117 lines
54 KiB
JSON
117 lines
54 KiB
JSON
{
|
||
"task_intent": "Submit a merge request for a11yproject.com/redesign branch to be merged into master branch, assign Justin Armstrong as the reviewer",
|
||
"prompt": "# Instruction\n- You are an expert in cleaning process data descriptions. Given a task, you are provided with a set of annotation description\ndata for a certain visual LLM related to human user operation videos. Plus, You are provided with full trace of playwright action,\nwhic includes action and url before and after the action.\n- You need to analyze all the descriptive data and ultimately summarize a complete and reasonable user operation description that can accomplish the given task.\n- For each strategy, give a clear list of the low level action sequence.\n\n# Task\nSubmit a merge request for a11yproject.com/redesign branch to be merged into master branch, assign Justin Armstrong as the reviewer\n\n# Annotation description\n## Part 1\n### Step-by-Step Actions in the Video Segment\n\n#### 1. **Initial State**\n- **Action:** The video starts with a view of the GitLab Projects page.\n- **Page Changes:** The Projects page is fully loaded, displaying a list of projects with details such as project names, descriptions, and update times.\n- **Possible Purpose:** The initial state sets the context for the subsequent actions, indicating that the user is about to interact with the Projects page.\n\n#### 2. **Hovering Over the \"Explore\" Tab**\n- **Action:** I move the cursor over the \"Explore\" tab located in the navigation bar.\n- **Page Changes:** No immediate changes occur on the page; however, a tooltip appears, showing the text \"get_by_role('link', name='Explore')\".\n- **Possible Purpose:** Hovering over the \"Explore\" tab might be to inspect the element or to prepare for clicking it. The tooltip suggests that the user is using a tool (possibly for testing or development) that provides accessibility information about the elements.\n\n#### 3. **Clicking on the Search Bar**\n- **Action:** I click on the search bar at the top of the page.\n- **Page Changes:** The search bar becomes active, and a placeholder text \"Search GitLab\" is highlighted. A tooltip appears, showing the text \"get_by_placeholder('Search GitLab')\".\n- **Possible Purpose:** Clicking on the search bar is likely to initiate a search action. The tooltip again indicates the use of an inspection tool, possibly to verify the search bar's accessibility attributes.\n\n#### 4. **Typing in the Search Bar**\n- **Action:** I type \"a11yproject.com/redesign\" into the search bar.\n- **Page Changes:** As I type, the text appears in the search bar. After typing, the page transitions to a search results page.\n- **Possible Purpose:** The purpose of typing this specific text is to search for a project or resource related to \"a11yproject.com/redesign\" within GitLab.\n\n#### 5. **Navigating to the Search Results Page**\n- **Action:** I submit the search query by pressing Enter or clicking the search icon.\n- **Page Changes:** The page changes to the search results page. The search query \"a11yproject.com/redesign\" is displayed in the search bar, and a message appears stating, \"We couldn't find any projects matching a11yproject.com/redesign.\"\n- **Possible Purpose:** The search action aims to locate a specific project or resource. The result indicates that no matching projects were found, which could be for verification or troubleshooting purposes.\n\n#### 6. **Inspecting the Search Bar Again**\n- **Action:** I click on the search bar once more.\n- **Page Changes:** The search bar becomes active again, and the previous search query is cleared. A tooltip appears, showing the text \"get_by_placeholder('Search for projects, issues, etc.')\".\n- **Possible Purpose:** Re-clicking the search bar might be to clear the previous search or to perform a new search. The tooltip continues to suggest the use of an inspection tool for verifying the search bar's attributes.\n\n#### 7. **Typing a New Search Query**\n- **Action:** I type \"a11yproject.com\" into the search bar.\n- **Page Changes:** As I type, the text appears in the search bar. The page does not change immediately but prepares for a new search submission.\n- **Possible Purpose:** The new search query is likely intended to find projects or resources related to \"a11yproject.com,\" which is a broader search compared to the previous one.\n\n#### 8. **Submitting the New Search Query**\n- **Action:** I submit the new search query by pressing Enter or clicking the search icon.\n- **Page Changes:** The page transitions to the search results page. The search query \"a11yproject.com\" is displayed in the search bar, and the results show one matching project: \"The A11Y Project / a11yproject.com.\"\n- **Possible Purpose:** The purpose of this search is to locate the specific project \"a11yproject.com\" within GitLab. The successful search allows the user to access the desired project.\n\n### Summary\nIn this video segment, I interact with the GitLab Projects page by hovering over the \"Explore\" tab, using the search bar to perform two different searches, and navigating to the search results page. The actions are likely part of a process to locate specific projects within GitLab, with an additional focus on verifying the accessibility attributes of UI elements using an inspection tool.\n\n---\n\n## Part 2\n### Step-by-Step Actions in the Video Segment\n\n#### 1. **Initial State**\n- **Action:** The video starts with a view of the GitLab project page for `a11yproject.com`.\n- **Page Changes:** The page displays various sections such as Project information, Repository, Issues, Merge requests, etc.\n- **Possible Purpose:** The initial state sets the context for navigating and interacting with the project's repository.\n\n#### 2. **Hovering Over the \"Repository\" Section**\n- **Action:** I hover over the \"Repository\" section in the sidebar menu.\n- **Page Changes:** No immediate changes occur on the page; it remains the same.\n- **Possible Purpose:** Hovering might be to prepare for selecting an option within the \"Repository\" section or to view any tooltips or additional information that appears on hover.\n\n#### 3. **Clicking on \"Merge Requests\" in the Sidebar**\n- **Action:** I click on the \"Merge Requests\" link in the sidebar menu.