77 lines
40 KiB
JSON
77 lines
40 KiB
JSON
{
|
||
"task_intent": "Open my latest updated issue that has keyword \"better\" in its title to check if it is closed",
|
||
"prompt": "# Instruction\n- You are an expert in cleaning process data descriptions. Given a task, you are provided with a set of annotation description\ndata for a certain visual LLM related to human user operation videos. Plus, You are provided with full trace of playwright action,\nwhic includes action and url before and after the action.\n- You need to analyze all the descriptive data and ultimately summarize a complete and reasonable user operation description that can accomplish the given task.\n- For each strategy, give a clear list of the low level action sequence.\n\n# Task\nOpen my latest updated issue that has keyword \"better\" in its title to check if it is closed\n\n# Annotation description\n## Part 1\n### Step-by-Step Actions in the Video Segment\n\n#### 1. **Action:** I click on the \"Issues\" tab located at the top of the page.\n - **Page Changes:** The page transitions from the \"Projects\" view to the \"Issues\" view, displaying a list of open issues associated with the selected projects.\n - **Possible Purpose:** The likely intent is to navigate to the section where project issues are managed and reviewed.\n\n#### 2. **Action:** I use the search bar by typing \"Byte Blaze\" into the \"Assignee\" filter field.\n - **Page Changes:** The list of issues updates to show only those assigned to \"Byte Blaze.\"\n - **Possible Purpose:** The purpose is to filter the issues specifically to those assigned to the user or entity named \"Byte Blaze,\" allowing for focused review or management of their tasks.\n\n#### 3. **Action:** I type the word \"better\" into the main search bar within the Issues page.\n - **Page Changes:** The issue list further narrows down to include only those issues whose titles or descriptions contain the word \"better.\"\n - **Possible Purpose:** This action aims to refine the search results even more specifically, possibly to find issues related to improvements or enhancements suggested by the term \"better.\"\n\n#### 4. **Action:** I hover over the \"Created date\" column header.\n - **Page Changes:** No immediate change occurs, but this action might be preparatory for sorting.\n - **Possible Purpose:** The intent could be to sort the issues based on their creation date, either to prioritize newer or older issues.\n\n#### 5. **Action:** I click on the \"Created date\" column header.\n - **Page Changes:** The issues list is sorted by their creation date, either in ascending or descending order.\n - **Possible Purpose:** Sorting by creation date helps in organizing the issues temporally, which can be useful for tracking the timeline of reported issues or focusing on the most recent ones.\n\n#### 6. **Action:** I click on the \"Updated date\" column header.\n - **Page Changes:** The issues list is now sorted by their last updated date.\n - **Possible Purpose:** Sorting by the updated date allows me to focus on the most recently active issues, which might be the ones currently being worked on or have had recent developments.\n\n### Summary\nIn this video segment, I navigate from the \"Projects\" page to the \"Issues\" page, filter issues by assignee and specific keywords, and sort the issues by their creation and update dates. These actions suggest a systematic approach to managing and reviewing specific issues assigned to \"Byte Blaze,\" with a focus on finding relevant, recent, or updated tasks.\n\n---\n\n## Part 2\n### Step-by-Step Actions in the Provided Video Segment\n\n#### 1. **Action**: I click on the \"Edit\" button located next to the \"Assignee\" section.\n - **Page Changes**: The page transitions into an editing mode for the assignee section, allowing me to select or change the assignee.\n - **Possible Purpose**: The likely intent is to modify or confirm the assignee for this issue, ensuring it is correctly assigned to the responsible individual.\n\n#### 2. **Action**: I click on the \"Eric Bailey\" option from the dropdown menu that appears after clicking \"Edit.\"\n - **Page Changes**: The assignee is updated to \"Eric Bailey,\" and the editing interface reverts to its standard display mode.\n - **Possible Purpose**: The purpose is to assign the issue to Eric Bailey, presumably because he is the appropriate person to handle or oversee this task.\n\n#### 3. **Action**: I click on the \"Edit\" button next to the \"Labels\" section.\n - **Page Changes**: The labels section enters an editable state, displaying a list of available labels that can be added or removed.\n - **Possible Purpose**: The intention is to modify the labels associated with this issue, which helps in categorizing and prioritizing the task effectively.\n\n#### 4. **Action**: I click on the \"Type: Enhancement\" label within the editable labels section.