a question. \n\nLooking at the strategies, US1 is about navigating to a specific page, so I'll use that to go to reddit.com. Next, they need to search for gaming consoles, so US2 (Search/Filter) makes sense here. Then, after finding the subreddit, they have to post a question, which falls under US9 (Create Item) because they're creating a new post.\n\nI'll map each step to the appropriate strategy IDs to ensure the solution is clear and follows the guidelines."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 612,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 612,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to r-books\",\n \"Create a New Post\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Create Item\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US9\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to handle this task where I need to post a review on Reddit's r-books. The input says the task is to post a review with a specific title and comment. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I remember that the task involves using a GUI Agent to break down the task into strategies using the provided universal strategies. The example they gave had a JSON output with strategies, their universal IDs, and the sites involved.\n\nLooking at the example, they had a task where they needed to navigate to a page, configure some parameters, and then generate a report. For our case, we need to navigate to Reddit's r-books, create a new post, and include the specific title and comment.\n\nSo, starting with navigation. Reddit has different subreddits, and I need to get to r-books. I think that involves using the search function or going to the subreddit directly. I'm not entirely sure which strategy applies here. Maybe US1, which is \"Navigate To Page/Section,\" would be the first step. That makes sense because I need to go to the correct subreddit.\n\nNext, after being on r-books, I need to create a new post. That should fall under \"Create Item,\" which is US9. So, filling out a form with the title and comment and submitting it. That seems straightforward.\n\nWait, but do I need to configure any parameters first? Maybe not in this case because the task doesn't specify any particular parameters beyond the title and comment. So perhaps US9 is sufficient for creating the post.\n\nPutting it all together, the steps would be: navigate to r-books, create a new post with the given title and comment. So in terms of universal strategies, that would be US1 (navigate) and US9 (create item). I don't think any other strategies are needed here because it's a straightforward post creation without any filtering, analyzing, or updating existing items.\n\nI should make sure that I'm not missing any steps. Is there anything else required when posting a new comment? Maybe checking the subreddit guidelines, but since the task specifies the exact title and comment, I assume that's all that's needed. So the strategies should be US1 and US9.\n\nI think that's it. The task doesn't involve any other actions like editing an existing post or submitting a form beyond the initial creation. So the strategies are clear: navigate to the subreddit and create the post with the details provided."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 619,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 619,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Save image of costume contest\",\n \"Log in to Reddit\",\n \"Navigate to Funny Subreddit\",\n \"Upload image to Reddit post\",\n \"Generate and post image\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\",\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US6\", \"US4\", \"US1\", \"US5\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, let's tackle this task. So, the user wants me to re-post an image of a costume contest from the reddit subreddit to the funny subreddit, and they also want to note that it's from /f/pics. \n\nFirst, I need to figure out what steps are required here. I think the first thing to do is to locate the image on the reddit page. So, I'll need to navigate to the costume contest image. Once I have the image, I should probably save it locally so I can upload it later. \n\nAfter saving the image, the next step is to log in to reddit. I'll need to find the submission form for the funny subreddit. Once there, I'll have to fill in the title, description, and other required fields. Importantly, I need to make sure to include the note about it being from /f/pics in the title or description. \n\nOnce the form is filled out with all the necessary information, including the note, I'll need to upload the image I saved earlier. After uploading, I'll submit the form to post the image in the funny subreddit. \n\nNow, I should map these steps to the universal strategies provided. Let's see:\n\n1. Navigating to the costume contest image on reddit would be using US1, as I'm moving to a specific page.\n2. Saving the image might fall under US6, since I'm extracting the image from the web and retrieving it locally.\n3. Logging into reddit and navigating to the submission form would again use US1, as I'm moving to a specific section within reddit.\n4. Filling out the form would involve US9, as I'm creating a new item (post) with specific parameters.\n5. Uploading the image would be another instance of US6, as I'm retrieving information to upload.\n6. Submitting the form to post would be US4, initiating the action of generating and submitting the report or post.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would involve navigating to the image, saving it, logging in, configuring the submission, uploading the image, and generating the post. Each of these steps corresponds to the universal strategies mentioned."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 626,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 626,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Reddit subreddit for iPhone discussion\",\n \"Configure Parameters for Creating iPhone 14 discussion post\",\n \"Generate and Post iPhone 14 discussion post\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I have this task where I need to figure out how to create a discussion post on Reddit about the iPhone 14. The user wants me to break this down into steps using the universal strategies provided. Let me start by understanding what each step should involve.\n\nFirst, I need to create a discussion post. That means I have to navigate to the right subreddit on Reddit. Reddit has different subreddits, and the user mentioned \"reddit\" as the site, so I guess the subreddit is probably r/iphone or r/iphone14. But I'm not entirely sure, so maybe I should check that first. So, step one would be to navigate to the subreddit where the discussion will take place.\n\nNext, I need to create the post. On Reddit, you can't just type a message and send it; you have to go through the subreddit's interface. So, I should find the \"Create a new discussion\" button or a similar prompt. Once there, I have to fill in the title and content of the post. The title should be something catchy, maybe \"The Best iPhone 14: Why It's the Top Choice in 2023.\" The content should include the user's opinion that they're asking for, so I'll mention that I want others to share their opinions about the iPhone 14.\n\nAfter creating the post, I need to post it. But before that, maybe I should set it as public so others can see it. I think on Reddit, you can set a post as public by clicking a button when creating it. Once it's public, I can go back and edit it if needed, but I think the main steps are create and then post.\n\nWait, is there anything else I need to do? Maybe I should mention adding a comment or starting the conversation, but I think the main steps are: navigate to the subreddit, create the post, and then post it.\n\nSo, breaking it down into steps using the universal strategies, the first step is navigating to the subreddit, which is US1. Then, creating the post would involve configuring parameters, which is US3, and finally executing the process, which is US4.\n\nI think that covers the main actions. I might have missed some steps like previewing the post before posting, but the main ones are there. So, the strategies would be navigating to the page, configuring the parameters for the post, and executing the creation and posting process."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 641,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US9",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 641,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to the subreddit/section for Harry Potter enthusiasts.\",\n \"Create a new post in the subreddit.\",\n \"Fill out the post with event details and a brief description.\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Create Item\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US5\", \"US9\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to create a notice for a virtual meetup for Harry Potter enthusiasts on July 8th in the books subreddit on Reddit. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I should start by navigating to the subreddit where the meetup is happening. That's the books subreddit on Reddit. So, I'll need to go to reddit.com and find the books subreddit. Once I'm there, I'll look for the specific thread or section where the meetup is being announced. Maybe there's a dedicated flair for events or a weekly meeting section.\n\nNext, after finding the right place, I need to post the notice. To do that, I'll have to create a new post. This usually involves filling out a form with the event details: title, date (July 8th), time (if specified), location (probably a link to a website or a calendar invite), and a brief description explaining the meetup. I should also include a reason for posting, like promoting events for communities.\n\nWait, but before posting, maybe I should check if there's an existing thread for this meetup to avoid duplication. I can use a search function on Reddit to look for \"Harry Potter virtual meetup July 8th.\" If I find something, I'll add my post to that thread instead.\n\nNow, thinking about the structure of the post, I should make it engaging. Maybe start with a catchy title, include some emojis to make it visually appealing, and provide a clear call to action for others to join. I should also use appropriate flair tags to categorize the post correctly, so it shows up in the right section of Reddit.\n\nAfter posting, I might need to wait for it to be approved, especially if I'm a new user. So, I'll have to monitor my post's status in the subreddit. If it gets approved, great, I can then share the link or the ID of the post in a private chat or another community.\n\nWait, but the task is just to create the notice, not necessarily to monitor it. Maybe I don't need to worry about the approval process unless required. I'll focus on drafting the post correctly.\n\nI should also consider the platform's guidelines. Reddit has rules about self-promotion, so I need to make sure my post complies with those. Maybe include a link to the event page or a calendar invite if possible.\n\nPutting it all together, my steps would be: navigate to the subreddit, find the appropriate section, create a new post, fill in the event details, and hit submit. I should also make sure the post is well-formatted and follows any specific Reddit formatting guidelines to make it stand out.\n\nI think that's a solid plan. Now, I'll outline the strategies based on the universal templates provided."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 645,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 645,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Reddit Books Subreddit\",\n \"Generate and Submit Post\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to create a strategy for this task. The task is to post in the books subreddit about what machine learning can help in a specific field. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I need to understand what the user is asking for. They want to share a post on Reddit's books section discussing the applications of machine learning in a particular field. So, the main actions here are: creating a Reddit post, choosing the right subreddit, and writing the content about machine learning's applications.\n\nNow, looking at the universal strategies provided, I need to map each action to the appropriate strategy. \n\n1. **Creating a Reddit Post**: This involves finding the post button on the Reddit interface. I think that falls under navigating to a specific page or section. So, the strategy would be \"US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\"\n\n2. **Choosing the subreddit**: Reddit has a lot of subreddits, and I need to find the \"books\" subreddit. This is another navigation task, so again, \"US1\" would apply here.\n\n3. **Writing and Posting the Content**: Once in the books subreddit, I need to write a post about machine learning applications. This involves composing the message, which is more about content creation. However, since the user mentioned it's a strategy on a web interface, maybe it's more about the process of submitting the post. So, perhaps it's part of \"US4: Execute Action/Process,\" where you click \"Submit\" or \"Post.\"\n\nWait, but the example output includes strategies for navigating, configuring, and executing. In this case, navigating to the subreddit and then executing the post. So, maybe the strategies are \"US1\" for navigating to the subreddit and \"US4\" for executing the post.\n\nI don't see a strategy for content creation, so perhaps it's beyond the scope here. The task is more about the interface interactions than the actual content writing.\n\nSo, putting it all together, the strategies would be navigating to the subreddit and then submitting the post. Therefore, the universal strategies used are US1 and US4."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 65,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US7",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 65,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Customer Order History Report\",\n \"Sort Customers by Order Count\",\n \"View Details of Customer with Fifth Highest Orders\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US7\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, let's tackle this task step by step. The user is asking which customer has completed the fifth most number of orders in the entire history. So, I need to figure out how to approach this on a web interface.\n\nFirst, I think I need to navigate to the section where customer order history is tracked. That would probably be the Orders or Customer Analytics section. So, I'll use US1 for that.\n\nOnce there, I need to look for a way to view customer order counts. Maybe there's a reporting feature or a dashboard that aggregates this data. I'll have to locate the report or dashboard, which might be another navigation step using US1 again if it's in the same section.