\n- **Page Changes:** The page transitions to the \"Merge Requests\" section. It shows a list of merge requests with details such as their status (Open, Merged, Closed), titles, authors, and update dates.\n- **Possible Purpose:** The intent is to navigate to the \"Merge Requests\" section to view, manage, or create new merge requests related to the project.\n\n#### 4. **Scrolling Down the Merge Requests List**\n- **Action:** I scroll down the list of merge requests.\n- **Page Changes:** More merge requests become visible as I scroll, revealing additional entries with their respective details.\n- **Possible Purpose:** Scrolling allows me to review more merge requests that are not initially visible on the screen, possibly to find a specific request or to get an overview of all existing merge requests.\n\n#### 5. **Clicking on \"New Merge Request\" Button**\n- **Action:** I click on the \"New Merge Request\" button located at the top-right corner of the merge requests page.\n- **Page Changes:** A new page or modal opens, prompting me to create a new merge request. It includes fields for selecting the source and target branches.\n- **Possible Purpose:** The action aims to initiate the process of creating a new merge request, likely to propose changes from one branch to another within the project.\n\n#### 6. **Selecting the Source Branch**\n- **Action:** I click on the \"Select source branch\" dropdown menu.\n- **Page Changes:** A dropdown list appears, showing available branches that can be selected as the source for the merge request.\n- **Possible Purpose:** The purpose is to choose the specific branch that contains the changes I want to merge into another branch.\n\n#### 7. **Typing in the Source Branch Dropdown**\n- **Action:** I type into the source branch dropdown field.\n- **Page Changes:** As I type, the list filters to show branches that match the entered text.\n- **Possible Purpose:** Typing helps narrow down the list of branches, making it easier to find and select the desired source branch for the merge request.\n\n### Summary\nIn this video segment, I navigate from the main project page to the \"Merge Requests\" section, scroll through the list of existing merge requests, and begin the process of creating a new merge request by selecting a source branch. Each step is performed methodically to achieve the goal of proposing changes within the project's repository.\n\n---\n\n## Part 3\n### Step-by-Step Actions:\n\n1. **Action:** I click on the \"Select source branch\" dropdown menu.\n - **Page Changes:** A list of available branches appears, showing options such as `add-color-utility-classes`, `chore/add-vscode-settings`, `feature/markdown-figure`, and others.\n - **Possible Purpose:** The likely intent is to choose a specific branch to use as the source for the new merge request.\n\n2. **Action:** I scroll through the list of branches and select the `redesign` branch.\n - **Page Changes:** The `redesign` branch is highlighted, and its details (commit message and author) are displayed below the selection box.\n - **Possible Purpose:** The purpose is to confirm the `redesign` branch as the source for the merge request, preparing it for comparison with the target branch.\n\n3. **Action:** I click on the \"Compare branches and continue\" button.\n - **Page Changes:** The page transitions to the next step in the merge request process, where the differences between the selected source and target branches will be displayed.\n - **Possible Purpose:** The intent is to proceed with the merge request creation by comparing the selected source branch (`redesign`) with the target branch (`main`), allowing for a review of the changes before finalizing the request. \n\n### Summary:\nIn this segment, I initiate the process of creating a new merge request by selecting the `redesign` branch as the source and then proceeding to compare it with the target branch. Each action is methodically performed to ensure the correct branches are chosen for the merge request.\n\n---\n\n## Part 4\n### Step-by-Step Actions in the Video Segment\n\n#### 1. **Action:** I click on the \"New merge request\" button.\n - **Page Changes:** The page transitions to a form for creating a new merge request, displaying fields such as \"Title,\" \"Description,\" \"Assignee,\" \"Reviewer,\" \"Milestone,\" and \"Labels.\"\n - **Possible Purpose:** The likely intent is to initiate the process of creating a new merge request, which is a common action when proposing changes to a project's codebase.\n\n#### 2. **Action:** I click inside the \"Title\" text box.\n - **Page Changes:** The cursor appears in the \"Title\" text box, indicating it is ready for input.\n - **Possible Purpose:** The intention is to enter a title for the merge request, which is a required field for identifying the purpose of the proposed changes.\n\n#### 3. **Action:** I click inside the \"Description\" text box.\n - **Page Changes:** The cursor moves to the \"Description\" text box, preparing it for text input.\n - **Possible Purpose:** The goal is to provide a detailed description of the changes being proposed, which helps reviewers understand the context and specifics of the merge request.\n\n#### 4. **Action:** I click on the \"Request review from\" section.\n - **Page Changes:** A dropdown or search interface appears, allowing me to select or search for a reviewer.\n - **Possible Purpose:** The aim is to assign a specific person or team to review the merge request, ensuring that the changes are evaluated by the appropriate individuals.\n\n#### 5. **Action:** I type a name (e.g., \"justin\") into the \"Request review from\" search box.\n - **Page Changes:** As I type, the system filters potential reviewers, displaying matching results dynamically.\n - **Possible Purpose:** The objective is to find and select a specific reviewer by name, narrowing down the options to relevant users.\n\n#### 6. **Action:** I click on the \"Assign to me\" link next to the \"Assignee\" section.\n - **Page Changes:** The \"Assignee\" field updates to show my username, indicating that I have assigned the merge request to myself.\n - **Possible Purpose:** The intent is to take ownership of the merge request, which might involve managing its progress or ensuring it is completed as needed.\n\n#### 7. **Action:** I scroll down to the \"Create merge request\" button and click it.\n - **Page Changes:** The page likely transitions to a confirmation or overview screen for the merge request, summarizing the details I have entered.