\n - **Page Changes**: The \"Type: Enhancement\" label is highlighted or confirmed, indicating it is selected or deselected (depending on its previous state).\n - **Possible Purpose**: The goal is to ensure that the \"Type: Enhancement\" label is appropriately applied to this issue, aiding in its classification and management.\n\n#### 5. **Action**: I click on the \"Create merge request\" button located near the top-right of the issue details.\n - **Page Changes**: A new window or overlay appears, prompting me to create a merge request related to this issue.\n - **Possible Purpose**: The aim is to initiate the process of creating a merge request, which is typically done to propose changes that address the issue at hand.\n\n#### 6. **Action**: I type the text \".get_by_test_id('by-labels').get_by_test_id('collapsed')\" into the search bar at the top of the page.\n - **Page Changes**: The search bar reflects the entered text, but no immediate page changes occur as a result of this action (search results are not shown in this segment).\n - **Possible Purpose**: The likely intent is to perform a search using a specific query, possibly to locate related issues, code snippets, or documentation that includes this exact phrase.\n\n### Summary\nIn this video segment, I perform a series of actions focused on managing an issue within a GitLab project. These actions include assigning the issue to a specific user, editing and confirming labels, initiating a merge request, and entering a specific search query. Each step appears to be part of a workflow aimed at organizing, addressing, and potentially resolving the issue efficiently.\n\n# Playwright action\n[\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"action_0\",\n \"idx\": 0,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_label(\\\"Issues\\\", exact=True)\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"action_1\",\n \"idx\": 1,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clicklocator(\\\"#filtered-search-issues\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/dashboard/issues?assignee_username=byteblaze\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/dashboard/issues?assignee_username=byteblaze\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"action_2\",\n \"idx\": 2,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.presslocator(\\\"#filtered-search-issues\\\")Enter\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/dashboard/issues?scope=all&state=opened&assignee_username=byteblaze&search=better\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/dashboard/issues?assignee_username=byteblaze\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"base-dropdown-toggle\",\n \"idx\": 3,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_test_id(\\\"base-dropdown-toggle\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/dashboard/issues?scope=all&state=opened&assignee_username=byteblaze&search=better\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/dashboard/issues?scope=all&state=opened&assignee_username=byteblaze&search=better\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"text_Updated date\",\n \"idx\": 4,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_text(\\\"Updated date\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/dashboard/issues?assignee_username=byteblaze&scope=all&search=better&sort=updated_desc&state=opened\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/dashboard/issues?scope=all&state=opened&assignee_username=byteblaze&search=better\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"action_5\",\n \"idx\": 5,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clicklocator(\\\"div\\\").filter(has_text=\\\"Issues Select project to create issue Search for project Open 2 Closed 4 All 6 S\\\").nth(1)\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/dashboard/issues?assignee_username=byteblaze&scope=all&search=better&sort=updated_desc&state=opened\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/dashboard/issues?assignee_username=byteblaze&scope=all&search=better&sort=updated_desc&state=opened\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"link_Better initial load experience\",\n \"idx\": 6,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"Better initial load experience\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/dashboard/issues?assignee_username=byteblaze&scope=all&search=better&sort=updated_desc&state=opened\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8023/dashboard/issues?assignee_username=byteblaze&scope=all&search=better&sort=updated_desc&state=opened\"\n }\n }\n]\n\n# Output format\n- 先总结整个任务的Objective，然后按照Strategy-SubStrategy-action三级层次来给出整个过程，\n- 接着给出整个操作流程后的观察和有趣的发现，最后严格按照json格式输出三级层次的过程描述。\n- 最后的输出json应该是包在```{json}```之间，最底层动作需要包含描述、对应的playwright动作指令顺序编号，以及具体指令内容。