\n\nAfter accessing the report, I'll need to sort or filter the data to find the customer with the fifth highest order count. Sorting by order count in descending order would help. This falls under US7, Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data, because I'm evaluating the data to find the specific customer.\n\nFinally, once sorted, I can review the fifth customer in the list. Using US8, I'll navigate through the results page to ensure I'm on the correct page and can view the details. Then, using US5, I'll view the details of that customer to get all the necessary information.\n\nSo, putting it all together, the strategies would involve navigating to the right section, analyzing the data to sort and filter, and then viewing the specific customer's details."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 652,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 652,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Reddit Home Page\",\n \"Search for the Post\",\n \"Create Comment with '???'\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Create Item\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US9\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, let's tackle this task step by step. So, the user wants me to act as a GUI Agent and come up with a strategy to reply to a post on Reddit with a specific comment. Hmm, okay, first, I need to understand the task thoroughly.\n\nThe task is to reply to a post with a comment. The intent is pretty straightforward, but I should break it down into actionable steps. Let me think about what needs to be done.\n\nFirst, I need to navigate to the Reddit site. Since the site is reddit, I know that Reddit has a specific interface. So, the first step would be to go to reddit.com. Once there, I need to find the specific post that the user wants to reply to. Reddit has a search bar, so I can search for the post title or author to locate it.\n\nAfter finding the post, the next step is to actually reply to it. Reddit has a comment section below each post where users can add their comments. I think there's a \"New Comment\" button or just typing in the box and pressing enter. So, I need to locate that area and either click the button or type the comment directly.\n\nThe comment the user wants to make is \"???\". That's three question marks. I wonder why they chose that? Maybe they're uncertain or have a specific reason. Regardless, the strategy should just be to input that exact text.\n\nNow, thinking about the Universal Strategies, I can map each action to the appropriate strategy. Navigating to the Reddit site would fall under US1, which is \"Navigate To Page/Section\". Searching for the post would be US2, \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\". Finally, replying to the comment would be US9, \"Create Item\" because it's creating a new comment item.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategy steps would be: navigate to reddit.com, search for the post, and create a new comment with \"???\".\n\nI should make sure that each step is clear and follows logically. Also, considering the user might not be familiar with Reddit's interface, the steps should be straightforward. Maybe adding a note about the comment text being three question marks could be helpful, but since the task is to just reply with that, perhaps it's unnecessary unless specified.\n\nSo, the final plan is to use three strategies: navigate to the page, search for the post, and create the comment. That should cover the task comprehensively."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 668,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US9",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 668,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Merge Request Section\",\n \"Create Merge Request\",\n \"Configure Merge Request Branch\",\n \"Assign Reviewer\",\n \"Review Merge Request\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Create Item\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US9\", \"US3\", \"US7\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to complete the task given for the web interface. The task is to submit a merge request for a specific branch into the master branch and assign a reviewer. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I think I need to navigate to the section where merge requests are handled. Since GitLab is involved, I remember that there's a specific section for PRs (pull requests). So, the first step should be to go to the PR section. That would correspond to US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\n\nOnce I'm in the PR section, I probably need to create a new PR. I'm pretty sure GitLab has a \"Create Issue\" button or a form where you can enter the details. So, the next step would be to create a new PR. That would fall under US9: Create Item.\n\nAfter creating the PR, I need to set its branch. The user specified that the branch should be moved from \"a11yproject.com/redesign\" to the \"master\" branch. I believe GitLab allows you to select the destination branch from a dropdown menu once the PR is created. So, navigating to the destination branch would be another step. This might be part of configuring parameters, so it could fit under US3: Configure Parameters/Settings.\n\nOnce the PR is created and the branch is set, the next logical step is to assign a reviewer. Reviewers in GitLab are typically assigned through the PR details. I think there's a field where you can enter the reviewer's name or select from a list. So, assigning Justin Armstrong as the reviewer would be another action, possibly under US9 again, since it's related to creating or modifying an item.\n\nFinally, after setting everything up, I should review the PR to ensure all details are correct before submitting. Reviewing could be considered under US7: Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data, where I check the PR details for accuracy.\n\nPutting it all together, the steps I would take are:\n1. Navigate to the PR section.\n2. Create a new PR.\n3. Configure the PR's branch destination.\n4. Assign Justin Armstrong as the reviewer.\n5. Review the PR before submission.\n\nEach of these steps corresponds to specific universal strategies. So, the strategies used would be US1, US9, and US3, with IDs \"US1\", \"US9\", and \"US3\" respectively.\n\nI should make sure that the order makes sense and that each step logically follows the previous one. It's important to ensure that all required fields are filled out correctly before submitting the merge request. Also, assigning the reviewer should be done after setting the branch to maintain the correct workflow.\n\nI wonder if there are any additional steps, like checking permissions or waiting for a mentor to review the PR before assigning it to Justin. But since the task doesn't specify that, I'll stick to the main steps: navigating, creating, configuring, and assigning the reviewer. Reviewing the PR is a good practice but might not be necessary if the task only requires the submission, so I'll include it as a final step.\n\nOverall, the plan seems solid. I'll structure the response to include each step with the corresponding universal strategy and IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 678,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 678,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Orders Report\",\n \"Filter Orders by Canceled Status\",\n \"Navigate Through Filtered Results\",\n \"Analyze Canceled Orders\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Navigate Within Data/Results\",\n \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US8\", \"US7\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to complete this task. The user provided some instructions and an example of how to structure the output. Let me break it down.\n\nFirst, the task is to \"Lookup orders that are canceled.\" The site involved is \"shopping_admin.\" So, I need to plan how to achieve this on the web interface.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies, I need to select the appropriate ones. Let me go through each step.\n\n1. The first step is to navigate to the correct section. Since the task is about orders, I should go to the Orders report or a section where orders are listed. That would be US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\n\n2. Once in the Orders report, I need to filter the orders by their status being \"Canceled.\" This requires using the filtering functionality. So, I should use US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data.\n\n3. After filtering, I might need to sort the results to see them in a specific order, maybe by date or some other criteria. So, using US8: Navigate Within Data/Results to move through the filtered pages.\n\n4. Finally, I need to analyze or review the canceled orders. So, I should use US7: Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data to check each order.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies are US1, US2, US8, and US7. Each step logically follows the previous one to achieve the task of looking up canceled orders.\n\nI should make sure to include all these in the output as per the instructions, using the correct JSON structure. Also, I need to reference the universal strategy IDs correctly."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 682,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 682,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to GitLab Repository\",\n \"View GitLab Repository Details\",\n \"Create Reddit Post\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US5\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to complete this task using the Universal Strategies provided. The task is to find a GitLab repository related to chatGPT and then make a Reddit post linking to it in a relevant subreddit. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I need to find the GitLab repository. GitLab has a search function, so I should probably start by navigating to the GitLab interface and searching for \"chatGPT\". That makes sense. Once I find the repository, I'll need to view its details to get more information about it. So, after searching, I'll click on the repository to view its details. This would be using US5, which is \"View/Inspect Item Details\".\n\nNow, after I have the details, I probably need to make a post on Reddit. Reddit has different communities, and I need one that's relevant to chatGPT. I'm not exactly sure which subreddit that would be, but I can search for something like \"chatGPT\" on Reddit to find a suitable subreddit. Once I find the right subreddit, I need to create a new post. I think Reddit allows users to create posts directly, so I can just start typing my post there. This might involve some basic formatting, but that's standard.\n\nHowever, I'm wondering if there's a way to automate this process, like using an API to post directly without manually typing. But since the task is to find the repository and make the post, I'll stick with the manual method for now. Still, using US4, \"Execute Action/Process\", would be appropriate here because I'm initiating the process of creating a post.\n\nWait, do I need to configure any parameters before posting? Maybe I should set some initial parameters like the title or content before posting. If that's the case, then I might need to use US9, \"Create Item\", where I can complete the form with the necessary details before submitting. But since the task is quite straightforward, I might not need to go into such detailed configuration.\n\nPutting it all together, the steps I need to follow are:\n\n1. Navigate to GitLab and search for \"chatGPT\" to find the repository.\n2. View the details of the repository found.\n3. Go to Reddit and find a suitable subreddit related to chatGPT.\n4. Create a new post in that subreddit.\n\nNow, mapping these steps to the Universal Strategies:\n\n1. Navigating to GitLab and searching would be US1, \"Navigate To Page/Section\".\n2. Viewing the repository details would be US5, \"View/Inspect Item Details\".\n3. Going to Reddit and finding the subreddit is another navigation task, so again US1.\n4. Creating a new post on Reddit would be US4, \"Execute Action/Process\".\n\nWait, but creating a post might involve more than just executing an action. It might require filling out a form, so maybe US9 applies here. But since the task is just to make the post, perhaps US4 is sufficient as it's about initiating the action of posting.\n\nAlternatively, if I'm just composing the text without any specific settings, it might not require US9. So, perhaps US4 is the right one here.\n\nSo, the strategies would be:\n\n- US1: Navigating to GitLab and Reddit.\n- US5: Viewing the repository details.\n- US4: Creating the Reddit post.\n\nI think that covers all the necessary steps without missing anything. I don't see a need to use US3 or US6 here because there's no parameter configuration or information extraction needed beyond viewing the details. US7 might come into play if I need to analyze something, but since the task is straightforward, analysis isn't required.\n\nSo, the final strategy list should include US1, US4, and US5."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 686,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US7",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 686,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Auth0 Storage Dashboard\",\n \"Review Documentation\",\n \"Send Summary to Subreddit\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US7\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I have this task where I need to promote Auth0's Angular Storage to a subreddit called technology. The user provided an example of how to structure the output, so I should follow that. Let me break it down.\n\nFirst, I need to figure out the steps involved in promoting this storage. The main goal is to get the subreddit community aware of this storage solution. I think the first step would be to navigate to the Auth0 Storage dashboard where I can find the Angular Storage feature. From there, I can probably access the documentation or a landing page that explains what Angular Storage is and how it can be used.\n\nOnce I have the landing page, I need to download the documentation or the repository materials. The user mentioned that the description should come from the repo itself, so I should include that. After downloading the docs, I should review them to understand the features and benefits. This will help me prepare a compelling summary that highlights the key points to present to the subreddit.\n\nFinally, I need to craft a summary that effectively communicates the value of Angular Storage. I should make sure to include the description from the repository, the features, and how it can benefit the community. After writing the summary, I'll send it to the subreddit with an appropriate post, maybe explaining why I'm promoting it and what I hope to achieve.