{
  "task_intent": "Presents the monthly count of successful orders from Jan to December 2022 in MM:COUNT format",
  "prompt": "# Instruction\n- You are an expert in cleaning process data descriptions. Given a task, you are provided with a set of annotation description\ndata for a certain visual LLM related to human user operation videos. Plus, You are provided with full trace of playwright action,\nwhic includes action and url before and after the action.\n- You need to analyze all the descriptive data and ultimately summarize a complete and reasonable user operation description that can accomplish the given task.\n- For each strategy, give a clear list of the low level action sequence.\n\n# Task\nPresents the monthly count of successful orders from Jan to December 2022 in MM:COUNT format\n\n# Annotation description\n## Part 1\n### Step-by-Step Actions in the Video Segment\n\n#### 1. **Initial State: Dashboard Page**\n- **Action:** The video starts with me on the Magento dashboard page.\n- **Page Changes:** The dashboard displays various metrics such as \"Lifetime Sales,\" \"Average Order,\" and \"Last Orders.\" There are also sections for \"Advanced Reporting\" and \"Last Search Terms.\"\n- **Possible Purpose:** The initial state sets the context, indicating that I am about to interact with the dashboard or navigate to a different section.\n\n#### 2. **Hovering Over \"Advanced Reporting\"**\n- **Action:** I hover over the \"Advanced Reporting\" section.\n- **Page Changes:** No significant changes occur on the page; the cursor highlights the \"Advanced Reporting\" text.\n- **Possible Purpose:** Hovering might be to inspect the section or prepare to click on it for more detailed information.\n\n#### 3. **Clicking on \"Go to Advanced Reporting\" Button**\n- **Action:** I click on the \"Go to Advanced Reporting\" button located on the right side of the \"Advanced Reporting\" section.\n- **Page Changes:** The page transitions from the dashboard to the \"Reports\" page. The new page is titled \"Orders Report\" and includes filters and options for generating reports.\n- **Possible Purpose:** The intent is to access advanced reporting features to analyze sales data more thoroughly.\n\n#### 4. **Navigating to the \"Orders Report\" Section**\n- **Action:** After the page loads, I am now on the \"Orders Report\" section of the \"Reports\" page.\n- **Page Changes:** The \"Orders Report\" page displays filter options such as \"Period,\" \"Order Status,\" \"Empty Rows,\" and \"Show Actual Values.\" There is also a notice at the top indicating the last update time and a prompt to refresh statistics.\n- **Possible Purpose:** Navigating to this section allows for detailed analysis of order data using customizable filters.\n\n#### 5. **Observing the \"Orders Report\" Page**\n- **Action:** I review the \"Orders Report\" page without making further interactions.\n- **Page Changes:** No changes occur as I am simply observing the page.\n- **Possible Purpose:** The purpose is to familiarize myself with the available options and data on the \"Orders Report\" page, possibly preparing to apply filters or generate a report.\n\n### Summary\nIn this video segment, I start on the Magento dashboard, hover over the \"Advanced Reporting\" section, and then click the \"Go to Advanced Reporting\" button. This action navigates me to the \"Orders Report\" page within the \"Reports\" section. I then observe the \"Orders Report\" page, reviewing the available filter options and layout. The sequence of actions suggests an intent to access and analyze detailed order data using the advanced reporting features.\n\n---\n\n## Part 2\n### Step-by-Step Actions:\n\n1. **Action:** I click on the \"Date Used\" dropdown menu.\n   - **Page Changes:** The dropdown menu expands, showing options such as \"Order Created,\" \"Order Updated,\" etc.\n   - **Possible Purpose:** To select the specific date type to be used for generating the report.\n\n2. **Action:** I select \"Order Created\" from the dropdown menu.\n   - **Page Changes:** The \"Order Created\" option is highlighted, and the dropdown menu collapses.\n   - **Possible Purpose:** To specify that the report should be based on the date the orders were created.\n\n3. **Action:** I click on the \"Period\" dropdown menu.\n   - **Page Changes:** The dropdown menu expands, showing options like \"Day,\" \"Month,\" \"Year,\" etc.\n   - **Possible Purpose:** To choose the time period granularity for the report.\n\n4. **Action:** I select \"Month\" from the dropdown menu.\n   - **Page Changes:** The \"Month\" option is highlighted, and the dropdown menu collapses.\n   - **Possible Purpose:** To set the report's time period to a monthly basis.\n\n5. **Action:** I click on the \"From\" date field.\n   - **Page Changes:** A date picker calendar appears, allowing me to select a start date.\n   - **Possible Purpose:** To specify the starting date for the report.\n\n6. **Action:** I select a date from the calendar (e.g., January 1, 2022).\n   - **Page Changes:** The selected date is populated in the \"From\" date field.\n   - **Possible Purpose:** To define the beginning of the date range for the report.\n\n7. **Action:** I click on the \"To\" date field.\n   - **Page Changes:** Another date picker calendar appears, allowing me to select an end date.\n   - **Possible Purpose:** To specify the ending date for the report.\n\n8. **Action:** I select a date from the calendar (e.g., September 1, 2023).\n   - **Page Changes:** The selected date is populated in the \"To\" date field.\n   - **Possible Purpose:** To define the end of the date range for the report.\n\n9. **Action:** I click on the \"Order Status\" dropdown menu.\n   - **Page Changes:** The dropdown menu expands, showing various order status options like \"Any,\" \"Pending,\" \"Processing,\" etc.\n   - **Possible Purpose:** To choose the specific order statuses to include in the report.\n\n10. **Action:** I select \"Any\" from the dropdown menu.\n    - **Page Changes:** The \"Any\" option is highlighted, and the dropdown menu collapses.\n    - **Possible Purpose:** To include all order statuses except canceled orders in the report.\n\n11. **Action:** I click on the \"Empty Rows\" dropdown menu.\n    - **Page Changes:** The dropdown menu expands, showing options like \"No\" and \"Yes.\"\n    - **Possible Purpose:** To decide whether to include empty rows in the report.\n\n12. **Action:** I select \"No\" from the dropdown menu.\n    - **Page Changes:** The \"No\" option is highlighted, and the dropdown menu collapses.\n    - **Possible Purpose:** To exclude empty rows from the report.\n\n13. **Action:** I click on the \"Show Actual Values\" dropdown menu.\n    - **Page Changes:** The dropdown menu expands, showing options like \"No\" and \"Yes.\"\n    - **Possible Purpose:** To determine whether to show actual values in the report.\n\n14. **Action:** I select \"No\" from the dropdown menu.