\n - **Possible Purpose:** The final step is to submit the merge request, making it officially part of the project's workflow for review and potential merging.\n\n### Summary\nIn this video segment, I systematically navigate through the process of creating a new merge request on GitLab. Each action is focused on filling out the necessary details (title, description), selecting a reviewer, assigning the request to myself, and finally submitting the request. These steps are typical for proposing and managing code changes in a collaborative development environment.\n\n---\n\n## Part 5\n### Step-by-Step Actions in the Video Segment\n\n#### 1. **Action:** I click on the \"Reviewer\" dropdown menu.\n - **Page Changes:** A dropdown list appears, showing options for selecting a reviewer. Initially, it displays \"Unassigned.\"\n - **Possible Purpose:** The likely intent is to assign a specific reviewer to the merge request, ensuring that the appropriate person reviews the changes before they are merged.\n\n#### 2. **Action:** I type \"Request review from\" into the Reviewer dropdown search box.\n - **Page Changes:** As I type, the dropdown attempts to filter results based on the input. However, since \"Request review from\" does not match any user names or relevant options, it shows \"No matching results.\"\n - **Possible Purpose:** The action suggests an intention to quickly find and select a reviewer by name or keyword. The lack of results indicates either a typo, an incorrect phrase, or that no reviewers match this exact text.\n\n#### 3. **Action:** I hover over the \"Create merge request\" button.\n - **Page Changes:** No immediate changes occur on the page, but the button becomes highlighted, indicating it is interactive and ready to be clicked.\n - **Possible Purpose:** Hovering over the button is typically done to either prepare for clicking it or to check if there are any tooltips or additional information provided upon hovering.\n\n#### 4. **Action:** I do not click the \"Create merge request\" button and instead pause.\n - **Page Changes:** The page remains static with the \"Create merge request\" button still highlighted.\n - **Possible Purpose:** This pause might indicate hesitation or a decision to review the current state of the merge request before proceeding. It could also suggest a realization that there are no commits yet, as indicated by the message at the bottom of the page.\n\n### Summary of Observations:\n- The primary actions involve attempting to assign a reviewer and preparing to create a merge request.\n- The process is halted due to the absence of commits, which is a necessary condition for creating a valid merge request.\n- The actions reflect a step-by-step approach to setting up a merge request, though it is ultimately paused, possibly due to the incomplete state of the request (no commits).\n\n# Playwright action\n[\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"action_0\",\n \"idx\": 0,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_placeholder(\\\"Search GitLab\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"action_1\",\n \"idx\": 1,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_placeholder(\\\"Search GitLab\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"action_2\",\n \"idx\": 2,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.pressget_by_placeholder(\\\"Search GitLab\\\")Enter\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/search?search=a11yproject.com%2Fredesign&nav_source=navbar\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/search?search=a11yproject.com%2Fredesign&nav_source=navbar\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"action_3\",\n \"idx\": 3,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_placeholder(\\\"Search for projects, issues, etc.\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/search?search=a11yproject.com%2Fredesign&nav_source=navbar\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/search?search=a11yproject.com%2Fredesign&nav_source=navbar\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"action_4\",\n \"idx\": 4,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.pressget_by_placeholder(\\\"Search for projects, issues, etc.\\\")Enter\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/search?search=a11yproject.com&nav_source=navbar\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/search?search=a11yproject.com&nav_source=navbar\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"link_The A11Y Project\\\\n/ a11yproject.com\",\n \"idx\": 5,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"The A11Y Project\\\\n/ a11yproject.com\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"button_main\",\n \"idx\": 12,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"button\\\", name=\\\"main\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"menuitem_redesign\",\n \"idx\": 7,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"menuitem\\\", name=\\\"redesign\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/tree/redesign\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/tree/redesign\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"link_Merge requests\",\n \"idx\": 8,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_label(\\\"Project navigation\\\").get_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"Merge requests\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/tree/redesign\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"link_New merge request\",\n \"idx\": 9,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"New merge request\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"button_Select source branch\",\n \"idx\": 10,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"button\\\", name=\\\"Select source branch\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"link_redesign\",\n \"idx\": 11,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"redesign\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"action_13\",\n \"idx\": 13,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clicklocator(\\\"html\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new#\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new#\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"button_Compare branches and continue\",\n \"idx\": 14,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"button\\\", name=\\\"Compare branches and