\n\nNow, thinking about the universal strategies, I need to map each step to the appropriate strategy ID. The first step is navigating to the Storage dashboard, which would be US1. Reviewing the documentation would involve US7, and sending the summary would be US4.\n\nI should make sure each step is clear and follows the structure the user provided. The strategies should be in order, and the universal strategy IDs should match the respective steps. I think that's it. Let me put it all together in the required JSON format."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 69,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US7",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 69,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Reddit Main Interface\",\n \"Navigate to Books Subreddit\",\n \"Retrieve Top Posts in Books\",\n \"Analyze Top Posts for Local Bookstores\",\n \"Extract Organizations Mentioned\",\n \"View Details of Local Bookstores\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US1\", \"US2\", \"US7\", \"US6\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to approach this task given the instructions. Let me start by understanding what the user is asking for. They provided a JSON input with a task_id of 69, sites as [\"reddit\"], and an intent to find out among the top 10 posts in the \"books\" forum if any discuss supporting local bookstores and identify the organizations involved.\n\nLooking at the Universal Strategy Templates, I need to break down the task into steps. The first step is to navigate to a specific page or section. Since the intent is about Reddit posts, I should go to the Reddit interface first. That would be US1: Navigate To Page/Section.\n\nNext, I need to find the specific forum for books. Reddit has different subreddits, so I have to navigate to the \"books\" subreddit. That's another step using US1 again.\n\nOnce on the books subreddit, I need to find the top posts. So, I'll go to the top posts section, which is another US1. Now, I need to limit this to the top 10 posts. I can use US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data to filter by the top 10.\n\nAfter getting the top 10 posts, I have to analyze each one to see if they talk about supporting local bookstores. This involves checking each post's content, which falls under US7: Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data.\n\nIf I find a relevant post, I need to extract the organizations mentioned. That's US6: Extract/Retrieve Information. Then, I have to view the details of those organizations, which is US5: View/Inspect Item Details.\n\nFinally, I need to summarize the findings, which is a general step but not directly covered by any universal strategy, so I'll note that as a final step without a specific template.\n\nSo, the strategies would be: navigate to Reddit, navigate to the books subreddit, get top posts, analyze them, extract info, view details, and summarize. The universal strategy IDs would be US1, US2, US7, US6, and US5. I think that covers all the necessary steps without overlapping."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 693,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 693,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Contact Us Page\",\n \"View/Inspect Contact Us Form Details\",\n \"Send Email\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US5\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I've got this task to figure out how to draft an email to the shop owner via their contact us function for a coupon. The user mentioned that their refund is supposed to be replaced by a coupon. Hmm, let me break this down.\n\nFirst, I need to understand the main steps involved. The user wants to send an email from the contact us section, so the first step is probably to navigate to that part of the website. That would fall under the \"Navigate To Page/Section\" strategy, which is US1.\n\nOnce they're on the contact us page, the next step is to find the right section where they can draft a message. The contact us page usually has different sections like \"Contact Us\" or \"Message Us,\" so I need to direct them there. That's another instance of US1 because they're moving to a specific page.\n\nNow, the main action is to write the email. They need to include a coupon offer as a replacement for their refund. So, they'll have to fill in the necessary details in the message. This would involve using the compose or message editor, which is part of the \"View/Inspect Item Details\" strategy, which is US5. They have to view the contact us form details and input their message there.\n\nAfter drafting the email, they need to send it. Sending an email is typically done by clicking a send or submit button. That's covered by the \"Execute Action/Process\" strategy, which is US4. So, they'll click the send button to make the email go through.\n\nLet me make sure I'm not missing any steps. They need to navigate to the contact us page (US1), view the form details to draft the message (US5), and then execute the send action (US4). That seems comprehensive.\n\nI should also consider if there are any other strategies involved, but I don't think so. The main actions are navigating, viewing details, and executing an action. So, the strategies are US1, US4, and US5. \n\nWait, do I need to include any other strategies like search or filter? In this case, they're not searching for a specific coupon or anything, just drafting a message. So, no, those aren't necessary here.\n\nAlright, so the final output should list these strategies and their corresponding steps. I'll structure it as per the example given, making sure to include all the necessary details in the JSON format."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 695,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 695,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Product Management/Inventory\",\n \"Configure Product Details (Size 38, Color Yellow)\",\n \"Add Product to Inventory\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, I need to figure out how to complete this task using the given universal strategies. The task is to add a specific product to the shopping admin site. Let me break it down step by step.\n\nFirst, I think I need to navigate to the correct section where I can add a product. That would probably be the \"Product Management\" or \"Inventory\" section. So, I'll use US1, which is \"Navigate To Page/Section.\"\n\nOnce I'm on that page, I need to create a new product. I'll probably see a button like \"Create New Product\" or \"Add Item.\" Clicking that would lead me to a form, so that's covered by US4, \"Execute Action/Process.\"\n\nNow, filling out the form. I need to enter the product name, which is \"Energy-Bulk Man Yoga Pant.\" The stock quantity is 50, so I'll input that. Size 38 and color yellow should be selected from their dropdowns. The price is $69.99, so that goes in the price field. I should make sure to review the form to avoid any mistakes before submitting.\n\nAfter submitting, the product should be listed in the inventory. I might need to navigate to the inventory section to confirm, so that would be another US1. Then, I can check the product details using US5, \"View/Inspect Item Details,\" to ensure everything is correct.\n\nFinally, I'll need to generate a report or confirmation of the added product. That would involve US8, \"Navigate Within Data/Results,\" to view the reports section, then using US4 again to generate the report.\n\nWait, but the output example only included the necessary strategies without extra steps. Let me stick to the essential ones: navigating to the product section, configuring the parameters, executing the add process, and reviewing the product. That should cover it without overcomplicating.\n\nSo, the strategies would be navigating to the product page, configuring the settings, executing the add, and then reviewing the product. The universal strategy IDs would be US1, US3, US4, and US5. Hmm, but the output example only included three strategies. Maybe I should just focus on the primary steps: navigating, configuring, and executing. Then, the reviewing can be part of the execution or a separate step.\n\nI think the key steps are US1 for navigation, US3 for configuration, and US4 for execution. That should cover the process of adding the product. I'll structure the output accordingly, making sure to reference the correct strategies and IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 7,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US7",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 7,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Google Maps\",\n \"Search for Carnegie Mellon University\",\n \"Filter Airports within 50 km\",\n \"View Address Details of Airports\",\n \"Export or Collect Airports' Addresses\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US2\", \"US5\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, I need to figure out how to complete this task using the provided universal strategies. The task is to find the full addresses of all international airports within a 50 km driving distance from Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Since Carnegie Mellon is in Pittsburgh, I'll focus on Pittsburgh, PA.\n\nFirst, I should navigate to a map site like Google Maps because the task involves a map. So, I'll use US1 to go to the Google Maps interface.\n\nNext, I need to search for Carnegie Mellon University. On Google Maps, this should appear as a pin on the map. Now, I need to find nearby airports. I remember that international airports in the Pittsburgh area include locations like Pittsburgh International Airport (Pittsburgh, PA) and maybe others nearby. So, I'll use US2 to search for nearby airports.\n\nAfter searching, I should have a list of airports. Now, I need to filter these to find those within a 50 km driving distance. On Google Maps, there's a filter option where I can set the radius to 50 km. I'll use US2 again to apply this filter.\n\nOnce the map updates, I should see only the airports within the specified distance. Now, I need to retrieve the full addresses of these airports. This involves clicking on each airport marker, which should display their addresses. I'll use US5 for each airport to view their details.\n\nFinally, I'll compile all the addresses I collected. Since this is a batch process, I might use US9 to create a list or export function to gather all the addresses efficiently. \n\nSo, the steps are: navigate to Google Maps (US1), search for Carnegie Mellon (US2), filter by 50 km (US2), view each airport's details (US5), and collect the addresses (US9)."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 703,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US9",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 703,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Create Item\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Generate and Submit\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Create Item\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US9\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I've got this task to draft a new marketing price rule for Thanksgiving sale, offering a $40 discount on checkout for all customers. I'm a bit new to this, so I need to figure out the best way to approach it step by step.\n\nFirst, I think I need to navigate to the section where I can create marketing rules. I remember from the previous example that there was a \"Create Item\" strategy, which is US9. So maybe I should start with that. I'll go to the Marketing Rules section and look for a way to create a new rule.\n\nOnce I'm in the create rule form, I need to figure out where the discount parameter is. I'm not entirely sure where that field is, but I can look for something that says \"Discount Amount\" or similar. Let me check the interface. Oh, there it is! There's a field labeled \"Discount Amount ($)\" with a placeholder of $10. I need to change that to $40. That should be straightforward—just type in 40 and maybe save the rule.\n\nWait, but before I do that, I should make sure that the rule is applicable for Thanksgiving. Maybe there's a date range selector. I'll look for a \"Date Range\" option. I'll set the start date to November 22nd and the end date to November 28th, which is typical for the Thanksgiving sale period. I should double-check that the system recognizes these dates or if I need to input them in a specific format like YYYY-MM-DD.\n\nAfter setting the dates, I might need to review the rule to ensure everything looks correct. Maybe there's a preview button to check how the rule will appear on the checkout page. I'll click that and make sure the discount is correctly displayed as $40. If there are any issues, I can go back and adjust the parameters.\n\nOnce I'm satisfied with the rule, I'll submit it. There might be a confirmation message, so I'll note that. I should also check if there's an option to save the rule with a specific name or category, like \"Thanksgiving Sale Discount,\" for easy access later.\n\nHmm, did I miss anything? Maybe I should verify that the rule updates automatically when the sale is active. Sometimes systems require a trigger or event to apply the discount. I'll look for any notifications or alerts after submitting the rule. If there's a confirmation, great! If not, there might be instructions on how to manually activate it during the sale period.\n\nI think that's all for now. I've navigated to create the rule, configured the discount amount and dates, reviewed it, and submitted it. Hopefully, this works smoothly and the discount is applied correctly during the Thanksgiving sale."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 704,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": true,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 704,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Sales Report for Last Month\",\n \"Configure Report Parameters for Last Month\",\n \"Generate Sales Report for Last Month\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, I need to figure out how to generate a sales order report for last month on the shopping_admin site. The user's task is to generate this report, so I should break it down into steps.\n\nFirst, I should navigate to the sales report section. That sounds like using the \"Navigate To Page/Section\" strategy, which is US1. So I'll add that as the first step.\n\nNext, I need to configure the report parameters. The user wants data from last month, so I should set the date range. That falls under \"Configure Parameters/Settings,\" which is US3. I'll include that as the second step.\n\nAfter setting the parameters, I need to generate the report. That's an \"Execute Action/Process,\" which is US4. So that will be the third step.\n\nI should make sure each step is clear and uses the correct universal strategy. I don't think I need any other strategies beyond these three. So the final output should list these strategies with their IDs and the steps in order."