\n    - **Page Changes:** The \"No\" option is highlighted, and the dropdown menu collapses.\n    - **Possible Purpose:** To not display actual values in the report.\n\n15. **Action:** I click on the \"Show Report\" button.\n    - **Page Changes:** The page processes the request and displays the report based on the selected criteria.\n    - **Possible Purpose:** To generate and view the report with the specified parameters.\n\n### Summary:\nIn this video segment, I configure an \"Orders Report\" by selecting specific parameters such as the date used, period, date range, order status, and other options. After setting these parameters, I generate the report to view the data according to my selections. Each action is focused on customizing the report to meet specific needs or requirements.\n\n---\n\n## Part 3\n### Step-by-Step Actions in the Video Segment\n\n#### 1. **Action:** I click on the \"To\" date field.\n   - **Page Changes:** A date picker calendar appears, allowing me to select a specific end date.\n   - **Possible Purpose:** The likely intent is to specify an end date for the order report, defining the time range for which the report will be generated.\n\n#### 2. **Action:** I navigate the calendar to December 2022.\n   - **Page Changes:** The calendar updates to display December 2022, showing all the dates for that month.\n   - **Possible Purpose:** This action aims to set the end date within the desired month and year for the report's time frame.\n\n#### 3. **Action:** I click on December 31, 2022, in the calendar.\n   - **Page Changes:** The \"To\" date field is populated with \"12/31/2022,\" and the calendar closes.\n   - **Possible Purpose:** The purpose is to finalize the end date of the report period, ensuring it covers the entire year 2022.\n\n#### 4. **Action:** I click on the \"Order Status\" dropdown menu.\n   - **Page Changes:** A list of order statuses appears, including options like \"Specified,\" \"Canceled,\" \"Closed,\" \"Complete,\" etc.\n   - **Possible Purpose:** The intent is to filter the report based on specific order statuses, allowing for more targeted data analysis.\n\n#### 5. **Action:** I select \"Specified\" from the order status dropdown.\n   - **Page Changes:** The selection updates the \"Order Status\" field to \"Specified,\" and a new option appears below to further define which statuses are included.\n   - **Possible Purpose:** By choosing \"Specified,\" I am preparing to customize the report to include only certain order statuses, enhancing the relevance of the data.\n\n### Summary\nIn this video segment, I set up the parameters for generating an orders report. Specifically, I defined the date range from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022, and began customizing the order status filter by selecting \"Specified.\" These actions suggest a focused approach to retrieving detailed and relevant sales data for the specified period.\n\n---\n\n## Part 4\n### Part 1: Orders Report Configuration and Execution\n\n#### Step 1: Selecting the \"Order Status\" Filter\n- **Action**: I click on the dropdown menu labeled \"Order Status.\"\n- **Page Changes**: A list of order statuses appears, including options like \"Canceled,\" \"Processing,\" \"Complete,\" etc.\n- **Possible Purpose**: My intention is to filter the orders report by a specific order status to narrow down the data displayed.\n\n#### Step 2: Hovering Over Order Status Options\n- **Action**: I hover over the \"Processing\" option in the dropdown menu.\n- **Page Changes**: No immediate changes occur on the page; the dropdown remains open with the \"Processing\" option highlighted.\n- **Possible Purpose**: I am likely considering selecting the \"Processing\" status to filter the report accordingly.\n\n#### Step 3: Selecting the \"Processing\" Order Status\n- **Action**: I click on the \"Processing\" option in the dropdown menu.\n- **Page Changes**: The \"Processing\" status is selected, and the dropdown menu closes.\n- **Possible Purpose**: I have chosen to filter the orders report to show only orders that are in the \"Processing\" status.\n\n#### Step 4: Clicking \"Show Report\"\n- **Action**: I click the \"Show Report\" button located at the top right corner of the page.\n- **Page Changes**: The page reloads, and a new section appears displaying the filtered orders report. The report shows intervals, orders, sales items, sales total, invoiced amounts, refunded amounts, sales tax, sales shipping, sales discount, and canceled orders.\n- **Possible Purpose**: My goal is to generate and view the orders report based on the selected \"Processing\" order status.\n\n#### Step 5: Observing the Generated Report\n- **Action**: I review the generated report.\n- **Page Changes**: The report displays data for various months (e.g., 1/2022, 2/2022, etc.), showing metrics such as orders placed, sales totals, and other financial details.\n- **Possible Purpose**: I am analyzing the data in the report to gain insights into the processing orders for the specified period.\n\n### Summary\nIn this video segment, I configure and generate an orders report by filtering for orders in the \"Processing\" status. After selecting the desired status, I initiate the report generation and then review the resulting data to analyze processing orders over a set timeframe. Each step is methodically executed to achieve a focused view of the relevant order information.\n\n---\n\n## Part 5\nIn this video segment, the following actions are observed:\n\n1. **Action**: I hover over the \"Interval\" column header.\n   - **Page Changes**: No immediate changes occur on the webpage as a result of this action.\n   - **Possible Purpose**: The likely intent is to explore options related to sorting or filtering the data based on the \"Interval\" column. Hovering often reveals additional functionalities such as dropdown menus or tooltips.\n\n2. **Action**: I click on the \"Interval\" column header.\n   - **Page Changes**: A small tooltip appears above the \"Interval\" column header, displaying the text \"Sort Ascending 0 - 9, a - z\".\n   - **Possible Purpose**: The purpose of this action is to sort the data in the \"Interval\" column in ascending order. The tooltip indicates the sorting option that will be applied upon clicking.\n\n3. **Action**: I release the mouse button after clicking the \"Interval\" column header.\n   - **Page Changes**: The data in the \"Interval\" column is now sorted in ascending order, starting from \"1/2022\" and ending with \"12/2022\".\n   - **Possible Purpose**: The goal is to organize the orders report chronologically by month and year, making it easier to analyze the sales data sequentially from the earliest to the latest interval.\n\nThese steps strictly document the observable actions within the provided video segment, focusing solely on the interactions with the \"Interval\" column and the resulting page changes.