\n\n# Example\n### Complete User Operation Description to Display Labeled Issues in kkroening/ffmpeg-python\n\n**Objective:** Filter and display all issues labeled as \"question\" in the kkroening/ffmpeg-python repository.\n\n---\n\n#### **Strategy 1: Navigate to the Repository**\n**Low-Level Action Sequence:**\n1. **Search for the user \"kkroening\"**\n - Click the global search bar (placeholder: \"Search GitLab\").\n - Type \"kkroening\" and press `Enter`.\n2. **Select the user from results**\n - Click the \"Users\" tab in search results.\n - Click on \"Karl Kroening @kkroening\" in the user list.\n3. **Access the repository**\n - Navigate to the \"Personal projects\" section.\n - Click on the \"ffmpeg-python\" project.\n\n---\n\n#### **Strategy 2: Filter Issues by Label**\n**Low-Level Action Sequence:**\n1. **Open the Issues tab**\n - Scroll to the left sidebar menu.\n - Click the \"Issues\" tab (displaying the count, e.g., \"Issues 402\").\n2. **Apply label filtering**\n - Click the search/filter bar in the issues list.\n - Select the \"Label\" dropdown from the filter options.\n - Type or select \"question\" from the label dropdown.\n - Click the search/apply button to confirm the filter.\n\n---\n\n#### **Final Oberservation**\nThe issues list will refresh to show only issues with the \"question\" label. The URL will reflect the filter:\n`.../ffmpeg-python/-/issues/?label_name[]=question`.\n\n---\n\n### Key Observations from Playwright Trace\n- The final URL after filtering:\n `http://ec2-3-135-39-80.../ffmpeg-python/-/issues/?label_name%5B%5D=question`\n confirms the \"question\" label filter is applied.\n- Critical interactions include selecting the \"Label\" dropdown and explicitly choosing \"question\" to refine results.\n\n### Final output\n```json\n[{\n \"strategy\" : \"Navigate to the Repository\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Search for the user \\\"kkroening\\\"\",\n \"actions\" : [\n {\n \"description\": \"Click the global search bar (placeholder: \\\"Search GitLab\\\"). \",\n \"playwright_idx\" : 18,\n \"playwright_instruction\" : \"frame.pressget_by_placeholder(\\\"Search GitLab\\\")Enter\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Select the user from results\",\n \"actions\" : [\n ]\n }\n ]\n},\n{\n \"strategy\" : \"Filter Issues by Label\",\n \"substrategies\" : [\n ]\n}]\n```",
|
||
"response": "<think>\nOkay, let's tackle this problem. The task is to open the latest updated issue with the keyword \"better\" in its title and check if it's closed. The user provided annotation descriptions from two parts and a Playwright action trace. I need to analyze all this data to create a structured summary of the user's actions that achieve the task.\n\nFirst, I'll start by understanding the objective. The user wants to find their latest updated issue that has \"better\" in the title and verify its status is closed. So the main steps would involve navigating to the issues, filtering by the keyword, sorting by update date, and checking the status.\n\nLooking at Part 1 of the annotation, the user clicks on the Issues tab, uses the search bar to filter by assignee \"Byte Blaze\" and keyword \"better\", then sorts by Created and Updated dates. The summary mentions navigating to Issues, filtering, and sorting. However, the task doesn't mention filtering by assignee, so maybe that's an extraneous step. But the Playwright actions might clarify this.\n\nIn the Playwright trace, the first action is clicking on the Issues tab (action_0), then interacting with the filter search (action_1 and action_2). The URLs show parameters like assignee_username=byteblaze and search=better. So the user did filter by assignee, but the task doesn't require that. Hmm, maybe the user's personal workflow includes filtering their own assigned issues, but the task is more general. However, since the task is to open \"my\" latest issue, perhaps \"my\" implies issues assigned to the user, so filtering by assignee makes sense here. So that step is relevant.\n\nThen, in action_2, they press Enter after typing in the search, which applies the \"better\" keyword. Then there's a click on the \"base-dropdown-toggle\" (action_3), which might be the sorting dropdown. Then clicking \"Updated date\" (action_4) to sort by that. The URL after action_4 includes sort=updated_desc, which sorts by updated date descending. Then action_6 is clicking on the link named \"Better initial load experience\", which is the issue they want.