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 71,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US2"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 71,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Search for Chatham University on the map\",\n \"View the details of Chatham University to find the zip code\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US2\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to solve this task where I have to find the zip code of Chatham University using a web interface. The user provided some universal strategies, so I'll start by looking at those.\n\nFirst, the task is to find the zip code, which is a specific piece of information. That makes me think I need to view or inspect some details. Looking at the strategies, US5 is about viewing item details. So maybe I can locate Chatham University on the map and then view its details to find the zip code.\n\nBut wait, how do I locate Chatham University on the map? The sites provided are [\"map\"], so the interface has a map. I might need to search for \"Chatham University\" on the map. That sounds like a search function, which is US2—search/filter/sort data. So first, I'll search for the university.\n\nOnce I've found it on the map, I need to get more details about it. That would involve viewing the details, which is US5. So the first step is to search for the university, then view its details to find the zip code.\n\nAlternatively, maybe there's a way to directly search for the zip code. But US2 is more about filtering data, not directly searching for a piece of information. So probably, searching for the university and then viewing its details is the way to go.\n\nSo the steps would be: search for Chatham University, then view its details to get the zip code. That corresponds to US2 and US5. I don't think I need US1 or anything else because I'm not navigating to a different page, just searching and viewing details.\n\nWait, but the output example includes the strategies and their IDs. So for US2, the ID is \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\", and for US5, it's \"View/Inspect Item Details\". So I'll need to reference those IDs: \"US2\" and \"US5\".\n\nI don't think I need any other steps because once I view the details, the zip code should be there. I don't have to configure any settings or execute an action unless there's a form to fill, but the task is just to find the zip code, so viewing the details should suffice.\n\nSo putting it all together, the strategy would be to search for Chatham University on the map and then view its details to retrieve the zip code. The corresponding universal strategies are US2 and US5 with IDs \"US2\" and \"US5\"."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 710,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 710,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Shipping Report\",\n \"Configure Report Parameters for 08/05/2022 - 03/01/2023\",\n \"Generate Shipping Report\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I have this task where I need to create a shipping report from August 5, 2022, to March 1, 2023, using the shopping_admin site. The output needs to include a JSON response with strategies and their corresponding Universal Strategy IDs. \n\nFirst, I need to break down the task into smaller steps. The main goal is to create a report, so the first step is probably to navigate to where the shipping reports are. That would likely involve using the navigation function, which is US1.\n\nOnce on the report page, I need to set the date range. Looking at the examples, US3 is for configuring parameters or settings. So I'll use US3 to set the start and end dates.\n\nAfter setting the dates, I need to generate the report. That's a straightforward action, so US4 would apply here.\n\nI don't think I need any other strategies like searching or extracting information unless those are part of creating the report, but based on the examples, the main steps cover navigation, configuration, and generation. So the strategies should be US1, US3, and US4."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 714,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 714,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Reddit\",\n \"Navigate Within Subreddit to Find Top Post\",\n \"Downvote the Top Post\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Navigate Within Data/Results\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US8\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I have this task to figure out how to thumbs down the top 1 post ever in gadgets on Reddit. Let me break it down step by step.\n\nFirst, I need to understand the goal. The user wants to downvote the top post in the gadgets category. So, I should find that post and then downvote it.\n\nLooking at the provided task, it's on reddit, so I'll need to navigate to reddit.com. Then, I should go to the subreddit for gadgets. Once there, I need to find the top post. After identifying it, the next step is to downvote it.\n\nI remember there are universal strategies mentioned. Let me see which ones fit here. The first step is to navigate to the subreddit, which is US1: \"Navigate To Page/Section\". Then, once on the subreddit, I need to find the top post. That might involve scrolling or using a search function, but since the intent is to find the top post, scrolling to the top should do. However, since this is about navigating within the data, maybe US8: \"Navigate Within Data/Results\" applies here because I'm moving through the results to find the top one.\n\nOnce I've located the post, the next step is to downvote it. That's a straightforward action, so US4: \"Execute Action/Process\" would be appropriate.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategy would involve navigating to reddit, navigating within the subreddit to find the top post, and then executing the downvote action.\n\nI should make sure each step is clear and follows the templates provided. Also, I need to reference the correct universal strategy IDs so that the system knows which steps to follow.\n\nWait, do I need to include the exact URL for navigating to reddit? The output example didn't do that, so maybe just the strategy name is sufficient. That way, the system can handle the specifics of the URL.\n\nSo, the strategies would be:\n1. Navigate to Reddit (using US1)\n2. Navigate within the subreddit to find the top post (using US8)\n3. Execute the downvote action (using US4)\n\nI think that covers all the necessary steps without being too vague. I should double-check if there's a more specific strategy for finding the top post, but US8 seems general enough for scrolling or navigating through results.\n\nAlright, I think I've got it figured out."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 720,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 720,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to earthporn subreddit\",\n \"Find CameronKelsey's submissions and navigate to them\",\n \"Like CameronKelsey's submissions\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Navigate Within Data/Results\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US8\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to help the user with their task. Let's see what they provided. The task is to \"Like all submissions created by CameronKelsey in subreddit earthporn\" on reddit. \n\nFirst, I should break this down. The user wants to like submissions made by a specific user in a particular subreddit. So, the steps involved would likely involve navigating to the subreddit, finding the user's submissions, and liking each one.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies, I remember US1 is about navigating to a page or section. So, the first step would be to navigate to the earthporn subreddit. That makes sense because you need to be there to interact with the submissions.\n\nNext, after being on the subreddit page, the user needs to find CameronKelsey's submissions. That probably involves navigating within the subreddit, maybe through a search function or a user profile. So, that would fall under US8, which is about navigating within data or results. They might be looking through a list of posts, so scrolling or using pagination controls would be part of this step.\n\nOnce CameronKelsey's submissions are displayed, the user needs to like each one. That's a straightforward action, which would be covered by US4, the execute action/process strategy. Clicking the like button for each post would be the action here.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be: navigate to the subreddit, navigate within the subreddit to find the user's posts, and then execute the like action on each post. The corresponding universal strategy IDs would be US1, US8, and US4.\n\nI should make sure that each step is clear and follows logically. The user needs to first go to the right place, then find the relevant content, and finally perform the action. I don't think there are any other steps needed, like viewing details or extracting information, because the main goal is just to like them.\n\nSo, the final JSON output should list these strategies and their respective IDs. I'll structure it as the user demonstrated in the example, making sure to include the task ID, strategies in order, the universal strategies, and their IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 729,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 729,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Reddit API\",\n \"Configure Reddit API Parameters for posts by AdamCannon in UpliftingNews\",\n \"Generate and Dislike Posts\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to handle this task for the Reddit API. The user wants to dislike all submissions created by AdamCannon in the subreddit UpliftingNews. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I need to understand the structure of Reddit's API. I remember that Reddit has an API where you can interact with posts, comments, etc. There's a RedditAPI object that I can use to make requests. I think I need to authenticate with Reddit using AppID, secret, and maybe a redirect URL for OAuth.\n\nWait, how do I get all the posts created by AdamCannon? I remember there's a RedditAPI class with a method called get_posts. That makes sense. So I'll probably call get_posts with the subreddit parameter set to UpliftingNews. But I also need to filter these posts to only include those created by AdamCannon.\n\nHow do I get the username of AdamCannon? Oh right, I can use the get_users method with his display name as the argument. That should give me the user object, from which I can extract the username.\n\nOnce I have the username, I can pass it to the get_posts method using the username parameter. That should limit the results to posts by AdamCannon. But wait, Reddit also has a payout system, right? So I need to check if a post is modded or has a payout to avoid disliking them because of the Reddit API's rate limits or policies.\n\nSo after getting the posts, I'll loop through each one, check if it's modded or has a payout, and if not, dislike it. Disliking a submission probably means hitting the dislike button on Reddit, which the API should handle automatically.\n\nPutting this all together, the steps are: authenticate, get all posts by AdamCannon in UpliftingNews, filter out modded or pAYOUT posts, and dislike the remaining ones.\n\nI think each of these steps corresponds to a universal strategy. The first step is navigating to the Reddit API interface, which is US1. Then configuring the parameters to get the specific posts, which is US3. Finally, executing the action to dislike each post, which is US4.\n\nWait, do I need to handle any exceptions or errors? Maybe, but the user didn't mention that. So I'll stick to the main steps.\n\nSo the final strategies would be: navigate to Reddit API, configure posts by AdamCannon in UpliftingNews, and generate a report by disliking those posts. The universal strategy IDs would be US1, US3, and US4."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 733,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US10",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 733,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Star Trek Starfleet Academy subreddit\",\n \"Search for the Star Trek: The Next Generation post\",\n \"Edit the post body to add 'Every watch makes me feel like a kid again'\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, I need to figure out how to help the user with their task. Let me start by understanding the problem they presented.\n\nThe user provided a task where they want to edit a post on Reddit related to the Star Trek Starfleet Academy series. The specific action is to add a line to the body of the post saying \"Every watch makes me feel like a kid again.\"\n\nFirst, I should break down this task into smaller steps. The main action here is editing the post's body. So, the first step would be to navigate to the correct subreddit where this post exists. Reddit has a structure where you can navigate through communities and posts, so I'll need a strategy to go to the subreddit.\n\nOnce in the subreddit, the next step is to locate the specific post. This might involve scrolling through the posts or using search functions within Reddit. After finding the post, the final step is to edit its body by adding the desired line.\n\nNow, looking at the universal strategies provided, I can match these steps to the appropriate templates. \n\n1. Navigating to the subreddit would fall under \"Navigate To Page/Section,\" which is US1.\n2. Locating the post within the subreddit might involve searching or scrolling, but since the example doesn't specify, I'll assume it's a simple search, so US2 (Search/Filter/Sort Data) could apply.\n3. Editing the post's body would involve using the \"Edit\" option, which aligns with \"Execute Action/Process,\" which is US4.\n\nI should ensure that the strategies are in the correct order and that each step is clearly defined. Also, I need to make sure that the output is in JSON format as specified, including the task ID, strategies, universal strategies, and their IDs.\n\nI think that covers all the necessary steps. I'll structure the response accordingly, making sure each part is clear and follows the examples provided."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 741,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 741,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to the Map section\",\n \"Search for Carnegie Mellon University\",\n \"Filter results by the NBA team in Boston\",\n \"Generate and review the directions\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, let me try to figure out how to approach this task. The user provided a query where they have a task with an ID of 741, and it's about showing the way from Carnegie Mellon University to the home stadium of the Boston NBA team. The sites involved are Wikipedia and Map. \n\nFirst, I need to understand what the task is asking for. It seems like the user wants a step-by-step guide on navigating from one place to another. So, the main goal is to create a strategy that helps someone find directions using the provided sites.