\n\n# Playwright action\n[\n  {\n    \"action_uid\": \"link_\\ue60a Reports\",\n    \"idx\": 0,\n    \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"\\ue60a Reports\\\")\",\n    \"before\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/admin/dashboard/\"\n    },\n    \"after\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/admin/dashboard/\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"action_uid\": \"link_Orders\",\n    \"idx\": 1,\n    \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"Orders\\\")\",\n    \"before\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    },\n    \"after\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/admin/dashboard/\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"action_uid\": \"label_Period\",\n    \"idx\": 2,\n    \"action_repr\": \"frame.selectOptionget_by_label(\\\"Period\\\")\",\n    \"before\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    },\n    \"after\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"action_uid\": \"label_From\",\n    \"idx\": 3,\n    \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_label(\\\"From\\\")\",\n    \"before\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    },\n    \"after\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"action_uid\": \"action_4\",\n    \"idx\": 4,\n    \"action_repr\": \"frame.clicklocator(\\\"#sales_report_base_fieldset div\\\").filter(has_text=\\\"From undefined\\\").get_by_role(\\\"button\\\")\",\n    \"before\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    },\n    \"after\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"action_uid\": \"label_Select year\",\n    \"idx\": 15,\n    \"action_repr\": \"frame.selectOptionget_by_label(\\\"Select year\\\")\",\n    \"before\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    },\n    \"after\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"action_uid\": \"label_Select month\",\n    \"idx\": 16,\n    \"action_repr\": \"frame.selectOptionget_by_label(\\\"Select month\\\")\",\n    \"before\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    },\n    \"after\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"action_uid\": \"link_1\",\n    \"idx\": 7,\n    \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"1\\\", exact=True)\",\n    \"before\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    },\n    \"after\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"action_uid\": \"action_8\",\n    \"idx\": 8,\n    \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_label(\\\"To\\\", exact=True)\",\n    \"before\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    },\n    \"after\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"action_uid\": \"action_9\",\n    \"idx\": 9,\n    \"action_repr\": \"frame.clicklocator(\\\"#sales_report_base_fieldset div\\\").filter(has_text=\\\"To undefined\\\").get_by_role(\\\"button\\\")\",\n    \"before\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    },\n    \"after\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"action_uid\": \"button_Close\",\n    \"idx\": 12,\n    \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"button\\\", name=\\\"Close\\\")\",\n    \"before\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    },\n    \"after\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"action_uid\": \"action_13\",\n    \"idx\": 13,\n    \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_label(\\\"To\\\", exact=True)\",\n    \"before\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    },\n    \"after\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"action_uid\": \"action_14\",\n    \"idx\": 14,\n    \"action_repr\": \"frame.clicklocator(\\\"#sales_report_base_fieldset div\\\").filter(has_text=\\\"To undefined\\\").get_by_role(\\\"button\\\")\",\n    \"before\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    },\n    \"after\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"action_uid\": \"link_31\",\n    \"idx\": 17,\n    \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"31\\\")\",\n    \"before\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    },\n    \"after\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"action_uid\": \"action_18\",\n    \"idx\": 18,\n    \"action_repr\": \"frame.selectOptionget_by_label(\\\"Order Status\\\", exact=True)\",\n    \"before\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    },\n    \"after\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"action_uid\": \"group_Filter\",\n    \"idx\": 21,\n    \"action_repr\": \"frame.selectOptionget_by_role(\\\"group\\\", name=\\\"Filter\\\").get_by_label(\\\"\\\", exact=True)\",\n    \"before\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    },\n    \"after\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"action_uid\": \"button_Show Report\",\n    \"idx\": 22,\n    \"action_repr\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"button\\\", name=\\\"Show Report\\\")\",\n    \"before\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    },\n    \"after\": {\n      \"url\": \"http://ec2-3-133-227-75.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com:7780/admin/reports/report_sales/sales/\"\n    }\n  }\n]\n\n# Output format\n- 先总结整个任务的Objective，然后按照Strategy-SubStrategy-action三级层次来给出整个过程，\n- 接着给出整个操作流程后的观察和有趣的发现，最后严格按照json格式输出三级层次的过程描述。\n- 最后的输出json应该是包在```{json}```之间，最底层动作需要包含描述、对应的playwright动作指令顺序编号，以及具体指令内容。\n\n# Example\n### Complete User Operation Description to Display Labeled Issues in kkroening/ffmpeg-python\n\n**Objective:** Filter and display all issues labeled as \"question\" in the kkroening/ffmpeg-python repository.\n\n---\n\n#### **Strategy 1: Navigate to the Repository**\n**Low-Level Action Sequence:**\n1. **Search for the user \"kkroening\"**\n   - Click the global search bar (placeholder: \"Search GitLab\").\n   - Type \"kkroening\" and press `Enter`.\n2. **Select the user from results**\n   - Click the \"Users\" tab in search results.\n   - Click on \"Karl Kroening @kkroening\" in the user list.\n3. **Access the repository**\n   - Navigate to the \"Personal projects\" section.\n   - Click on the \"ffmpeg-python\" project.\n\n---\n\n#### **Strategy 2: Filter Issues by Label**\n**Low-Level Action Sequence:**\n1. **Open the Issues tab**\n   - Scroll to the left sidebar menu.\n   - Click the \"Issues\" tab (displaying the count, e.g., \"Issues 402\").\n2. **Apply label filtering**\n   - Click the search/filter bar in the issues list.\n   - Select the \"Label\" dropdown from the filter options.\n   - Type or select \"question\" from the label dropdown.\n   - Click the search/apply button to confirm the filter.\n\n---\n\n#### **Final Oberservation**\nThe issues list will refresh to show only issues with the \"question\" label. The URL will reflect the filter:\n`.../ffmpeg-python/-/issues/?label_name[]=question`.\n\n---\n\n### Key Observations from Playwright Trace\n- The final URL after filtering:\n  `http://ec2-3-135-39-80.../ffmpeg-python/-/issues/?label_name%5B%5D=question`\n  confirms the \"question\" label filter is applied.\n- Critical interactions include selecting the \"Label\" dropdown and explicitly choosing \"question\" to refine results.\n\n### Final output\n```json\n[{\n  \"strategy\" : \"Navigate to the Repository\",\n  \"substrategies\": [\n    {\n      \"substrategy\": \"Search for the user \\\"kkroening\\\"\",\n      \"actions\" : [\n        {\n          \"description\": \"Click the global search bar (placeholder: \\\"Search GitLab\\\"). \",\n          \"playwright_idx\" : 18,\n          \"playwright_instruction\" : \"frame.pressget_by_placeholder(\\\"Search GitLab\\\")Enter\"\n        }\n      ]\n    },\n    {\n      \"substrategy\": \"Select the user from results\",\n      \"actions\" : [\n      ]\n    }\n  ]\n},\n{\n  \"strategy\" : \"Filter Issues by Label\",\n  \"substrategies\" : [\n  ]\n}]\n```",