continue\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new?merge_request%5Bsource_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Bsource_branch%5D=redesign&merge_request%5Btarget_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Btarget_branch%5D=main\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new#\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"action_15\",\n \"idx\": 15,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clicklocator(\\\"div\\\").filter(has_text=re.compile(r\\\"^UnassignedRequest review from$\\\")).get_by_role(\\\"button\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new?merge_request%5Bsource_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Bsource_branch%5D=redesign&merge_request%5Btarget_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Btarget_branch%5D=main\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new?merge_request%5Bsource_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Bsource_branch%5D=redesign&merge_request%5Btarget_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Btarget_branch%5D=main\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"link_Assign to me\",\n \"idx\": 16,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"Assign to me\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new?merge_request%5Bsource_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Bsource_branch%5D=redesign&merge_request%5Btarget_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Btarget_branch%5D=main\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new?merge_request%5Bsource_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Bsource_branch%5D=redesign&merge_request%5Btarget_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Btarget_branch%5D=main\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"button_Byte Blazea11yproject.contributor.me\",\n \"idx\": 17,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"button\\\", name=\\\"Byte Blazea11yproject.contributor.me\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new?merge_request%5Bsource_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Bsource_branch%5D=redesign&merge_request%5Btarget_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Btarget_branch%5D=main\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new?merge_request%5Bsource_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Bsource_branch%5D=redesign&merge_request%5Btarget_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Btarget_branch%5D=main\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"action_18\",\n \"idx\": 18,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clicklocator(\\\"#new_merge_request div\\\").filter(has_text=\\\"Assignee Byte Blazea11yproject.contributor.meSelect assignee Unassigned Assignee\\\").nth(1)\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new?merge_request%5Bsource_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Bsource_branch%5D=redesign&merge_request%5Btarget_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Btarget_branch%5D=main\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new?merge_request%5Bsource_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Bsource_branch%5D=redesign&merge_request%5Btarget_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Btarget_branch%5D=main\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"button_Unassigned\",\n \"idx\": 19,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"button\\\", name=\\\"Unassigned\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new?merge_request%5Bsource_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Bsource_branch%5D=redesign&merge_request%5Btarget_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Btarget_branch%5D=main\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new?merge_request%5Bsource_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Bsource_branch%5D=redesign&merge_request%5Btarget_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Btarget_branch%5D=main\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"searchbox_Search users\",\n \"idx\": 20,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"searchbox\\\", name=\\\"Search users\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new?merge_request%5Bsource_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Bsource_branch%5D=redesign&merge_request%5Btarget_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Btarget_branch%5D=main\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new?merge_request%5Bsource_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Bsource_branch%5D=redesign&merge_request%5Btarget_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Btarget_branch%5D=main\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"action_21\",\n \"idx\": 21,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clicklocator(\\\".col-12 > div:nth-child(4) > div\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new?merge_request%5Bsource_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Bsource_branch%5D=redesign&merge_request%5Btarget_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Btarget_branch%5D=main\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/a11yproject/a11yproject.com/-/merge_requests/new?merge_request%5Bsource_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Bsource_branch%5D=redesign&merge_request%5Btarget_project_id%5D=174&merge_request%5Btarget_branch%5D=main\"\n }\n }\n]\n\n# Output format\n- 先总结整个任务的Objective，然后按照Strategy-SubStrategy-action三级层次来给出整个过程，\n- 接着给出整个操作流程后的观察和有趣的发现，最后严格按照json格式输出三级层次的过程描述。\n- 最后的输出json应该是包在```{json}```之间，最底层动作需要包含描述、对应的playwright动作指令顺序编号，以及具体指令内容。\n\n# Example\n### Complete User Operation Description to Display Labeled Issues in kkroening/ffmpeg-python\n\n**Objective:** Filter and display all issues labeled as \"question\" in the kkroening/ffmpeg-python repository.\n\n---\n\n#### **Strategy 1: Navigate to the Repository**\n**Low-Level Action Sequence:**\n1. **Search for the user \"kkroening\"**\n - Click the global search bar (placeholder: \"Search GitLab\").\n - Type \"kkroening\" and press `Enter`.\n2. **Select the user from results**\n - Click the \"Users\" tab in search results.\n - Click on \"Karl Kroening @kkroening\" in the user list.\n3. **Access the repository**\n - Navigate to the \"Personal projects\" section.\n - Click on the \"ffmpeg-python\" project.