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies, I should pick templates that fit each step. The first step is probably to navigate to a page or section, so US1 makes sense. Then, once on the map, they might need to search or filter results, so US2 would be applicable. Finally, executing the action to get the directions would be US4.\n\nI need to structure the strategies in order, making sure each step logically follows the previous one. So, starting with navigating to the map, searching for Carnegie Mellon, then filtering by the NBA team in Boston, and finally generating the directions. \n\nI should also ensure that the universal_strategy_ids are correctly referenced. The example provided used US1, US3, US4, so I'll follow that format. \n\nPutting it all together, I'll outline each step clearly and assign the appropriate strategy IDs. This should provide a clear and concise plan for the user to follow."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 745,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US9",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "The task involves creating a new public project on GitLab and adding members, which can be broken down into three main steps using the universal strategies.\n\n```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 745,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Create New Public Project\",\n \"Set Project as Public\",\n \"Add Member: primer\",\n \"Add Member: convexegg\",\n \"Add Member: abishek\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Configure Parameters/Settings\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US3\", \"US4\", \"US4\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I have this task where I need to create a new public project on GitLab called \"awesome-llms\" and add three members: primer, convexegg, and abishek. Let me think about how to approach this step by step.\n\nFirst, I remember that GitLab has a specific interface for creating projects. I think I need to log into my GitLab account and navigate to the main interface. Once I'm there, I believe there's a section where you can create new projects. Maybe it's under the \"Teams\" or \"Projects\" tab. So, the first step would be to log in and go to the Create Project page. That would correspond to the US1 strategy, which is \"Navigate To Page/Section.\"\n\nAfter creating the project, I need to set it as public. I'm not exactly sure where that option is, but I think it's under the project settings. Maybe after creating it, I have to go into the project settings and toggle the public option on. That would be another step using US3, \"Configure Parameters/Settings.\"\n\nNext, I have to add the members. I believe GitLab allows adding members through a form or a sidebar. I might need to navigate to the members section, perhaps by clicking on a gear icon or a section labeled \"Members.\" Once there, I can either type the usernames or select them from a list. So, adding each member would be individual actions, perhaps using US4, \"Execute Action/Process,\" for each addition.\n\nPutting it all together, the steps would be: navigate to the project creation page, create the project, set it as public, and then add each member. Each of these steps corresponds to the respective universal strategies.\n\nI should make sure I'm using the correct IDs as per the provided list. So, US1 for navigation, US3 for configuration, and US4 for each execution step. I think that covers all the necessary actions without missing anything.\n\nWait, do I need to consider any additional steps, like permissions or existing projects? I'm not sure, but since the task is straightforward, I'll stick to the main steps: create, set public, and add members.\n\nOkay, I think I have a clear plan now. The strategies will be US1, US3, and US4 for each member addition, but since each addition is an individual action, I'll list each one separately in the strategies array."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 748,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US9",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 748,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to GitLab Interface\",\n \"Execute Project Creation Process\",\n \"Create Private Project with Members\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\",\n \"Create Item\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US4\", \"US9\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to help the user with their task. They provided an input example and an output example, which is helpful. Let me break down the problem step by step.\n\nFirst, the task is to create a private project on GitLab using a web agent for Android XL, with specific members. The user wants to add three members: Android template, convexegg, and abishek.\n\nLooking at the output example, I see that the strategies are based on Universal Strategies. The example used US1 for navigating to a page, US4 for executing an action, and US9 for creating an item.\n\nSo, for the given task, I need to identify which strategies apply. \n\n1. **US1: Navigate to Page/Section** - The user needs to go to GitLab's interface, so this makes sense.\n2. **US4: Execute Action/Process** - After navigating, they have to create a project, which is an action.\n3. **US9: Create Item** - Creating a project is adding an item, which fits here.\n\nI should structure the response by first outlining the strategies in order, then list the corresponding universal strategy IDs.\n\nI also need to make sure the JSON structure matches the example, with \"task_id\", \"strategies\", \"universal_strategies\", and \"universal_strategy_ids\".\n\nSo, putting it all together, the strategies are navigate to GitLab, execute project creation, and create the project. The universal strategies are US1, US4, US9.\n\nI think that covers everything the user needs. Let me double-check if there's anything else, but it seems straightforward. The example provided matches the structure, so I'm confident this is correct."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 75,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US9",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 75,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Map Navigation Tool\",\n \"View MIT location details\",\n \"Create Harvard University marker\",\n \"Create Boston Logan marker\",\n \"Optimize route between locations\",\n \"Analyze total travel time\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Create Item\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\",\n \"Navigate Within Data/Results\",\n \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US5\", \"US9\", \"US4\", \"US8\", \"US7\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to solve this task using the Universal Strategy templates provided. The task is about finding the optimal route through three locations in Massachusetts: MIT, Harvard University, and Boston Logan International Airport. The journey starts at MIT.\n\nFirst, I'll break down the task into smaller steps. The main goal is to minimize travel time between these three points. So, I think the first step would be to navigate to a mapping tool or platform where I can input these locations and find the shortest route.\n\nLooking at the Universal Strategies, US1 is about navigating to a page or section. That makes sense here because I need to go to a mapping interface. So, I'll use US1 with the strategy \"Navigate to Map Navigation Tool.\"\n\nOnce I'm on the map, I need to input the starting point, which is MIT. To do that, I should find the location details section, which US5 covers—viewing item details. So, I'll use US5 to \"View MIT location details\" to get the correct address.\n\nNext, I need to input all three locations into the mapping tool. This might involve adding each location as a marker. The strategy for adding an item would be US9, \"Create Item,\" so I'll create markers for Harvard University and Boston Logan International Airport using US9 with strategies \"Create Harvard University marker\" and \"Create Boston Logan marker.\"\n\nAfter setting up all the markers, I need to plan the route between them. The mapping tool likely has a feature to calculate the optimal route between multiple points. This would involve using US8, \"Navigate Within Data/Results,\" to move through the map's interface and use the route optimization feature. I'll use US8 with the strategy \"Optimize route between locations.\"\n\nFinally, once the route is optimized, I need to view the total travel time. To do this, I'll use US7, \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data,\" to evaluate the route's total time and ensure it's the shortest possible.\n\nWait, but I'm not sure if I need to extract any information or just view it. The task mentions minimizing total travel time, so maybe I just need to view the route and its time. So, after optimizing, I'll use US7 to \"Analyze total travel time\" to confirm it's minimized.\n\nPutting it all together, my strategies would be:\n\n1. Navigate to the map tool (US1).\n2. View MIT details (US5).\n3. Create markers for Harvard and the airport (US9 twice).\n4. Optimize the route (US8).\n5. Analyze the route's time (US7).\n\nI think that covers all the necessary steps to find the optimal route. I should make sure each step is clear and uses the correct Universal Strategy ID."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 760,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 760,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Search for Amanda Kim's location\",\n \"Navigate to the map interface\",\n \"Plan and display the route\",\n \"Calculate and show driving time\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\",\n \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US2\", \"US1\", \"US4\", \"US7\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to help the user with their task. The task is to show the route and driving time from Allentown, PA to the city where Amanda Kim lives. Let me break this down.\n\nFirst, I need to determine where Amanda Kim lives. I'll probably have to search for her location. Once I have that, I can plan the route. So, the first step is to find Amanda's city. That probably involves a search function on the map site.\n\nNext, I need to navigate to a mapping tool on the map site. Once there, I can input the starting point as Allentown, PA and the destination as Amanda's city. After that, the mapping tool should provide the route and driving time. \n\nI should also check if there are any additional steps, like exporting the route or providing directions. But the main steps seem to be searching for Amanda's location, mapping the route, and displaying the driving time.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies, I can map these steps to the appropriate strategies. Searching for Amanda's location would fall under US2 (Search/Filter/Sort Data). Navigating to the map would be US1 (Navigate To Page/Section). Executing the route search and getting the results would be US4 (Execute Action/Process) and US7 (Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data) for checking driving time.\n\nSo, the strategies would be US2, US1, US4, and US7. The tasks would involve searching for Amanda, navigating to the map, executing the route, and analyzing the driving time.\n\nI should make sure the output includes the strategies in the correct format, listing each step and referencing the appropriate universal strategies with their IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 762,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 762,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Map Interface\",\n \"Search for Carnegie Music Hall in NYC\",\n \"Plan and Generate Driving Directions to Carnegie Mellon University\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate Within Data/Results\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US8\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, I need to figure out how to help the user with their task. They provided a JSON input with a task ID, sites, and an intent. The task is to get directions from Carnegie Music Hall in NYC to Carnegie Mellon University using driving options.\n\nFirst, I'll break down the intent. The user wants directions, so they're likely looking for a navigation feature. The sites mentioned are [\"map\"], which suggests the user is interacting with a mapping service.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies, I should match each step of the task to the appropriate strategy ID. \n\n1. The first step is to navigate to the mapping interface. So, I'll use US1: \"Navigate To Page/Section\". That makes sense because they need to go to the map.\n\n2. Once on the map, they need to input Carnegie Music Hall in NYC. This involves searching for a location, so I'll use US2: \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\". They'll search for the address to center the map.\n\n3. After the map is centered, they'll need to plan the route to Carnegie Mellon University. This requires configuring the settings for the driving options, so US3: \"Configure Parameters/Settings\" is the right choice. They might set the route type or preferred mode of transportation.\n\n4. Finally, they'll execute the driving action by generating the directions. This falls under US4: \"Execute Action/Process\", where they click a submit button or initiate the search.\n\nI need to make sure each step logically follows the previous one and that the strategies are accurately matched. Also, the output should be in JSON format, including the strategies and their corresponding IDs. I should avoid any markdown and keep the explanation clear."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 768,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 768,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Stock Management Page\",\n \"Search for Product\",\n \"Update Stock\",\n \"Save Changes\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to handle this task where I need to update the stock of a specific product. The user mentioned that 5 blue Cronus yoga pants with size 33 arrived and the stock needs to be updated. \n\nFirst, I think I need to navigate to the correct section where the stock information is stored. Probably, there's a stock management or inventory section on the website. So, the first step would be to go to the Stock Management Page. That makes sense because that's where all the stock data is kept.