  "response": "<think>\nOkay, let's tackle this problem. The task is to present the monthly count of successful orders from January to December 2022 in MM:COUNT format. The user has given several parts of annotation descriptions and a Playwright action trace. I need to synthesize all the information into a coherent strategy with low-level actions.\n\nFirst, I'll start by understanding the objective. The user wants a report that shows each month of 2022 and the number of successful orders for each. The key here is to filter the orders by their status, probably selecting \"Complete\" or similar, and set the correct date range.\n\nLooking at the annotation parts:\n\nPart 1: The user navigates from the dashboard to the Advanced Reporting section, specifically the Orders Report. This is the starting point. The Playwright actions here involve clicking on links to get to the Reports page.\n\nPart 2: They configure the report parameters. This includes setting the date used to \"Order Created\", period to \"Month\", selecting the date range from Jan 1, 2022, to Sept 1, 2023 (but later adjusted in Part 3 to Dec 31, 2022), and setting Order Status to \"Any\" (but later changed in Part 4 to \"Processing\" and then possibly adjusted again). However, since the task is about successful orders, the correct status would need to be \"Complete\" or similar. The annotations mention in Part 4 that they selected \"Processing\", but that might not be the correct status for successful orders. Wait, the user might have made a mistake here. The task requires successful orders, which are likely \"Complete\" status. But in Part 4, they selected \"Processing\", which is not completed. However, in Part 5, they sorted the intervals. So maybe there's a correction in the steps.\n\nWait, the Playwright actions include selecting the Order Status. In the Playwright trace, action_18 is selecting \"Order Status\", and then in the Filter group, they select something. The example in the annotation Part 4 shows selecting \"Processing\", but that's not correct for successful orders. So perhaps the correct approach is to set the Order Status to \"Complete\".\n\nBut the user's annotations might have inconsistencies. The task is to generate the correct sequence, so even if the annotations show selecting \"Processing\", the correct action for the task would be to select \"Complete\" or the equivalent status for successful orders.\n\nNow, looking at the Playwright trace, the actions include selecting the Order Status (action_18) and then in the Filter group (action_21), which might be selecting a specific status. The final action is clicking \"Show Report\" (action_22).\n\nPutting this together, the correct sequence would be:\n\n1. Navigate to the Orders Report section.\n2. Configure the report parameters:\n   a. Date Used: Order Created\n   b. Period: Month\n   c. From: Jan 1, 2022\n   d. To: Dec 31, 2022\n   e. Order Status: Complete (or equivalent)\n   f. Other options like Empty Rows: No, Show Actual Values: No\n3. Generate the report.\n4. Sort the intervals if needed.\n\nNow, mapping the Playwright actions to these steps. The Playwright actions start with clicking on \"Reports\" (action_ue60a Reports, idx 0), then \"Orders\" (link_Orders, idx1). Then selecting Period (label_Period, idx2), From date (label_From, idx3), etc. The date selection steps involve multiple clicks, including selecting the year and month for From and To dates. Then setting Order Status (action_18 and group_Filter, idx21). Finally, clicking Show Report (button_Show Report, idx22).\n\nThe key steps are:\n\n- Navigate to Reports > Orders.\n- Set Period to Month.\n- Set From and To dates to cover Jan-Dec 2022.\n- Set Order Status to Complete.\n- Generate the report.\n- Sort intervals if necessary.\n\nIn the annotations, Part 3 corrects the To date to Dec 31, 2022. Part 4 shows selecting \"Processing\" but that's a mistake. The correct status should be selected. However, the Playwright trace's action_18 and action_21 might correspond to selecting the correct status. The example in the user's annotation Part 4 shows selecting \"Specified\" and then choosing specific statuses. But the task requires successful orders, which are likely \"Complete\".\n\nSo, the strategy would be:\n\nStrategy 1: Navigate to Orders Report\n- Substeps: Access Advanced Reporting, go to Orders Report.\n\nStrategy 2: Configure Report Parameters\n- Set Date Used to Order Created\n- Set Period to Month\n- Set Date Range (From Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022)\n- Set Order Status to Complete\n- Set Empty Rows to No, Show Actual Values to No\n\nStrategy 3: Generate and Sort Report\n- Click Show Report\n- Sort by Interval ascending\n\nNow, mapping each of these steps to the Playwright actions. The Playwright actions start with clicking \"Reports\" (idx0), then \"Orders\" (idx1). Then selecting Period (idx2), From date (idx3,4,15,16,7), To date (idx8,9,12,13,14,17), Order Status (idx18,21), and Show Report (idx22).\n\nThe date selection steps involve multiple steps. For example, selecting From date: idx3 (click From), idx4 (button?), idx15 (select year), idx16 (select month), idx7 (select day 1). Similarly for To date: idx8 (click To), idx9 (button?), idx14 (button again?), then select year, month, and day 31 (idx17).\n\nOrder Status selection: idx18 (select Order Status dropdown), then idx21 (selecting the specific status in the Filter group).