\n\nIn Part 2 of the annotation, the user is editing the issue's assignee, labels, etc., but that seems unrelated to the task of checking if the issue is closed. So Part 2 might be part of a different task, perhaps after opening the issue. The task here is just to open the latest updated issue with \"better\" in the title and check its status, so Part 2's actions might not be needed unless checking the status is part of it. But the task is to check if it's closed, so after opening the issue, the user would look at the status. However, in the Playwright trace, the final action is clicking the link to the issue (action_6), but there's no action after that. So maybe the status check is just visual on the issue's page, which isn't captured in the Playwright actions provided. But the annotations in Part 1 don't mention checking the status either. So perhaps the actual step of checking if it's closed is implied once the issue is opened. The user's summary in Part 1 mentions navigating to the Issues page, filtering, and sorting, but not the actual check. However, the Playwright trace ends with clicking the issue link. So the final step is opening the issue, and the user would then observe its status (closed or open) on that page.\n\nNow, structuring the strategies. The main strategies would be:\n\n1. Navigate to the Issues page.\n2. Filter issues by the keyword \"better\" in the title and by assignee (assuming \"my\" issues implies assigned to the user).\n3. Sort the issues by updated date in descending order to get the latest.\n4. Open the top issue (the latest one) and check its status.\n\nBut looking at the Playwright actions, after filtering and sorting, they click on the specific issue. So the steps are:\n\n- Click Issues tab (action_0)\n- Click on the filtered search bar (action_1)\n- Enter \"better\" and press Enter (action_2)\n- Open the sorting dropdown (action_3)\n- Click \"Updated date\" to sort (action_4)\n- Click the issue link (action_6)\n\nWait, in the Playwright actions, action_2 is pressing Enter in the search bar, which applies the \"better\" filter. But the URL after action_2 is ...assignee_username=byteblaze&search=better. Then action_3 is clicking the base-dropdown-toggle (probably the sort dropdown), then action_4 clicks \"Updated date\", which updates the URL to include sort=updated_desc. Then action_6 clicks the issue link.\n\nSo the steps are:\n\n1. Navigate to Issues.\n2. Apply assignee filter (byteblaze) and search for \"better\".\n3. Sort by updated date descending.\n4. Open the first issue in the sorted list.\n\nBut the task is to open the latest updated issue with \"better\" in the title. So the steps make sense.\n\nNow, the annotation in Part 1 mentions typing \"Byte Blaze\" into the Assignee filter, but in the Playwright trace, the URL already has assignee_username=byteblaze after action_0. Wait, action_0's after URL is the same as before. Wait, looking at the Playwright actions:\n\naction_0: before URL is the base URL, after is the same. But the action is clicking the Issues tab. Maybe the URL changes but isn't reflected here. Or perhaps the initial page is the Projects view, and clicking Issues navigates to the Issues page. The annotation in Part 1 says the page transitions from Projects to Issues. But the Playwright trace's URLs don't change here. That's odd. Maybe the site is a single-page app, so the URL doesn't change, but the content does. So the Playwright actions may not show URL changes for in-page navigation.\n\nBut according to the annotation, after clicking the Issues tab, the page changes to the Issues view. So action_0 is the first step.\n\nThen action_1 is clicking the filtered search bar. Then action_2 is pressing Enter, which applies the search. The URL after action_2 includes search=better. Then action_3 and 4 are for sorting. Then action_6 is clicking the issue link.\n\nSo the strategies would be:\n\nStrategy 1: Navigate to the Issues page.\n\nStrategy 1's actions: Click on the \"Issues\" tab (action_0).\n\nStrategy 2: Filter issues by assignee and keyword.\n\nSub-strategy 2.1: Apply assignee filter. But in the Playwright trace, the assignee filter is already applied. Wait, the initial URL after action_0 is .../dashboard/issues?assignee_username=byteblaze. So maybe the Issues tab link includes the assignee filter by default. Or perhaps the user had a previous state where the assignee was already set. But according to the annotation, the user types \"Byte Blaze\" into the Assignee filter. However, in the Playwright actions, after action_0, the URL already has assignee_username=byteblaze. So maybe the initial click on the Issues tab navigates to a pre-filtered view. This is conflicting with the annotation. Hmm.\n\nWait, the annotation in Part 1 says:\n\nAction 1: Click on Issues tab. Page changes to Issues view.\n\nAction 2: Type \"Byte Blaze\" into Assignee filter. Page updates to show only those assigned to Byte Blaze.\n\nBut in the Playwright trace, after action_0 (clicking Issues), the URL is .../dashboard/issues?assignee_username=byteblaze. So perhaps the Issues tab is a link that includes the assignee filter. So the user didn't manually type the assignee; instead, clicking the Issues tab already applies the assignee filter. That's conflicting with the annotation. So there's a discrepancy here. The annotation says the user types \"Byte Blaze\" into the Assignee filter, but the Playwright trace shows that after clicking the Issues tab, the assignee is already set. So maybe the annotation is incorrect, or the Playwright trace is from a different scenario.