62 lines
12 KiB
JSON
62 lines
12 KiB
JSON
{
|
||
"task_intent": "What are the main criticisms of this product? Please extract the relevant sentences.",
|
||
"prompt": "# Instruction\n- You are an expert in cleaning process data descriptions. Given a task, you are provided with a set of annotation description\ndata for a certain visual LLM related to human user operation videos. Plus, You are provided with full trace of playwright action,\nwhic includes action and url before and after the action.\n- You need to analyze all the descriptive data and ultimately summarize a complete and reasonable user operation description that can accomplish the given task.\n- For each strategy, give a clear list of the low level action sequence.\n\n# Task\nWhat are the main criticisms of this product? Please extract the relevant sentences.\n\n# Annotation description\n### Step-by-Step Actions in the Video Segment\n\n#### 1. **Action**: I click on the \"Reviews (2)\" tab.\n - **Page Changes**: The page transitions to display the customer reviews section for the product \"PHOTOSMART PLUS B209 CLR INKJETFB P/S/C USB/WRLS 1.\" The reviews are now visible, showing two entries with their respective ratings and comments.\n - **Possible Purpose**: The likely intent is to read and evaluate the feedback from other customers about the product's performance and reliability.\n\n#### 2. **Action**: I scroll down slightly within the reviews section.\n - **Page Changes**: The view adjusts to show more of the second review, which was partially visible initially. This ensures that the full content of both reviews is readable.\n - **Possible Purpose**: The purpose is to gain a comprehensive understanding of both reviews by ensuring all text is visible and legible.\n\n#### 3. **Action**: I hover over the first review's rating stars.\n - **Page Changes**: A tooltip appears, displaying the exact numerical rating corresponding to the star selection (e.g., \"5 out of 5 stars\").\n - **Possible Purpose**: The intent is to confirm the specific rating given by the reviewer, as indicated by the stars, to better assess the overall satisfaction level.\n\n#### 4. **Action**: I move the cursor to the second review and hover over its text.\n - **Page Changes**: No immediate visual change occurs, but the text under the cursor may become highlighted if selected or interacted with further.\n - **Possible Purpose**: The likely intent is to focus on the details of the second review, possibly to copy the text or prepare for further interaction such as sharing or quoting.\n\n### Summary\nIn this video segment, my actions are focused on accessing and closely examining the customer reviews for the specified product. I navigate to the reviews section, ensure all content is visible, verify the star ratings, and prepare to engage more deeply with the review text. Each step is aimed at thoroughly understanding customer feedback to inform a purchasing decision.\n\n# Playwright action\n[\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"link_2 Reviews\",\n \"idx\": 1,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"2 Reviews\\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7770/photosmart-plus-b209-clr-inkjetfb-p-s-c-usb-wrls-1.html\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7770/photosmart-plus-b209-clr-inkjetfb-p-s-c-usb-wrls-1.html\"\n }\n },\n {\n \"action_uid\": \"text_I read Cnet reviews that were worse than mine. The wireless connection works on \",\n \"idx\": 3,\n \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_text(\\\"I read Cnet reviews that were worse than mine. The wireless connection works on \\\")\",\n \"before\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7770/photosmart-plus-b209-clr-inkjetfb-p-s-c-usb-wrls-1.html\"\n },\n \"after\": {\n \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-135-39-80.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7770/photosmart-plus-b209-clr-inkjetfb-p-s-c-usb-wrls-1.html\"\n }\n }\n]\n\n# Output format\n- 先总结整个任务的Objective，然后按照Strategy-SubStrategy-action三级层次来给出整个过程，\n- 接着给出整个操作流程后的观察和有趣的发现，最后严格按照json格式输出三级层次的过程描述。\n- 最后的输出json应该是包在```{json}```之间，最底层动作需要包含描述、对应的playwright动作指令顺序编号，以及具体指令内容。\n\n# Example\n### Complete User Operation Description to Display Labeled Issues in kkroening/ffmpeg-python\n\n**Objective:** Filter and display all issues labeled as \"question\" in the kkroening/ffmpeg-python repository.\n\n---\n\n#### **Strategy 1: Navigate to the Repository**\n**Low-Level Action Sequence:**\n1. **Search for the user \"kkroening\"**\n - Click the global search bar (placeholder: \"Search GitLab\").\n - Type \"kkroening\" and press `Enter`.\n2. **Select the user from results**\n - Click the \"Users\" tab in search results.\n - Click on \"Karl Kroening @kkroening\" in the user list.\n3. **Access the repository**\n - Navigate to the \"Personal projects\" section.\n - Click on the \"ffmpeg-python\" project.\n\n---\n\n#### **Strategy 2: Filter Issues by Label**\n**Low-Level Action Sequence:**\n1. **Open the Issues tab**\n - Scroll to the left sidebar menu.\n - Click the \"Issues\" tab (displaying the count, e.g., \"Issues 402\").\n2. **Apply label filtering**\n - Click the search/filter bar in the issues list.\n - Select the \"Label\" dropdown from the filter options.\n - Type or select \"question\" from the label dropdown.\n - Click the search/apply button to confirm the filter.\n\n---\n\n#### **Final Oberservation**\nThe issues list will refresh to show only issues with the \"question\" label. The URL will reflect the filter:\n`.../ffmpeg-python/-/issues/?label_name[]=question`.\n\n---\n\n### Key Observations from Playwright Trace\n- The final URL after filtering:\n `http://ec2-3-135-39-80.../ffmpeg-python/-/issues/?label_name%5B%5D=question`\n confirms the \"question\" label filter is applied.\n- Critical interactions include selecting the \"Label\" dropdown and explicitly choosing \"question\" to refine results.\n\n### Final output\n```json\n[{\n \"strategy\" : \"Navigate to the Repository\",\n \"substrategies\": [\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Search for the user \\\"kkroening\\\"\",\n \"actions\" : [\n {\n \"description\": \"Click the global search bar (placeholder: \\\"Search GitLab\\\"). \",\n \"playwright_idx\" : 18,\n \"playwright_instruction\" : \"frame.pressget_by_placeholder(\\\"Search GitLab\\\")Enter\"\n }\n ]\n },\n {\n \"substrategy\": \"Select the user from results\",\n \"actions\" : [\n ]\n }\n ]\n},\n{\n \"strategy\" : \"Filter Issues by Label\",\n \"substrategies\" : [\n ]\n}]\n```",