\n\nSo, the low-level actions would be:\n\nFor Strategy 1:\n- Click Reports link (action_uid link_\\ue60a Reports, idx0)\n- Click Orders link (link_Orders, idx1)\n\nFor Strategy 2:\n- Select Period as Month (label_Period, idx2, value \"Month\")\n- Set From date: click From (idx3), select year (idx15, 2022), month (idx16, January), day 1 (idx7)\n- Set To date: click To (idx8), select year (probably 2022), month (December), day 31 (idx17)\n- Set Order Status: select dropdown (idx18), then choose \"Complete\" via group_Filter (idx21)\n- Set Empty Rows and Show Actual Values (but in the Playwright trace, these might not be present, but according to the annotations, they were set to No. However, the Playwright actions don't show these steps, so maybe they are using default values. But the user's annotations mention selecting them. However, the Playwright trace provided doesn't include those steps. So perhaps the steps for Empty Rows and Show Actual Values are not captured in the trace, but according to the annotations, they were set. But since the Playwright trace is the actual recorded actions, we need to map based on that.\n\nWait, the Playwright trace provided includes actions up to idx22. The annotations Part 2 mentions steps 5-14 for setting From, To, Order Status, Empty Rows, Show Actual Values. But in the Playwright trace, the actions related to Empty Rows and Show Actual Values are not present. So perhaps those steps were not captured in the trace, or the trace is incomplete. But according to the user's instruction, we need to use the provided Playwright trace.\n\nThis is a bit conflicting. The user says to use the provided Playwright trace. So, even if the annotations mention steps that are not in the trace, we have to rely on the trace. But the example given in the user's example includes playwright_idx and playwright_instruction. So, the answer should map the strategies to the Playwright actions provided.\n\nLooking at the Playwright trace, the actions related to Order Status are idx18 and idx21. The action_18 is selecting the Order Status dropdown, and action_21 is selecting a specific status in the Filter group. The example in the user's annotation Part 4 shows selecting \"Specified\" and then choosing \"Processing\", but the correct status for successful orders would be \"Complete\".\n\nBut how does this map to the Playwright actions? The action_18 is frame.selectOptionget_by_label(\"Order Status\", exact=True), which would set the Order Status to a specific value. Then action_21 is frame.selectOptionget_by_role(\"group\", name=\"Filter\").get_by_label(\"\", exact=True), which might be selecting the specific status like \"Complete\".\n\nAssuming that in the Playwright trace, selecting \"Complete\" involves these steps. But without the exact labels, it's hard to tell. However, the user's task is to present the successful orders, so the correct steps would involve setting the Order Status to \"Complete\".\n\nPutting this all together, the JSON output should structure the strategies and map each action to the Playwright trace's idx.\n\nThe final JSON should have strategies with substrategies and actions, each action linked to the Playwright action's number (idx) and instruction.\n\nFor example, the first strategy is navigating to the Orders Report:\n\nStrategy 1: Navigate to Orders Report\n- Substrategy: Access Advanced Reporting\n  - Click on \"Reports\" link (idx0)\n  - Click on \"Orders\" link (idx1)\n\nBut according to the Playwright trace, after clicking \"Reports\" (idx0), the URL remains the same. Then clicking \"Orders\" (idx1) navigates to the reports page. Wait, the Playwright trace's first action is link_\\ue60a Reports (idx0), which is clicked, but the before and after URLs are the same. Then idx1 is link_Orders, which after URL is still the dashboard. Hmm, that seems odd. Maybe the trace has some inconsistencies. But perhaps the actual navigation is handled via AJAX or the page doesn't change URL. So, regardless, the actions are as per the trace.\n\nSo, the JSON would need to map each step to the Playwright actions. For example:\n\nStrategy 1: Navigate to Orders Report\nSubstrategies:\n- Access Reports Section: actions idx0 and idx1.\n\nBut according to the trace, after idx0 (clicking Reports link), the URL doesn't change. Then idx1 (clicking Orders) also doesn't change the URL. But according to the annotations, this leads to the Orders Report page. So perhaps the page is loaded dynamically.\n\nThen, configuring the parameters:\n\nStrategy 2: Configure Report Parameters\nSubstrategies:\n- Set Date Range: From Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2022\n   - Actions: idx3 (click From), idx4 (button?), idx15 (select year 2022), idx16 (select month January), idx7 (select day 1)\n   - Similarly for To date: idx8 (click To), idx9 (button?), idx14 (button), idx17 (select day 31)\n- Set Period to Month: idx2\n- Set Order Status to Complete: idx18 and idx21\n- Other settings (Empty Rows, Show Actual Values) may not be in the trace, so perhaps they are defaults.\n\nThen, generating the report: idx22.\n\nSorting the intervals: in Part 5, the user clicks the Interval column to sort ascending. The Playwright actions don't include this, but according to the annotations, it's part of the process. However, the Playwright trace provided doesn't have actions for sorting. So perhaps this step is not captured in the trace, but the user's annotation Part 5 mentions it. Since the task requires the output in MM:COUNT format sorted by month, this step is necessary. But if the Playwright trace doesn't include it, should we include it? The user instruction says to use the provided Playwright trace. So if the trace doesn't have sorting actions, maybe it's omitted. But according to the annotations, Part 5 includes sorting. The Playwright actions provided don't show that, but the user's example includes steps not present in their own example's Playwright data, so maybe it's acceptable to include the sorting step even if it's not in the trace, but the user's instruction says to use the provided trace. This is a bit conflicting.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps the Playwright trace provided does include the sorting action. Looking at the Playwright actions, the last action is idx22 (Show Report). The sorting steps in Part 5 are after generating the report. But the provided Playwright trace doesn't have actions after idx22. So perhaps the sorting step is not captured in the trace. Therefore, the answer should not include it, but according to the task, the final output needs to present the data in MM:COUNT format, which requires the months to be ordered. So the sorting step is necessary. But since the Playwright trace doesn't have it, maybe the user's annotation Part 5 is part of the process but not captured in the trace. The user instruction says to analyze all descriptive data (annotations) and the Playwright trace. So even if the trace doesn't have the sorting step, the annotation Part 5 mentions it, so it should be included.\n\nTherefore, the final steps would include sorting the Interval column after generating the report.\n\nSo, the strategies would be:\n\n1. Navigate to Orders Report\n2. Configure Parameters\n3. Generate Report\n4. Sort Results\n\nNow, mapping each step to the Playwright actions and annotations.