\n\nOnce I'm on the Stock Management Page, I need to find where the specific product is listed. The product in question is 5 blue Cronus yoga pants with size 33. So, I should use a search function to find this product. Maybe there's a search bar or a filter option where I can type in the product name and size. This would involve using the Search/Filter/Sort Data strategy, which is probably identified as US2.\n\nAfter finding the product, the next step is to update the stock. I guess I need to go into the product's details and adjust the stock count. This might involve clicking on a \"Stock\" or \"Update Stock\" button next to the product. That would fall under the Configure Parameters/Settings strategy, which is US3. \n\nOnce I've made the changes, I need to save them. So, I'll have to click on a Save or Generate button to apply the changes. That's the Execute Action/Process strategy, which is US4.\n\nWait, but is there a possibility that after updating the stock, I might need to refresh the page to see the changes? I'm not sure, but the example didn't mention that. The example only had three steps, so maybe it's assumed that the save action takes care of it.\n\nSo, putting it all together, the steps would be: navigate to the stock management page (US1), search for the product (US2), update the stock (US3), and then save the changes (US4). That should cover the necessary actions to update the stock correctly."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 77,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 77,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Reviews Report\",\n \"Filter Reviews to Pending\",\n \"Generate Pending Reviews Report\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to solve this task. The task is to find the total count of Pending reviews among all the reviews. The provided example shows a JSON output structure that includes strategies and their corresponding Universal Strategies.\n\nFirst, I should break down the task. The main goal is to count Pending reviews. To do that, I probably need to navigate to the reviews section, filter or view only the Pending ones, and then generate a report or summary of their count.\n\nLooking at the Universal Strategies, I think the first step would be to navigate to the Bestsellers Report, but wait, that's about sales. Maybe I need to go to a different section. Since the task is about reviews, I should go to the Reviews section. So that would be \"Navigate to Reviews Report\" using US1.\n\nNext, I need to focus on the Pending reviews. So I should filter the reviews to show only Pending ones. That would involve using a filter function, which falls under US2: Search/Filter/Sort Data.\n\nAfter filtering, I need to retrieve the count. That would involve using an action like \"Generate and submit the report\" or \"View the details\" to get the total number. So I think using US4: Execute Action/Process to generate the report and then maybe US5 to view the details to get the count.\n\nWait, but the example output had US1, US3, US4. Let me think again. To get the total count, I might just need to generate the report, which would be US4. But to ensure I'm only looking at Pending reviews, I need to filter first, which is US2.\n\nSo maybe the steps are: navigate to the Reviews section (US1), filter to Pending reviews (US2), and then generate the report (US4). But the example used US5 to view details, but in this case, maybe after generating the report, the count is displayed, so maybe US4 alone is sufficient.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps after filtering, I can directly retrieve the count without viewing details. Hmm, maybe US4 is enough after US1 and US2.\n\nWait, the example had US1, US3, US4 because it was about sales. In this case, since it's about Pending reviews, I think the steps are: navigate to the reviews section (US1), filter for Pending (US2), and then generate the report (US4). So the strategies would be US1, US2, US4.\n\nBut the initial example didn't have US2 because it was a different task. Let me confirm the example: the example task was about sales, so they used US1, US3, US4. In this case, since it's about reviews and requires filtering, I need to include US2.\n\nSo the strategies would be:\n\n1. Navigate to the Reviews Report (US1)\n2. Filter to Pending reviews (US2)\n3. Generate the report (US4)\n\nI think that covers all the steps needed. So the JSON output should reflect these strategies with their respective IDs."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 771,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US10",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 771,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Retrieve Positive Reviews\",\n \"Approve Reviews\",\n \"Verify Approved Reviews\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\",\n \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US5\", \"US4\", \"US7\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, I need to figure out how to approach this task. The user has given me a JSON input with a task_id, sites, and an intent. The intent is to approve positive reviews for display in the store. \n\nFirst, I should break this down into steps. The main goal is to approve positive reviews, so I need to find those reviews, get their details, and then submit them for approval.\n\nI think the first step would be to navigate to the reviews section. That would fall under the \"Navigate To Page/Section\" strategy, which is US1. So, I'll start with that.\n\nNext, I need to filter the reviews to find the positive ones. The intent mentions \"positive reviews,\" so I'll use the search or filter function. That's another US1 strategy because it's about navigating and searching. So, I'll add \"Search/Filter Data\" as another step.\n\nOnce I have the positive reviews listed, I need to retrieve their details. Maybe each review has a form or a section where I can edit the approval status. So, I'll use the \"Retrieve Information\" strategy, which is US6. I'll have to click on each review and then extract their necessary information to submit for approval.\n\nAfter retrieving the information, the next step is to submit the approvals. That involves clicking on a \"Submit\" or \"Approve\" button, which falls under US4, \"Execute Action/Process.\" I'll need to do this for each relevant review.\n\nFinally, I should review the results to ensure everything went smoothly. That would be using the \"Analyze/Evaluate/Verify Data\" strategy, US7, to check if the approvals were processed correctly.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies needed are US1, US6, US4, and US7. The steps would involve navigating to the reviews, searching for positives, retrieving details, submitting, and verifying."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 773,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US11"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 773,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Reviews\",\n \"View Pending Negative Reviews\",\n \"Delete Pending Negative Reviews\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US5\", \"US10\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I've got this task where I need to delete all pending negative reviews on the shopping_admin site. Let me break this down step by step. \n\nFirst, I think I need to navigate to the right place where all pending negative reviews are stored. So, I should probably go to the reviews section. I remember that in the Universal Strategies, there's one about navigating to a page or section. That's US1. So, I'll start with that.\n\nOnce I'm in the reviews section, I need to find the pending reviews. Maybe there's a filter or a specific section for pending items. I'm not entirely sure, but I'll look for a filter option or a link that says \"Pending\" or something similar. This might involve using US5, which is viewing or inspecting item details, but I'm not sure if that's the right approach or if it's just a filter.\n\nAfter finding the pending reviews, I need to delete them. I recall that deleting items usually involves selecting them and then confirming the action. There's a strategy called US10, which is about updating or modifying an item, but I think that's more for changing settings rather than deleting. However, maybe the process is similar. I'll need to select each pending review and then proceed to delete them. \n\nWait, but deleting multiple items might require a different strategy. Maybe US8, which is about navigating within data results, could help me go through each review one by one. So, after selecting a review, I can navigate to the next one using the pagination controls. Then, I can delete each one individually. \n\nAlternatively, if there's a bulk delete feature, that might be more efficient. But I'm not sure if that exists. If not, then I'll have to go through each review step by step. \n\nPutting it all together, my steps would be: navigate to the reviews section (US1), select the pending negative reviews, and then delete each one using the delete strategy. If there's a bulk delete option, that would be better, but if not, I'll have to do it one by one.\n\nI'm a bit confused about whether US11 applies here. US11 is about deleting an item, but I think that's for a single item. Since I need to delete multiple, I might need to use US10 for each deletion. \n\nSo, to summarize, I'll use US1 to navigate to the reviews, then for each pending review, I'll use US10 to delete them. If there are multiple strategies involved in selecting the reviews, maybe US5 is part of that process. \n\nI think the output should list each action, so I'll have strategies like \"Navigate to Reviews\" (US1), \"View Pending Reviews\" (maybe a combination of US5 and US8), and then \"Delete Pending Reviews\" (US10). \n\nI'm not entirely confident about the exact strategy IDs, but I think US1 for navigating, US10 for deleting, and maybe US8 for navigating through the results. \n\nI should also consider if there's a way to automate this process, but since it's a manual task, each deletion would be an individual step. \n\nAlright, I think I've got a rough plan. Now, I'll structure it according to the required JSON format."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 782,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 782,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Product Catalog\",\n \"Filter Products by Color and Size\",\n \"Configure Price Increase Settings\",\n \"Apply Price Increase\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to increase the price of all blue running t-shirts in extra small and small sizes by 23%. Let's break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I need to locate where these t-shirts are in the system. That probably means I have to navigate to the product catalog. I remember there's a universal strategy for navigating to a specific page, which is US1: \"Navigate To Page/Section.\"\n\nOnce I'm in the product catalog, I should filter the results to show only blue running t-shirts. I think there's a filtering option, maybe under a dropdown or a filter section. That would be US2: \"Search/Filter/Sort Data,\" specifically using the filter function.\n\nNow, after filtering, I need to select all the blue running t-shirts that are in extra small and small sizes. I might need to use another filter or perhaps a \"Select All\" feature for those specific sizes. Once selected, I'll probably need to adjust their prices. That sounds like configuring parameters, which is US3: \"Configure Parameters/Settings.\" I can set the price increase to 23% there.\n\nAfter configuring the settings, I'll need to apply the price increase. This might involve clicking a \"Save\" or \"Apply Changes\" button, which falls under US4: \"Execute Action/Process.\"\n\nWait, but do I need to view the details before configuring the settings? Maybe I should first view the t-shirts to confirm I have the right ones selected. That would be US5: \"View/Inspect Item Details.\" But since I'm adjusting prices, maybe I can skip viewing each one and just select the sizes. Hmm, perhaps I can do that without viewing each detail.\n\nSo, to sum up, the steps are: navigate to the product catalog, filter by color and size, configure the price increase, and then apply it. The universal strategies used are US1, US2, US3, and US4. I think that covers it.\n\nI should make sure that the order makes sense. First, navigate, then filter, configure, and execute. That seems logical. I don't think I need to extract information or analyze data here, so US6 and US7 aren't necessary. Also, no need to create or update an item, so US9 and US10 are out. No deleting either, so US11 isn't needed.\n\nSo the final strategies would be US1, US2, US3, and US4. I'll structure the JSON accordingly, listing each strategy and its corresponding ID."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 787,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US7",
|
||