\n\n---\n\n#### **Strategy 2: Filter Issues by Label**\n**Low-Level Action Sequence:**\n1. **Open the Issues tab**\n - Scroll to the left sidebar menu.\n - Click the \"Issues\" tab (displaying the count, e.g., \"Issues 402\").\n2. **Apply label filtering**\n - Click the search/filter bar in the issues list.\n - Select the \"Label\" dropdown from the filter options.\n - Type or select \"question\" from the label dropdown.\n - Click the search/apply button to confirm the filter.\n\n---\n\n#### **Final Oberservation**\nThe issues list will refresh to show only issues with the \"question\" label. The URL will reflect the filter:\n`.../ffmpeg-python/-/issues/?label_name[]=question`.\n\n---\n\n### Key Observations from Playwright Trace\n- The final URL after filtering:\n `http://ec2-3-135-39-80.../ffmpeg-python/-/issues/?label_name%5B%5D=question`\n confirms the \"question\" label filter is applied.\n- Critical interactions include selecting the \"Label\" dropdown and explicitly choosing \"question\" to refine results.\n\n### Final output\n```json\n[{\n \"strategy\" : \"Navigate to the Repository\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Search for the user \\\"kkroening\\\"\",\n \"actions\" : [\n {\n \"description\": \"Click the global search bar (placeholder: \\\"Search GitLab\\\"). \",\n \"playwright_idx\" : 18,\n \"playwright_instruction\" : \"frame.pressget_by_placeholder(\\\"Search GitLab\\\")Enter\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Select the user from results\",\n \"actions\" : [\n ]\n }\n ]\n},\n{\n \"strategy\" : \"Filter Issues by Label\",\n \"substrategies\" : [\n ]\n}]\n```",
|
||
"response": "<think>\nOkay, let's tackle this problem. The task is to submit a merge request for the a11yproject.com/redesign branch to be merged into master, assigning Justin Armstrong as the reviewer. I need to analyze the provided annotation descriptions and playwright actions to create a structured summary of the user's operation.\n\nFirst, I'll go through each part of the annotation to understand the steps taken. Part 1 involves searching for the project. The user starts on the GitLab Projects page, hovers over the \"Explore\" tab, then uses the search bar to look for \"a11yproject.com/redesign\". The search didn't find anything, so they tried a broader search for \"a11yproject.com\", which worked. This led them to the project page.\n\nIn Part 2, the user navigates to the project's \"Merge Requests\" section, scrolls through existing requests, and clicks \"New Merge Request\". They start selecting the source branch. Part 3 continues with selecting the \"redesign\" branch as the source and comparing it with the target branch (probably main/master).\n\nPart 4 details filling out the merge request form: entering title, description, assigning to themselves, and trying to assign a reviewer. Part 5 shows some confusion in assigning the reviewer, possibly due to a typo or incorrect input, and then pausing before submission, maybe due to missing commits.\n\nNow, looking at the playwright actions, there's a sequence of clicks and inputs. For example, action_0 to action_4 involve interacting with the search bar. Then, clicking on the project link, navigating to merge requests, creating a new merge request, selecting branches, and attempting to assign a reviewer.\n\nI need to map these steps into strategies. The main strategies would be: navigating to the project, creating the merge request, configuring the branches, filling the details, assigning the reviewer, and submitting. Each strategy will have substrategies and specific actions.\n\nFor example, the first strategy is navigating to the correct project. The substrategies would be searching for the project and accessing it. The actions here include clicking the search bar, typing the project name, pressing enter, and selecting the project from results.\n\nNext, creating the merge request involves navigating to the merge requests section and initiating a new one. The actions here are clicking the \"Merge Requests\" link and the \"New Merge Request\" button.\n\nConfiguring the branches includes selecting the source (redesign) and target (master) branches. The playwright actions show selecting the source branch dropdown, typing to filter, selecting \"redesign\", then proceeding to compare branches.\n\nFilling the details involves entering title, description, and assigning oneself. The actions here are clicking the title and description fields, inputting text, and clicking \"Assign to me\".\n\nAssigning the reviewer requires opening the reviewer dropdown, searching for Justin, and selecting him. The playwright actions show some attempts here, like typing \"justin\" and selecting from the dropdown.\n\nFinally, submitting the merge request by clicking the create button. However, the annotations mention a pause due to no commits, but the task requires the submission, so maybe that's an error to ignore or a step that was eventually completed.\n\nI need to ensure that each action in the JSON output corresponds to the correct playwright action_uid and idx. For example, when the user types \"a11yproject.com\" in the search, that's action_4. Selecting the project is action_5. Navigating to merge requests is action_8, and so on.\n\nPotential issues: The target branch in the annotations is mentioned as \"main\", but the task says \"master\". Need to check if that's a discrepancy. Also, in the playwright actions, the target branch might be main, but the task requires master. However, the user might have selected main, but the task says master. This is a point to note, but according to the provided data, the target was main. Maybe the task has a typo, or the user intended main. Since the data shows main, I'll proceed with that unless instructed otherwise.\n\nAnother point is assigning Justin as a reviewer. In the annotations, the user tried typing \"justin\" but had no results. However, in the playwright actions, there's a step where they click on \"Justin Armstrong\" in the dropdown. Wait, looking at the playwright actions, action_17 and others involve selecting a user. Let me check the playwright data again.\n\nLooking at the playwright actions, after action_15, there's a click on the \"Request review from\" section, typing \"justin\", then assigning. However, in the provided data, the final steps (action_20 and 21) involve searching for users but it's unclear if Justin was successfully selected. The annotations in Part 5 mention that typing \"justin\" didn't find results, but maybe the correct method was used elsewhere. Alternatively, perhaps the correct step is in the playwright actions where they successfully select Justin. Need to cross-reference.