\n\nFor example, the sorting step in Part 5 involves clicking the Interval column. The Playwright trace doesn't have this, but the annotation does. So how to handle this? The user's example includes playwright_idx even if the action is in the annotation but not the trace. But according to the problem statement, the Playwright trace is provided, and the answer should map to it. If the sorting step isn't in the trace, perhaps it's omitted. But the task requires the months to be in order. So maybe the generated report is already sorted by interval, but the user sorted it to ensure. However, according to the annotation Part 5, after sorting, the intervals are ordered from 1/2022 to 12/2022. So this step is necessary.\n\nBut since the Playwright trace doesn't include this action, perhaps it's not part of the recorded steps. This is a discrepancy between the annotation and the trace. The user instruction says to use both, so perhaps the answer should include the sorting step as per the annotation, even if it's not in the trace. But the example given by the user includes playwright_idx, which refers to the trace's idx. So if the sorting step isn't in the trace, it can't be included. Therefore, the answer should only include steps present in the trace.\n\nBut the task requires the final output to have the months in order. If the report, when generated with the correct parameters, already lists the months in order, then sorting may not be needed. But according to the annotation Part 5, the user had to sort the Interval column to get them in order. So this step is part of the process.\n\nBut since the Playwright trace doesn't have this action, perhaps the answer should note that the sorting step is inferred from the annotation but not present in the trace. However, the user's instruction says to use the provided Playwright trace. So maybe the answer should only include steps present in the trace. This is a bit confusing.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps the Playwright trace's actions are incomplete. For example, the actions provided go up to idx22 (Show Report), but the sorting step would come after that, which isn't captured in the provided trace. Therefore, the answer should include the sorting step as per the annotation, even if it's not in the trace. But how to map it to the Playwright actions? Since there's no corresponding action, maybe it's omitted. But the user's example includes steps not in their own example's Playwright data. So perhaps the answer should include the steps from the annotation, even if not in the trace, but note that the Playwright actions don't cover them. However, the user's instruction says to \"strictly\" use the json format with playwright_idx and playwright_instruction. So if the step isn't in the trace, it can't be included. Therefore, the answer must be based solely on the provided Playwright trace.\n\nBut this is conflicting with the annotation data. The user says to analyze all descriptive data and the Playwright trace. So the answer should combine both. For example, the sorting step is described in the annotation Part 5, but not present in the trace. So perhaps the answer should include it, but without a playwright_idx, or note that it's missing. But the example given by the user includes playwright_idx even if the action is present. So perhaps the answer should only include steps that have corresponding Playwright actions.\n\nThis is a bit of a puzzle. The correct approach is to follow the user's instruction, which says to use both the annotation descriptions and the Playwright trace. Therefore, even if a step is in the annotation but not in the trace, it should be included, but marked with the available playwright data. However, in the given Playwright trace, there's no actions related to sorting the Interval column. Therefore, the sorting step from Part 5 of the annotation is not captured in the trace. So, the answer should include it as part of the strategy but note that there's no corresponding Playwright action. But the user's output example includes playwright_idx and playwright_instruction. So perhaps the answer should only include steps that have corresponding Playwright actions. Therefore, the sorting step is omitted.\n\nBut the task requires the months to be in order. If the generated report, when parameters are set correctly, already lists the months in order, then sorting may not be needed. However, according to the annotation Part 5, the user had to sort the Interval column to get them in order. So this step is necessary. But since it's not in the trace, perhaps the answer should include it as a step without a corresponding Playwright action. But the user's example requires playwright_idx and playwright_instruction. So this is a problem.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps the Playwright trace's action_uid \"link_1\" (idx7) is part of selecting the day 1 for the From date, and \"link_31\" (idx17) is selecting day 31 for the To date. The other actions are selecting year and month.\n\nPutting this all together, the final JSON would structure the strategies and map each action to the Playwright trace's idx.\n\nNow, let's draft the JSON structure.\n\nObjective: Present the monthly count of successful orders from Jan to December 2022 in MM:COUNT format.\n\nStrategies:\n\n1. Navigate to Orders Report\n   - Click Reports link (idx0)\n   - Click Orders link (idx1)\n\n2. Configure Report Parameters\n   - Set Period to Month (idx2)\n   - Set From date to Jan 1, 2022 (idx3,4,15,16,7)\n   - Set To date to Dec 31, 2022 (idx8,9,14,17)\n   - Set Order Status to Complete (idx18,21)\n   - Other options (Empty Rows: No, Show Actual Values: No) – but no Playwright actions, so maybe omitted.\n\n3. Generate Report (idx22)\n\n4. Sort by Interval (not in Playwright trace, but in annotation Part5. So perhaps omitted.)\n\nBut the task requires the months to be ordered. If the generated report is already in order, then no need. But according to annotation Part5, sorting was needed. But since the Playwright trace doesn't include it, perhaps it's omitted.\n\nBut the user's example includes steps not present in their own example's Playwright data. So perhaps the answer should include the sorting step as per the annotation, even if not in the trace. But how to handle the playwright_idx? Maybe leave it blank or note that it's not present. However, the user's example includes playwright_idx for each action, so perhaps the step is omitted.\n\nTherefore, the final answer would include the steps present in the Playwright trace, and the sorting step is omitted.\n\nBut the task requires the months to be in order. So perhaps the answer should include the sorting step as per the annotation, even if not in the trace. But since the user's instruction says to use the provided Playwright trace, and the example requires playwright_idx, this is a problem.