"US7"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 787,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Projects\",\n \"Sort by Commit Count\",\n \"View Contributor Profile\",\n \"Extract Follower Count\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US5\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to complete the task given. The task is to find out the number of followers of the contributor with the most commits to the main branch on Gitlab. \n\nFirst, I should break this down into smaller steps. The main goal is to find the contributor with the highest number of commits and then determine how many followers they have. \n\nStep 1: Access the Gitlab interface. I think that means navigating to the Gitlab website. So, I would use the \"Navigate to Page/Section\" strategy, which is US1.\n\nOnce on the Gitlab page, I need to find information about the projects and their contributors. I believe Gitlab has a view where you can see all the projects and their stats. So, I should look for a section that displays project statistics. That might involve selecting a specific view, which could be another strategy, maybe \"View/Inspect Item Details\" as US5, but I'm not sure if that's necessary yet.\n\nAfter viewing the projects, I need to identify the contributor with the most commits. This likely involves sorting the contributors based on the number of commits. So, I might need to use a sorting function or dropdown to select the highest commits. That sounds like using the \"Sort Data\" feature, which could fall under US2, \"Search/Filter/Sort Data.\"\n\nOnce I've sorted the contributors by commits, I need to get the number of followers for the top contributor. This probably involves viewing the profile of that specific contributor and looking for a section that displays their followers. So, using \"View/Inspect Item Details\" again, which is US5, to focus on their profile.\n\nFinally, I should extract the number of followers from that profile. This would involve reading the information displayed, which is covered by US6, \"Extract/Retrieve Information.\"\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be: navigating to the projects section, sorting by commits, viewing the top contributor's details, and extracting the follower count. The corresponding universal strategy IDs would be US1, US2, US5, and US6. However, since the output requires the strategies in order, I might adjust the steps to include each necessary action without repetition.\n\nWait, maybe I don't need to view the project details first. Perhaps after sorting, I can directly go to the top contributor's profile. So the steps could be: navigate to the projects, sort by commits, then view the top contributor's details, and extract the followers. That would cover US1, US2, US5, and US6.\n\nI think that makes sense. So the strategies would be navigating to projects, sorting by commits, viewing the contributor's profile, and extracting the follower count."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 791,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US9",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 791,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Open the raw GitHub link for gitlab.com/r/gimmiethat.space\",\n \"Create a new folder named 'car' within the gimmiethat.space repository\",\n \"Search Reddit for the 5 most recent posts tagged with 'car' or 'Auto'\",\n \"Collect the URLs of these posts\",\n \"Create a text file named 'urls.txt' within the 'car' folder containing these URLs\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Open a URL\",\n \"Create a Folder\",\n \"Search for Content\",\n \"Create a File\",\n \"Collect Data\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US2\", \"US1\", \"US2\", \"US6\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I'm looking at this task where I need to create a folder named \"car\" on a GitHub repository called gimmiethat.space. Then, I have to include a file called urls.txt that has links to the 5 most recent posts from cars. The user also mentioned using Reddit as one of the sites, but I'm not entirely sure how that plays into this. Maybe it's for testing or backup?\n\nFirst, I need to figure out how to create a folder on a GitHub repository. I remember that GitHub uses the \"raw\" link to access repositories, so I might need to navigate there. Then, inside that repository, I should create a new folder named \"car\". I think the steps for that involve going to the repository's URL, then clicking on \"New\" and selecting \"Folder\" or something similar. I hope there's an option for that.\n\nNext, I need to find the 5 most recent posts from cars on Reddit. Since the user specified \"reddit\", I should probably go to reddit.com and search for posts tagged with \"car\". I can use the search function there, maybe sort by \"new\" to get the most recent ones. I'll have to make sure I'm looking at the correct subreddit, probably r/cars or something similar.\n\nOnce I have those URLs, I need to create a text file called urls.txt within the \"car\" folder. I think I can do this by opening a text editor, pasting all the URLs, each on a new line, and then saving the file with the correct name. I should double-check the spelling of \"urls.txt\" to make sure it's correct.\n\nPutting it all together, I need to break this down into specific steps. Maybe first navigate to the raw GitHub link, then create the folder, then search Reddit for the posts, collect the URLs, and finally create the text file. I should check if there are any specific tools or commands the user prefers using, but since they didn't specify, I'll stick to basic Git commands and text editors.\n\nI'm a bit worried about the Reddit part. What if the subreddit changes or the tags aren't \"car\"? Should I specify a more precise search query? Maybe include both \"car\" and \"Auto\" since sometimes Reddit uses different tags for cars. Also, I should make sure to only include the top 5, so I'll have to count them carefully.\n\nAnother thing is ensuring that the URLs are correctly formatted with the right protocol (http or https) and that they point directly to the Reddit posts. I don't want to include any broken links or incorrect domains. Maybe I'll copy the URLs directly from the search results to avoid mistakes.\n\nAfter gathering all the URLs, I'll need to make sure the text file is properly formatted. Each URL should be on its own line, and the file should be saved with the exact name urls.txt. I'll probably use a text editor like Notepad or Sublime Text to do this, but any basic editor should work.\n\nI'm also thinking about the order of the URLs. Should they be in the order they were found, or sorted in some way? The task just says the 5 most recent, so I think the order from the search results is fine. I'll just list them as they appear.\n\nFinally, I should test each step to make sure it works. Maybe try creating the folder first, then see if I can access it. Then, check if I can find the URLs on Reddit. If any step fails, I might need to troubleshoot, like checking permissions or repository settings.\n\nOverall, I think the strategy is clear: navigate to the GitHub repository, create the folder, search Reddit for car posts, collect URLs, and create the text file. I just need to be careful with each step to avoid errors."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 798,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US9",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 798,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Delivery Address Management\",\n \"Edit and Update Delivery Address\",\n \"Submit Changes to Delivery Address\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Modify Item Details\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US9\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, I need to figure out the best strategy for this task. The task is to change the delivery address for a recent order at the shopping site. First, I should break it down into steps.\n\nSo, the first thing I need to do is locate the delivery address section. That probably involves navigating to the order details or a specific page where addresses are managed. Looking at the universal strategies, US1 is about navigating to a page, so that's a good start.\n\nOnce I'm on the delivery address page, I need to find where I can edit the address. There might be an \"Edit\" button or an option to manage addresses. That sounds like US9, which is about creating or modifying an item. I might need to fill in the new address details there.\n\nAfter editing, I have to submit the changes. That would likely involve a submit or save button, which falls under US4, the execute action process. So, I'll need to click that to save the new delivery address.\n\nPutting it all together, I'll start by navigating to the delivery address page (US1), then modify the address details (US9), and finally submit the changes (US4). I think that covers all the necessary steps without missing anything."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 809,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US9"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US8",
|
||
"US9",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 809,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to GitLab Project Repository\",\n \"Create Issue in a11yproject Repository\",\n \"Set Issue Title, Assignee, and Due Date\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate Within Data/Results\",\n \"Create Item\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US8\", \"US9\", \"US4\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, let me try to figure out how to approach this task. The user wants me to create an issue on a GitLab repository with specific details. First, I need to break down the steps required to achieve this.\n\nSo, the goal is to create an issue titled \"404 for many URLs\", assign it to the user's own email, and set the due date to 2030-1-3. Let me think about the process step by step.\n\nThe first thing I should do is navigate to the GitLab interface. I remember that GitLab has a specific layout, so I'll need to go to the project repository where the issue will be created. That means going to https://gitlab.com/[organization]/a11yproject and then clicking on the repository.\n\nOnce inside the repository, I need to find the \"Issues\" section. Typically, GitLab has a sidebar with different sections, so I'll look for a tab or menu labeled \"Issues\" and click on it. This should take me to a page where I can see existing issues and create a new one.\n\nNext, I'll look for the \"Create Issue\" button. It's usually a prominent button that says something like \"New Issue\" or \"Create Issue.\" Clicking this button will open a form where I can enter the details of the issue.\n\nNow, filling in the issue title is straightforward. I'll type \"404 for many URLs\" into the title field. After that, I need to set the assignee. Since the user wants it assigned to themselves, I'll enter their email address in the \"Assignee\" field. I should double-check that the email is correct to avoid any errors.\n\nThe next step is setting the due date. The task specifies 2030-1-3, so I'll input that in the \"Due date\" field. GitLab typically allows input in various formats, so I can either type it in or use the date picker if available.\n\nI also have to ensure that the project is selected correctly. Sometimes, when creating an issue, you might need to choose the project from a dropdown menu. I'll make sure that \"a11yproject\" is selected to ensure the issue is created in the right repository.\n\nAfter filling in all the necessary fields, I'll review everything to make sure there are no mistakes. It's important to double-check the title, assignee, due date, and project selection before submitting.\n\nFinally, I'll click the \"Create Issue\" button to submit the issue. GitLab should then process the creation and display a new issue page where I can view it or assign it to someone else if needed.\n\nLet me recap the steps to ensure I didn't miss anything: navigate to the project, go to the Issues section, create a new issue, fill in the title, assignee, due date, select the project, review, and submit.\n\nI think that covers all the necessary actions. I should also consider if there are any additional fields or options available, but based on the initial task, these four steps should suffice."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 811,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US10"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 811,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Backlog\",\n \"View Issue Details\",\n \"Assign Issue to Self\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US5\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Alright, I need to figure out how to assign an issue to myself on GitLab based on the given task. The task specifies that the issue is about a 404 error in the a11yproject and needs to be assigned to the user.\n\nFirst, I'll break down the task into smaller steps. The main action here is assigning the issue, so I need to find the appropriate section or page on GitLab where I can perform this action. I remember that GitLab has a Backlog section where issues are listed, so that's probably where the issue is located.\n\nNext, I need to navigate to this Backlog section. Once there, I should look for the specific issue related to the 404 error. After locating the issue, the next step is to assign it to myself. I believe GitLab allows assigning issues directly from the issue view, so I'll need to click on the \"Assign\" button or find a similar option.\n\nLooking at the universal strategies provided, I think the most relevant ones are US1 for navigating to a specific page, US9 for creating an item, but wait, in this case, it's not creating an issue but assigning one. Hmm, maybe US8 for navigating within results isn't quite right either. Let me double-check the strategies.\n\nUS1 is definitely about navigating to a page, which applies to moving to the Backlog. US9 is about creating an item, which isn't needed here. US4 is about executing an action, which would fit assigning the issue. So perhaps US1 and US4 are the relevant strategies here.\n\nWait, but the task is to assign the issue, not create it. So maybe US9 isn't necessary. I think the steps are: navigate to the Backlog (US1), find the issue (view details, maybe US5), then assign it (US4). So the strategies would be US1, US4, and maybe US5 if needed for viewing details.\n\nBut the output example didn't include US5. Let me check the example again. In the example, they used US1, US3, US4. So perhaps for assigning, US4 is sufficient because it's about executing the action of assigning. So the strategies would be US1 (navigate to Backlog), US4 (assign the issue).\n\nWait, but in the output example, US5 was used when they needed to view details. In this case, I'm supposed to assign the issue, so I might not need to view it in detail unless required. So maybe just US1 and US4.\n\nAlternatively, if the issue needs to be viewed in detail before assigning, then US5 would come into play. But since the task is to assign it to oneself, perhaps the steps are just navigate to Backlog, assign the issue, and that's it. So the strategies are US1 and US4.\n\nWait, but in the example, they had US5 as well. Maybe the steps are: navigate to Backlog (US1), view the issue (US5), assign it (US4). So that's three strategies: US1, US5, US4.\n\nI think that's a reasonable breakdown. So the strategies would be plan: first navigate to the Backlog, then view the specific issue, and then assign it."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 82,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 82,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to MIT\",\n \"Navigate to Harvard University\",\n \"Retrieve Walking Time from MIT to Harvard\",\n \"Navigate to Boston Logan International Airport\",\n \"Retrieve Driving Time from Harvard to Logan Airport\",\n \"Add Walking and Driving Times\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US1\", \"US6\", \"US1\", \"US6\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I've got this task to figure out the duration required to walk from MIT to Harvard University and then drive to Boston Logan Airport. The task is part of a web interface, so I need to break this down into steps using the provided universal strategies.\n\nFirst, I need to navigate to the MIT and Harvard University locations. The web interface probably has maps or directions, so I'll use \"Navigate to MIT\" and \"Navigate to Harvard University\" as the first steps. That would correspond to US1, which is \"Navigate To Page/Section\".\n\nOnce I'm at Harvard, I need to drive to Logan Airport. So, I'll plan to \"Navigate to Boston Logan International Airport\" from Harvard. That's another US1 application.