\n\nIn the playwright actions, action_15 is clicking the reviewer dropdown, action_20 is clicking the search box, and action_21 is selecting. But the JSON data for playwright actions doesn't clearly show selecting Justin. However, the task requires assigning him, so perhaps the correct steps are there but the annotations had a misstep. The final successful assignment would be part of the correct process.\n\nPutting it all together, the strategies would be:\n\n1. Navigate to the a11yproject.com project.\n2. Create a new merge request from the redesign branch.\n3. Configure source and target branches.\n4. Fill in merge request details.\n5. Assign Justin Armstrong as reviewer.\n6. Submit the merge request.\n\nEach strategy has substrategies and specific actions with playwright indices.\n\nNow, mapping each action to the playwright steps:\n\n- Searching for the project: actions 0-4, then action_5 (clicking the project link).\n- Navigating to merge requests: action_8 (clicking Merge Requests link).\n- Creating new MR: action_9 (New merge request button).\n- Selecting source branch: actions 10-11 (clicking source, selecting redesign).\n- Compare branches: action_14 (Compare branches button).\n- Filling title/description: actions in Part 4, but playwright actions may not show typing, but maybe the form fields are filled via other steps. The playwright actions here are clicking the title (action_15?), but need to check.\n\nWait, the playwright actions after creating the MR (action_9) involve selecting source branch (action_10, 11), then compare (14). Then filling details: action_15 is clicking the reviewer dropdown, action_16 is \"Assign to me\", action_17 is possibly selecting the user.\n\nBut the exact steps for title and description are not clear in the playwright actions. The annotations mention typing in title and description, but the playwright data may not capture the typing steps, only the clicks. However, the example given in the output format shows including actions where possible.\n\nIn the JSON example, some actions have playwright_idx and instructions. So, even if the typing isn't captured, the clicks and selections are.\n\nSo, for the title and description, the user would click the fields (playwright actions for those clicks) and type, but if the playwright data doesn't have the typing steps, maybe those are omitted, or included as part of the action description.\n\nIn the provided playwright data, after action_14 (Compare branches), the next actions are related to the merge request form. For example, action_15 is clicking the reviewer dropdown, action_16 is \"Assign to me\", action_17 is clicking a user (Byte Blaze?), action_20 is the search box.\n\nBut the task requires assigning Justin Armstrong. However, in the playwright data, the user may have selected a different user, but the task's requirement is to assign Justin. So perhaps there's a discrepancy here. But according to the task, we need to follow the correct steps to assign Justin, even if the playwright data shows a different user. However, the annotations mention that in Part 5, typing \"justin\" didn't find results, but maybe the correct way is to search properly.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps the example data is using a different username, and \"Justin Armstrong\" is represented differently. The key is to follow the task's requirement and map the steps that would achieve it, even if the playwright data shows a different user. But since the annotations and playwright data are the inputs, we have to base our answer on them.\n\nIn the playwright actions, action_17 is clicking a button with name \"Byte Blazea11yproject.contributor.me\", which might be the user assigning to themselves. Then action_20 is searching for users. But in the annotations, Part 5 mentions typing \"justin\" and getting no results. However, the task requires assigning Justin, so perhaps the correct steps involve successfully searching and selecting him, which might not be present in the data. This could be an error in the user's process, but the task is to summarize the correct steps to accomplish the task.\n\nGiven that the task is to submit the MR with Justin as reviewer, the correct steps would include successfully searching and selecting him, even if the provided data shows a failed attempt. However, since we have to base the answer on the provided data, which may not include the successful assignment, this is a problem.\n\nBut the user's intention is clear from the task, so the answer should reflect the correct steps needed, even if the provided annotations show a failed attempt. However, the instructions say to analyze the provided descriptive data and summarize a complete and reasonable description that can accomplish the task. So we need to reconcile the provided data with the task's goal.\n\nLooking at the playwright actions, after action_20 (searchbox_Search users), there's action_21 which is a locator click. Maybe that's where the user selects Justin. But the data doesn't specify the name. However, in the task, the reviewer is Justin Armstrong, so the steps should include searching for \"Justin Armstrong\" and selecting him.\n\nBut according to the annotations in Part 5, the user tried typing \"Request review from\" which didn't work, then typed \"justin\" and found no results. But maybe the correct approach is to type \"Justin Armstrong\" correctly. However, the provided data doesn't show this. This is a possible gap, but we have to use the available data.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps the correct steps are present in the playwright actions but not clearly described. For example, action_17 might be selecting the correct user. But the name in action_17 is \"Byte Blazea11yproject.contributor.me\", which doesn't seem like Justin. So perhaps the user assigned themselves but failed to assign Justin. However, the task requires assigning Justin, so the correct steps must include that.\n\nThis is a conflict between the provided data and the task's requirement. Since the task is to submit the MR with Justin as reviewer, but the annotations and playwright data show the user struggling to assign, perhaps the correct steps involve successfully assigning him despite the shown difficulties. But how to represent that in the answer?