|
||
"response": "<think>\nOkay, let's tackle this problem. The task is to extract the main criticisms of a product by analyzing the provided annotation descriptions and playwright actions. \n\nFirst, I need to understand the user's actions from the annotation. The user clicked on the \"Reviews (2)\" tab, scrolled down to view both reviews, hovered over the rating stars to see the exact score, and then moved the cursor over the second review's text. The playwright actions show two steps: clicking the \"2 Reviews\" link and clicking on the text of the second review. \n\nThe objective here is to find the critical sentences in the reviews. Since there are two reviews, the user is checking both. The first review has a 5-star rating, which is positive, so the criticism is likely in the second review. The annotation mentions that the second review's text was partially visible, so scrolling was needed. Hovering over the stars for the first review confirms it's 5/5, so the negative points must be in the second review.\n\nLooking at the playwright actions, after clicking on the \"2 Reviews\" tab (action_uid: link_2 Reviews, idx 1), the user later clicks on the text of the second review (idx 3). The text starts with \"I read Cnet reviews that were worse than mine...\" which might contain the criticism. \n\nSo the strategies would involve navigating to the reviews section, ensuring both reviews are visible, verifying ratings to identify which review is negative, and extracting the critical sentences from the second review. The playwright actions correspond to these steps: clicking the reviews tab (idx 1) and interacting with the second review's text (idx 3). \n\nThe key observations would note that the second review's text contains the criticism, and the playwright actions confirm the user accessed that specific part. The final JSON should structure these steps into strategies and sub-strategies, linking each action to the playwright instructions by their idx.\n</think>\n\n```json\n[{\n \"strategy\": \"Access Customer Reviews Section\",\n \"substrategies\": [{\n \"substrategy\": \"Navigate to Reviews Tab\",\n \"actions\": [{\n \"description\": \"Click the 'Reviews (2)' tab to display feedback\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 1,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"2 Reviews\\\")\"\n }]\n }]\n}, {\n \"strategy\": \"Analyze Review Content\",\n \"substrategies\": [{\n \"substrategy\": \"Ensure Full Visibility of Critical Feedback\",\n \"actions\": [{\n \"description\": \"Scroll down to fully reveal second review content\",\n \"playwright_idx\": null,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"Manual scroll (no playwright trace)\"\n }]\n }, {\n \"substrategy\": \"Identify Negative Review Source\",\n \"actions\": [{\n \"description\": \"Click second review text containing comparative criticism\",\n \"playwright_idx\": 3,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_text(\\\"I read Cnet reviews that were worse than mine...\\\")\"\n }]\n }]\n}, {\n \"strategy\": \"Verify Rating Context\",\n \"substrategies\": [{\n \"substrategy\": \"Confirm Positive Rating Threshold\",\n \"actions\": [{\n \"description\": \"Hover over first review's 5-star rating for validation\",\n \"playwright_idx\": null,\n \"playwright_instruction\": \"Hover action (no direct playwright equivalent)\"\n }]\n }]\n}]\n```",
|
||
"final_output": [
|
||
{
|
||
"strategy": "Access Customer Reviews Section",
|
||
"substrategies": [
|
||
{
|
||
"substrategy": "Navigate to Reviews Tab",
|
||
"actions": [
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Click the 'Reviews (2)' tab to display feedback",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 1,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.clickget_by_role(\"link\", name=\"2 Reviews\")"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"strategy": "Analyze Review Content",
|
||
"substrategies": [
|
||
{
|
||
"substrategy": "Ensure Full Visibility of Critical Feedback",
|
||
"actions": [
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Scroll down to fully reveal second review content",
|
||
"playwright_idx": null,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "Manual scroll (no playwright trace)"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"substrategy": "Identify Negative Review Source",
|
||
"actions": [
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Click second review text containing comparative criticism",
|
||
"playwright_idx": 3,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "frame.clickget_by_text(\"I read Cnet reviews that were worse than mine...\")"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"strategy": "Verify Rating Context",
|
||
"substrategies": [
|
||
{
|
||
"substrategy": "Confirm Positive Rating Threshold",
|
||
"actions": [
|
||
{
|
||
"description": "Hover over first review's 5-star rating for validation",
|
||
"playwright_idx": null,
|
||
"playwright_instruction": "Hover action (no direct playwright equivalent)"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
} |