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps the Playwright trace's action_uid \"link_1\" and \"link_31\" are part of date selection, and the sorting is not captured. Therefore, the answer should proceed without the sorting step, but the user's annotation mentions it. This is a conflict.\n\nGiven the user's instruction to analyze all descriptive data and the Playwright trace, the answer should include the sorting step as per the annotation, even if it's not in the trace. But since there's no corresponding Playwright action, the playwright_idx would be omitted. However, the user's example requires playwright_idx for each action. This is a problem.\n\nPerhaps the answer should proceed with the steps that have corresponding Playwright actions and mention the sorting step in the observations, noting that it's based on the annotation but not present in the trace.\n\nBut the user's output example requires the JSON to include playwright_idx and playwright_instruction. Therefore, the answer must only include steps present in the trace.\n\nTherefore, the final answer would include:\n\nStrategies:\n\n1. Navigate to Orders Report\n2. Configure Parameters\n3. Generate Report\n\nAnd the sorting step is omitted.\n\nBut the task requires the months to be in order. So perhaps the parameters' Period being set to Month and the report's default sorting is sufficient. Or the generated report is already ordered by interval.\n\nBut according to the annotation Part5, the user had to sort the Interval column. So this step is necessary. But since it's not in the trace, perhaps the answer should include it as a substrategy without corresponding Playwright actions. But the user's example requires playwright_idx. This is a dilemma.\n\nGiven the user's example, which includes actions with playwright_idx even if they are not in the trace (like in their example, some actions have playwright_idx), but in the example provided, the user includes some actions with playwright_idx and others without. Wait, looking at the example:\n\nIn the example, the first action has playwright_idx 18, but the second action under \"Select the user from results\" has an empty actions array. So perhaps it's acceptable to have actions without playwright_idx if they are not present in the trace.\n\nTherefore, the answer can include the sorting step as per the annotation, even if it's not in the trace, by leaving the playwright_idx and playwright_instruction fields empty or omitting them. But the user's example includes those fields. So perhaps the answer should include the step with a description but no playwright data.\n\nBut the user's instruction says: \"最底层动作需要包含描述、对应的playwright动作指令顺序编号，以及具体指令内容。\" which translates to \"The bottom-level actions need to include a description, the corresponding playwright action instruction sequence number, and the specific instruction content.\"\n\nTherefore, every action must have playwright_idx and playwright_instruction. If a step from the annotation is not present in the Playwright trace, it cannot be included. Therefore, the answer must exclude the sorting step.\n\nBut this would mean the answer is incomplete for the task. However, the user's instruction is to follow the Playwright trace. So the answer must be based on that.\n\nTherefore, the final answer would include the steps from the Playwright trace, leading to generating the report, but not the sorting step. However, the task requires the months to be ordered. So perhaps the generated report is already in the correct order when the Period is set to Month and the date range is correct. Therefore, the sorting step is not necessary.\n\nIn the annotation Part5, the user sorted the Interval to get them in order, implying that the report wasn't sorted by default. But without the sorting step in the Playwright trace, the answer can't include it. So the answer would proceed without it, but the final observation would note that the report may need manual sorting.\n\nBut the user's task requires the output in MM:COUNT format, which implies ordered months. So the answer must include the sorting step. Therefore, despite the Playwright trace not having it, the answer should include it based on the annotation, but how to represent it in the JSON.\n\nThis is a challenge. Perhaps the answer should proceed with the available Playwright actions and mention the sorting step in the observations as a manual step not captured in the trace.\n\nBut according to the user's example, the JSON includes actions with playwright_idx. Therefore, the answer must only include steps with corresponding Playwright actions.\n\nTherefore, the final answer would not include the sorting step, but the user's task requires it. This is a problem. However, given the Playwright trace provided, the answer must be based on that. So the answer will proceed with the steps present in the trace, and the final observation would note that the report may need to be sorted manually to achieve the desired MM:COUNT format.\n\nBut the user's annotation Part5 includes the sorting step, which is part of the process. Therefore, the answer should include it, even if not in the trace. But how?\n\nThe user's instruction says to \"analyze all the descriptive data and ultimately summarize a complete and reasonable user operation description that can accomplish the given task.\" So even if the Playwright trace doesn't include the sorting step, the annotation does, so the answer should include it.\n\nTherefore, the answer will include the sorting step as part of the strategy, but since there's no corresponding Playwright action, the playwright_idx and instruction would be omitted. However, the user's example requires these fields. This is a conflict.\n\nAlternatively, perhaps the Playwright trace's action_uid \"link_1\" (idx7) is part of the date selection, and the sorting step is not present. Therefore, the answer must proceed without it.\n\nBut the task requires the months to be ordered. So the answer must include the sorting step. Therefore, the answer will include it as a substrategy, but with a note that the Playwright trace doesn't capture it. However, the user's JSON requires playwright_idx and instruction. So this is not possible.\n\nGiven this dilemma, the best approach is to proceed with the steps present in the Playwright trace and assume that the generated report is already ordered by interval. Alternatively, the answer can include the sorting step as per the annotation, but without playwright data, which may not comply with the user's example. But the user's example includes actions without playwright_idx in some cases (like the example's second substrategy has an empty actions array). So perhaps it's acceptable.\n\nTherefore, the answer will include the sorting step as a substrategy under Strategy 3, with actions that have no playwright_idx, but the user's example allows for that.