\n\nThe instructions say to \"ultimately summarize a complete and reasonable user operation description that can accomplish the given task\", so even if the provided data has errors or incomplete steps, the answer should outline the correct steps needed.\n\nTherefore, even though the user in the annotations had trouble assigning Justin, the correct process should include successfully searching for and selecting him. So the steps would include:\n\nIn the \"Assign Reviewer\" strategy:\n\n- Click the \"Request review from\" dropdown.\n- Type \"Justin Armstrong\" into the search box.\n- Select Justin Armstrong from the filtered results.\n\nBut according to the playwright data, the user might not have done this successfully. However, to accomplish the task, these steps are necessary. Therefore, the answer should include these steps, even if the provided data shows a failed attempt. The key is to create a correct process based on the task, using the available data where possible.\n\nBut how to map this to the playwright actions? The playwright actions include steps where the user interacts with the reviewer dropdown and search box. For example, action_15 is clicking the reviewer dropdown, action_20 is clicking the search box, and action_21 is a click that might select the user. Even if the specific selection of Justin isn't in the data, the answer should include these steps as part of the process.\n\nSo, the final JSON structure would include strategies and substrategies with the necessary actions, referencing the relevant playwright actions where applicable. For example, the action of typing \"Justin Armstrong\" would correspond to action_20 (searchbox_Search users) and selecting him would be action_21, even if the data doesn't explicitly show it.\n\nIn summary, the answer should outline the correct steps to accomplish the task, using the playwright actions that align with those steps, even if the annotations show some missteps. The key is to create a coherent, correct process based on the task and the available data.\n</think>\n\n### Complete User Operation Description to Submit Merge Request for a11yproject.com/redesign\n\n**Objective:** Submit a merge request for the `redesign` branch of the `a11yproject.com` project to be merged into the `main` branch, assigning Justin Armstrong as the reviewer.\n\n---\n\n#### **Strategy 1: Navigate to the Target Project**\n**Sub-Strategy 1.1: Search for the Project** \n1. **Click the GitLab search bar** \n - *Playwright Action:* `action_0` (click placeholder \"Search GitLab\"). \n2. **Type project name and submit** \n - Enter `a11yproject.com` and press `Enter` (*Playwright Action:* `action_4`). \n3. **Select the project from results** \n - Click the project link \"The A11Y Project / a11yproject.com\" (*Playwright Action:* `action_5`). \n\n---\n\n#### **Strategy 2: Initiate Merge Request Creation** \n**Sub-Strategy 2.1: Access Merge Requests Section** \n\n1. **Navigate to \"Merge Requests\"** \n - Click the \"Merge Requests\" link in the sidebar (*Playwright Action:* `action_8`). \n2. **Start new merge request** \n - Click \"New Merge Request\" (*Playwright Action:* `action_9`). \n\n---\n\n#### **Strategy 3: Configure Source and Target Branches** \n**Sub-Strategy 3.1: Select Source Branch** \n\n1. **Open source branch dropdown** \n - Click \"Select source branch\" (*Playwright Action:* `action_10`). \n2. **Choose `redesign` branch** \n - Select \"redesign\" from the list (*Playwright Action:* `action_11`). \n\n**Sub-Strategy 3.2: Set Target Branch** \n\n1. **Confirm target branch** \n - Ensure target branch is `main` (default in most cases). \n2. **Proceed to compare branches** \n - Click \"Compare branches and continue\" (*Playwright Action:* `action_14`). \n\n---\n\n#### **Strategy 4: Fill Merge Request Details** \n**Sub-Strategy 4.1: Add Metadata** \n\n1. **Enter title and description** \n - Click the \"Title\" field and input a summary (e.g., \"Merge redesign into main\"). \n - Click the \"Description\" field and add context (annotations indicate manual input; no direct Playwright action). \n\n**Sub-Strategy 4.2: Assign Ownership** \n\n1. **Assign to self** \n - Click \"Assign to me\" (*Playwright Action:* `action_16`). \n\n---\n\n#### **Strategy 5: Assign Reviewer** \n**Sub-Strategy 5.1: Search and Select Reviewer** \n\n1. **Open reviewer dropdown** \n - Click \"Request review from\" section (*Playwright Action:* `action_15`). \n2. **Search for Justin Armstrong** \n - Type \"Justin\" into the search box (*Playwright Action:* `action_20`). \n3. **Select from results** \n - Click \"Justin Armstrong\" in the filtered list (implied by task; no direct Playwright action). \n\n---\n\n#### **Strategy 6: Submit Merge Request** \n**Sub-Strategy 6.1: Finalize and Create** \n\n1. **Click \"Create Merge Request\"** \n - Scroll to and click the button (*Playwright Action:* Similar to `action_14` but not explicitly logged). \n\n---\n\n### Key Observations from Playwright Trace \n- The final merge request URL includes parameters confirming the source (`redesign`) and target (`main`) branches. \n- Critical Playwright actions include selecting the `redesign` branch (`action_11`) and confirming branch comparison (`action_14`). \n\n```json\n[\n {\n \"strategy\": \"Navigate to the Target Project\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Search for the Project\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Click the GitLab search bar\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 0,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_placeholder(\\\"Search GitLab\\\")\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Type 'a11yproject.com' and submit\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 4,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.pressget_by_placeholder(\\\"Search for projects, issues, etc.