\n\nNext, I need to get information about the walking time from MIT to Harvard. The web interface likely has a feature to calculate walking time, so I'll use \"Retrieve Walking Time from MIT to Harvard\" using US6, Extract/Retrieve Information.\n\nThen, I'll need to find the driving time from Harvard to Logan. Again, the web interface probably has a driving time calculator, so I'll use \"Retrieve Driving Time from Harvard to Logan Airport\" with US6.\n\nAfter getting both times, I'll add them together to find the total duration. This step doesn't directly map to any of the universal strategies, but it's part of the overall process of completing the task.\n\nSo, putting it all together, my strategies are navigating from MIT to Harvard, then to Logan, extracting walking time, extracting driving time, and adding them up. The universal strategies used are US1 for navigation and US6 for extracting information.\n\nI think that covers all the necessary steps. I just need to make sure I'm following the correct order and that each step logically follows the previous one without missing any crucial information."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 88,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US3"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 88,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to the Map\",\n \"Search for Homewood Suites Southpointe and PPG Paints Arena\",\n \"View Location Details to Get Driving Time\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to solve this task using the Universal Strategy templates provided. The task is to estimate the driving time from Homewood Suites Southpointe to PPG Paints Arena. \n\nFirst, I'll break down the intent. The user is staying at a hotel and wants to know how long it takes to drive to a specific arena. That means I need to navigate to a map that shows both locations and provides driving time.\n\nStep 1: Navigate to a map section. That would be using US1, which is \"Navigate To Page/Section.\" So, I'll plan to go to the map on the map site.\n\nOnce on the map, I need to identify both the hotel and the arena. I think I should search for locations using their names. So, step 2 would involve using US2: \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\" to find both places on the map.\n\nAfter locating both locations, I need to check the driving time. I believe that involves clicking on each location and then seeing the time, which would fall under US5: \"View/Inspect Item Details.\" So, I'll have to view the details for each location to get the driving information.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be navigating to the map, searching/filtering to find the locations, and then viewing their details to get the driving time. That makes sense because each step logically follows the previous one, ensuring the user gets the information they need."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 93,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 93,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to US States Map\",\n \"View New Hampshire Details\",\n \"Extract Neighboring States Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US5\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to answer the question: \"Which US states border New Hampshire?\" using the provided Universal Strategy templates. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, the task is to find the neighboring states of New Hampshire. I know that New Hampshire is in the northeastern part of the US, so I expect it to border several states. But I'm not entirely sure, so I'll need to plan how to get this information using the available strategies.\n\nLooking at the Universal Strategies, I'll start by considering what each strategy does. US1 is about navigating to a specific page or section. Since this task is about geographical information, I might need to access a map or a map section on the web interface. So, maybe the first step is to navigate to a US states map or a bordering states section. That would align with US1.\n\nOnce I'm on the map, I need to locate New Hampshire. US5 is about viewing or inspecting an item's details. So, I could click on the New Hampshire region to view its details, which should include neighboring states. That makes sense.\n\nAfter viewing New Hampshire's details, I need to extract the information about its neighboring states. US6 is for extracting information from the current page or item's details. So, I would use this strategy to retrieve the list of adjacent states.\n\nI should also consider if I need to sort or filter the data to get the neighboring states specifically. Maybe US2 comes into play here if I have a list of states and need to filter for those that share a border with New Hampshire.\n\nWait, but the example provided in the output includes strategies in the order they are applied. So, first navigate to the map, then view New Hampshire's details, and then extract the neighboring states. That seems logical.\n\nI might also need to analyze or verify the data to ensure that the neighboring states listed are accurate. US7 is about analyzing or evaluating data, which could involve cross-referencing with known geographical facts. However, since the task is to retrieve the information from the web interface, I might not need US7 unless there's a discrepancy.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be: navigate to the US states map, inspect New Hampshire's details, and extract the neighboring states. The corresponding Universal Strategy IDs would be US1, US5, and US6.\n\nI think that covers the necessary steps without needing to go further into the web interface beyond these strategies. So, the final answer should include these strategies in the correct order."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 95,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US6",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 95,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Invoice 000000002\",\n \"Retrieve Invoice Details\",\n \"Generate and Review Invoice Summary\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\",\n \"Execute Action/Process\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US6\", \"US4\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to complete this task using the Universal Strategy Templates provided. The task is to tell me the grand total of invoice 000000002. Let me break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I should understand what the user is asking for. They want the grand total of a specific invoice. That means I need to locate that invoice and then find its total amount. \n\nLooking at the Universal Strategies, I see several options that might be relevant. US1 is about navigating to a page or section, which makes sense because I'll need to go to the invoice page. US3 is about configuring parameters or settings, but in this case, the user isn't asking to change any settings, just to retrieve information, so US6 might be more appropriate. US4 is about executing an action, which would involve generating a report or retrieving the information.\n\nSo, the first step is to navigate to the invoice page. That would be using US1. Then, once on that page, I need to retrieve the grand total. That's where US6 comes in, as it's about extracting or retrieving information. Finally, executing that action would involve using US4 to generate the report or directly retrieve the total.\n\nWait, but do I need to sort or filter anything? The user didn't specify any particular sorting criteria, so maybe US2 isn't necessary here. The key steps are navigating to the correct page, retrieving the information, and then executing the action to get the total.\n\nLet me make sure I'm not missing anything. The task is straightforward: find the total of a specific invoice. No need for sorting or filtering, just retrieving the data. So the strategies should be US1 for navigating, US6 for retrieving, and US4 for executing the action.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be: navigate to the Invoice page, retrieve the invoice details, and then execute the action to get the grand total. That should cover the task comprehensively."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 96,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US2",
|
||
"US5"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 96,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Order Details\",\n \"Search for Latest Order\",\n \"View Order Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Search/Filter/Sort Data\",\n \"View/Inspect Item Details\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US2\", \"US5\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to complete this task using the Universal Strategy Templates provided. The task given is to tell the user the status of their latest order and when it will arrive. The user has provided some examples and explanations, so I need to break this down step by step.\n\nFirst, I need to understand what the user is asking for. They want to know the status of their latest order and the delivery date. So, the steps involved would likely involve navigating to the right section of the website, finding their order, checking the status, and then seeing when it's expected to arrive.\n\nLooking at the Universal Strategies, I see several that might fit. The first one is US1, which is about navigating to a specific page or section. That makes sense because the user needs to go to the right place on the website to find their order.\n\nNext, after navigating to the correct page, the user would need to find their latest order. So, perhaps they need to view or inspect the order details. That would correspond to US5, which is about viewing or inspecting item details.\n\nOnce they have the order open, they might need to search or filter the order to get specific information. US2 is about searching, filtering, or sorting data, so that could be useful here to get the order's status and delivery date.\n\nAfter retrieving the information, the user would probably want to generate or display the report or information. That would fit with US4, which is about executing an action or process, like generating a report.\n\nSo, putting it all together, the steps would be: navigate to the Orders section, view the latest order details, search for the specific information, and then generate the report. Each of these steps corresponds to the Universal Strategies US1, US5, US2, and US4.\n\nI should make sure that each step is clearly explained and that the strategies are correctly referenced. Also, I need to present the final output in JSON format as specified, including the task_id, strategies, universal_strategies, and universal_strategy_ids.\n\nWait, let me double-check. The task is to tell the status of the latest order and when it will arrive. So after viewing the order details, the user might need to check the status and delivery date. Maybe the search or filter isn't necessary unless there are multiple orders, but since it's the latest one, perhaps just viewing it is enough. Hmm, but the example output included US2, so maybe it's better to include that in case there are multiple orders or to sort by date.\n\nAlternatively, if the user is specifically looking for the latest one, maybe the search isn't needed. But to be thorough, including a search or filter to ensure the latest order is selected might be a good step. So, US2 would involve searching or filtering to get the latest order, then viewing its details, and finally generating the report.\n\nYes, that makes sense. So the steps are: navigate to the Orders section (US1), search/filter to get the latest order (US2), view its details (US5), and generate the report (US4). That covers all aspects the user needs.\n\nI think that's a solid plan. Now, I'll structure the output accordingly, making sure each strategy is correctly mapped to its ID and the explanations are clear."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"task_id": 97,
|
||
"expected_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US3",
|
||
"US4"
|
||
],
|
||
"actual_ids": [
|
||
"US1",
|
||
"US6"
|
||
],
|
||
"correct": false,
|
||
"model_output": "```json\n{\n \"task_id\": 97,\n \"strategies\": [\n \"Navigate to Map\",\n \"Extract and Report Driving Distance\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategies\": [\n \"Navigate To Page/Section\",\n \"Extract/Retrieve Information\"\n ],\n \"universal_strategy_ids\": [\"US1\", \"US6\"]\n}\n```",
|
||
"model_reasoning": "Okay, so I need to figure out how to solve this user's task using the Universal Strategy Templates provided. The task is to tell them the distance to drive from Carnegie Mellon University to the top computer science school in Massachusetts. Hmm, let me break this down.\n\nFirst, I think the main steps would involve finding the top computer science schools in Massachusetts. I know that MIT is one of them, so that's probably the top. Now, I need to figure out the driving distance between Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) and MIT in Massachusetts.\n\nSo, the first step would be to locate both institutions on a map. That means I need to navigate to a mapping tool or a site that can display locations. Since the user mentioned \"map\" and \"wikipedia\", maybe they want to use a combination of these sites. I'll start by going to a mapping site like Google Maps. That should be covered under \"map\".\n\nOnce on Google Maps, I can enter both CMU and MIT into the search bar. After marking their locations, I'll need to find the driving route between them. Google Maps should show the route and the distance. I'll note that distance down.\n\nWait, but how do I actually get to Google Maps from the provided sites? The user has \"map\" and \"wikipedia\". So, I can navigate to the map site first, then use it to find the locations. That makes sense.\n\nSo, the steps would be:\n\n1. Navigate to the map site to locate CMU and MIT.\n2. Use the mapping tool to find the driving distance between them.\n\nNow, looking at the Universal Strategies, the first step would be \"Navigate To Page/Section\" which is US1. The second step would be extracting the information, specifically the distance, which is US6.\n\nWait, but do I need to configure any parameters? Maybe not in this case. So, perhaps just navigating and extracting is enough.\n\nAlternatively, if there's a need to view the details of each institution on Wikipedia, that might be another step. But the main goal is to get the driving distance, so maybe viewing the details isn't necessary unless the user wants more information about each school.\n\nSo, perhaps the strategies are:\n\n- Navigate to the map site to locate the two universities.\n- Extract the driving distance from the mapping tool.\n\nThat would correspond to US1 and US6. Maybe US4 if there's an action involved in generating a report or something, but in this case, it's just extracting the distance.\n\nI think that's the plan. Let me structure it properly."
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
} |