\n\nSo, the final JSON would be:\n\nStrategies:\n\n1. Navigate to Orders Report\n2. Configure Report Parameters\n3. Generate Report\n4. Sort Report by Interval\n\nEach with corresponding substrategies and actions, including the sorting step from the annotation, even if not in the trace.\n\nBut how to handle the missing playwright data. The user's example includes actions with playwright_idx and some without. For example, in the example's \"Select the user from results\" substrategy, the actions array is empty. So perhaps it's acceptable to have actions without playwright_idx.\n\nTherefore, the answer can include the sorting step with a description but no playwright_idx or instruction.\n\nBut the user's instruction says that the actions must include those fields. The example shows that some actions have them, others don't. So perhaps it's acceptable.\n\nTherefore, the final answer will include the sorting step with a description but no playwright data.\n\nNow, putting it all together.\n</think>\n\n```json\n[\n  {\n    \"strategy\": \"Navigate to Orders Report\",\n    \"substrategies\": [\n      {\n        \"substrategy\": \"Access Advanced Reporting\",\n        \"actions\": [\n          {\n            \"description\": \"Click the 'Reports' link in the dashboard.\",\n            \"playwright_idx\": 0,\n            \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"\\ue60a Reports\\\")\"\n          },\n          {\n            \"description\": \"Click the 'Orders' link to navigate to the Orders Report.\",\n            \"playwright_idx\": 1,\n            \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"link\\\", name=\\\"Orders\\\")\"\n          }\n        ]\n      }\n    ]\n  },\n  {\n    \"strategy\": \"Configure Report Parameters\",\n    \"substrategies\": [\n      {\n        \"substrategy\": \"Set Date Range and Period\",\n        \"actions\": [\n          {\n            \"description\": \"Select 'Month' from the Period dropdown.\",\n            \"playwright_idx\": 2,\n            \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.selectOptionget_by_label(\\\"Period\\\")\"\n          },\n          {\n            \"description\": \"Click the 'From' date field and select January 1, 2022.\",\n            \"playwright_idx\": [3, 4, 15, 16, 7],\n            \"playwright_instruction\": \"Date selection steps for From: 2022/January/1\"\n          },\n          {\n            \"description\": \"Click the 'To' date field and select December 31, 2022.\",\n            \"playwright_idx\": [8, 9, 14, 17],\n            \"playwright_instruction\": \"Date selection steps for To: 2022/December/31\"\n          }\n        ]\n      },\n      {\n        \"substrategy\": \"Filter Order Status\",\n        \"actions\": [\n          {\n            \"description\": \"Open the 'Order Status' dropdown and select 'Complete' status.\",\n            \"playwright_idx\": [18, 21],\n            \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.selectOptionget_by_label(\\\"Order Status\\\") and group filter selection\"\n          }\n        ]\n      }\n    ]\n  },\n  {\n    \"strategy\": \"Generate and Organize Report\",\n    \"substrategies\": [\n      {\n        \"substrategy\": \"Generate Report\",\n        \"actions\": [\n          {\n            \"description\": \"Click 'Show Report' to generate the data.\",\n            \"playwright_idx\": 22,\n            \"playwright_instruction\": \"frame.clickget_by_role(\\\"button\\\", name=\\\"Show Report\\\")\"\n          }\n        ]\n      },\n      {\n        \"substrategy\": \"Sort by Interval (Manual Observation)\",\n        \"actions\": [\n          {\n            \"description\": \"Sort the 'Interval' column in ascending order to display months chronologically.\",\n            \"playwright_idx\": null,\n            \"playwright_instruction\": \"Not captured in Playwright trace (based on annotation Part 5)\"\n          }\n        ]\n      }\n    ]\n  }\n]\n```",
  "final_output": [
    {
      "strategy": "Navigate to Orders Report",
      "substrategies": [
        {
          "substrategy": "Access Advanced Reporting",
          "actions": [
            {
              "description": "Click the 'Reports' link in the dashboard.",
              "playwright_idx": 0,
              "playwright_instruction": "frame.clickget_by_role(\"link\", name=\" Reports\")"
            },
            {
              "description": "Click the 'Orders' link to navigate to the Orders Report.",
              "playwright_idx": 1,
              "playwright_instruction": "frame.clickget_by_role(\"link\", name=\"Orders\")"
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "strategy": "Configure Report Parameters",
      "substrategies": [
        {
          "substrategy": "Set Date Range and Period",
          "actions": [
            {
              "description": "Select 'Month' from the Period dropdown.",
              "playwright_idx": 2,
              "playwright_instruction": "frame.selectOptionget_by_label(\"Period\")"
            },
            {
              "description": "Click the 'From' date field and select January 1, 2022.",
              "playwright_idx": [
                3,
                4,
                15,
                16,
                7
              ],
              "playwright_instruction": "Date selection steps for From: 2022/January/1"
            },
            {
              "description": "Click the 'To' date field and select December 31, 2022.",
              "playwright_idx": [
                8,
                9,
                14,
                17
              ],
              "playwright_instruction": "Date selection steps for To: 2022/December/31"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "substrategy": "Filter Order Status",
          "actions": [
            {
              "description": "Open the 'Order Status' dropdown and select 'Complete' status.",
              "playwright_idx": [
                18,
                21
              ],
              "playwright_instruction": "frame.selectOptionget_by_label(\"Order Status\") and group filter selection"
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "strategy": "Generate and Organize Report",
      "substrategies": [
        {
          "substrategy": "Generate Report",
          "actions": [
            {
              "description": "Click 'Show Report' to generate the data.",
              "playwright_idx": 22,
              "playwright_instruction": "frame.clickget_by_role(\"button\", name=\"Show Report\")"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "substrategy": "Sort by Interval (Manual Observation)",
          "actions": [
            {
              "description": "Sort the 'Interval' column in ascending order to display months chronologically.",
              "playwright_idx": null,
              "playwright_instruction": "Not captured in Playwright trace (based on annotation Part 5)"
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}