\\\")Enter\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Select the project from results\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 5,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"The A11Y Project\\\\n/ a11yproject.com\\\")\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"strategy\": \"Initiate Merge Request Creation\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Access Merge Requests Section\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Navigate to 'Merge Requests'\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 8,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_label(\\\"Project navigation\\\").get_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"Merge requests\\\")\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Start new merge request\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 9,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"New merge request\\\")\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"strategy\": \"Configure Source and Target Branches\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Select Source Branch\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Open source branch dropdown\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 10,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"button\\\", name=\\\"Select source branch\\\")\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Choose 'redesign' branch\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 11,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"redesign\\\")\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Set Target Branch\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Proceed to compare branches\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 14,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"button\\\", name=\\\"Compare branches and continue\\\")\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"strategy\": \"Assign Reviewer\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Search and Select Reviewer\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Open reviewer dropdown\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 15,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clicklocator(\\\"div\\\").filter(has_text=re.compile(r\\\"^UnassignedRequest review from$\\\")).get_by_role(\\\"button\\\")\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Search for 'Justin Armstrong'\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 20,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"searchbox\\\", name=\\\"Search users\\\")\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"strategy\": \"Submit Merge Request\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Finalize and Create\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Click 'Create Merge Request'\",\n \"playwright_idx\": null,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"Implied by task (not explicitly logged)\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n }\n]\n```",
|
||
"final_output": [
|
||
{
|
||
"strategy": "Navigate to the Target Project",
|
||
"substrategies": [
|
||
{
|
||
"substrategy": "Search for the Project",
|
||
"actions": [
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Click the GitLab search bar",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 0,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.clickget_by_placeholder(\"Search GitLab\")"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Type 'a11yproject.com' and submit",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 4,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.pressget_by_placeholder(\"Search for projects, issues, etc.\")Enter"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Select the project from results",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 5,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.clickget_by_role(\"link\", name=\"The A11Y Project\\n/ a11yproject.com\")"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"strategy": "Initiate Merge Request Creation",
|
||
"substrategies": [
|
||
{
|
||
"substrategy": "Access Merge Requests Section",
|
||
"actions": [
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Navigate to 'Merge Requests'",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 8,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.clickget_by_label(\"Project navigation\").get_by_role(\"link\", name=\"Merge requests\")"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Start new merge request",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 9,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.clickget_by_role(\"link\", name=\"New merge request\")"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"strategy": "Configure Source and Target Branches",
|
||
"substrategies": [
|
||
{
|
||
"substrategy": "Select Source Branch",
|
||
"actions": [
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Open source branch dropdown",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 10,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.clickget_by_role(\"button\", name=\"Select source branch\")"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Choose 'redesign' branch",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 11,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.clickget_by_role(\"link\", name=\"redesign\")"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"substrategy": "Set Target Branch",
|
||
"actions": [
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Proceed to compare branches",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 14,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.clickget_by_role(\"button\", name=\"Compare branches and continue\")"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"strategy": "Assign Reviewer",
|
||
"substrategies": [
|
||
{
|
||
"substrategy": "Search and Select Reviewer",
|
||
"actions": [
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Open reviewer dropdown",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 15,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.clicklocator(\"div\").filter(has_text=re.compile(r\"^UnassignedRequest review from$\")).get_by_role(\"button\")"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Search for 'Justin Armstrong'",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 20,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.clickget_by_role(\"searchbox\", name=\"Search users\")"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"strategy": "Submit Merge Request",
|
||
"substrategies": [
|
||
{
|
||
"substrategy": "Finalize and Create",
|
||
"actions": [
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Click 'Create Merge Request'",
|
||
"playwright_idx": null,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "Implied by task (not explicitly logged)"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
} |