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps the \"Issues\" tab is part of a user's dashboard that already has the assignee filter applied. So the user's Issues tab is pre-configured to show their assigned issues. In that case, the step of setting the assignee filter is not needed. But according to the annotation, the user does perform that step. This is conflicting.\n\nThis is a problem. The Playwright actions and the annotation don't align here. How to resolve this?\n\nLooking at action_0 in Playwright: action_repr is \"frame.clickget_by_label(\"Issues\", exact=True)\", and the before and after URLs are the same. But according to the annotation, this navigates to the Issues view. So perhaps the URL doesn't change because it's a single-page app, but the content changes. The annotation's Part 1 says after clicking Issues, the page shows the Issues view. Then, the user uses the search bar to filter by assignee. But in the Playwright trace, after action_0, the URL is .../dashboard/issues?assignee_username=byteblaze. So maybe the Issues tab's link includes the assignee filter. So the user didn't manually type the assignee; it's part of the navigation. Therefore, the step of filtering by assignee is part of the initial navigation, not a separate action. But the annotation says the user types \"Byte Blaze\" into the Assignee filter. So there's a contradiction here.\n\nThis suggests that the annotation may have an error, or the Playwright trace is from a different session. Since the task is to create a correct user operation description based on the provided data, I need to reconcile these.\n\nLooking at the Playwright actions:\n\naction_0: Clicks Issues tab. After URL is same as before. But according to the annotation, this navigates to the Issues view. Then action_1 is clicking the filtered search bar (locator \"#filtered-search-issues\"). Then action_2 is pressing Enter in that search bar. The before URL for action_2 is ...assignee_username=byteblaze&search=better. So after action_2, the URL is ...assignee_username=byteblaze. Wait, that's strange. The before URL has search=better, and after pressing Enter, the URL loses the search parameter. That doesn't make sense. Maybe the Playwright trace is incorrect or there's a misordering.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps action_1 is clicking the search bar, then typing \"better\" and pressing Enter (action_2). But the before URL for action_2 is ...assignee_username=byteblaze&search=better. So maybe the user had already entered \"better\" in the search bar, and pressing Enter applies it, but the URL after action_2 is ...assignee_username=byteblaze. That seems like a step backward. This is confusing.\n\nAlternatively, maybe the Playwright actions are not in the correct order. But the \"idx\" values go from 0 to 6, so the order is correct.\n\nThis is getting complicated. Let's try to map each annotation step to the Playwright actions.\n\nAnnotation Part 1:\n\n1. Click on Issues tab. Playwright action_0.\n\n2. Type \"Byte Blaze\" into Assignee filter. But in Playwright, after action_0, the URL already has assignee_username=byteblaze. So maybe this step is not present in the Playwright trace. Or perhaps the annotation is incorrect here.\n\n3. Type \"better\" into main search bar. Playwright action_1 is clicking the search bar, action_2 is pressing Enter. But the before URL for action_2 already has search=better. So maybe the user had already entered \"better\" before action_2. So action_2 is pressing Enter to apply the search. But why does the after URL lose the search parameter? That's odd. Maybe there's a mistake in the Playwright trace's URLs.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps the user first clicks the search bar (action_1), types \"better\", presses Enter (action_2), which applies the search. Then the URL includes search=better. But according to the Playwright trace, after action_2, the URL is ...assignee_username=byteblaze, which doesn't include search=better. That's conflicting.\n\nThis suggests that the Playwright trace may not accurately capture the URL changes, or there's a bug in the application. Alternatively, the user is on a page where the search is handled via client-side rendering, and the URL doesn't update immediately. This complicates things.\n\nGiven the discrepancies, I need to rely on the annotation and Playwright actions as best as possible, but the task is to create a coherent process.\n\nThe key steps needed for the task are:\n\n- Navigate to Issues.\n\n- Filter by keyword \"better\" in title.\n\n- Sort by updated date descending.\n\n- Open the first issue.\n\n- Check if it's closed.\n\nThe Playwright actions include clicking the Issues tab (action_0), interacting with the search bar (actions 1 and 2), sorting (actions 3 and 4), and clicking the issue link (action_6).\n\nThe annotation's Part 1 includes filtering by assignee, but the task is about \"my\" issues, which could imply the assignee is the current user. So filtering by assignee is part of the process. However, in the Playwright trace, the assignee is already set after action_0. So perhaps the Issues tab is a shortcut that includes the assignee filter. Therefore, the steps would be:\n\n1. Click on the Issues tab (which navigates to the Issues view filtered by the user's assigned issues).\n\n2. Use the search bar to enter \"better\" and apply the filter.\n\n3. Sort the issues by updated date descending.\n\n4. Open the first issue in the list.\n\n5. Check if the status is closed.\n\nNow, in the Playwright actions, after action_0, the URL includes assignee_username=byteblaze. So action_0 is the step that applies the assignee filter. Then action_1 and 2 are for the search term. Then actions 3 and 4 sort by updated date. Then action_6 clicks the issue.\n\nSo the strategies would be:\n\nStrategy 1: Navigate to assigned issues.\n\n- Action: Click on the \"Issues\" tab (action_0).\n\nStrategy 2: Filter issues by keyword \"better\".\n\n- Sub-strategy: Enter keyword into search.\n\n - Click the search bar (action_1).\n\n - Type \"better\" and press Enter (action_2).\n\nStrategy 3: Sort by latest update.\n\n- Sub-strategy: Apply sorting by updated date.\n\n - Click the sorting dropdown (action_3).\n\n - Select \"Updated date\" (action_4).\n\nStrategy 4: Open the latest issue.\n\n- Click on the issue with \"better\" in the title (action_6).\n\nThen, check the status (closed or not). However, the Playwright trace doesn't show any action after opening the issue. The annotation's Part 1 also doesn't mention checking the status. But the task requires checking if it's closed. So after opening the issue, the user would look at the status, which is part of the observation.\n\nNow, the example output includes a \"Final Observation\" section. So in this case, the final observation would be the issue's status displayed on the page, which is either closed or open.\n\nPutting this all into the required structure:\n\nObjective: Open the user's latest updated issue with \"better\" in the title and check if it's closed.\n\nStrategies:\n\n1. Navigate to Assigned Issues:\n - Click the \"Issues\" tab (action_0).\n\n2. Filter by Keyword \"better\":\n - Enter \"better\" into the search bar and apply (actions 1 and 2).\n\n3. Sort by Latest Update:\n - Open sorting dropdown (action_3) and select \"Updated date\" (action_4).\n\n4. Open the Latest Matching Issue:\n - Click the top issue link (action_6).\n\nFinal Observation: The issue's status (closed/open) is displayed on the page.\n\nKey Observations from Playwright Trace:\n- The final action opens the issue, and the URL would reflect the specific issue's page. The status would be visible there.\n\nNow, mapping each action to the Playwright steps:\n\n- action_0: Click Issues tab.\n\n- action_1: Click search bar.\n\n- action_2: Press Enter (after typing \"better\").\n\n- action_3: Click sorting dropdown (base-dropdown-toggle).\n\n- action_4: Click \"Updated date\".\n\n- action_6: Click the issue link.\n\nBut in the Playwright trace, action_2's after URL loses the search=better parameter. That's confusing. But according to the annotation, the search is applied. So perhaps the Playwright trace has an error, but the user's intended actions are as per the annotation.\n\nIn the JSON output, each action should reference the playwright_idx and instruction.\n\nFor example:\n\nStrategy 1: Navigate to Assigned Issues.\n\nSub-strategy: Click Issues tab.\n\nAction: Click on \"Issues\" tab. Playwright action_0.\n\nStrategy 2: Filter by Keyword \"better\".\n\nSub-strategy: Enter search term.\n\nActions:\n\n- Click search bar (action_1).\n\n- Type \"better\" and press Enter (action_2).\n\nBut action_2's instruction is \"frame.presslocator(\"#filtered-search-issues\")Enter\". So the description would be \"Type 'better' into the search bar and press Enter\".\n\nBut the Playwright action for action_2 is pressing Enter, but the actual typing isn't captured in the actions. The annotation says the user types \"better\" into the main search bar. So the Playwright action for typing would be missing. However, the Playwright actions provided don't include a 'type' action, only clicks and presses. So perhaps action_1 is clicking the search bar, and action_2 is pressing Enter, which implies that the text was already entered. But how?\n\nThis is a gap. The annotation says the user types \"better\" into the search bar, but the Playwright trace only has a press Enter action. So maybe the typing is not captured in the Playwright actions, or it's part of a different step. This is a problem. The Playwright actions may not capture the typing, only the pressing of the Enter. So in the JSON, the action would be represented by action_2 (pressing Enter), but the description would include typing \"better\".\n\nBut according to the Playwright action_repr for action_2: \"frame.presslocator(\"#filtered-search-issues\")Enter\". The 'press' command in Playwright can simulate typing and pressing a key. But if the user types \"better' and presses Enter, the Playwright action would be a sequence of type and press. But in the provided trace, action_2 is a press of Enter. So perhaps the 'type' action is missing, or it's assumed that the search bar already has the text. This is unclear.\n\nGiven the provided data, I'll proceed with the annotation's description, even if the Playwright actions don't fully capture it. So the action of typing \"better\" is part of the process, even if the Playwright trace only shows pressing Enter.\n\nSo for Strategy 2, the actions would be:\n\n- Click the search bar (action_1).\n\n- Type \"better\" and press Enter (action_2).\n\nBut action_2's instruction is pressing Enter. So the typing is part of the action's description, but the Playwright action only includes pressing Enter. So the actual typing isn't captured in the Playwright trace. This is a limitation of the data provided.\n\nIn the JSON, each action should reference the Playwright action's idx and instruction. So for typing \"better\", if there's no Playwright action for that, it can't be included. But according to the trace, action_2 is pressing Enter, which would apply the search. So perhaps the typing is part of the action's description, but the Playwright instruction is pressing Enter. So the description would be \"Type 'better' into the search bar and press Enter\", with Playwright_idx 2 and instruction \"frame.presslocator(\"#filtered-search-issues\")Enter\".\n\nSimilarly, the sorting steps: action_3 is clicking the base-dropdown-toggle (the sorting dropdown), action_4 is clicking \"Updated date\". So the description would be \"Click the sorting dropdown and select 'Updated date'\".\n\nPutting this all into the JSON structure:\n\nThe final JSON should have strategies, substrategies, and actions with descriptions and Playwright references.\n\nSo the JSON would look like:\n\n[\n {\n \"strategy\": \"Navigate to Assigned Issues\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Access the Issues Page\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Click on the \\\"Issues\\\" tab at the top of the page.\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 0,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_label(\\\"Issues\\\", exact=True)\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"strategy\": \"Filter Issues by Keyword 'better'\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Apply Keyword Filter\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Click the main search bar to focus on it.\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 1,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clicklocator(\\\"#filtered-search-issues\\\")\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Type 'better' into the search bar and press Enter to apply the filter.\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 2,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.presslocator(\\\"#filtered-search-issues\\\")Enter\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"strategy\": \"Sort Issues by Latest Update\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Change Sorting to Updated Date\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Open the sorting dropdown menu.\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 3,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_test_id(\\\"base-dropdown-toggle\\\")\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Select 'Updated date' to sort issues by most recently updated.\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 4,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_text(\\\"Updated date\\\")\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"strategy\": \"Open the Latest Issue\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Access the Target Issue\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Click on the issue titled 'Better initial load experience' in the sorted list.\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 6,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"Better initial load experience\\\")\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n }\n]\n\nThe Final Observation would note that the issue's status (closed or open) is visible on the page. The Key Observations from the Playwright trace would mention the final URL after opening the issue, but in the provided trace, the after URL for action_6 is the same as before. This might be due to the application's routing not updating the URL, or the trace being incomplete. However, the key point is that the user opens the issue and can check its status.\n\nThis should fulfill the task requirements.\n</think>\n\n```json\n[\n {\n \"strategy\": \"Navigate to Assigned Issues\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Access the Issues Page\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Click on the \\\"Issues\\\" tab at the top of the page to view assigned issues.\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 0,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_label(\\\"Issues\\\", exact=True)\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"strategy\": \"Filter Issues by Keyword 'better'\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Apply Keyword Filter\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Click the main search bar to focus on it.\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 1,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clicklocator(\\\"#filtered-search-issues\\\")\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Type 'better' into the search bar and press Enter to filter issues containing the keyword.\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 2,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.presslocator(\\\"#filtered-search-issues\\\")Enter\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"strategy\": \"Sort Issues by Latest Update\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Change Sorting to Updated Date\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Open the sorting dropdown menu to select a sorting criterion.\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 3,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_test_id(\\\"base-dropdown-toggle\\\")\"\n },\n {\n \"description\": \"Select 'Updated date' to sort issues by most recently updated (descending order).\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 4,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_text(\\\"Updated date\\\")\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"strategy\": \"Open and Verify Target Issue\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Access the Latest Matching Issue\",\n \"actions\": [\n {\n \"description\": \"Click on the top issue in the sorted list (titled \\\"Better initial load experience\\\").\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 6,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"Better initial load experience\\\")\"\n }\n ]\n }\n ]\n }\n]\n```",
|
||
"final_output": [
|
||
{
|
||
"strategy": "Navigate to Assigned Issues",
|
||
"substrategies": [
|
||
{
|
||
"substrategy": "Access the Issues Page",
|
||
"actions": [
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Click on the \"Issues\" tab at the top of the page to view assigned issues.",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 0,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.clickget_by_label(\"Issues\", exact=True)"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"strategy": "Filter Issues by Keyword 'better'",
|
||
"substrategies": [
|
||
{
|
||
"substrategy": "Apply Keyword Filter",
|
||
"actions": [
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Click the main search bar to focus on it.",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 1,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.clicklocator(\"#filtered-search-issues\")"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Type 'better' into the search bar and press Enter to filter issues containing the keyword.",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 2,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.presslocator(\"#filtered-search-issues\")Enter"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"strategy": "Sort Issues by Latest Update",
|
||
"substrategies": [
|
||
{
|
||
"substrategy": "Change Sorting to Updated Date",
|
||
"actions": [
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Open the sorting dropdown menu to select a sorting criterion.",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 3,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.clickget_by_test_id(\"base-dropdown-toggle\")"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Select 'Updated date' to sort issues by most recently updated (descending order).",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 4,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.clickget_by_text(\"Updated date\")"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"strategy": "Open and Verify Target Issue",
|
||
"substrategies": [
|
||
{
|
||
"substrategy": "Access the Latest Matching Issue",
|
||
"actions": [
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Click on the top issue in the sorted list (titled \"Better initial load experience\").",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 6,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.clickget_by_role(\"link\", name=\"Better initial load experience\")"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
} |